CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: St. Anselm
Encyclopedia
Summa
Fathers
Bible
Library
Catholic Encyclopedia
> St. Anselm
St. Anselm
Please help support the mission of New Advent
and get the full contents of this website as an instant download. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99...
Archbishop
of
Canterbury
Doctor of the Church
; born at
Aosta
Burgundian
town on the confines of
Lombardy
, died 21 April, 1109.
His father, Gundulf, was a Lombard who had become a citizen of
Aosta
, and his mother, Ermenberga, came of an old
Burgundian
family
. Like many other
saints
, Anselm learnt the first lessons of
piety
from his mother, and at a very early age he was fired with the
love
of learning. In after life he still cherished the memories of childhood, and his biographer, Eadmer, has preserved some incidents which he had learnt from the
saint's
own lips. The child had heard his mother speak of
God
, Who dwelt on high ruling all things. Living in the mountains, he thought that
Heaven
must be on their lofty summits. "And while he often revolved these matters in his mind, it chanced that one night he saw in a vision that he must go up to the summit of the mountain and hasten to the court of
God
, the great King. But before he began to ascend the mountain, he saw in the plain through which he had passed to its foot,
women
, who were the King's handmaidens, reaping the corn; but they were doing this very negligently and
slothfully
. Then, grieving for their
sloth
, and rebuking them, he bethought him that he would accuse them before their Lord and King. Thereafter, having climbed the mountain he entered the royal court. There he found the King with only his cupbearer. For it seemed that, as it was now Autumn, the King had sent his household to gather the harvest. As the boy entered he was called by the Master, and drawing nigh he sat at his feet. Then with cheery kindliness he was asked who and whence he was and what he was seeking. To these questions he made answer as well as he
knew
. Then at the Master's command some moist white bread was brought him by the cupbearer and he feasted thereon in his presence, wherefore when morning came and he brought to mind the things he had seen, as a simpler and innocent child he believed that he had truly been fed in
heaven
with the bread of the Lord, and this he publicly affirmed in the presence of others". (Eadmer, Life of St. Anselm, I, i.) Eadmer adds that the boy was beloved by all and made rapid progress in learning. Before he was fifteen he sought admission to a
monastery
. But the
abbot
, fearing the father's displeasure, refused him. The boy then made a strange
prayer
. He asked for an illness, thinking this would move the
monks
to yield to his wishes. The illness came but his admission to the
monastery
was still denied him. None the less he determined to gain his end at some future date. But ere long he was drawn away by the pleasures of youth and lost his first ardour and his
love
of learning. His
love
for his mother in some measure restrained him. But on her death it seemed that his anchor was lost, and he was at the mercy of the waves.
At this time his
father
treated him with great harshness; so much so that he resolved to leave his home. Taking a single companion, he set out on foot to cross Mont Cenis. At one time he was fainting with hunger and was fain to refresh his strength with snow, when the servant found that some bread was still left in the baggage, and Anselm regained strength and continued the journey. After passing nearly three years in
Burgundy
and
France
, he came into
Normandy
and tarried for a while at Avranches before finding his home at the Abbey of Bec, then made illustrious by
Lanfranc's
learning. Anselm profited so well by the lessons of this master that he became his most familiar disciple and shared in the work of teaching. After spending some time in this labour, he began to think that his toil would have more merit if he took the monastic habit. But at first he felt some reluctance to enter the Abbey of Bec, where he would be overshadowed by
Lanfranc
. After a time, however, he saw that it would profit him to remain where he would be surpassed by others. His father was now dead, having ended his days in the monastic habit, and Anselm had some thought of living on his patrimony and relieving the needy. The life of a
hermit
also presented itself to him as a third alternative. Anxious to act with
prudence
he first asked the advice of
Lanfranc
, who referred the matter to the
Archbishop
of
Rouen
. This
prelate
decided in favour of the monastic life, and Anselm became a
monk
in the Abbey of Bec. This was in 1060. His life as a simple
monk
lasted for three years, for in 1063
Lanfranc
was appointed
Abbot
of Caen, and Anselm was elected to succeed him as Prior. There is some
doubt
as to the
date
of this appointment. But Canon Poree points out that Anselm, writing at the time of his election as
Archbishop
(1093), says that he had then lived thirty three years in the monastic habit, three years as a
monk
without preferment, fifteen as prior, and fifteen as
abbot
(Letters of Anselm, III, vii). This is confirmed by an entry in the chronicle of the Abbey of Bec, which was compiled not later than 1136. Here it is recorded that Anselm died in 1109, in the forty-ninth year of his monastic life and the seventy-sixth of his age, having been three years a simple
monk
; fifteen, prior; fifteen,
abbot
; and sixteen
archbishop
(Poree, Histoire de l'abbaye de Bec, III, 173). At first his promotion to the office vacated by
Lanfranc
gave offence to some of the other
monks
who considered they had a better claim than the young stranger. But Anselm overcame their opposition by gentleness, and ere long had won their affection and obedience. To the
duties
of prior he added those of teacher. It was likewise during this period that he composed some of his
philosophical
and
theological
works, notably, the "Monologium" and the "Proslogium". Besides giving good counsel to the
monks
under his care, he found time to comfort others by his letters. Remembering his attraction for the solitude of a hermitage we can hardly wonder that he felt oppressed by this busy life and longed to lay aside his office and give himself up to the delights of contemplation. But the
Archbishop
of
Rouen
bade him retain his office and prepare for yet greater burdens.
