BOC Athletic Trainer State Regulations

BOC Athletic Trainer State Regulations
Our system is experiencing intermittent slowness. We apologize for any inconvenience and are working to resolve the issue. Thank you for your patience.
Main Menu
How can we help you?
Identify yourself to get started.
State Regulation
State Regulation
State Regulation
Currently, 49 states and the District of Columbia regulate the practice of athletic training. Individuals must be legally recognized by the appropriate state regulatory agency prior to practicing athletic training. The BOC exam is recognized by all Athletic Trainer state regulatory agencies to meet their exam requirement. Compliance with state regulatory requirements is mandatory and the only avenue to legal athletic training practice.
Go to Interactive State Regulation Map
AT Compact
Project Description
AT Compact FAQs
Compact Functionality
Compact Development
Compact Requirements
Supporter Engagement & Benefits
Athletic Trainer Compact
The Council of State Governments (CSG), through a cooperative agreement with the Department of Defense (DoD), is partnering with the BOC to support the need for mobility of licensed Athletic Trainers (ATs) through the development of a new interstate compact. An interstate compact will allow ATs to practice across state lines both physically and remotely (e.g. digital health) improving continuity of care.
Development of an AT Interstate Compact has been launched through the CSG’s National Center for Interstate Compacts.
Occupational licensure compacts represent the gold standard of policy options for states to improve licensure portability. This AT interstate compact will enhance reciprocity among compact member states to reduce the barriers to employment and delivery of care.
Visit the AT Compact Website
Current Status
The Athletic Trainer Compact model legislation is available to states for enactment. At least seven states must join the compact before it can go into effect.
Compact Model Legislation
Read the AT Compact Legislation
View Section-By-Section Summary
Educational Resources
The compact model language must be enacted into law by a state to officially join the Athletic Trainer Compact.
No substantive changes should be made to the model language. Any substantive changes may jeopardize the enacting state’s participation in the compact.
The Council of State Governments National Center for Interstate Compacts reviews state compact legislation to ensure consistency with the model language. Please direct inquiries to
atcompact@csg.org
Official AT Compact Website
Additional information regarding the AT interstate compact and Frequently Asked Questions can be found on the
BOC AT Compact website
or the
AT Compact website
Project Description
A kick-off meeting to announce the AT interstate compact project was held on June 5, 2024. Anne Minton, CEO represented the BOC, providing an overview of the positive impact the compact would have for ATs and the profession overall.
Hundreds of ATs and other stakeholders tuned in, hearing from DoD officials, CSG staff and BOC leadership. Speakers mapped out the function of an AT interstate compact, the background and aspirations for the project, as well as the compact development process and timeline.
“The BOC was interested in applying for technical assistance with the development of an interstate compact to advance the athletic training profession itself, as well as enhance opportunities for AT professionals, ultimately maximizing patient care and protection of the public,” said Minton. “Creating transportability of BOC certifications domestically and worldwide through this AT compact expands access.”
An open comment period was held from mid-March until April 25, 2025 to ensure the compact’s model legislation was reviewed by stakeholders in the athletic training profession prior to implementation. The initial draft of the legislation and a section-by-section summary were provided for review. ATs, regulators and other stakeholders had the opportunity to complete a survey to express their feedback.
Informational review sessions to go over the legislation and provide a forum for questions were held on April 3 and 10, 2025 for ATs and the public to attend, with representatives from CSG and the BOC participating. An informational review session was held on April 8, 2025, specifically for state regulators and board members to provide feedback.
Following the open comment period, the Technical Assistance Group, Document team, CSG and the BOC reviewed the feedback provided in the surveys and review sessions. The feedback was used to finalize the compact legislation in preparation for future legislative sessions. Once the final legislation was ready for implementation, CSG hosted a legislative summit on August 28, 2025 to introduce the model legislation to potential legislators, state regulatory agency leaders and state association leaders.
Context
ATs have the knowledge and skills to be effective in many health care settings, including remotely. Digital health opens doors for ATs and provides patients with increased access to qualified health care professionals. An interstate compact is the most efficient way for ATs to use digital health in multiple states.
An interstate compact is also a more efficient and effective way for AT regulators to exchange licensure and disciplinary data, which again would improve protection of the public.
Through licensure compacts, states establish uniform standards to lower barriers to multi-state practice while preserving a state’s practice act and initial licensure process. Licensure compacts enhance public protection through a data system that allows compact member states to efficiently communicate licensure data, including disciplinary actions against licensees.
Licensure compacts are developed through an extensive stakeholder informed and consensus-based process from the existing policies across states and respond to the unique characteristics and needs of a profession. States join interstate compacts by agreeing to uniform provisions through the legislative process.
CSG has been a part of helping to drive change in state occupational licensure policy in recent years. Based on this experience, CSG believes interstate compacts provide the most effective means for achieving borderless practice for licensed practitioners and military spouses relieving the burdens of maintaining multiple state licenses.
The following pages outline some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) related to the Athletic Trainer Interstate Compact. The questions have been grouped in the following common categories:
Compact Functionality
Compact Development
Compact Requirements
Stakeholder Engagement & Benefits
Use the menu on the left to navigate through each of the categories.
For the latest updates and more information regarding the Athletic Trainer Interstate Compact please visit the
Council for State Governments
website.
