Alba B (2018) To achieve gender equality, we must first tackle our unconscious biases. http://theconversation.com/to-achieve-gender-equality-we-must-first-tackle-our-unconscious-biases-92848
Augustine V, Hudepohl J, Marcinczak P, Snipes W (2017) Deploying software team analytics in a multinational organization. IEEE Softw 35(1):72–76
Bacchelli A, Bird C (2013) Expectations, outcomes, and challenges of modern code review. In: 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), IEEE, pp 712–721
Barnett M, Bird C, Brunet J, Lahiri SK (2015) Helping developers help themselves: Automatic decomposition of code review changesets. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, vol 1. IEEE, pp 134–144
Beard C (2018) Diversity and inclusion at mozilla. https://blog.mozilla.org/careers/diversity-and-inclusion-at-mozilla/. Accessed 2023/04/01
Beneschott B (2014) Is open source open to women? https://www.toptal.com/open-source/is-open-source-open-to-women. Accessed 2023/04/01
Bertagnoli L (2021) How tech can get more women into software engineering. https://builtin.com/software-engineering-perspectives/women-in-engineering. Accessed 2023/04/01
Bird C, Carnahan T, Greiler M (2015) Lessons learned from building and deploying a code review analytics platform. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, IEEE, pp 191–201
Boston University SoPH (2016) Correlation and regression with R. https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/MPH-Modules/BS/R/R5_Correlation-Regression/R5_Correlation-Regression4.html. Accessed 29 May 2021
Bosu A, Carver JC (2014) Impact of developer reputation on code review outcomes in oss projects: An empirical investigation. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ESEM ’14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652544
Bosu A, Sultana KZ (2019) Diversity and inclusion in open source software (oss) projects: Where do we stand? In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)
Bosu A, Carver JC, Hafiz M, Hilley P, Janni D (2014) Identifying the characteristics of vulnerable code changes: An empirical study. 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering. China, Hong Kong, pp 257–268
Bosu A, Carver JC, Bird C, Orbeck J, Chockley C (2016) Process aspects and social dynamics of contemporary code review: Insights from open source development and industrial practice at microsoft. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 43(1):56–75
Bourke J (2017) Diversity and inclusion: The reality gap. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2017/diversity-and-inclusion-at-the-workplace.html. Accessed 29 June 2022
Built-in (2021) Diversity + inclusion.what is the meaning of diversity & inclusion? a 2021 workplace guide. https://builtin.com/diversity-inclusion. Accessed 29 May 2021
Burnett M, Stumpf S, Macbeth J, Makri S, Beckwith L, Kwan I, Peters A, Jernigan W (2016) Gendermag: A method for evaluating software’s gender inclusiveness. Interact Comput 28(6):760–787
Burnett M, Counts R, Lawrence R, Hanson H (2017) Gender hcl and microsoft: Highlights from a longitudinal study. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), pp 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2017.8103461
Calvo D (2020) The (in)visible barriers of free software: Inequalities of online communities in spain. Stud Commun Sci 21. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2021.01.011
Canedo E, Bonifacio R, Okimoto M, Serebrenik A, Pinto G, Monteiro E (2020) Work practices and perceptions from women core developers in oss communities. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pp 1–11
Canedo ED, Mendes F, Cerqueira A, Okimoto M, Pinto G, Bonifacio R (2021) Breaking one barrier at a time: How women developers cope in a men-dominated industry. In: Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, SBES ’21, p 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474624.3474638
Catolino G, Palomba F, Tamburri D, Serebrenik A, Ferrucci F (2019) Gender diversity and women in software teams: how do they affect community smells? In: Proceedings - 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering, ACM/IEEE, pp 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIS.2019.00010. https://2019.icse-conferences.org/home
Ciceri F (2021) Diversity statement. https://www.debian.org/intro/diversity. Accessed 2023/04/01
David PA, Shapiro JS (2008) Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate? Inf Econ Policy 20(4):364–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.10.001. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624508000553
Durrleman S, Simon R (1989) Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 8(5):551–561
Eidinger E, Enbar R, Hassner T (2014) Age and gender estimation of unfiltered faces. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 9(12):2170–2179
Fan Y, Xia X, Lo D, Li S (2018) Early prediction of merged code changes to prioritize reviewing tasks. Empir Softw Eng 23(6):3346–3393
Forte A, Antin J, Bardzell S, Honeywell L, Riedl J, Stierch S (2012) Some of all human knowledge: Gender and participation in peer production. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, CSCW ’12, p 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141512.2141530
Foundation (2008) Geek feminisom wiki. http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/FLOSS#Discussion_of_issues. Accessed 2023/04/01
Frluckaj H, Dabbish L, Widder DG, Qiu HS, Herbsleb J (2022) Gender and participation in open source software development. Proc ACM Hum-Comput Interaction 6(CSCW2):1–31
Fulton LV, Mendez FA, Bastian ND, Musal RM (2012) Confusion between odds and probability, a pandemic? J Stat Educ 20(3)
