Amazon Threatens 'Drastic Action' After Saks Bankruptcy - Slashdot

Amazon Threatens 'Drastic Action' After Saks Bankruptcy - Slashdot
Close
binspam
dupe
notthebest
offtopic
slownewsday
stale
stupid
fresh
funny
insightful
interesting
maybe
offtopic
flamebait
troll
redundant
overrated
insightful
interesting
informative
funny
underrated
descriptive
typo
dupe
error
180586916
story
Amazon wants a federal judge to
reject Saks Global's bankruptcy financing plan
, writing in court papers the beleaguered department store "burned through hundreds of millions of dollars in less than a year" and failed to hold up their agreement. From a report:
When Saks acquired Neiman Marcus for $2.7 billion in December 2024, Amazon invested $475 million into the venture on the grounds the retailer would start selling its products on Amazon's website and the tech company would offer technology and logistics expertise.
"That equity investment is now presumptively worthless," Amazon's attorneys wrote in a Wednesday filing, hours after Saks filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. "Saks continuously failed to meet its budgets, burned through hundreds of millions of dollars in less than a year, and ran up additional hundreds of millions of dollars in unpaid invoices owed to its retail partners."
As part of the deal, Saks launched a branded "Saks at Amazon" storefront on the e-commerce company's website featuring a range of luxury fashion and beauty items. It also agreed to pay a referral fee for Saks-branded goods sold on the platform, guaranteeing at least $900 million in payments to Amazon over eight years.
You may like to read:
The United States Needs Fewer Bus Stops
Amazon To Display Tariff Costs For Consumers, Report Says
Trump AI Czar Sacks on Universal Basic Income: 'It's Not Going To Happen'
'AI Can't Think'
Europe Fears It Can't Catch Up in Great Power Competition
Why We're Unlikely to Get Artificial General Intelligence Any Time Soon
Many People Who Come Off GLP-1 Drugs Regain Weight Within 2 Years, Review Suggests
This discussion has been archived.

No new comments can be posted.
Amazon Threatens 'Drastic Action' After Saks Bankruptcy
More
Amazon Threatens 'Drastic Action' After Saks Bankruptcy
Comments Filter:
All
Insightful
Informative
Interesting
Funny
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Amazon can speak up on money issues
Score:
, Insightful)
by
TheMiddleRoad
( 1153113 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @01:25PM (
#65926624
But Bezos is silent on the death of democracy, despite owning a newspaper that claims otherwise.
Share
Re:
Score:
by
echo123
( 1266692 )
writes:
But Bezos is silent on the death of democracy, despite owning a newspaper that claims otherwise.
The WaPo motto "Democracy Dies in Darkness" does not actually specify whether Bezos (and WaPo) is against darkness when profit is involved.
Read my sig.
Re:
Score:
by
TheMiddleRoad
( 1153113 )
writes:
Damn good point. I was just biased in my reading.
Re:
Score:
by
unixisc
( 2429386 )
writes:
That newspaper announced sometime last year that they'd always be in favor of free markets and capitalism. Maybe they wanted to avoid being blacklisted by Trump, but whatever the reason, you can't hold them to what they were during the Biden years if they've explicitly announced a departure from that
Re:
Score:
by
unixisc
( 2429386 )
writes:
Free markets are what the name suggests - free! Regulations are the thing that Teddy Roosevelt type Republicans used to support. Not sure there are any now
Re:
Score:
by
sabbede
( 2678435 )
writes:
I support regulation, markets require and generate them, but that doesn't mean all of the regulations we have are good or should be kept.
Re:
Score:
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
Republicans and billionaires oppose free markets. Free markets require regulation.
"Free regulated markets" is an oxymoron. Republicans and billionaires
love
free markets. They oppose
regulated
ones. Or at least they want regulations that favor their side.
Re:
Score:
by
PPH
( 736903 )
writes:
The power of the government has grown too large when one is forced to practice sycophancy and kiss the ring of the reigning potentate. No matter which political camp you occupy.