Download AT Compact FAQs
Q: While most states recognize the BOC exam for those licensure applicants that are BOC-certified, some states have their own state exam that is given to applicants as well.
How would this be handled in the compact?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Is it true that as long as ATs are working with their own team/athletes, they are only held to their own state practice act, regardless of which state they travel to practice?
A: Typically ATs don’t need a license if traveling with a team, but you would need to comply with the state’s law in which you are traveling. Each state defines its own licensure requirements and exemptions, which varies state-to-state, on the amount of time a person may practice in a state without seeking licensure.
Q: Will the compact license ATs or just provide them the privilege to practice, and who decides that?
A: It is important to remember that states issue licenses and compact authorizations to practice (i.e. privileges to practice). Compact authorizations to practice provide the same benefits as licensure. Compacts are simply agreements between states about how those licenses and privileges are issued and regulated. The compact is still being developed, but ultimately, the members of the development teams and stakeholders in the profession will decide these and other issues related to the compact.
Q: Each state varies with its scope of practice, so which state practice act is the AT required
to follow with the compact?
A: By practicing in a state using compact privileges, ATs will be required to follow the scope of practice, laws and rules/regulations of the state where you are practicing.
Q: Is the compact mandatory for ATs who do not travel or can they choose only to be licensed in a single state?
A: A regular state license is still required to practice in your home state. Obtaining compact privileges is optional, therefore is not required if an AT will not be practicing in other compact member states.
Q: What is the difference between a compact addressing ATs moving to a new state versus
ATs traveling with their team/athletes/jobs?
A: ATs traveling with a team may be exempt from obtaining a license in a state in which their team is playing, as long as they are caring for their team’s athlete’s. ATs who move to the state will need to obtain a permanent license either through a regular license and/or a compact license.
Q: Does the compact allow for different state licensing or registering different
endorsements, such as the Orthopedic Specialty mentioned on BOC’s website?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Does an AT’s physician supervision follow them across state lines or will they need to establish physician oversight within each state?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Can an AT work on a temporary license within the states if they change jobs within the compact states while waiting to get their license?
A: Compacts generally remove the need for temporary or provisional licensure because a compact authorization is legally equivalent to a license. Additionally, some compacts contain provisions allowing licensees to “transfer” their home state license if moving between member states.
Q: Where can draft legislation of the compact be found, along with a list of states that have passed, opposed or supported it?
A: Draft legislation and updates can be found on
the CSG website.
Q: How does the compact apply to states like California, which are licensed through the Department of Education?
A: California does not have licensure and would not qualify to be part of the compact until the state enacts a state licensure law for athletic trainers. To be a compact member state, each state must have an existing licensure law for athletic trainers.
Q: How long will it take for the compact to be adopted by more than 50% of states after the initial phases are completed?
A: Typically compacts in occupational licensure must have 7-10 states participate to become active, however this has yet to be determined.
Q: Are states obligated to pass compact legislation?
A: States are not obligated to join a compact. Compact member states must be willing to pass compact legislation and abide by the legislative requirements imposed by the compact.
Q: When is the legislation likely to become an option for ATs?
A: Model legislation is expected to be ready for introduction for the 2026 legislation session.
Q: How can ATs find out if the compact is recognized by their state?
A: Licensees would be notified of the compact option.
Q: Will each state need to maintain the compact on an ongoing basis, or is it a one-and-done effort?
A: It is typically one-and-done.
Q: Is there inter-professional opposition to many compacts, and how is resistance from other professions handled?
A: The compact development teams (comprised of AT state regulators, professionals, and other stakeholders) are responsible for creating the policies contained in the compact’s model legislation. In nearly every interstate licensure compact, each member state retains authority over scope of practice. Further, states can’t force other states to change their scope of practice through the compact and states alone determine their respective practice acts. It is not a federal issue.
Because the compact is a piece of legislation, it is subject to public input. CSG will release the initial draft of the model legislation to the public as part of the stakeholder review process. During this time ATs, and any member of the public, can review the model legislation and provide feedback (including any potential inter-professional opposition). The compact development teams will review and incorporate feedback as appropriate. Further, as the legislation will be introduced in state legislatures, members of the public can voice their opinions about each individual bill.
Q: How many ATs are expected to utilize the compact, and how long is the wait for each
state?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Will the compact help ATs that are working internationally in the DHA/DoD?
A: The AT Compact is domestic only.
Q:
Will ATs be required to pay licensure fees within each state or is there a single fee for the
compact?
A: All compacts authorize member states to charge initial licensure and license renewal fees. Details regarding compact fees (how much and how often) have not been determined as the compact is still in development.
Q: Are additional CEUs required for this compact?
A: Typically, you will still be required to comply with any continuing education requirements for the license of your home state.
Q: Who monitors if an AT is practicing within the scope of practice and who can report it?
A: ATs will be required to follow the scope of practice, laws and rules/regulations of the state where you are practicing. The same complaint and discipline process applies.
Q: Have you established a fee for the compact and will the state board need to create an application process?
A: No. This has yet to be determined.
Q: Does this compact project solely focus on military spouses?
A: No.
Q: Will the compact also assist the professional licensing boards of each state in expediting and approving licensure?
A: Compacts reduce the application processing burden on licensing boards because member states can instantly verify through the shared compact data system that licensees and applicants for a compact authorization to practice have met uniform requirements.
Q: What can or should ATs do to help support the passing of the compact legislature?
