References
1. J. Rogelj, D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, H. Kheshgi, S. Kobayashi, E. Kriegler, L. Mundaca, R. Séférian, M.V. Vilariño. Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty; 2018.Search in Google Scholar
2. D. Larcher, J.-M. Tarascon. Towards Greener and More Sustainable Batteries for Electrical Energy Storage. Nature chemistry 2015; 7:19–29.10.1038/nchem.2085Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. M. Jentsch, T. Trost, M. Sterner. Optimal Use of Power-to-Gas Energy Storage Systems in an 85 % Renewable Energy Scenario. Energy Procedia 2014; 46:254–61.10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.180Search in Google Scholar
4. A. Maroufmashat, M. Fowler. Transition of Future Energy System Infrastructure; through Power-to-Gas Pathways. Energies 2017; 10(8):1089.10.3390/en10081089Search in Google Scholar
5. P. Kohlhepp, V. Hagenmeyer. Technical Potential of Buildings in Germany as Flexible Power-to-Heat Storage for Smart-Grid Operation. Energy Technology 2017; 5(7):1084–104.10.1002/ente.201600655Search in Google Scholar
6. L. Andresen, G. Schmitz. Bewertung von Power-to-Gas-Anlagen mittels dynamischer Systemsimulation. gwf-Gas+Energie 2016; 682–9.Search in Google Scholar
7. M. Geimer, T. Krüger, P. Linsel. Co-Simulation, gekoppelte Simulation oder Simulatorkopplung?: Ein Versuch der Begriffsvereinheitlichung. O+P Ölhydraulik und Pneumatik 2006; 11:572–6.Search in Google Scholar
8. P. Palensky, A.A. van der Meer, C.D. Lopez, A. Joseph, K. Pan. Cosimulation of Intelligent Power Systems: Fundamentals, Software Architecture, Numerics, and Coupling. EEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2017; 11(1):34–50.10.1109/MIE.2016.2639825Search in Google Scholar
9. T. Eldabi, M. Balaban, S. Brailsford, N. Mustafee, R.E. Nance, B.S. Onggo et al. Hybrid Simulation: Historical Lessons, Present Challenges and Futures. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press; 2016, p. 1388–403.10.1109/WSC.2016.7822192Search in Google Scholar
10. C. Gomes, C. Thule, D. Broman, P.G. Larsen, H. Vangheluwe. Co-simulation: State of the art; Available from: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.00686v1.Search in Google Scholar
11. C. Gomes, C. Thule, D. Broman, P.G. Larsen, H. Vangheluwe. Co-Simulation: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 2018; 51(3):49.10.1145/3179993Search in Google Scholar
12. M. Busch. Zur effizienten Kopplung von Simulationsprogrammen. Zugl.: Kassel, Univ., Diss., 2012. Kassel: Kassel University Press; 2012.Search in Google Scholar
13. M. Busch. Performance Improvement of Explicit Co-simulation Methods Through Continuous Extrapolation. In: Schweizer B., editor. IUTAM Symposium on Solver-Coupling and Co-Simulation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019, p. 57–80.10.1007/978-3-030-14883-6_4Search in Google Scholar
14. K. Johnstone, S.M. Blair, M.H. Syed, A. Emhemed, G.M. Burt, T.I. Strasser. Co-simulation approach using PowerFactory and MATLAB/Simulink to enable validation of distributed control concepts within future power systems. CIRED - Open Access Proceedings Journal 2017; 2017(1):2192–6.10.1049/oap-cired.2017.1175Search in Google Scholar
15. M. Arnold, M. Günther. Preconditioned Dynamic Iteration for Coupled Differential-Algebraic Systems. BIT Numerical Mathematics 2001; 41(1):1–25.10.1023/A:1021909032551Search in Google Scholar
16. R. Kübler, W. Schiehlen. Two Methods of Simulator Coupling. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems 2000; 6(2):93–113.10.1076/1387-3954(200006)6:2;1-M;FT093Search in Google Scholar
17. R. Venkatraman, S.K. Khaitan, V. Ajjarapu. Dynamic Co-Simulation Methods for Combined Transmission-Distribution System and Integration Time Step Impact on Convergence. CoRR 2018;abs/1801.01185.10.1109/PESGM40551.2019.8973942Search in Google Scholar
18. P. Palensky, A.A. van der Meer, C.D. Lopez, A. Joseph, K. Pan. Applied Cosimulation of Intelligent Power Systems: Implementing Hybrid Simulators for Complex Power Systems. EEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2017; 11(2):6–21.10.1109/MIE.2017.2671198Search in Google Scholar
19. K.G. Müller. SimPy, a discrete event simulation package in Python. In: EuroSciPy2008, Leipzig, Germany; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
20. S. Rohjans, E. Widl, W. Müller, S. Schütte, S. Lehnhoff. Gekoppelte Simulation komplexer Energiesysteme mittels MOSAIK und FMI. at - Automatisierungstechnik 2014; 62(5):325–36.10.1515/auto-2014-1087Search in Google Scholar