Re:
Score:
by
Anonymous Coward
writes:
biden didnt ask for ring kissing
this is shit conservatives say to justify their own bad decisions. is that what you're doing friend or are you really gonna stick to the both sides thing despite all evidence to the contrary.
may as well be an antivaxxer too if you want to maintain that level of cognitive dissonance
Re:
Score:
by
unixisc
( 2429386 )
writes:
No, b'cos that paper was already where he wanted it to be. As well as most other media outlets
Re:
Score:
, Informative)
by
Anonymous Coward
writes:
pure weapons grade copium
wapo and NYT and all the other "liberal" media was running negative stories on biden all day long, they couldnt stop talking about his so called senility at every turn
also lest we forget the 2016 wapo column "donald the dove, hillary the hawk" or almost everything maggie haberman wrote, they have and continue to sanwash the admin whenever given the oppurtunity
the idea these outlets are in the bag for democrats is actually republican propaganda and you all slurp it up like trumps ran
Re:
Score:
by
sabbede
( 2678435 )
writes:
No, he just told everyone they had to enforce DEI policies that got me fired.
Re:
Score:
by
Anonymous Coward
writes:
You got fired for being a demonstrable asshole. No DEI required.
Re:
Score:
by
TheMiddleRoad
( 1153113 )
writes:
Oh, the WaPo is a total fucking mess now. It was pretty decent before Bozos bought and ruined it, kind of like Nazi Musk and Twitter.
Re:
Score:
by
Kokuyo
( 549451 )
writes:
You username is total irony, isn't it?
Re:
Score:
by
TheMiddleRoad
( 1153113 )
writes:
No. Right wingers see everyone to their left as leftists, and left wingers see everyone to their right as right wingers. You're just suffering from your narrow perspective.
Re:
Score:
by
ToasterMonkey
( 467067 )
writes:
That newspaper announced sometime last year that they'd always be in favor of free markets and capitalism. Maybe they wanted to avoid being blacklisted by Trump, but whatever the reason, you can't hold them to what they were during the Biden years if they've explicitly announced a departure from that
It was "personal liberties and free markets", AKA libertarianism for billionaires. And the editorial pages, not the news coverage. So far.
Yes it was to appease Trump, how much more obvious could that get, the actions took place in February immediately after Trump took office. Right in line with the government suing news organizations and universities, threatening to block corporate mergers for personal favors, threatening broadcast licenses to attack anyone not nice to Mr Trump, restricting media access to
Re:
Score:
by
unixisc
( 2429386 )
writes:
Since when has Trump been a Libertarian? If Amazon wanted to please Trump, they would have cast their mission as being in favor of tariffs, as well as targeted government intervention in particular markets, such as energy and semiconductors
Re:Amazon can speak up on money issues
Score:
, Insightful)
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @02:47PM (
#65926924
Journal
Democracies gradually erode before they suddenly collapse. Others in the past who noted the erosion were justified to be alarmed.
Right now, things seem different. I fear there is a "gathering storm" -- to borrow the words of Winston Churchill regarding the prelude to World War II. Trump is openly threatening a NATO nation, and by extension, the Western alliance.
I suspect you and I are old enough to recognize the potential historic parallels that are unfolding now.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
TheMiddleRoad
( 1153113 )
writes:
My hope is to be in Hawaii on a farm with established agriculture and a steady, independent water supply before WWIII strikes. I fear I won't make it.
Re:Amazon can speak up on money issues
Score:
, Insightful)
by
TheMiddleRoad
( 1153113 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @03:01PM (
#65926986
Reagan and both Bushes took pickaxes to the foundation of Democracy. Trump got the steamshovel. He literally knocked down a wing of the White House so he and his cronies can have nicer parties. He literally sent a mob into the Capitol. Are you congenitally blind or willfully so?
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
ArchieBunker
( 132337 )
writes:
Because there is no "death of democracy". I've heard this hysterical horseshit all my long life. Everytime a Republican wins the White House, it means democracy died. Funny that I heard it for Reagan, both Bushes, and now Trump, and yet we keep having elections and Democrats win the White House sometimes too. "Democracy Died" just means that you threw a tantrum because your candidate didn't win.