A: During the compact development process, there will be opportunities for all stakeholders to provide input and feedback.
Q: Will state organizations receive support from this group for how to get the compact enacted in individual states?
A: Yes.
Q: Some states, like Texas, have a clause that allows out-of-state ATs to practice for an approved period of time without additional licensing requirements. How does the compact improve on that?
A: This limits the AT to care for only their team. If they were to have a compact license and Texas was part of that, they would be able to provide care to anyone.
BOC’s Brad Sherman Regulatory Conference
Brad Sherman Regulatory Conference
Compliance and Regulatory Education: Best Practices for Athletic Training Regulation
August 20 & 21, 2026
BOC Headquarters – Omaha, NE
Join us as we explore regulatory best practices and trends. Program topics will empower regulators and state leaders in developing strategic initiatives and resolutions that protect the public.
Preliminary Conference Objectives:
Participants will be able to:
Describe current approaches and considerations in state regulation of athletic training.
Explain the role and growing influence of artificial intelligence in healthcare and regulation.
Discuss considerations related to scope of practice in an evolving athletic training profession.
Summarize updates related to the Athletic Training Compact and its potential impact on regulation.
Recognize the importance of wellness within the athletic training and regulatory communities.
Discuss the role of strategic planning in supporting effective board operations.
Examine updates and developments across states.
Summarize updates from the Board of Certification for the Athletic Trainer on key initiatives and activities.
Identify challenges related to board governance and conduct.
Explain the importance of maintaining appropriate professional boundaries.
Coming Soon: Preliminary Program
If you have any questions regarding the Brad Sherman Regulatory Conference, please contact us at
statereg@bocatc.org
Regulatory Conference Archives
2024
2022
2021
2019
Regulatory Conference Archives
In this tab you will find the Regulatory conference archives that date back to the 2019 conference. Click the links provided to view the PowerPoint presentation for that speaker.
2024
The following program and conference materials were included in the 2024 conference, which was held July 9-10 in Omaha, Nebraska.
CARE Conference 2024 Program
Is Regulation Innovative? Recent Relevant Activities in the Regulatory Community
Dale Atkinson
Developing an Interstate Compact for Athletic Trainers
Carl Sims, Keith Buckhout
Informed Workforce Policy and Planning: Calling data champions!
Hannah Maxey
Handling Social Media Attacks Regarding Misinformation on Social Media
Missy Anthony
Regulatory Implications from the Evolution of AT Education
Eric Lippincott
State Reports: Current Trends and Updates from your State
Missy Anthony, Tom Ryan, Jim Winkler, Kristen Streeter
BOC Update
René Revis Shingles
BOC Exam Report
Ian Hembry
BOC Disciplinary Action Exchange
Jason Graham
Investigating Reports of Sexual Misconduct
MarLa Duncan, Carly Rasiewicz
N/A
2022
The following program and PowerPoint presentations were included in the 2022 conference, which was July 15-16 in Omaha, Nebraska.
CARE Conference 2022 Program
Disciplinary Best Practice – Part I & II
Dale Atkinson, Mark Brengelman, Hollie Kozak, Bruce Bronoske
Regulators Role in Well-being: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution
Tim Kolb
Top Regulatory Cases
Dale Atkinson
BOC Update: BOC Orthopedic Specialty Certification Update
Michael Hudson
BOC Update: The International Arrangement for the Athletic Training and Therapy Profession
Rusty McKune
BOC Update
René Revis Shingles
BOC Update: Model Language
Jim Winkler
BOC Lightning Rounds: BOC Discipline Process
Stacy Arrington
BOC Lightning Rounds: BOC Certification Exam
Nathan Burns
Remaining Relevant: The Future Role of Licensure Boards
Veronica Meadows
Moving the Needle: Promoting Equity and Inclusion within Michigan’s Regulatory Community
Marion Brown
License Mobility: Ohio Experience
Missy Anthony
License Mobility: An Interstate Compact for Athletic Trainers
Dan Logsdon, Shaun Conway, Missy Anthony
Telehealth: State Telehealth Policy Landscape
Sydne Enlund
Telehealth: Athletic Training Opportunities in Connected Care and Telehealth
David Gallegos
The New Normal for Regulatory Operations
2021
The following are resources for the BOC CARE Conference Educational Series Webinars published in spring 2021.
Professional Certification Coalition Update Webinar:
BOC CARE Educational Series
Pivoting in an Emergency:
The Pandemic’s Impact on Regulation and the Athletic Trainer Role
Occupational Licensing Portability Webinar:
BOC CARE Educational Series
State Telehealth Policy Landscape Post-Pandemic Webinar:
BOC CARE Educational Series
2019
The following program and PowerPoint presentations were included in the 2019 conference, which was July 12-13 in Omaha, Nebraska.