This advice was prophetic, for in 1078, on the death of Herluin, founder and first
Abbot
of Bec Anselm was elected to succeed him. It was with difficulty that the
monks
overcame his reluctance to accept the office. His biographer, Eadmer, gives us a picture of a strange scene. The Abbot-elect fell prostrate before the brethren and with tears besought them not to lay this burden on him, while they prostrated themselves and earnestly begged him to accept the office. His election at once brought Anselm into relations with
England
, where the Norman
abbey
had several possessions. In the first year of his office, he visited Canterbury where he was welcomed by
Lanfranc
. "The converse of Lanfranc and Anselm", says Professor Freeman, "sets before us a remarkable and memorable pair. The lawyer, the secular scholar, met the divine and the
philosopher
; the
ecclesiastical
statesman stood face to face with the
saint
. The wisdom, conscientious no
doubt
but still hard and worldly, which could guide churches and kingdoms in troublous times was met by the boundless
love
which took in all
God's
creatures of whatever race or species" (History of the Norman Conquest, IV, 442). It is interesting to note that one of the matters discussed on this occasion related to a Saxon
archbishop
Elphage
(Ælfheah), who had been
put to death
by the Danes for refusing to pay a ransom which would impoverish his people.
Lanfranc
doubted
his claim to the honours of a
martyr
since he did not die for the Faith. But Anselm solved the difficulty by saying that he who died for this lesser reason would much more be ready to die for the Faith. Moreover, Christ is
truth
and
justice
and he who dies for
truth
and
justice
dies for Christ. It was on this occasion that Anselm first met Eadmer, then a young
monk
of
Canterbury
. At the same time the
saint
, who in his childhood was
loved
by all who
knew
him, and who, as Prior of Bec, had won the affection of those who resisted his authority, was already gaining the hearts of
Englishmen
. His fame had spread far and wide, and many of the great men of the age prized his friendship and sought his counsel. Among these was William the Conqueror, who desired that Anselm might come to give him consolation on his death-bed.