It's always same stupid fucking thing:
if we don't stop them this time, it's over! Democracy will die! This is the most important election
Evarrrr!!!
The world keeps spinning. Elections keep happening. You win sometimes and you lose sometimes. You people have become the boy that cried wolf, and no one gives a shit anymore. No one outside of your hysterical sewing circles buys it.
[theguardian.com]
The FBI raided the home of a Washington Post reporter early on Wednesday in what the newspaper called a “highly unusual and aggressive” move by law enforcement, and press freedom groups condemned as a “tremendous intrusion” by the Trump administration.
Agents descended on the Virginia home of Hannah Natanson as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials.
Wasn't that the exact sam
Re:
Score:
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
I think you agree that Trump
actually did
have classified government documents, despite his repeated claims that he had returned them all. Whereas we don't know yet whether this reporter had access to anything at all that was classified. We can't tell right now, because
the DOJ has sealed the records in the case.
[cnn.com] So, stay tuned?
Re: Amazon can speak up on money issues
Score:
by
DrSpock11
( 993950 )
writes:
âoeDemocracy is dead because the guy I dislike won the election and is doing exactly what he said he was going to do.â
Re:Amazon can speak up on money issues
Score:
, Insightful)
by
fahrbot-bot
( 874524 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @05:04PM (
#65927502
But Bezos is silent on the death of democracy, despite owning a newspaper that claims otherwise.
He donated to and supports the darkness, 'cause it makes him way more $$$ elsewhere.
FBI executes search warrant at Washington Post reporter’s home
[washingtonpost.com] [non-paywalled article below]
The FBI executed a search warrant Wednesday morning at a Washington Post reporter’s home as part of an investigation into a government contractor accused of illegally retaining classified government materials.
There's no indication that the Administration tried other, more usual, avenues, like a subpoena, prior to getting the search warrant.
Some people think this action is just a pretext to harass the Washington Post reporter, Hannah Natanson, and gather information about the numerous current and former federal workers talking to her. From
FBI raids home of Washington Post reporter in ‘highly unusual and aggressive’ move
[theguardian.com]
In a
first-person account
[washingtonpost.com] published last month, Natanson described herself as the Post’s “federal government whisperer”, and said she would receive calls day and night from “federal workers who wanted to tell me how President Donald Trump was rewriting their workplace policies, firing their colleagues or transforming their agency’s missions”.
Natanson said her work had led to 1,169 new sources, “all current or former federal employees who decided to trust me with their stories”. She said she learned information “people inside government agencies weren’t supposed to tell me”, saying that the intensity of the work nearly “broke” her.
Parent
Share
Oh NO!
Score:
, Funny)
by
dmomo
( 256005 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @01:30PM (
#65926640
A 2.5 trillion dollar company is losing 0.02% of it's value because of a bad investment. Somebody DO SOMETHING.
Share
Re:
Score:
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
Amazon's presence has been an existential threat to other retailers, both online and with brick-and-mortar stores. Many of them have gone bankrupt.
Saks thought they could still make it work, and acquired Neiman Marcus, ironically with a little help from Amazon. And now Saks has discovered they
can't
make it work after all.
It's interesting to speculate whether Amazon is a major contributor to the failure here. And their complaints about it sound like a very tiny violin.
Amazon knew it was coming
Score:
, Informative)
by
CommunityMember
( 6662188 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @01:39PM (
#65926666
Only a fool (and Amazon exec's are not fools) did not see the bankruptcy coming in recent times (the WSJ has had articles about Saks Globals situation for a while now). Once the bankruptcy was filed, they, like a lot of other unsecured creditors, now need to make their case to the judge as to what they might actually get (they all want it all back, of course, which seems unlikely, but you have to ask).
Share
Re:
Score:
by
Dan Posluns
( 794424 )
writes:
I dunno, I worked at Amazon for 5 years and saw some pretty foolish decisions trickle down from the executive pipeline during my tenure.
Is this a real bankruptcy?