CARE Conference 2019 Program
Insights – BOC:
Rusty McKune
Insights – CAATE:
Eric Sauers
Insights – NATAGAC:
Anna Sedorye
Insights – FARB:
Dale Atkinson
Promoting Competition in Regulated Occupations – FTC Perspectives:
Karen Goldman
Portability Implementation – NABP: Electronic License Portability – The NABP E-LTP Program Today and Tomorrow:
Bill Cover
Portability Implementation – BOC: Athletic Trainer Model Language: What You Need to Know:
Scott Lawrance
Lightning Talks: BOC Discipline:
Stacy Arrington
Lightning Talks: BOC Exam:
Kelli Wilkins
Lightning Talks: Sports Medicine Licensure Clarity Act:
Amy Callender
Lightning Talks: Telehealth:
Tim Sensor
Operational War Stories – Transition to Online Licensure:
Karen Whiteford
Operational War Stories – Board/Staff Conduct:
Robin Jenkins
Surviving a Regulatory Review – Arizona:
Karen Whiteford
Surviving a Regulatory Review – Indiana:
Scott Lawrence
Stakeholder Engagement – Colorado:
Nathan Batchelder
Stakeholder Engagement – Ohio:
Missy Anthony
Top Disciplinary Cases You Need to Know About:
Amigo Wade
Disciplinary Action Exchange
Disciplinary Action Exchange
The Disciplinary Action Exchange (DAE)
was developed to help the BOC, states and consumers locate disciplinary actions in an efficient manner. The BOC encourages all states to participate in the DAE. The DAE contains final BOC disciplinary actions that have been deemed public, as well as disciplinary actions taken by state regulatory agencies.
If you would like more information in regards to a disciplinary action taken by a state, please contact the State Regulatory Agency.
If you would like more information in regards to a disciplinary action taken by the BOC, please send an email to Professional Practice Manager.
Launch DAE
Log In to DAE
State Regulatory Network
State Regulatory Network
The purpose of the BOC State Regulatory Network is to:
Provide a platform for AT regulators to share best practices
Assist board staff and regulators develop working relationships
Obtain guidance and direction from AT regulators in the development of model language
Facilitate the sharing of disciplinary actions taken by state AT boards and the BOC
Log In to State Regulatory Network
Regulatory Affairs
Regulatory Support
Legislation
AT Advocacy Partners
Resources
Regulator Login
Governmental Affairs
Overview
Regulatory Affairs includes overseeing all regulatory and legislative activity within the state or federal government relating to athletic training – with the overall goal of protecting the public. This may incorporate:
Reviewing rules and regulations and providing feedback
Monitoring legislative bills
Providing support to state regulatory boards/agencies
Collaborating with state regulatory boards/agencies, state associations, and strategic partners
Regulatory Support
The BOC has the same mission as state regulatory boards/agencies, to protect the public.
We are here to support your efforts to regulate Athletic Trainers as effectively and efficiently as possible. BOC support includes, but is not limited to:
Review of proposed rules and regulations and provides feedback for states looking to update or revise regulations
Assistance with certification verifications
Advocacy efforts
Administrative
Platform to communicate with other regulators
Biannual newsletter to keep you current on BOC news
Contact
the BOC for more information
Log In to State Regulatory Network
Legislation
Click here to view all current legislation
AT Advocacy Partners
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine
The American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) is a multi-disciplinary organization of sports medicine physicians whose members are dedicated to education, research, advocacy and the care of athletes of all ages. Founded in 1991, the AMSSM is now comprised of more than 2,100 sports medicine physicians whose goal is to provide a link between the rapidly expanding core of knowledge related to sports medicine and its application to patients in a clinical setting.
Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation (CLEAR)
The American Medical Society for Council on Licensure, Enforcement Regulation (CLEAR) promotes regulatory excellence through conferences, educational programs, webinars, seminars and symposia. The organization provides networking opportunities, publications and research services for those involved with, or affected by, professional and occupational regulation. As a neutral forum to encourage and provide for the sharing of best practices, CLEAR serves and supports the international regulatory community and its vital contribution to public protection. CLEAR has defined its own educator role as proactively identifying critical issues; providing a dynamic, interactive forum for exploration of these issues and collecting and disseminating relevant information on them.
Federation of Associations of Regulatory Boards (FARB)
The American Medical Society for The Federation of Associations of Regulatory Boards (FARB) is a not-for-profit corporation formed in 1974 to promote public protection and provide a forum for information exchange for associations of regulatory boards and their affiliate stakeholders with interests in professional regulation. It is a membership association which, based upon its public protection mission, is recognized as exempt from federal taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. FARB’s mission is to advance excellence in regulation of the professions in the interest of public protection.
Healthforce Center at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
Healthforce Center at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), formerly Center for the Health Professions, was founded in 1992. For over 2 decades, their research and publications have helped healthcare leaders and policymakers better understand the health workforce and develop successful strategies and policies. Their leadership training programs have touched thousands of people across the entire healthcare ecosystem who continue to make significant and meaningful change in healthcare.
Korey Stringer Institute
The Korey Stringer Institute works to provide information, resources, assistance and advocacy for the prevention of sudden death in sport, especially as it relates to exertional heat stroke in the physically active community.
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) is committed to the success of all legislators and staff. Their mission is to improve the quality and effectiveness of state legislatures. NCSL is also committed to promoting policy innovation and communication among state legislatures. Their goal is to ensure state legislatures a strong, cohesive voice in the federal system.
STOP Sports Injuries
The development of the STOP (Sports Trauma and Overuse Prevention) Sports Injuries campaign was initiated by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) and now includes numerous partnering organizations. STOP’s public outreach program addresses overuse, trauma and professional expertise.
Youth Sports Safety Alliance
The BOC is a member of the Youth Sports Safety Alliance (YSSA), which aims to raise awareness, advance legislation and improve medical care for young athletes across the country. The YSSA was established by the National Athletic Trainers’ Association and includes more than 70 member organizations.