When
Lanfranc
died, William Rufus kept the
See of Canterbury
vacant for four years, seized its revenues, and kept the
Church
in
England
in a state of
anarchy
. To many the
Abbot
of Bec seemed to be the man best fitted for the
archbishopric
. The general desire was so evident that Anselm felt a reluctance to visit
England
lest it should appear that he was seeking the office. At length, however, he yielded to the entreaty of Hugh, Earl of
Chester
and came to
England
in 1092. Arriving in Canterbury on the eve of the
Nativity of the Blessed Virgin
, he was hailed by the people as their future
archbishop
; but he hastened away and would in no wise consent to remain for the festival. At a private interview with the King, who received him kindly, he spoke freely on the evils by which the land was made desolate. Anselm's own affairs kept him in
England
for some months, but when he wished to return to Bec the King objected. Meanwhile the people made no secret of their desires. With the King's permission
prayers
were offered in all the churches that
God
would move the King to deliver the
Church
of
Canterbury
by the appointment of a
pastor
, and at the request of the
bishops
Anselm drew up the form of
prayer
. The King fell ill early in the new year (1093), and on his sick-bed he was moved to repentance. The
prelates
and barons urged on him the necessity of electing an
archbishop
. Yielding to the manifest desire of all he named Anselm, and all joyfully concurred in the election. Anselm, however, firmly refused the
honour
, whereupon another scene took place still more strange than that which occurred when he was elected
abbot
. He was dragged by force to the King's bedside, and a
pastoral staff
was thrust into his closed hand; he was borne thence to the altar where the "Te Deum" was sung. There is no reason to suspect the sincerity of this resistance. Naturally drawn to contemplation, Anselm could have little liking for such an office even in a period of peace; still less could he desire it in those stormy days. He
knew
full well what awaited him. The King's repentance passed away with his sickness and Anselm soon saw signs of trouble. His first offence was his refusal to consent to the alienation of Church lands which the King had granted to his followers. Another difficulty arose from the King's need of money. Although his
see
was impoverished by the royal rapacity, the
Archbishop
was expected to make his majesty a free gift; and when he offered five hundred marks they were scornfully refused as insufficient. As if these trials were not enough Anselm had to bear the reproaches of some of the
monks
of Bec who were loath to lose him; in his letters he is at pains to show that he did not desire the office. He finally was
consecrated
Archbishop
of
Canterbury
4 December, 1093. It now remained for him to go to
Rome
to obtain the
pallium
. But here was a fresh occasion of trouble. The
Antipope Clement
was disputing the authority of
Urban II
, who had been recognized by
France
and Normandy. It does not appear that the English King was a partisan of the
Antipope
, but he wished to strengthen his own position by asserting his right to decide between the rival claimants. Hence, when Anselm asked leave to go to the
Pope
, the King said that no one in
England
should acknowledge either Pope till he, the King, had decided the matter. The
Archbishop
insisted on going to
Pope Urban
, whose authority he had already acknowledged, and, as he had told the King, this was one of the conditions on which alone he would accept the
archbishopric
. This grave question was referred to a council of the realm held at Rockingham in March, 1095. Here Anselm boldly asserted the authority of
Urban
. His speech is a memorable testimony to the
doctrine
of
papal
supremacy. It is significant that not one of the
bishops
could call it in question (Eadmer, Historia Novorum, lib. I). Regarding Anselm's
belief
on this point we may cite the frank words of Dean Hook: "Anselm was simply a papist — He believed that St. Peter was the Prince of the Apostles — that as such he was the source of all
ecclesiastical
authority and power; that the
pope
was his successor; and that consequently, to the
pope
was due, from the
bishops
and
metropolitans
as well as from the rest of
mankind
, the obedience which a spiritual suzerain has the
right
to expect from his vassals" [Lives of the Archbishops of
Canterbury
(London, 18(i0-75), II, 183].
William now sent envoys to
Rome
to get the
pallium
. They found
Urban
in possession and recognized him. Walter,
Bishop
of
Albano
, came back with them as
legate
bearing the
pallium
. The King publicly acknowledged the authority of
Urban
, and at first endeavoured to get Anselm deposed by the
legate
. Eventually a reconciliation was occasioned by the royal difficulties in
Wales
and in the north. The King and the
Archbishop
met in peace. Anselm would not take the
pallium
from the King's hand; but in a solemn service at
Canterbury
on 10 June, 1095 it was laid on the altar by the
legate
, whence Anselm took it. Fresh trouble arose in 1097. On returning from his ineffectual
Welsh
campaign William brought a charge against the
Archbishop
in regard to the contingent he had furnished and required him to meet this charge in the King's court. Anselm declined and asked leave to go to
Rome
. This was refused, but after a meeting at
Winchester
Anselm was told to be ready to sail in ten days. On parting with the King, the
Archbishop
gave him his blessing, which William received with bowed head. At
St. Omer's
Anselm confirmed a multitude of
persons
Christmas