Score:
by
innocent_white_lamb
( 151825 )
writes:
Is this a real bankruptcy (company out of business, assets sold off to pay the creditors some percentage of what they owe) or one of the relatively common fake bankruptcies where they file paperwork to say "we're bankrupt", the court stamps it approval and all of the creditors get nothing or very little, then the company just carries on doing whatever it was doing before?
Re:Is this a real bankruptcy?
Score:
, Informative)
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @01:46PM (
#65926696
Journal
It's Chapter 11, which is (I suppose) not a "real" bankruptcy, in that the company's debt obligations are restructured, and it gets to stay in business.
Perhaps a "real" bankruptcy would be Chapter 8, where everything gets liquidated to pay creditors and the lights get turned off.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
CommunityMember
( 6662188 )
writes:
Perhaps a "real" bankruptcy would be Chapter 8, where everything gets liquidated to pay creditors and the lights get turned off.
Chapter 7 is liquidation (there is no actual Chapter 8).
Re:
Score:
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
You're right. Sorry for the misinformation.
Re:
Score:
by
thegarbz
( 1787294 )
writes:
No such thing as Chapter 8. You're describing Chapter 7
Re:
Score:
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
Yes, already addressed by CommunityMember above. My bad.
Re:
Score:
by
thegarbz
( 1787294 )
writes:
My bad too. I preopen a lot of Slashdot tabs so I don't see if someone else may have made the same reply 20minutes before I get to the tab
:-)
Re:
Score:
by
ClickOnThis
( 137803 )
writes:
No biggie. That has happened to me many times too.
Re:
Score:
by
weepinganus
( 767987 )
writes:
My bad too. I preopen a lot of Slashdot tabs so I don't see if someone else may have made the same reply 20minutes before I get to the tab
:-)
No biggie. That has happened to me many times too.
Such civility! Is this still the internet?!
Amazon can't even get Whole Foods right
Score:
, Interesting)
by
smooth wombat
( 796938 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @01:44PM (
#65926692
Journal
To this day, Amazon has not been able to integrate Whole Foods into the Amazon family. Their internal systems are still Whole Foods, not Amazon. That was 7.5 years ago. Here's how bad things are.
I do a search for the closest Whole Foods to where I live. I select the link to the store site. My local store shows somewhere in another state. I have to manually select my closest store and Make It My Store even though I selected the link to my closest store.
After doing all of the above, I search for a product while I'm at work. It shows available. I go home, a few miles from my work, and perform the exact same steps. The product shows out of stock. Not just on one day, but over multiple days this scenario persists.
On top of all that, the product I'm looking for is constantly out of stock (once I've verified things are working correctly).
I'm not sure what "technology and logistics expertise" Amazon was offering Saks, but if they can't get their own shit together on their own store, Saks owes them nothing.
Share
Re: Amazon can't even get Whole Foods right
Score:
by
jddj
( 1085169 )
writes:
The culprit for your "wrong store" problem might be 'ZIP code search', vs 'geocoded address search'.
The largest ZIP code in the US is bigger than Maryland, and 'center of nearest ZIP code' can be a blunt instrument.
Hard to say if that kind of failure is poor shop site design, bad database design, or a fallback from refusing to provide your location (maybe a long time ago and remembered/persisted).
Could easily be something else, of course. Amazon certainly is one of the most mature shippers re: GIS. Whole Fo
Re:
Score:
by
smooth wombat
( 796938 )
writes:
The culprit for your "wrong store" problem might be 'ZIP code search', vs 'geocoded address search'.
It shouldn't matter. If I select my closest store the least that should be done is select the same city as the store, not several states away from me.
This same scenario happens with Lowes. For some inexplicable reason, it chooses a different state as my default until I change to the store which is literally, in the truest sense of the word, five miles from me.
Businesses need to stop thinking.
Re:
Score:
by
dgatwood
( 11270 )
writes:
Businesses need to stop thinking. Only do what the potential customer tells them.
This. When I choose a store, that is my store. If I choose a different store, that is my new store. If you can't figure out how to permanently store which store I chose, you shouldn't be building websites.