Resources
Download Athletic Training Essentials
Download Changes in Healthcare Professions’ Scope of Practice: Legislative Considerations
Download Crosswalk Comparing PA8 and CAATE 2020 Standards
Download Concussion Management Knowledge Skills
Regulator Login
Log in here
State Regulation
Currently, 49 states and the District of Columbia regulate the practice of athletic training. Individuals must be legally recognized by the appropriate state regulatory agency prior to practicing athletic training. The BOC exam is recognized by all Athletic Trainer state regulatory agencies to meet their exam requirement. Compliance with state regulatory requirements is mandatory and the only avenue to legal athletic training practice.
Go to Interactive State Regulation Map
Athletic Trainer Compact
The Council of State Governments (CSG), through a cooperative agreement with the Department of Defense (DoD), is partnering with the BOC to support the need for mobility of licensed Athletic Trainers (ATs) through the development of a new interstate compact. An interstate compact will allow ATs to practice across state lines both physically and remotely (e.g. digital health) improving continuity of care.
Development of an AT Interstate Compact has been launched through the CSG’s National Center for Interstate Compacts.
Occupational licensure compacts represent the gold standard of policy options for states to improve licensure portability. This AT interstate compact will enhance reciprocity among compact member states to reduce the barriers to employment and delivery of care.
Visit the AT Compact Website
Current Status
The Athletic Trainer Compact model legislation is available to states for enactment. At least seven states must join the compact before it can go into effect.
Compact Model Legislation
Read the AT Compact Legislation
View Section-By-Section Summary
Educational Resources
The compact model language must be enacted into law by a state to officially join the Athletic Trainer Compact.
No substantive changes should be made to the model language. Any substantive changes may jeopardize the enacting state’s participation in the compact.
The Council of State Governments National Center for Interstate Compacts reviews state compact legislation to ensure consistency with the model language. Please direct inquiries to
atcompact@csg.org
Official AT Compact Website
Additional information regarding the AT interstate compact and Frequently Asked Questions can be found on the
BOC AT Compact website
or the
AT Compact website
Brad Sherman Regulatory Conference
Compliance and Regulatory Education: Best Practices for Athletic Training Regulation
August 20 & 21, 2026
BOC Headquarters – Omaha, NE
Join us as we explore regulatory best practices and trends. Program topics will empower regulators and state leaders in developing strategic initiatives and resolutions that protect the public.
Preliminary Conference Objectives:
Participants will be able to:
Describe current approaches and considerations in state regulation of athletic training.
Explain the role and growing influence of artificial intelligence in healthcare and regulation.
Discuss considerations related to scope of practice in an evolving athletic training profession.
Summarize updates related to the Athletic Training Compact and its potential impact on regulation.
Recognize the importance of wellness within the athletic training and regulatory communities.
Discuss the role of strategic planning in supporting effective board operations.
Examine updates and developments across states.
Summarize updates from the Board of Certification for the Athletic Trainer on key initiatives and activities.
Identify challenges related to board governance and conduct.
Explain the importance of maintaining appropriate professional boundaries.
Coming Soon: Preliminary Program
If you have any questions regarding the Brad Sherman Regulatory Conference, please contact us at
statereg@bocatc.org
Regulatory Conference Archives
In this tab you will find the Regulatory conference archives that date back to the 2019 conference. Click the links provided to view the PowerPoint presentation for that speaker.
Disciplinary Action Exchange
The Disciplinary Action Exchange (DAE)
was developed to help the BOC, states and consumers locate disciplinary actions in an efficient manner. The BOC encourages all states to participate in the DAE. The DAE contains final BOC disciplinary actions that have been deemed public, as well as disciplinary actions taken by state regulatory agencies.
If you would like more information in regards to a disciplinary action taken by a state, please contact the State Regulatory Agency.
If you would like more information in regards to a disciplinary action taken by the BOC, please send an email to Professional Practice Manager.
Launch DAE
Log In to DAE
State Regulatory Network
The purpose of the BOC State Regulatory Network is to:
Provide a platform for AT regulators to share best practices
Assist board staff and regulators develop working relationships
Obtain guidance and direction from AT regulators in the development of model language
Facilitate the sharing of disciplinary actions taken by state AT boards and the BOC
Log In to State Regulatory Network
Governmental Affairs
Overview
Regulatory Affairs includes overseeing all regulatory and legislative activity within the state or federal government relating to athletic training – with the overall goal of protecting the public. This may incorporate:
Reviewing rules and regulations and providing feedback
Monitoring legislative bills
Providing support to state regulatory boards/agencies
Collaborating with state regulatory boards/agencies, state associations, and strategic partners
Project Description
A kick-off meeting to announce the AT interstate compact project was held on June 5, 2024. Anne Minton, CEO represented the BOC, providing an overview of the positive impact the compact would have for ATs and the profession overall.
Hundreds of ATs and other stakeholders tuned in, hearing from DoD officials, CSG staff and BOC leadership. Speakers mapped out the function of an AT interstate compact, the background and aspirations for the project, as well as the compact development process and timeline.
“The BOC was interested in applying for technical assistance with the development of an interstate compact to advance the athletic training profession itself, as well as enhance opportunities for AT professionals, ultimately maximizing patient care and protection of the public,” said Minton. “Creating transportability of BOC certifications domestically and worldwide through this AT compact expands access.”