was spent at Cluny, and the rest of the winter at
Lyons
. In the spring he resumed his journey and crossed Mont Cenis with two companions all travelling as simple
monks
. At the
monasteries
on their way they were frequently asked for news of Anselm. On his arrival in
Rome
he was treated with great
honour
by the
Pope
. His case was considered and laid before the council, but nothing could be done beyond sending a letter of remonstrance to William. During his stay in
Italy
Anselm enjoyed the hospitality of the
Abbot
of
Telese
, and passed the summer in a mountain village belonging to this
monastery
. Here he finished his work, "Cur Deus Homo", which he had begun in
England
. In October, 1098,
Urban
held a council at
Bari
to deal with the difficulties raised by the Greeks in regard to the procession of the Holy Ghost. Here Anselm was called by the Pope to a place of
honour
and bidden to take the chief part in the discussion. His arguments were afterwards committed to writing in his treatise on this subject. His own case was also brought before this council, which would have
excommunicated
William but for Anselm's intercession. Both he and his companions now desired to return to
Lyons
, but were bidden to await the action of another council to be held in the Lateran at
Easter
. Here Anselm heard the canons passed against Investitures, and the
decree
of
excommunication
against the offenders. This incident had a deep influence on his career in
England
While still staying in the neighbourhood of
Lyons
, Anselm heard of the tragic death of William. Soon messages from the new king and chief men of the land summoned him to
England
. Landing at Dover, he hastened to King Henry at
Salisbury
. He was kindly received, but the question of Investitures was at once raised in an acute form. Henry required the
Archbishop
himself to receive a fresh investiture. Anselm alleged the decrees of the recent Roman council and declared that he had no choice in the matter. The difficulty was postponed, as the King decided to send to
Rome
to ask for a special exemption. Meanwhile, Anselm was able to render the King two signal services. He helped to remove the obstacle in the way of his marriage with Edith, the heiress of the Saxon kings. The daughter of
St. Margaret
had sought shelter in a
convent
, where she had worn the veil, but had taken no
vows
. It was thought by some that this was a bar to marriage, but Anselm had the case considered in a council at Lambeth where the royal maiden's liberty was fully established, and the
Archbishop
himself gave his blessing to the marriage. Moreover, when Robert landed at
Portsmouth
and many of the Norman nobles were wavering in their allegiance, it was Anselm who turned the tide in favour of Henry. In the meantime
Pope Paschal
had refused the King's request for an exemption from the Lateran decrees, yet Henry persisted in his resolution to compel Anselm to accept investiture at his hands. The revolt of Robert de Bellesme put off the threatened rupture. To gain time the King sent another embassy to
Rome
. On its return, Anselm was once more required to receive investiture. The Pope's letter was not made public, but it was reported to be of the same tenor as his previous reply. The envoys now gave out that the Pope had orally consented to the King's request, but could not say so in writing for fear of offending other sovereigns. Friends of Anselm who had been at
Rome
, disputed this assertion. In this crisis it was agreed to send to
Rome
again; meanwhile the King would continue to invest
bishops
and
abbots
, but Anselm should not be required to
consecrate
them.
During this interval Anselm held a council at
Westminster
. Here stringent canons were passed against the evils of the age. In spite of the compromise about investiture, Anselm was required to
consecrate
bishops
invested by the King, but he firmly refused, and it soon became evident that his firmness was taking effect. Bishops gave back the staff they had received at the royal hands, or refused to be
consecrated
by another in defiance of Anselm. When the Pope's answer arrived, repudiating the story of the envoys, the King asked Anselm to go to
Rome
himself. Though he could not support the royal request he was willing to lay the facts before the
Pope
. With this understanding he once more betook himself to
Rome
. The request was again refused, but Henry was not
excommunicated
. Understanding that Henry did not wish to receive him in
England
, Anselm interrupted his homeward journey at
Lyons
. In this city he received a letter from the Pope informing him of the
excommunication
of the counsellors who had advised the King to insist on investitures, but not decreeing anything about the King. Anselm resumed his journey, and on the way he heard of the illness of Henry's sister, Adela of
Blois
. He turned aside to visit her and on her recovery informed her that he was returning to
England
to
excommunicate
her brother. She at once exerted herself to bring about a meeting between Anselm and Henry, in July, 1105. But though a reconciliation was effected, and Anselm was urged to return to
England
, the claim to invest was not relinquished, and recourse had again to be made to
Rome
. A
papal
letter authorizing Anselm to absolve from censures incurred by breaking the
laws
against investitures healed past offences but made no provision for the future. At length, in a council held in
London
in 1107, the question found a solution. The King relinquished the claim to invest
bishops
and
abbots
, while the
Church
allowed the
prelates
to do homage for their temporal possessions.
