Apple's MacBook Neo Makes Repairs Easier, Cheaper Than Other MacBooks - Slashdot

Apple's MacBook Neo Makes Repairs Easier, Cheaper Than Other MacBooks - Slashdot
Close
binspam
dupe
notthebest
offtopic
slownewsday
stale
stupid
fresh
funny
insightful
interesting
maybe
offtopic
flamebait
troll
redundant
overrated
insightful
interesting
informative
funny
underrated
descriptive
typo
dupe
error
180961184
story
Apple's
new MacBook Neo
is "easier to repair than other modern MacBooks," according to Ars Technica's Andrew Cunningham. It introduces a more repairable internal design that makes components like the battery and keyboard easier and cheaper to replace. An anonymous reader quotes an excerpt from the report:
Replacements for pretty much any component in the Neo are
simpler and involve fewer steps and tools than in the M5 MacBook Air
. That includes the battery, which in the MacBook Air is attached to the chassis with multiple screws and adhesive strips but which in the Neo
comes out relatively easily
after you get some shielding and flex cables out of the way. But the most significant change in the Neo is that the keyboard is its own separate component. For essentially all modern MacBooks, going back at least as far as the late-2000s unibody aluminum MacBook designs, the keyboard has been integrated into the top part of the laptop case and is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to replace independently.
[...] Apple hasn't yet listed MacBook Neo components in its parts store, but based on the repair prices it has announced, Neo components should cost quite a bit less than those for higher-end MacBooks. An out-of-warranty battery replacement for the Neo will cost $149, down from $199 for current Airs and $229 for current MacBook Pros; fixing accidental screen or external enclosure damage will cost AppleCare+ subscribers $49 for a Neo, down from $99 for other MacBooks.
Related Links
Perplexity's 'Personal Computer' Lets AI Agents Access Your Local Files
Apple Announces Low-Cost 'MacBook Neo' With A18 Pro Chip
Submission: Apple's MacBook Neo Makes Repairs Easier, Cheaper Than Other MacBooks
Adobe CEO to Step Down After 18 Years
This discussion has been archived.

No new comments can be posted.
Apple's MacBook Neo Makes Repairs Easier, Cheaper Than Other MacBooks
More
Apple's MacBook Neo Makes Repairs Easier, Cheaper Than Other MacBooks
Comments Filter:
All
Insightful
Informative
Interesting
Funny
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Easier for tech at Apple Store
Score:
by
drnb
( 2434720 )
writes:
Well, easier for tech at Apple Store or other authorized repair center. The case may be easier to open but it's still highly integrated. RAM and SSD are still soldered into main board. So you still need to replace entire the main board. And that's easier since there are only two. 128/8 and 256/8/.
Re:
Score:
by
keltor
( 99721 )
writes:
None of the normal Apple products work anything like that. Airpods work like that because they are tiny.
Re: Easier for tech at Apple Store
Score:
by
paulatz
( 744216 )
writes:
Easier than other MacBooks does not mean easy in general. Removing the battery of a MacBook Pro is a 72 steps operation on fixed.it, including the application of solvent that can damage the screen. For a typical Dell laptop it is: remove the panel, unplug the old battery, plug the new battery, reattach the panel.
Re: Easier for tech at Apple Store
Score:
by
paulatz
( 744216 )
writes:
There definitely is solvent involved in the ifixed.it instructions for a MacBook pro.
[ifixit.com]
why would anyone be replacing RAM/SSD?
Score:
, Interesting)
by
jizmonkey
( 594430 )
writes:
Unless you do something stupid of galactic proportions like using the Macbook Neo to farm Chia tokens, the RAM and SSD will last the life of the computer. What will break are: battery wears out, keyboard and screen break, USB ports break. These are cheap and easy repairs. Apple is intending to disrupt Chromebooks from schools, so it is likely that district-wide there will be enough repairs needed to justify having an employee who does internal repairs. These are much easier for such an employee to do than h
Re:
Score:
by
drnb
( 2434720 )
writes:
You may want to upgrade your RAM 4-5 years into the useful life of the machine, instead of at build-to-order time when its new. The upgrade will be cheaper by then. Similar with SSD.