Ghosh RA (2005) Understanding free software developers: Findings from the FLOSS study. Perspect Free Open Source Softw 28:23–47
Gousios G (2013) The ghtorrent dataset and tool suite. In: Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, MSR ’13, pp 233–236. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2487085.2487132. Accessed 2023/04/01
Gousios G, Pinzger M, Deursen Av (2014) An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ICSE’2014, p 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1145/2568225.2568260
Goyal K, Agarwal K, Kumar R (2017) Face detection and tracking: Using opencv. In: 2017 International conference of Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA), vol 1. IEEE, pp 474–478
Guerrouj L, Baysal O, Lo D, Khomh F (2016) Software analytics: challenges and opportunities. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, pp 902–903
Harrell F (2015) Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics, Springer International Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?id=94RgCgAAQBAJ. Accessed 2023/04/01
Harrell F, Lee K, Califf R, Pryor D, Rosati R (1984) Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med 3(2):143–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780030207
Harrell F, Lee K, Matchar D, Reichert T (1985) Harrell jr fe, lee kl, matchar db, reichert taregression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. cancer treat rep 69: 1071–1077. Cancer Treat Rep 69:1071–77
Hasan M, Iqbal A, Islam MRU, Rahman AI, Bosu A (2021) Using a balanced scorecard to identify opportunities to improve code review effectiveness: An industrial experience report. Empir Softw Eng 26:1–34
Imtiaz N, Middleton J, Chakraborty J, Robson N, Bai G, Murphy-Hill E (2019). Investigating the effects of gender bias on github. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00079
Jeong G, Kim S, Zimmermann T, Yi K (2009) Improving code review by predicting reviewers and acceptance of patches. Res Softw Anal Error-Free Comput Center Tech-Memo (ROSAEC MEMO 2009-006) 1:1–18
Jiang Y, Adams B, German DM (2013) Will my patch make it? and how fast? case study on the linux kernel. In: 2013 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), IEEE, pp 101–110
Kalliamvakou E, Gousios G, Blincoe K, Singer L, German DM, Damian D (2016) An in-depth study of the promises and perils of mining github. Empir Softw Eng 21(5):2035–2071
Krieger B, Leach J, Nafus D (2006) Gender integrated report of findings. European Union Sixth Framework Programme, Free/Libre/Open Source Software: Policy Support 1(1)
Kononenko O, Baysal O, Guerrouj L, Cao Y (2015) Investigating code review quality: Do people and participation matter? pp 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2015.7332457
Laura Sherbin RR (2017) Diversity doesn’t stick without inclusion. https://www.vernamyers.com/2017/02/04/diversity-doesnt-stick-without-inclusion/. Accessed 2023/04/01
Lee A, Carver JC (2019) Floss participants’ perceptions about gender and inclusiveness: A survey. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00077
Lenarduzzi V, Nikkola V, Saarimäki N, Taibi D (2021) Does code quality affect pull request acceptance? an empirical study. J Syst Softw 171:110806
Lin B, Serebrenik A (2016) Recognizing gender of stack overflow users. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp 425–429
Lockwood P (2006) Someone like me can be successful: Do college students need same-gender role models? Psychol Women Q 30(1):36–46
Mansfield ER, Helms BP (1982) Detecting multicollinearity. Am Stat 36(3a):158–160
McIntosh S, Kamei Y, Adams B, Hassan AE (2015) An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality. Empir Softw Eng 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-015-9381-9
Mendez C, Padala HS, Steine-Hanson Z, Hilderbrand C, Horvath A, Hill C, Simpson L, Patil N, Sarma A, Burnett M (2018a) Open source barriers to entry, revisited: A sociotechnical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ICSE ’18, p 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180241
Mendez C, Sarma A, Burnett M (2018b) Gender in open source software: what the tools tell. pp 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3195570.3195572
Menking A, Erickson I, Pratt W (2019) People who can take it: how women wikipedians negotiate and navigate safety. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 1–14
Mirsaeedi E, Rigby PC (2020) Mitigating turnover with code review recommendation: balancing expertise, workload, and knowledge distribution. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 1183–1195
Nadri R, Rodríguez-Pérez G, Nagappan M (2021) On the relationship between the developer’s perceptible race and ethnicity and the evaluation of contributions in oss. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 48(8):2955–2968
Nafus D (2012) Patches don’t have gender: What is not open in open source software. New Media Soc 14(4):669–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811422887
Padala SH, Mendez CJ, Dias LF, Steinmacher I, Steine Hanson Z, Hilderbrand C, Horvath A, Hill C, Simpson LD, Burnett M, Gerosa M, Sarma A (2020) How gender-biased tools shape newcomer experiences in oss projects. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2984173
Parra E, Haiduc S, James R (2016) Making a difference: An overview of humanitarian free open source systems. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C), pp 731–733
Paul R, Bosu A, Sultana KZ (2019) Expressions of sentiments during code reviews: Male vs. female. pp 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2019.8667987