An open comment period was held from mid-March until April 25, 2025 to ensure the compact’s model legislation was reviewed by stakeholders in the athletic training profession prior to implementation. The initial draft of the legislation and a section-by-section summary were provided for review. ATs, regulators and other stakeholders had the opportunity to complete a survey to express their feedback.
Informational review sessions to go over the legislation and provide a forum for questions were held on April 3 and 10, 2025 for ATs and the public to attend, with representatives from CSG and the BOC participating. An informational review session was held on April 8, 2025, specifically for state regulators and board members to provide feedback.
Following the open comment period, the Technical Assistance Group, Document team, CSG and the BOC reviewed the feedback provided in the surveys and review sessions. The feedback was used to finalize the compact legislation in preparation for future legislative sessions. Once the final legislation was ready for implementation, CSG hosted a legislative summit on August 28, 2025 to introduce the model legislation to potential legislators, state regulatory agency leaders and state association leaders.
Context
ATs have the knowledge and skills to be effective in many health care settings, including remotely. Digital health opens doors for ATs and provides patients with increased access to qualified health care professionals. An interstate compact is the most efficient way for ATs to use digital health in multiple states.
An interstate compact is also a more efficient and effective way for AT regulators to exchange licensure and disciplinary data, which again would improve protection of the public.
Through licensure compacts, states establish uniform standards to lower barriers to multi-state practice while preserving a state’s practice act and initial licensure process. Licensure compacts enhance public protection through a data system that allows compact member states to efficiently communicate licensure data, including disciplinary actions against licensees.
Licensure compacts are developed through an extensive stakeholder informed and consensus-based process from the existing policies across states and respond to the unique characteristics and needs of a profession. States join interstate compacts by agreeing to uniform provisions through the legislative process.
CSG has been a part of helping to drive change in state occupational licensure policy in recent years. Based on this experience, CSG believes interstate compacts provide the most effective means for achieving borderless practice for licensed practitioners and military spouses relieving the burdens of maintaining multiple state licenses.
The following pages outline some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) related to the Athletic Trainer Interstate Compact. The questions have been grouped in the following common categories:
Compact Functionality
Compact Development
Compact Requirements
Stakeholder Engagement & Benefits
Use the menu on the left to navigate through each of the categories.
For the latest updates and more information regarding the Athletic Trainer Interstate Compact please visit the
Council for State Governments
website.
Download AT Compact FAQs
Q: While most states recognize the BOC exam for those licensure applicants that are BOC-certified, some states have their own state exam that is given to applicants as well.
How would this be handled in the compact?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Is it true that as long as ATs are working with their own team/athletes, they are only held to their own state practice act, regardless of which state they travel to practice?
A: Typically ATs don’t need a license if traveling with a team, but you would need to comply with the state’s law in which you are traveling. Each state defines its own licensure requirements and exemptions, which varies state-to-state, on the amount of time a person may practice in a state without seeking licensure.
Q: Will the compact license ATs or just provide them the privilege to practice, and who decides that?
A: It is important to remember that states issue licenses and compact authorizations to practice (i.e. privileges to practice). Compact authorizations to practice provide the same benefits as licensure. Compacts are simply agreements between states about how those licenses and privileges are issued and regulated. The compact is still being developed, but ultimately, the members of the development teams and stakeholders in the profession will decide these and other issues related to the compact.
Q: Each state varies with its scope of practice, so which state practice act is the AT required
to follow with the compact?
A: By practicing in a state using compact privileges, ATs will be required to follow the scope of practice, laws and rules/regulations of the state where you are practicing.
Q: Is the compact mandatory for ATs who do not travel or can they choose only to be licensed in a single state?
A: A regular state license is still required to practice in your home state. Obtaining compact privileges is optional, therefore is not required if an AT will not be practicing in other compact member states.
Q: What is the difference between a compact addressing ATs moving to a new state versus
ATs traveling with their team/athletes/jobs?
A: ATs traveling with a team may be exempt from obtaining a license in a state in which their team is playing, as long as they are caring for their team’s athlete’s. ATs who move to the state will need to obtain a permanent license either through a regular license and/or a compact license.
Q: Does the compact allow for different state licensing or registering different
endorsements, such as the Orthopedic Specialty mentioned on BOC’s website?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Does an AT’s physician supervision follow them across state lines or will they need to establish physician oversight within each state?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Can an AT work on a temporary license within the states if they change jobs within the compact states while waiting to get their license?
A: Compacts generally remove the need for temporary or provisional licensure because a compact authorization is legally equivalent to a license. Additionally, some compacts contain provisions allowing licensees to “transfer” their home state license if moving between member states.
Q: Where can draft legislation of the compact be found, along with a list of states that have passed, opposed or supported it?
A: Draft legislation and updates can be found on
the CSG website.
Q: How does the compact apply to states like California, which are licensed through the Department of Education?
A: California does not have licensure and would not qualify to be part of the compact until the state enacts a state licensure law for athletic trainers. To be a compact member state, each state must have an existing licensure law for athletic trainers.
Q: How long will it take for the compact to be adopted by more than 50% of states after the initial phases are completed?
A: Typically compacts in occupational licensure must have 7-10 states participate to become active, however this has yet to be determined.
Q: Are states obligated to pass compact legislation?
A: States are not obligated to join a compact. Compact member states must be willing to pass compact legislation and abide by the legislative requirements imposed by the compact.
