Co-Production Examples and Tools - NOAA RESTORE Science Program
An official website of the United States government.
Here's how you know we're official.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
lock
or
means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Skip to content
Co-Production Examples and Tools
The Science Program is working to build a community of researchers, resource managers, and other resource users to support the sustainability of the Gulf of Mexico ecosystem. To support applied ecosystem science and incentivize these communities to work together, the program invests in co-production.
To learn more about the Science Program’s efforts to support co-production,
read this feature story
Co-production
is the collaboration of researchers, resource managers, and other resource users across the four steps of a research project that will inform a specific natural resource management decision. Those four steps are 1) scoping, 2) design, 3) research and development, and 4) transfer and application of findings and products.
Scroll down to find project examples and tools for each step of the co-production process. If you have a question or a resource to share, contact the Science Program at
noaarestorescience@noaa.gov
Please note that co-production is seldom a linear process. The project team is likely to revisit each of the steps outlined here throughout the course of the project.
Steps 1 & 2: Scoping and Design
Co-production of science projects revolves around a natural resource management decision. A well-developed understanding of a management need can motivate and focus a group’s efforts, guide the design of a project’s technical and collaborative approach, and demonstrate a project’s potential value — in a nutshell — to potential funders. A problem statement is a critical starting point for pursuing a co-production idea, and it is likely to undergo numerous adjustments as you learn more about the management needs, uncertainties around the decision, context, and key players.
Project Examples
In 2023, 10 projects were funded by the NOAA RESTORE Science Progam’s Actionable Science competition to conduct previously planned research in the Gulf. Though each project conducted a collaborative planning process prior to receiving this funding, that process varied greatly from team to team. Planning activities include holding workshops to convene interested parties, conducting preliminary research to identify research gaps, and building relationships among team members to support better communication throughout the project.
Watch the videos below to hear from each team on their scoping and design process.
Collaborating to Conserve Vulnerable Fish Habitat: A Co-Production Story from Southwest Florida
Courtney Saari, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute
Watch the video
Lessons Learned in the Co-Production of Improved Fisheries Management Advice for the Gulf of Mexico
Dr. Nathan Vaughan, Vaughan Analytics
Watch the video
Accounting for Red Tide Mortality in Fisheries Stock Assessments and Management Advice in the Gulf of Mexico
Dr. David Chagaris, Nature Coast Biological Station, University of Florida
Watch the video
A Scientific Basis for High-Stakes Decisions: Guiding and Improving Oyster Reef Management in Texas’ Estuaries
Dr. Simon J. Brandl, The University of Texas at Austin, Marine Science Institute
Watch the video
Co-Producing Science to Maximize Benefits of Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration of the Chandeleur Islands, LA through the Protection and Enhancement of Seagrass Habitat
Dr. Kelly Darnell, University of Southern Mississippi Gulf Coast Research Laboratory
Watch the video
Seagrass Conservation through Actionable Research: Management Areas for the Prevention of Scarring
Dr. Savanna Barry, Florida Sea Grant and University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Extension
Watch the video
Designing Effective Stewardship and Post-Restoration Management Plans Through Co-Production to Protect Vulnerable Gulf of Mexico Coastal Birds
Dr. Nicole Michel, National Audubon Society
Watch the video
Using Unmanned Aerial Systems to Improve Response to Coastal Oil Spills
Dr. Scott Socolofsky, Texas A&M University
Watch the video
Tools
Worksheets
Scoping & Design Worksheet
NOAA RESTORE Science Program
In this worksheet, you will be guided through major questions to help you develop the scope and design of a co-produced project.
Guides
Guide to Collaborative Science, NERRS Science Collaborative
This guide has relevance to collaborative research, science transfer, and catalyst projects supported through the NERRS Science Collaborative and similar funding programs, as well as other science-based research, monitoring, assessment, and policy analysis efforts that require collaboration and adaptation to meet the needs of intended users. This guide is applicable to projects that draw on both the natural and social sciences.
The Guide to Collaborative Science was designed by the NERRS Science Collaborative to:
Introduce users to the collaborative science approach
Provide guidance on envisioning and planning a project
Support the design and management of projects through practical tools and relevant project examples
Co-Production Articles
Bandola-Gill, J., Arthur, M., & Leng, R. I. 2023. What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives. Evidence & Policy. 19(2): 275-298.
Beier, P., L.J. Hansen, L. Helbrecht, and D. Behar. 2017. A how-to guide for coproduction of actionable science. Conservation Letters. 10:288-296.
Djenontin, I.N. and A.M. Meadow. 2018. The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: Lessons from international practice. Environmental Management. 61:885–903.