Lingard
and other writers consider this a triumph for the King, saying that he had the substance and abandoned a mere form. But it was for no mere form that this long
war
had been waged. The rite used in the investiture was the symbol of a real power claimed by the English kings, and now at last abandoned. The victory rested with the
Archbishop
, and as
Schwane
says (Kirchenlexicon, s.v.) it prepared the way for the later solution of the same controversy in
Germany
. Anselm was allowed to end his days in peace. In the two years that remained he continued his pastoral labours and composed the last of his writings. Eadmer, the faithful chronicler of these contentions, gives a pleasing picture of his peaceful death. The dream of his childhood was come
true
; he was to climb the mountain and taste the bread of
Heaven
His active work as a
pastor
and stalwart champion of the
Church
makes Anselm one of the chief figures in
religious history
. The sweet influence of his spiritual teaching was felt far and wide, and its fruits were seen in many lands. His stand for the freedom of the
Church
in a crisis of
medieval
history had far-reaching effects long after his own time. As a writer and a thinker he may claim yet higher rank, and his influence on the course of
philosophy
and
Catholic
theology
was even deeper and more enduring if he stands on the one hand with
Gregory VII
, and
Innocent III
, and Thomas Becket; on the other he may claim a place beside
Athanasius
Augustine
, and
Thomas Aquinas
. His merits in the field of
theology
have received official recognition; he has been declared a
Doctor of the Church
by
Clement XI
, 1720, and in the office read on his
feast day
(21 April) it is said that his works are a pattern for all
theologians
. Yet it may be
doubted
whether his position is generally appreciated by students of divinity. In some degree his work has been hidden by the fabric reared on his foundations. His books were not adopted, like those of
Peter Lombard
and
St. Thomas
, as the usual text of commentators and lecturers in
theology
, nor was he constantly cited as an authority, like
St. Augustine
. This was natural enough, since in the next century new methods came in with the rise of the Arabic and
Aristotelean
philosophy; the "Books of Sentences" were in some ways more fit for regular
theological
reading; Anselm was yet too near to have the venerable authority of the early Fathers. For these reasons it may be said that his writings were not properly appreciated till time had brought in other changes in the
schools
, and men were led to study the history of
theology
. But though his works are not cast in the systematic form of the "Summa" of St. Thomas, they cover the whole field of
Catholic doctrine
. There are few pages of our
theology
that have not been illustrated by the labours of Anselm. His treatise on the procession of the Holy Spirit has helped to guide scholastic speculations on the Trinity, his "Cur Deus Homo" throws a flood of light on the
theology
of the Atonement, and one of his works anticipates much of the later controversies on Free Will and
Predestination
. In the seventeenth century, a
Spanish
Benedictine
, Cardinal d'Aguirre made the writings of Anselm the groundwork of a course of
theology
, "S. Anselmi Theologia" (Salamanca, 1678-81). Unfortunately the work never got beyond the first three folio volumes, containing the commentaries on the "Monologium". In recent years Dom Anselm Öcsényi, O.S.B. has accomplished the task on a more modest scale in a little Latin volume on the
theology
of St. Anselm, "De Theologia S. Anselmi" (Brünn, 1884).
Besides being one of the fathers of
scholastic theology
, Anselm fills an important place in the history of philosophic speculation. Coming in the first phase of the controversy on
Universals
, he had to meet the extreme
Nominalism
of
Roscelin
; partly from this fact, partly from his native
Platonism
his Realism took what may be considered a somewhat extreme form. It was too soon to find the golden mean of moderate Realism, accepted by later
philosophers
. His position was a stage in the process and it is significant that one of his biographers,
John of Salisbury
, was among the first to find the
true
solution.