Corporate breaks the Windows + Office + teams lock
Score:
by
will4
( 7250692 )
writes:
The largest point is that an Apple mac laptop with decent specs is good enough for corporate work for most users and
lets corporate break out of the Windows update lifecycle, use something other than Office, use something other than Teams and exit from paying Microsoft large Azure cloud fees.
This is a win for Apple.
1. Corporate user - $800 mac laptop
2. Corporate power user - $800 mac laptop + lowest cost mac mini for added compute
3. Engineer - mac laptop + large monitor + higher end mac mini for added comput
Re:
Score:
by
ambrandt12
( 6486220 )
writes:
It's a friggin' Chromebook... it's not meant to be fixed... it's a disposable item.
Same as your phone, coffee maker, car, computer, couch... it's fixable if you're adventurious enough to spend enough time going through all the hoops to desolder that RAM and 'upgrade' it (assuming the locked BIOS accepts it).
How about a laptop made by Dell or Apple or Toshiba or Lenovo that has the reparability of the Framework laptop, maybe for a cheaper price?
Is it so hard?
The laptop doesn't have to accept every single pro
Re:
Score:
by
unixisc
( 2429386 )
writes:
All
of Apple's products are meant to be discarded after a while: none are meant to last. I have a perfectly working iPod, iPad and watch, none of which are supported by Apple anymore. So let's drop this pretence of the Neo being a "Chromebook", which is an asinine assertion in and of itself, since data can be, or is meant to be stored on the device (hence the 256GB storage: chromebooks typically have 64-128GB for the apps and app data).
Re:
Score:
by
mspohr
( 589790 )
writes:
MacBook Pro battery swelled up and damaged the keyboard. Never had that happen to any other computer.
Pain in the ass to fix.
Re:
Score:
by
keltor
( 99721 )
writes:
It's an InFO-PoP chip, the DRAM and the Logic chip don't even have substrate between them. The Mx are also packages similar to that. The M5 Pro/Max in particular use the latest called SoIC-mH.
And unfortunately at some point, your Intel and AMD chips will also be built that way. The separation between the RAM and the processors cause a lot of technical problems that require lots of workarounds.
Re:
Score:
by
Mirddes
( 798147 )
writes:
EVEN IF you put a tonne of ram on package, 1-4 sodimm or dimms would be nice too, L5 cache anyone?
Re:
Score:
by
yemanja
( 258653 )
writes:
"RAM and SSD are still soldered into main board."
Yet, basically same old Apple.
A Winner from Apple In So Many Ways
Score:
by
crunchy_one
( 1047426 )
writes:
For one, I'm impressed by the Neo. Not only does it hit a decent price point, it's also durable, repairable, performs well, and doesn't require the soul sucking OS that Windows 11 has become. I'm expecting to see these everywhere in the coming months.
8Gb RAM?
Score:
by
echo123
( 1266692 )
writes:
It's only got 8Gb of RAM, soldered on the motherboard. How efficient is MacOS? How many browser tabs are possible? Seems crippled to me.
Re:
Score:
by
drinkypoo
( 153816 )
writes:
It's only got 8Gb of RAM
No, it has eight times that much.
How efficient is MacOS? How many browser tabs are possible? Seems crippled to me.
On one hand, you're not wrong there. 8 GB is not a lot. This is seriously a machine built to just run a browser. The answer to how many tabs you can have open is complicated and boring because old tabs get cached, so it's really just however many you can have before your browser explodes. But at least on OSX you have your choice of browsers, unlike on iOS.
I am not going to buy one for lots of reasons anyway, I have several bones to pick with Apple and have been abused by the
Re:8Gb RAM?