Laudien, R., E. Boon, H. Goosen, and K. van Nieuwaal. 2019. The Dutch adaptation web portal: seven lessons learnt from a co-production point of view. Climatic Change. 153:509–521.
Miller, B.W., A.J. Symstad, L. Frid, N.A. Fisichelli, and G.W. Schuurman. 2017. Co-producing simulation models to inform resource management: a case study from southwest South Dakota. Ecosphere 8(12):e02020.
Vincent, K., M. Daly, C. Scannell, and B. Leathes. 2018. What can climate services learn from theory and practice of co-production? Climate Services. 12:48-58.
Step 3: Research & Development
Once you have worked with your team to scope and design your project, the research process can begin. Though the scope, scale, and needs of each team varies, it can be helpful to learn more about how each team maintained their co-production process throughout.
Click on the stories below to learn more about the research and development phase of each project.
Project Examples
‘Information Rich’: Evolving Gulf-Wide Project Surveys Reef Fish and Their Habitats
The Gulf Fishery Independent Survey of Habitat and Ecosystem Resources (G-FISHER) project is collecting video surveys to create the Gulf’s most comprehensive database of reef fish and their habitats.
Watch video
Read More »
StoryMap: Marine Mammals in the Gulf of Mexico
Marine mammals are still being impacted by Deepwater Horizon as well as other threats. Scientists and managers are working to conserve them.
Watch video
Read More »
Microplastics in deep-sea stomachs: Study finds plastic eaten by fish and crustaceans increases with depth in the Gulf of Mexico
In the Gulf of Mexico, tiny particles of plastic fall from surface and settle in sediments on the ocean floor, up to 5,000 feet deep. Small fish and crustaceans dine on these microplastics, and in a surprising twist: the deeper they live, the more plastic these tiny animals eat.
Watch video
Read More »
Step 4: Transfer & Application
Sharing findings and products with end users and others interested in the research project is an essential part of the co-production process. Engaging end users in the early stages of scoping and design can help to form an effective plan to share project results later on.
Check out the stories and tools below to learn more about the transfer and application step of the co-production process.
Project Examples
Researchers and Resource Managers Confront Multiple Stressors in Mobile Bay
This project team has come together to understand how periods of low or high salinity, changes in the amount of oxygen in the water, acidic conditions, and extreme temperatures stress species living in Mobile Bay.
Watch video
Read More »
Red tide and gag grouper: Ecosystem modeling used to inform stock assessment and management
Gag grouper are an iconic species on Florida’s Gulf Coast. They are both predator and prey and, because of their unique life cycle, they are subject to shifting ocean currents and other ecosystem processes. This project focused on integrating information on ecosystem processes and predator-prey interactions into fisheries assessments and management in the Gulf of Mexico.
Read More »
Science-Stakeholder Partnership Leads to Broad Use of Decision-Support Tool in Southwest Florida
The project is working to build a decision-support tool designed to help resource managers in Collier County better engage in coastal planning around the effects of sea level rise. The tool has been used by managers from a range of sectors, including natural resources, urban infrastructure, and cultural and archeological resources.
Read More »
Tools
Worksheets
Transfer & application worksheet
NERRS Science Collaborative and NOAA RESTORE Science Program
In this worksheet, you will be guided through the process of developing products for end users of your research.
Guides
Monitoring the Co-Production Process
Throughout each step of the co-production process, it is important to remain attentive to the dynamics of the project team and be sure all players have an opportunity to communicate their needs and ideas. Monitoring the co-production process can be a time-consuming effort with many steps, and it can be helpful to dedicate one or more members of the team to lead and monitor the co-production process.
Click on the co-production monitoring toolkit below for resources, ideas, and tools to support your co-production effort.
Co-Production Monitoring Toolkit
This toolkit is intended to guide teams of researchers, resource managers, community members, and other regional experts who would like to evaluate their science co-production projects. What would a plan look like for assessing your collaborative efforts? What activities would need to be included in your proposal to demonstrate a commitment to monitoring and evaluation? Once funded and your project begins, this toolkit can help your team determine: How well are we doing? Where could we improve? What are we learning together? Beyond offering examples of specific instruments to gather information from participants, the toolkit presents a philosophy on why it matters to assess progress (together!). Furthermore, it points out challenges you may encounter upon the journey and potential strategies for navigation.
Tools
General Research Questions
Baseline Survey
Final Survey
Workshop Survey
In-Depth Interview Template
Participant Observation
Focus Groups
Related Organizations
USA.gov
Department of Commerce
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Ocean Service
Informational Links
Freedom of Information Act
Information Quality
Website Disclaimer
Survey
Recent Announcements
From Santa Barbara to the Gulf: Scientists synthesize decades of data to protect a changing Texas coast
January 12, 2026
Not on our Email List? Join Now!