Q: When is the legislation likely to become an option for ATs?
A: Model legislation is expected to be ready for introduction for the 2026 legislation session.
Q: How can ATs find out if the compact is recognized by their state?
A: Licensees would be notified of the compact option.
Q: Will each state need to maintain the compact on an ongoing basis, or is it a one-and-done effort?
A: It is typically one-and-done.
Q: Is there inter-professional opposition to many compacts, and how is resistance from other professions handled?
A: The compact development teams (comprised of AT state regulators, professionals, and other stakeholders) are responsible for creating the policies contained in the compact’s model legislation. In nearly every interstate licensure compact, each member state retains authority over scope of practice. Further, states can’t force other states to change their scope of practice through the compact and states alone determine their respective practice acts. It is not a federal issue.
Because the compact is a piece of legislation, it is subject to public input. CSG will release the initial draft of the model legislation to the public as part of the stakeholder review process. During this time ATs, and any member of the public, can review the model legislation and provide feedback (including any potential inter-professional opposition). The compact development teams will review and incorporate feedback as appropriate. Further, as the legislation will be introduced in state legislatures, members of the public can voice their opinions about each individual bill.
Q: How many ATs are expected to utilize the compact, and how long is the wait for each
state?
A: This is yet to be determined.
Q: Will the compact help ATs that are working internationally in the DHA/DoD?
A: The AT Compact is domestic only.
Q:
Will ATs be required to pay licensure fees within each state or is there a single fee for the
compact?
A: All compacts authorize member states to charge initial licensure and license renewal fees. Details regarding compact fees (how much and how often) have not been determined as the compact is still in development.
Q: Are additional CEUs required for this compact?
A: Typically, you will still be required to comply with any continuing education requirements for the license of your home state.
Q: Who monitors if an AT is practicing within the scope of practice and who can report it?
A: ATs will be required to follow the scope of practice, laws and rules/regulations of the state where you are practicing. The same complaint and discipline process applies.
Q: Have you established a fee for the compact and will the state board need to create an application process?
A: No. This has yet to be determined.
Q: Does this compact project solely focus on military spouses?
A: No.
Q: Will the compact also assist the professional licensing boards of each state in expediting and approving licensure?
A: Compacts reduce the application processing burden on licensing boards because member states can instantly verify through the shared compact data system that licensees and applicants for a compact authorization to practice have met uniform requirements.
Q: What can or should ATs do to help support the passing of the compact legislature?
A: During the compact development process, there will be opportunities for all stakeholders to provide input and feedback.
Q: Will state organizations receive support from this group for how to get the compact enacted in individual states?
A: Yes.
Q: Some states, like Texas, have a clause that allows out-of-state ATs to practice for an approved period of time without additional licensing requirements. How does the compact improve on that?
A: This limits the AT to care for only their team. If they were to have a compact license and Texas was part of that, they would be able to provide care to anyone.
2024
The following program and conference materials were included in the 2024 conference, which was held July 9-10 in Omaha, Nebraska.
CARE Conference 2024 Program
Is Regulation Innovative? Recent Relevant Activities in the Regulatory Community
Dale Atkinson
Developing an Interstate Compact for Athletic Trainers
Carl Sims, Keith Buckhout
Informed Workforce Policy and Planning: Calling data champions!
Hannah Maxey
Handling Social Media Attacks Regarding Misinformation on Social Media
Missy Anthony
Regulatory Implications from the Evolution of AT Education
Eric Lippincott
State Reports: Current Trends and Updates from your State
Missy Anthony, Tom Ryan, Jim Winkler, Kristen Streeter
BOC Update
René Revis Shingles
BOC Exam Report
Ian Hembry
BOC Disciplinary Action Exchange
Jason Graham
Investigating Reports of Sexual Misconduct
MarLa Duncan, Carly Rasiewicz
N/A
2022
The following program and PowerPoint presentations were included in the 2022 conference, which was July 15-16 in Omaha, Nebraska.
CARE Conference 2022 Program
Disciplinary Best Practice – Part I & II
Dale Atkinson, Mark Brengelman, Hollie Kozak, Bruce Bronoske
Regulators Role in Well-being: Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution
Tim Kolb
Top Regulatory Cases
Dale Atkinson
BOC Update: BOC Orthopedic Specialty Certification Update
Michael Hudson
BOC Update: The International Arrangement for the Athletic Training and Therapy Profession
Rusty McKune
BOC Update
René Revis Shingles
BOC Update: Model Language
Jim Winkler
BOC Lightning Rounds: BOC Discipline Process
Stacy Arrington
BOC Lightning Rounds: BOC Certification Exam
Nathan Burns
Remaining Relevant: The Future Role of Licensure Boards
Veronica Meadows
Moving the Needle: Promoting Equity and Inclusion within Michigan’s Regulatory Community
Marion Brown
License Mobility: Ohio Experience
Missy Anthony
License Mobility: An Interstate Compact for Athletic Trainers
Dan Logsdon, Shaun Conway, Missy Anthony
Telehealth: State Telehealth Policy Landscape
Sydne Enlund
Telehealth: Athletic Training Opportunities in Connected Care and Telehealth
David Gallegos
The New Normal for Regulatory Operations
2021
The following are resources for the BOC CARE Conference Educational Series Webinars published in spring 2021.