Score:
, Informative)
by
SoCalChris
( 573049 )
writes:
on Thursday March 12, 2026 @06:03PM (
#66038048
Journal
I bought a Mac Mini with the M1 and 8GB of RAM solely to compile apps on for the app store. A few months ago, I decided to try using it as my main dev machine to see if I liked Mac OS because I'm thinking of switching to a MacBook.
That machine hasn't had any issues running JetBrains Rider as the IDE along with several docker containers. Sure it could be a little faster, but for the specs it has, it does amazingly well. I doubt Windows would even be able to open the IDE with 8GB of RAM, let alone the IDE actually being useful.
I have no idea how the CPU will handle tougher tasks, but Mac OS does surprisingly well with a low amount of RAM in my experience.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
drnb
( 2434720 )
writes:
Sure it could be a little faster, but for the specs it has, it does amazingly well.
Same here. My day-to-day dev system is a M4 Mac mini 24GB. I purchased a used M1 MacBook Air 8GB as a test machine. According the Ars Technica the Neo is pretty close to this M1 8GB. I've been thoroughly and pleasantly surprised with this M1 8GB. Even using it for Xcode projects. Sure it's a bit slower for complete builds, but it works. And for incremental builds it's quite usable. Totally surprising in a pleasant way.
Re:
Score:
by
MightyMartian
( 840721 )
writes:
I can still run Eclipse without any issues on old M1 MacBook Pro with 8gb, about 5 years old now. Frankly Apple Silicon is just a beast and no matter how much people try to hand wave it away, these machines with the MacOS optimizations are beasts. I still take my M1 out on the road because if it gets damaged, it will still have paid for itself. I honestly cannot imagine going back to Intel/AMD and Windows, and every time I'm forced to use Windows, even on decent hardware, I'm come away realizing just how in
Re:
Score:
by
ArchieBunker
( 132337 )
writes:
I really don’t understand the people who have hundreds of tabs open.
Re:
Score:
by
Mspangler
( 770054 )
writes:
I have one tab open at the moment, but I have 17 bookmarks.
The desktop has like five folders of bookmarks, so probably fifty or sixty all together.
Are bookmarks that hard to do?
Re:
Score:
by
unixisc
( 2429386 )
writes:
It's just that we don't close tabs that we think we might want to revisit some time in the future
Re:
Score:
by
laughing_badger
( 628416 )
writes:
Is it not safer to just use the history search feature rather than risk the tab getting closed?
Re:
Score:
by
bussdriver
( 620565 )
writes:
I use firefox. It handles RAM pretty well and with some about:config it's best.
I have in this tab group... 29 tabs open. but I have my main tab group of 661 open tabs. 2nd is shopping with 187 tabs.
..ungrouped... 101 tabs. i'd guess I have 500 more tabs...
that is on my tower. the laptop probably as a few 100.
they are kind of like bookmarks but not permanent. I also have them in trees; another thing bookmarks can not do. some stay for 10 years... others go when that topic is completely done with. Thi
Re:
Score:
by
echo123
( 1266692 )
writes:
[one-tab.com] (helps me a lot!)
Re:
Score:
by
bussdriver
( 620565 )
writes:
I do like seeing a designer take up screen space! USE THE SPACE YOU HAVE! I'm so sick of UX people minimizing things for no good reason. If all I'm doing is 1 task at a time, then why not devote everything to doing that task well?
Thanx but I'll stick to the "Tree Tabs" add-on for firefox. I have it customized with CSS and everything. for at least a decade... I certainly have many ideas on how to browse better which i never do anything about...
Firefox because...privacy...and the ability to easily handle a
Re:
Score:
by
echo123
( 1266692 )
writes:
Well hang on... You do realize that one-tab is actually writing all those tabs out to HTML as it closes out each actual tab from the browser in one click. All the other bells and whistles one-tab offers are just fancy ways to restructure the HTML representation of your tabs -- many of which are desirable for the disciplined.