Paul R, Turzo AK, Bosu A (2021) Why security defects go unnoticed during code reviews? a case-control study of the chromium os project. In: 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp 1373–1385
Pourhoseingholi MA, Baghestani AR, Vahedi M (2012) How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 5(2):79
Prana GAA, Ford D, Rastogi A, Lo D, Purandare R, Nagappan N (2021) Including everyone, everywhere: Understanding opportunities and challenges of geographic gender-inclusion in oss. p 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2021.3092813
Qiu Y, Stewart KJ, Bartol KM (2010) Joining and socialization in open source women’s groups: An exploratory study of kde-women. In: Ågerfalk P, Boldyreff C, González-Barahona JM, Madey GR, Noll J (eds) Open Source Software: New Horizons. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 239–251
Rigby P, German D, Storey MA (2008) Open source software peer review practices. In: 2008 ACM/IEEE 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, pp 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1145/1368088.1368162
Robson N (2018) Diversity and decorum in open source communities. In: Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2018, pp 986–987
Santamaría L, Mihaljević H (2018) Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services. PeerJ Comput Sci 4:e156
Santos A, Vegas S, Oivo M, Juristo N (2019) A procedure and guidelines for analyzing groups of software engineering replications. IEEE Trans Softw Eng PP:1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2935720
Shull FJ, Carver JC, Vegas S, Juristo N (2008) The role of replications in empirical software engineering. Empir Softw Eng 13(2):211–218
Singh V (2019) Women participation in open source software communities. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Software Architecture - Volume 2, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, ECSA ’19, pp 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3344948.3344968
Singh V, Brandon W (2019) Open Source Software Community Inclusion Initiatives to Support Women Participation, pp 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20883-7_7
Singh V, Bongiovanni B (2021) Motivated and capable but no space for error women’s experiences of contributing to open source software. In: The international Journal of information, diversity and inclusion, vol 5
Smith TJ, McKenna CM (2013) A comparison of logistic regression pseudo r2 indices. Mult Linear Regression Viewpoints 39(2):17–26
Squire M, Gazda R (2015) Floss as a source for profanity and insults: Collecting the data. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, pp 5290–5298
Sultana S, Bosu A (2021) Are code review processes influenced by the genders of the participants? https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2108.07774. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07774
Sultana S, Turzo AK, Bosu A (2023) Replication package for Code Reviews in Open Source Projects : How Do Gender Biases Affect Participation and Outcomes? Zeonodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7608539
Tao Y, Han D, Kim S (2014) Writing acceptable patches: An empirical study of open source project patches. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution, IEEE, pp 271–280
Team FD (2019) Diversity and inclusion in fedora. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/diversity-inclusion/. Accessed 2023/04/01
Terrell J, Kofink A, Middleton J, Rainear C, Murphy-Hill E, Parnin C, Stallings J (2017) Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Comput Sci 3:e111
Thelwall M, Wilkinson D, Uppal S (2010) Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in myspace. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 61(1):190–199
Thongtanunam P, Tantithamthavorn C, Kula RG, Yoshida N, Iida H, Matsumoto Ki (2015) Who should review my code? a file location-based code-reviewer recommendation approach for modern code review. In: 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), IEEE, pp 141–150
Thongtanunam P, McIntosh S, Hassan A, Iida H (2016) Review participation in modern code review. Empir Softw Eng 22:768–817
Tourani P, Adams B, Serebrenik A (2017) Code of conduct in open source projects. In: 2017 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), pp 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2017.7884606
Vasilescu B, Capiluppi A, Serebrenik A (2014) Gender, representation and online participation : a quantitative study. Interact Comput 26(5):488–511
Vasilescu B, Posnett D, Ray B, van den Brand MG, Serebrenik A, Devanbu P, Filkov V (2015) Gender and tenure diversity in github teams. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 3789–3798
Veall MR, Zimmermann KF (1994) Evaluating pseudo-r2’s for binary probit models. Qual Quant 28(2):151–164
Vedres B, Vasarhelyi O (2019) Gendered behavior as a disadvantage in open source software development. EPJ Data Sci 8(1):25
Wajcman J (2007) From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Inf Community Soc 10(3):287–298
Wang L, Weinberger K (2020) Reasons for lack of diversity in open source: The case Katie Bouman. Free and Open Technologies
Xia X, Lo D, Wang X, Yang X (2015) Who should review this change?: Putting text and file location analyses together for more accurate recommendations. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), IEEE, pp 261–270
Yin P, Fan X (2001) Estimating r 2 shrinkage in multiple regression: A comparison of different analytical methods. J Exp Educ 69(2):203–224
Zafar S, Malik MZ, Walia GS (2019) Towards standardizing and improving classification of bug-fix commits. In: 2019 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), IEEE, pp 1–6
US