Re:
Score:
by
dgatwood
( 11270 )
writes:
They want you to sign up and sign in.
I *am* signed in. The Lowe's website STILL does this. Also, it annoying logs me out every few weeks, but that flaw seems independent of losing my store selection, which happens every two or three *days*.
No, this isn't somebody doing this for some dark pattern reason. This is just incompetence, because of at least one of the following:
A grossly inadequate feedback path from end users to the team coupled with inadequate internal testing
Grossly inadequate telemetry to detect user-hostile behavior
Incompeten
Re: Amazon can't even get Whole Foods right
Score:
by
jddj
( 1085169 )
writes:
Dunno where your jurisdictional borders are, but you might be closer to another ZIP Code's boundary than you are to Whole Foods or Lowe's.
Re: Amazon can't even get Whole Foods right
Score:
by
jddj
( 1085169 )
writes:
Also, if you're on a business network or a work VPN, or any of a few other situations, they could be assuming the location of your gateway to the Internet (so not a router in your house). One of my former offices in Georgia was periodically "in Texas".
I'm not saying any of this suckness is OK. Just providing some of the failure modes.
It ought to be better
Re:
Score:
by
smooth wombat
( 796938 )
writes:
Right. I understand when I'm at work it might seem I'm somewhere else. However, when I select the web site of the store closest to me, the delivery store option and the store itself should not be several states away. I've selected the store closest to me. Everything should be set to that store regardless of anything else.
Re:Amazon can't even get Whole Foods right
Score:
, Interesting)
by
sinkskinkshrieks
( 6952954 )
writes:
on Thursday January 15, 2026 @04:46PM (
#65927412
The WF flagship store in Austin is a shitshow. They don't even have fricking PITA BREAD. Anywhere. They only carry "SKUs that perform" and optimize algorithmically rather than using any sort of common sense. And their employees inconsistently have terrible, unprofessional attitudes... I can only guess that Amazon/WF treats them like shit and selectively treats others like princes/ses, or their hiring, training, and company culture suck. As such, I do as little shopping there as possible and go to the very nearby Trader Joe's instead.
Parent
Share
Reverse Midas touch
Score:
by
PPH
( 736903 )
writes:
Only exceeded by the likes of Google and Microsoft. But Amazon is catching up.
Re:
Score:
by
david.emery
( 127135 )
writes:
But still a long way to catch up to Meta, let alone AOL-Times-Warner...
Duh
Score:
by
Yo,dog!
( 1819436 )
writes:
What a stupid investment, esp. from a company that strives to disrupt retail.
What is lost?
Score:
by
sabbede
( 2678435 )
writes:
I took a peek at the Sax store on Amazon. Lots of clothes that were as ugly as they were expensive. I guess I don't understand fashion.
Business Shenanigans
Score:
by
Dripdry
( 1062282 )
writes:
it seems to me as if Amazon has probably done this plenty of times before.
does anyone else think that Amazon is just pissed off that Saks wouldnâ(TM)t spend the money back on Amazon again? Itâ(TM)s the same circular scheme going on in the tech industry, and Amazon was trying to start it with Saks.
Private equity gonna private equity
Score:
by
sinkskinkshrieks
( 6952954 )
writes:
I guess Amazon is envious they didn't think of ruining other companies fast enough while evading debt first.
Related Links
Top of the:
day
week
month
521
comments
Amazon To Display Tariff Costs For Consumers, Report Says
361
comments
Trump AI Czar Sacks on Universal Basic Income: 'It's Not Going To Happen'
289
comments
'AI Can't Think'
265
comments
Europe Fears It Can't Catch Up in Great Power Competition
261
comments
Why We're Unlikely to Get Artificial General Intelligence Any Time Soon
next
Many People Who Come Off GLP-1 Drugs Regain Weight Within 2 Years, Review Suggests
175
comments
previous
The United States Needs Fewer Bus Stops
171
comments
Slashdot Top Deals
The steady state of disks is full.
-- Ken Thompson
Close
Working...