Re:
Score:
by
bussdriver
( 620565 )
writes:
Tree Tabs is just a compact sidebar version of the same basic thing. I like having a sidebar. I have the screen space. I switch tabs enough i want quick access to them. ideally, I think i'd like to use both top and side. recent at top with a limited count. the side is a tree structure with the Task being the root which can be colored and rotated 90 and limited just as the top ones are.
It's not like the browser itself isn't creating data structures for the tabs. Firefox isn't loading all those inactive tab
Re:
Score:
by
aRTeeNLCH
( 6256058 )
writes:
Because anything else takes more time and effort. Bookmarks are just something more to manage. Leaving tabs open essentially takes zero effort. Note that I use Firefox, and if I open a new (empty!) tab, then type something that corresponds to a tab, it will ask if I want to jump to that tab. Obviously, whenever I am done with a page I'll close it, even a bunch of they are related and I'm done with the subject.
Then, whenever I notice Firefox using too much CPU (temperature going up, load up, etcetera), and
It'll get you through school, K-12 or college.
Score:
by
drnb
( 2434720 )
writes:
It's only got 8Gb of RAM, soldered on the motherboard. How efficient is MacOS? How many browser tabs are possible? Seems crippled to me.
I was highly skeptical of 8GB too. A few months ago I purchased a used 2020 MacBook Air M1 8GB as a low end test machine. The 2026 MacBook Neo is comparable to this 2020 Air according to Ars Technica benchmarks.
I am surprised as to how functional that M1 8GB is. I've used it as a normal day-to-day Mac. and as a development machine during some testing using Xcode. Absolutely surprising in a good way. This machine seems very good for what it is designed for, K-12 and College students. Even STEM, including
Re:8Gb RAM?
Score:
, Informative)
by
pond0123
( 784875 )
writes:
on Thursday March 12, 2026 @07:28PM (
#66038168
Homepage
It's such a damning testament to the
dreadful, bloated mess
that
my own industry
of software development has caused, that so many people say this kind of thing. IMHO the hubris and arrogance of the software industry as a whole is truly unpleasant; basically, it manifests as contempt for the end-user justified in a thousand ways which amount to syntax sugar over "lazy and cheap". Every developer seems to think that their software is the one and only thing the customer will ever want or need to run on their computer.
8GB is a huge amount of RAM
...
...though you might want to run older software, and avoid Electron like the plague. But isn't that true for everyone, no matter how powerful your computer? Did you buy all that CPU power and RAM capacity just to be able to run someone's React dependencies, or to be available for your workflows across multiple applications?
What's more, the Neo's SOC - despite being aimed at a phone - is absurdly powerful. Single-core performance
is much better than "desktop class" M1 from just a few scant years ago
. Again, really that just shows how truly bloated and slow modern software is; the resource requirements apparently needed to show a reminders app, or a weather app, or a calendar or whatever on a phone these days are just insane. It's doing somewhere between nothing and very little more in those applications, but they're just more bloated and, often, more buggy because Reasons.
That's kind of reinforced by how
older
software, simply written better in the core originally (although likely bloated by standards
of that day
) work just fine. Check YouTube and you'll find e.g. someone showing Davinci Resolve with 2 4K streams, Final Cut Pro with 3 4K streams, editing a large image in Photoshop and yes, even running Chome with several heavy tabs - which isn't "efficient" or older software, but new and huge - including YouTube and Prime,
all loaded at once
and running smoothly. There are no obvious lags between application switches and no dropped frames evident during the 4K multi-layer playbacks or, say, YouTube. Doubtless it's swapping with all that loaded, but it's not particularly visible to the end user.
Making better software doesn't cost more long-term - your overall velocity stays higher - but it costs more in the short term, and corporate types obsess about that. If you've got captive customers today, you probably don't care much about plunging velocity due to tech debt, bugs and bloat anyway. The customers will wait. The feature will ship one day, and hey, you can keep hiking subscription costs to pay for the devs until it's done. Meanwhile, the bloat means that customers are gaslit into thinking they need very powerful computers, because, well, there's a chance that they do! The ever-faster hardware is countered by ever-slower software.
