Substantial harm to competition | Konkurences padome
Source: https://www.kp.gov.lv/en/substantial-harm-competition
Archived: 2026-04-23 17:32
Substantial harm to competition | Konkurences padome
Skip to page content
Substantial harm to competition
Published: 21.09.2020.
The notion of
“substantial harm to competition”
is an open-ended legal concept which, in order to be applied in a specific instance, is given certain content
in accordance with the meaning and objectives of the Competition Law
.
The
burden of proof
of a substantial harm to competition is
on the market participant
filing a submission regarding potential violations of the Advertising Law.
This means that the market participant whose rights or lawful interests have been harmed has the duty to submit to the Competition Council documented information demonstrating that the violation has caused or may cause substantial harm to competition.
If no such proof is filed, the Competition Council may choose not to initiate a case.
Identifying whether harm is substantial
In assessing whether a violation is causing, or may cause, substantial harm to competition, a consideration is made of the conditions adversely affecting (hindering, restricting or distorting) competition in that particular market, that are or may be caused by the violation in question, such as:
The number of market participants affected (harmed) as a result of the violation
The size of the market share of the violator and the harmed market participants in the particular market, including the size of the turnover of the goods directly affected by the advertising reduction in market shares
The purpose of consumption and properties and significance to consumers of the goods whose turnover is or may be reduced as a result of the violation
The manner and duration of distribution of the banned advertising
The amount of losses caused to the party harmed by the violation
In assessing the harm to competition, it is also possible to consider other specific circumstances of the particular case which have or may have an impact on competition in the relevant market.
The harm to competition is usually
insubstantial
if the private economic interests of one or no more than two market participants in the particular market have been harmed as a result of an unlawful offence.
Print page
Share
Share this page content!
Choose a social network where you want to share the content of this page.
Facebook
X / Twitter
Linkedin
Threads
Skip to page content
Substantial harm to competition
Published: 21.09.2020.
The notion of
“substantial harm to competition”
is an open-ended legal concept which, in order to be applied in a specific instance, is given certain content
in accordance with the meaning and objectives of the Competition Law
.
The
burden of proof
of a substantial harm to competition is
on the market participant
filing a submission regarding potential violations of the Advertising Law.
This means that the market participant whose rights or lawful interests have been harmed has the duty to submit to the Competition Council documented information demonstrating that the violation has caused or may cause substantial harm to competition.
If no such proof is filed, the Competition Council may choose not to initiate a case.
Identifying whether harm is substantial
In assessing whether a violation is causing, or may cause, substantial harm to competition, a consideration is made of the conditions adversely affecting (hindering, restricting or distorting) competition in that particular market, that are or may be caused by the violation in question, such as:
The number of market participants affected (harmed) as a result of the violation
The size of the market share of the violator and the harmed market participants in the particular market, including the size of the turnover of the goods directly affected by the advertising reduction in market shares
The purpose of consumption and properties and significance to consumers of the goods whose turnover is or may be reduced as a result of the violation
The manner and duration of distribution of the banned advertising
The amount of losses caused to the party harmed by the violation
In assessing the harm to competition, it is also possible to consider other specific circumstances of the particular case which have or may have an impact on competition in the relevant market.
The harm to competition is usually
insubstantial
if the private economic interests of one or no more than two market participants in the particular market have been harmed as a result of an unlawful offence.
Print page
Share
Share this page content!
Choose a social network where you want to share the content of this page.
X / Twitter
Threads