Anselm's chief achievement in
philosophy
was the ontological argument for the
existence of God
put forth in his "Proslogium". Starting from the notion that
God
is "that than which nothing greater can be thought", he argues that what exists in reality is greater than that which is only in the mind; wherefore, since "
God
is that than which nothing greater can be thought", He exists in reality. The validity of the argument was disputed at the outset by a
monk
named Gaunilo, who wrote a criticism on it to which Anselm replied. Eadmer tells a curious story about St. Anselm's anxiety while he was trying to work out this argument. He could think of nothing else for days together. And when at last he saw it clearly, he was filled with
joy
, and made haste to commit it to writing. The waxen tablets were given in charge to one of the
monks
but when they were wanted they were missing. Anselm managed to recall the argument, it was written on fresh tablets and given into safer keeping. But when it was wanted it was found that the wax was broken to Pieces. Anselm with some difficulty put the fragments together and had the whole copied on parchment for greater security. The story sounds like an allegory of the fate which awaited this famous argument, which was lost and found again, pulled to pieces and restored in the course of controversy. Rejected by
St. Thomas
and his followers, it was revived in another form by
Descartes
. After being assailed by
Kant
, it was defended by
Hegel
, for whom it had a peculiar fascination — he recurs to it in many parts of his writings. In one place he says that it is generally used by later
philosophers
, "yet always along with the other
proofs
, although it alone is the
true
one" (German Works, XII, 547). Assailants of this argument should remember that all minds are not cast in one mould, and it is easy to understand how some can feel the force of arguments that are not felt by others. But if this
proof
were indeed, as some consider it, an absurd fallacy, how could it appeal to such minds as those of Anselm,
Descartes
, and
Hegel
? It may be well to add that the argument was not rejected by all the great
Schoolmen
. It was accepted by
Alexander of Hales
(Summa, Pt. I, Q. iii, memb. 1, 2), and supported by
Scotus
. (In I, Dist. ii, Q. ii.) In modern times it is accepted by Möhler, who quotes
Hegel's
defence with approval.
It is not often that a
Catholic
saint wins the admiration of German
philosophers
and English historians. But Anselm has this singular distinction
Hegel's
appreciation of his
mental
powers may be matched by Freeman's warm words of praise for the great
Archbishop
of
Canterbury
. "Stranger as he was, he has won his place among the noblest worthies of our island. It was something to be the model of all
ecclesiastical
perfection; it was something to be the creator of the
theology
of
Christendom
— but it was something higher still to be the very embodiment of righteousness and mercy, to be handed down in the annals of humanity as the man who saved the hunted hare and stood up for the
holiness
of Ælfheah" (History of the Norman Conquest, IV, 444).
Collections of the works of St. Anselm were issued soon after the invention of printing. Ocsenyi mentions nine earlier than the sixteenth century. The first attempt at a critical edition was that of
Th. Raynaud, S.J.
* (Lyons, 1630), which rejects many spurious works, e.g. the Commentaries on St. Paul. The best editions are those of Dom Gerberon, O.S.B. (Paris, 1675, 1721;
Venice
1744, Migne, 1845). Most of the more important works have also been issued separately — thus the "Monologium" is included in
Hurter's
"Opuscula SS. Patrum" and published with the "Proslogium" by Haas (Tübingen). There are numerous separate editions of the "Cur Deus Homo" and of Anselm's "Prayers and Meditations"; these last were done into English by Archbishop Laud (1638), and there are French and German versions of the "meditationes" and the "Monologium". "Cur Deus Homo" has also been translated into English and German — see also the translations by Deane (Chicago, 1903). For Anselm's views on
education
, see
ABBEY OF BEC
Sources
The chief sources for Anselm's life are his own letters and the two biographical works of his friend, disciple, and secretary, Eadmer, monk of Canterbury, and Bishop-elect of St. Andrews. Eadmers's
Historia Nonorum
may be called the "Life and Times of St. Anselm"; his
Vita S. Anselmi
gives the inner life of the saint. Also, there is a brief account of the miracles of St. Anselm which is also ascribed to Eadmer, but its authorship is doubtful. Other early writers on Anselm, such as John of Salisbury, add some new details, but their account of the Saint is largely drawn from Eadmer.
About this page
APA citation.
Kent, W.
(1907).
St. Anselm.
In
The Catholic Encyclopedia.
New York: Robert Appleton Company.
MLA citation.
Kent, William.
"St. Anselm."
The Catholic Encyclopedia.
Vol. 1.
New York: Robert Appleton Company,
1907.
Transcription.
This article was transcribed for New Advent by Tomas Hancil and Joseph P. Thomas.
Ecclesiastical approbation.
Nihil Obstat.
March 1, 1907. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor.
Imprimatur.
+John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York.
Contact information.
The editor of New Advent is Kevin Knight. My email address is webmaster
at
newadvent.org. Regrettably, I can't reply to every letter, but I greatly appreciate your feedback — especially notifications about typographical errors and inappropriate ads.
Copyright © 2026 by
New Advent LLC
. Dedicated to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
ADVERTISE WITH NEW ADVENT
US