Thanks to AI, RAM & storage just got
very
expensive. Even more last laughs for the industry and even more money out of the pocket of the customer. Except enter the Neo - a very unexpected twist. When Apple "launched Apple Intelligence" (ha!), the extra RAM needed was ostensibly linked to 16GB RAM becoming the entry-level baseline in their computing line. I figured it was all over for people with 24-32GB; macOS would just bloat out and swallow up the baseline RAM, so those who'd purchased more had far less headroom and would hit swap much more quickly. Early Tahoe releases showed that happening, but it got tighter again and I was surprised. Now I know why - it needs to run smoothly under 8GB, with space for applications. This is
excellent news for owners of more powerful machines because the baseline has stayed low
. Software has to meet a minimum bar of efficiency. Everyone benefits.
I don't want a developer's hubris to mean my (say) 16GB laptop has half its RAM used by a Figma browser tab, or launching MS Word and loading a small document into it. But that's the trajectory. Thanks to machines like the Neo, hopefully that stays slower.
Read the rest of this comment...
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
ceoyoyo
( 59147 )
writes:
It's not soldered on the motherboard. It's in the CPU package.
Great for K-12 and College. Nerf'd to protect Air.
Score:
by
drnb
( 2434720 )
writes:
For one, I'm impressed by the Neo. Not only does it hit a decent price point, it's also durable, repairable, performs well, and doesn't require the soul sucking OS that Windows 11 has become. I'm expecting to see these everywhere in the coming months.
It's great for what it's designed for school. K-12 or college. It plenty for those environments, and really modest home users. However in other areas 8GB is going to affect its longevity. It may not remain a good system for 8 years as MacBook Air and Pro typically do, when they have a build-to-order RAM upgrade.
It's basically designed to appeal to K-12 school district buyers, it's an absolutely great fit for them. But for traditional Mac users it's nerf'd well enough to avoid cannibalizing MacBook Air sa
Re:
Score:
by
Misagon
( 1135 )
writes:
Thus might sound like such a nit-pick thing compared to what users get subjected to on MS-Windows, but my design sense gets triggered by MacOS Tahoe's UI elements having unnecessary transparency and high corner radii.
I've heard of many Mac users
downgrading
their Macs to MacOS Sequoia to get a better user experience.
I don't expect that to be possible on the MacBook Neo, with this MacOS version being the first to ship with its SoC.
Re:
Score:
by
Tarlus
( 1000874 )
writes:
People on Reddit like to bitch and moan about Apple's recent UI flubs (and by "recent', I mean the last 4 years or so) and Tahoe is probably the worst and most misguided abortion of Apple's once celebrated standards. But once you decide to move on with your life they quickly become easy to ignore. It still works just fine.
"Easier and Cheaper"
Score:
, Insightful)
by
GoJays
( 1793832 )
writes:
on Thursday March 12, 2026 @05:27PM (
#66037998
Only because if anything goes wrong with the Macbook Neo it is easier and cheaper to throw it out and go buy a new one than to get it repaired.
Share
Re:
Score:
by
dgatwood
( 11270 )
writes:
Only because if anything goes wrong with the Macbook Neo it is easier and cheaper to throw it out and go buy a new one than to get it repaired.
Ironically, it is the cost, and more specifically, the low profit margin, that likely has driven these improvements. Even with a low failure rate, every extra minute spent doing repairs cuts into that margin. While you could go full disposable, that's a bit more objectionable in a laptop than in a cell phone.
Re:
Score:
by
Misagon
( 1135 )
writes:
Schools and businesses often acquire laptops with service contracts.
In many parts of the world, warranty isn't an optional extra: It is required by law.
If anything is deficient from the factory, Apple has to replace that part.
For these reasons it makes more economic sense to have things more easily repairable, to avoid repairs from eating into your bottom line.
Re:
Score:
by
Tarlus
( 1000874 )
writes:
It's all relative.