21. PYPOWER: Solves power flow and optimal power flow problems. [July 11, 2019]; Available from: https://pypi.org/project/PYPOWER/.Search in Google Scholar
22. OMNeT++ Discrete Event Simulator. [July 11, 2019]; Available from: https://omnetpp.org/.Search in Google Scholar
23. B. Palmintier, D. Krishnamurthy, P. Top, S. Smith, J. Daily, J. Fuller. Design of the HELICS high-performance transmission-distribution-communication-market co-simulation framework. In: Systems WoMaSoC-PE, editor. 2017 Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (MSCPES): April 21, 2017, Pittsburgh, PA, USA held as part of CPS Week, April 18–21, 2017, Pittsburgh, PA, USA proceedings. [Piscataway, NJ]: IEEE; 2017, p. 1–6.10.1109/MSCPES.2017.8064542Search in Google Scholar
24. REAL TIME POWER SYSTEM SIMULATION • RTDS Technologies Inc. [July 09, 2019]; Available from: https://www.rtds.com/real-time-power-system-simulation/.Search in Google Scholar
25. I.k. Park, P. Forsyth, H. Kim, K. Hur. A Study on synchronizing two separate RTDS simulation instances. In: 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM): IEEE; 2016, p. 1–5.10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741257Search in Google Scholar
26. H. Dommel. Digital Computer Solution of Electromagnetic Transients in Single-and Multiphase Networks. IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Syst. 1969; PAS-88(4):388–99.10.1109/TPAS.1969.292459Search in Google Scholar
27. VILLAS Framework. [July 08, 2019]; Available from: https://www.fein-aachen.org/projects/villas-framework/.Search in Google Scholar
28. A. Monti, M. Stevic, S. Vogel, R.W. de Doncker, E. Bompard, A. Estebsari et al. A Global Real-Time Superlab: Enabling High Penetration of Power Electronics in the Electric Grid. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2018; 5(3):35–44.10.1109/MPEL.2018.2850698Search in Google Scholar
29. M. Stevic, A. Estebsari, S. Vogel, E. Pons, E. Bompard, M. Masera et al. Multi-site European framework for real-time co-simulation of power systems. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution 2017; 11(17):4126–35.10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1576Search in Google Scholar
30. M. Stevic, A. Monti, A. Benigni. Development of a simulator-to-simulator interface for geographically distributed simulation of power systems in real time. In: IECON 2015 - 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society: IEEE; 2015, p. 5020–5.10.1109/IECON.2015.7392888Search in Google Scholar
31. H Lin, S. Sambamoorthy, S. Shukla, J. Thorp, L. Mili. Power system and communication network co-simulation for smart grid applications. In: ISGT 2011; 2011, p. 1–6.10.1109/ISGT.2011.5759166Search in Google Scholar
32. M.O. Faruque, M. Sloderbeck, M. Steurer, V. Dinavahi. Thermo-electric co-simulation on geographically distributed real-time simulators. In: 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting: IEEE; 2009, p. 1–7.10.1109/PES.2009.5275631Search in Google Scholar
33. S. Chatzivasileiadis, M. Bonvini, J. Matanza, R. Yin, T.S. Nouidui, E.C. Kara et al. Cyber–Physical Modeling of Distributed Resources for Distribution System Operations. Proc. IEEE 2016; 104(4):789–806.10.1109/JPROC.2016.2520738Search in Google Scholar
34. C. Molitor, S. Gross, J. Zeitz, A. Monti. MESCOS—A Multienergy System Cosimulator for City District Energy Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2014; 10(4):2247–56.10.1109/TII.2014.2334058Search in Google Scholar
35. S. Kochanneck, I. Mauser, K. Phipps, H. Schmeck. Hardware-in-the-Loop Co-simulation of a Smart Building in a Low-voltage Distribution Grid. In: 2018 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT-Europe): Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 21–25, 2018 conference proceedings. [Piscataway, New Jersey]: IEEE; 2018, p. 1–6.10.1109/ISGTEurope.2018.8571746Search in Google Scholar
36. Association M. Modelica - A Unified Object-Oriented Language for Systems Modeling, Version 3.3 Revision 1. [July 11, 2019].Search in Google Scholar
37. T. Blochwitz, M. Otter, J. Akesson, M. Arnold, C. Clauss, H. Elmqvist et al. Functional Mockup Interface 2.0: The Standard for Tool independent Exchange of Simulation Models. In: Proceedings of the 9th International MODELICA Conference, September 3–5, 2012, Munich, Germany: Linköping University Electronic Press; 2012, p. 173–84.10.3384/ecp12076173Search in Google Scholar