Professional Certification Coalition Update Webinar:
BOC CARE Educational Series
Pivoting in an Emergency:
The Pandemic’s Impact on Regulation and the Athletic Trainer Role
Occupational Licensing Portability Webinar:
BOC CARE Educational Series
State Telehealth Policy Landscape Post-Pandemic Webinar:
BOC CARE Educational Series
2019
The following program and PowerPoint presentations were included in the 2019 conference, which was July 12-13 in Omaha, Nebraska.
CARE Conference 2019 Program
Insights – BOC:
Rusty McKune
Insights – CAATE:
Eric Sauers
Insights – NATAGAC:
Anna Sedorye
Insights – FARB:
Dale Atkinson
Promoting Competition in Regulated Occupations – FTC Perspectives:
Karen Goldman
Portability Implementation – NABP: Electronic License Portability – The NABP E-LTP Program Today and Tomorrow:
Bill Cover
Portability Implementation – BOC: Athletic Trainer Model Language: What You Need to Know:
Scott Lawrance
Lightning Talks: BOC Discipline:
Stacy Arrington
Lightning Talks: BOC Exam:
Kelli Wilkins
Lightning Talks: Sports Medicine Licensure Clarity Act:
Amy Callender
Lightning Talks: Telehealth:
Tim Sensor
Operational War Stories – Transition to Online Licensure:
Karen Whiteford
Operational War Stories – Board/Staff Conduct:
Robin Jenkins
Surviving a Regulatory Review – Arizona:
Karen Whiteford
Surviving a Regulatory Review – Indiana:
Scott Lawrence
Stakeholder Engagement – Colorado:
Nathan Batchelder
Stakeholder Engagement – Ohio:
Missy Anthony
Top Disciplinary Cases You Need to Know About:
Amigo Wade
Regulatory Support
The BOC has the same mission as state regulatory boards/agencies, to protect the public.
We are here to support your efforts to regulate Athletic Trainers as effectively and efficiently as possible. BOC support includes, but is not limited to:
Review of proposed rules and regulations and provides feedback for states looking to update or revise regulations
Assistance with certification verifications
Advocacy efforts
Administrative
Platform to communicate with other regulators
Biannual newsletter to keep you current on BOC news
Contact
the BOC for more information
Log In to State Regulatory Network
Legislation
Click here to view all current legislation
AT Advocacy Partners
American Medical Society for Sports Medicine
The American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) is a multi-disciplinary organization of sports medicine physicians whose members are dedicated to education, research, advocacy and the care of athletes of all ages. Founded in 1991, the AMSSM is now comprised of more than 2,100 sports medicine physicians whose goal is to provide a link between the rapidly expanding core of knowledge related to sports medicine and its application to patients in a clinical setting.
Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation (CLEAR)
The American Medical Society for Council on Licensure, Enforcement Regulation (CLEAR) promotes regulatory excellence through conferences, educational programs, webinars, seminars and symposia. The organization provides networking opportunities, publications and research services for those involved with, or affected by, professional and occupational regulation. As a neutral forum to encourage and provide for the sharing of best practices, CLEAR serves and supports the international regulatory community and its vital contribution to public protection. CLEAR has defined its own educator role as proactively identifying critical issues; providing a dynamic, interactive forum for exploration of these issues and collecting and disseminating relevant information on them.
Federation of Associations of Regulatory Boards (FARB)
The American Medical Society for The Federation of Associations of Regulatory Boards (FARB) is a not-for-profit corporation formed in 1974 to promote public protection and provide a forum for information exchange for associations of regulatory boards and their affiliate stakeholders with interests in professional regulation. It is a membership association which, based upon its public protection mission, is recognized as exempt from federal taxation under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. FARB’s mission is to advance excellence in regulation of the professions in the interest of public protection.
Healthforce Center at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
Healthforce Center at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), formerly Center for the Health Professions, was founded in 1992. For over 2 decades, their research and publications have helped healthcare leaders and policymakers better understand the health workforce and develop successful strategies and policies. Their leadership training programs have touched thousands of people across the entire healthcare ecosystem who continue to make significant and meaningful change in healthcare.
Korey Stringer Institute
The Korey Stringer Institute works to provide information, resources, assistance and advocacy for the prevention of sudden death in sport, especially as it relates to exertional heat stroke in the physically active community.
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) is committed to the success of all legislators and staff. Their mission is to improve the quality and effectiveness of state legislatures. NCSL is also committed to promoting policy innovation and communication among state legislatures. Their goal is to ensure state legislatures a strong, cohesive voice in the federal system.
STOP Sports Injuries
The development of the STOP (Sports Trauma and Overuse Prevention) Sports Injuries campaign was initiated by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) and now includes numerous partnering organizations. STOP’s public outreach program addresses overuse, trauma and professional expertise.
Youth Sports Safety Alliance
The BOC is a member of the Youth Sports Safety Alliance (YSSA), which aims to raise awareness, advance legislation and improve medical care for young athletes across the country. The YSSA was established by the National Athletic Trainers’ Association and includes more than 70 member organizations.
Resources
Download Athletic Training Essentials
Download Changes in Healthcare Professions’ Scope of Practice: Legislative Considerations
Download Crosswalk Comparing PA8 and CAATE 2020 Standards
Download Concussion Management Knowledge Skills
Regulator Login
Log in here
Contact Us Today!
Skip to content