Oblig.:
Score:
by
Narcocide
( 102829 )
writes:
But will it run Linux? Seriously asking here.
Re: Oblig.:
Score:
by
gabebear
( 251933 )
writes:
Apple has a nice Hypervisor which lets you run Arm64 Linux as a guest OS really well. As the base/boot OS Linux still doesnâ(TM)t support a lot of really basic things on Appleâ(TM)s newer laptops.
Re:
Score:
by
caseih
( 160668 )
writes:
Linux support on the M series chips is not amazing, Asahi Linux notwithstanding. Since this is a iPhone CPU, I suspect Linux support will be even worse.
Although honestly the Linux experience on any ARM device is not great in my experience.
What I'd like to know is whether you can enable loading of unsigned kernel extensions with this CPU like you can with the normal Macs and their M chips. Or if the phone-style lock down of hardware is present here with this CPU.
Re:
Score:
by
ChunderDownunder
( 709234 )
writes:
I think the most exciting possibility is someone discovering a vulnerability in the A18 that would allow one to jailbreak.
macOS on an iPhone, make it happen.
(Before anyone from high like Schiller or Federighi says no one would ever want that, alas.)
Re:
Score:
by
unixisc
( 2429386 )
writes:
What is it that you'll get from Linux that you're not currently getting from the FreeBSD that underlies macOS?
Gunning for Microsoft?
Score:
by
jenningsthecat
( 1525947 )
writes:
on Thursday March 12, 2026 @10:59PM (
#66038408
Maybe Apple is taking advantage of the opportunity Microsoft created when it turned Windows into a bloated, ad-riddled, rent-seeking hellscape while stealing personal data by the bucket-load. This could be a chance for Mac to make some substantial gains in the laptop market.
Share
Nope
Score:
by
Slashythenkilly
( 7027842 )
writes:
Will never purchase another apple product after the way they treated me and other customers.
Not just "any other macbooks"
Score:
by
CAIMLAS
( 41445 )
writes:
Go watch the tear down video. It's not just "any other Macbooks". Frankly, it's any modern electronics. Everything is modular and replaceable (not including the RAM/CPU/storage, of course, but that's likely a minor part of the overall cost).
Think about it: these things cost $600. With that, you get: $150 battery, a $100 keyboard, a $140 trackpad. That's what it'd cost to buy those independently, and while there's definitely a markup the independent cost to Apple likely comparable. Say it costs half the cost
Re:
Score:
by
cmseagle
( 1195671 )
writes:
I think Apple's advantage here, which will be very difficult for others to replicate, is that the unit cost of the A18 Pro SoC (CPU, memory, and graphics) is probably outrageously low. They're already manufacturing bajillions of the things for their smartphones and I'm sure they have a favorable arrangement with TSMC. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the whole logic board costs 50 bucks.
Huh?
Score:
by
nospam007
( 722110 )
writes:
Isn't the keyboard ALWAYS easily replaceable?
When I buy new laptops for the family, my wife needs an AZERTY keyboard, I use a Swiss/French and My sister in law uses a Swiss/German one and they put them on right in the shop before I go to pay in less than 5 minutes, no matter the brand.
I guess the rest of the world does it the same way.
Related Links
Top of the:
day
week
month
333
comments
Apple Faces 25% Tariff Threat Unless iPhone Manufacturing Moves To US
282
comments
Trump Tells Apple CEO To Avoid Manufacturing in India
224
comments
25% iPhone Tariff Insufficient To Drive US Production Shift, Morgan Stanley Says
186
comments
Windows PCs Crash Three Times As Often As Macs, Report Says
152
comments
Intel's New Core Series 3 Is Its Answer To the MacBook Neo
next
Adobe CEO to Step Down After 18 Years
41
comments
previous
Perplexity's 'Personal Computer' Lets AI Agents Access Your Local Files
49
comments
Slashdot Top Deals
Excessive login or logout messages are a sure sign of senility.
Close
Working...