38. Modelica Association Project “FMI”. Functional Mockup Interface for Model Exchange and Co-Simulation, Version 2.0; Available from: https://fmi-standard.org/.Search in Google Scholar
39. M. Krammer, M. Benedikt, T. Blochwitz, K. Alekeish, N. Amringer, C. Kater et al. The Distributed Co-simulation Protocol for the integration of real-time systems and simulation environments. In: Proceedings of the 50th Computer Simulation Conference. Bordeaux, France: Society for Computer Simulation International; 2018, p. 1–14.Search in Google Scholar
40. K. Karlsson, K. Skytte, P.E. Morthorst, P. Bacher, H. Madsen. Integrated energy systems modelling. In: DTU International Energy Report. Energy systems integration for the transition to non-fossil energy systems, 2015: p. 23–33.Search in Google Scholar
41. S. Mittal, M. Ruth, A. Pratt, M. Lunacek, D. Krishnamurthy, W. Jones. A System-of-systems Approach for Integrated Energy Systems Modeling and Simulation. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Summer Computer Simulation. San Diego, CA, USA: Society for Computer Simulation International; 2015, p. 1–10.Search in Google Scholar
42. M. Robinius, A. Otto, P. Heuser, L. Welder, K. Syranidis, D. Ryberg et al. Linking the Power and Transport Sectors—Part 1: The Principle of Sector Coupling. Energies 2017; 10(7):956.10.3390/en10070956Search in Google Scholar
43. M. Robinius, A. Otto, K. Syranidis, D.S. Ryberg, P. Heuser, L. Welder et al. Linking the Power and Transport Sectors—Part 2: Modelling a Sector Coupling Scenario for Germany. Energies 2017; 10(7):957.10.3390/en10070957Search in Google Scholar
44. M.F. Ruth, B. Kroposki. Energy Systems Integration: An Evolving Energy Paradigm. The Electricity Journal 2014; 27(6):36–47.10.1016/j.tej.2014.06.001Search in Google Scholar
45. L. Andresen, P. Dubucq, R.P. Garcia, G. Ackermann, A. Kather, G. Schmitz. Transientes Verhalten gekoppelter Energienetze mit hohem Anteil Erneuerbarer Energien: Abschlussbericht des Verbundvorhabens; 2017.Search in Google Scholar
46. TransiEnt Library: Simulation von gekoppelten Energienetzen mit hohem Anteil Erneuerbarer Energien in Modelica. [July 11, 2019]; Available from: https://www.tuhh.de/transient-ee/.Search in Google Scholar
47. GTNETx2 CARD • RTDS Technologies Inc. [July 09, 2019]; Available from: https://www.rtds.com/the-simulator/our-hardware/gtnet-card/.Search in Google Scholar
48. A. Latif, M. Shahzad, P. Palensky, W. Gawlik. An alternate PowerFactory Matlab coupling approach. In: 2015 International Symposium on Smart Electric Distribution Systems and Technologies (EDST): IEEE; 2015, p. 486–91.10.1109/SEDST.2015.7315257Search in Google Scholar
49. M. Kyesswa, H.K. Çakmak, U. Kühnapfel, V. Hagenmeyer. A Matlab-Based Dynamic Simulation Module for Power System Transients Analysis in the eASiMOV Framework. In: 2017 European Modelling Symposium (EMS): IEEE; 2017, p. 157–62.10.1109/EMS.2017.36Search in Google Scholar
50. M. Stifter, R. Schwalbe, F. Andren, T. Strasser. Steady-state co-simulation with PowerFactory. In: 2013 Workshop on Modeling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems (MSCPES): IEEE; 2013, p. 1–6.10.1109/MSCPES.2013.6623317Search in Google Scholar
51. R.R. Dickinson, N. Lymperopoulos, A. Le Duigou, P. Lucchese, C. Mansilla, O. Tlili et al. Power-to-hydrogen and hydrogen-to-X pathways: Opportunities for next generation energy systems. In: 2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM), p. 1–6.10.1109/EEM.2017.7981882Search in Google Scholar
52. V. Hagenmeyer, H.K. Çakmak, C. Düpmeier, T. Faulwasser, J. Isele, H.B. Keller et al. Information and Communication Technology in Energy Lab 2.0: Smart Energies System Simulation and Control Center with an Open-Street-Map-Based Power Flow Simulation Example. Energy Technology 2016; 4(1):145–162.10.1002/ente.201500304Search in Google Scholar
53. A. Ursua, L.M. Gandia, P. Sanchis. Hydrogen Production From Water Electrolysis: Current Status and Future Trends. Proc. IEEE 2012; 100(2):410–26.10.1109/JPROC.2011.2156750Search in Google Scholar
54. M. Balestri, G. Benelli, F. Donatini, F. Arlati, G. Conti. Enel’s Fusina hydrogen-fed power generation plant. In: 2007 International Conference on Clean Electrical Power. Piscataway: IEEE; 2007, p. 456–63.10.1109/ICCEP.2007.384254Search in Google Scholar
55. M. Nose, T. Kawakami, H. Araki, N. Senba, S. Tanimura. Hydrogen-fired Gas Turbine Targeting Realization of CO2-free Society; 2018.Search in Google Scholar