…r for lead analysis, thus reducing the potential need for two separate sampling events. Although there are additional steps in the fifth liter protocol for LSL sites, EPA will work with states and stakeholders to provide templates for sampling instructions that are clear and simp…

…s of this approach noted differences in the criteria concerning assumptions and events that must be recognized, such as “at risk” status under ERISA or anticipation of plan changes that may occur under GAAP. One commenter was concerned with switching back to a going concern liabi…

…s of this approach noted differences in the criteria concerning assumptions and events that must be recognized, such as “at risk” status under ERISA or anticipation of plan changes that may occur under GAAP. One commenter was concerned with switching back to a going concern liabi…

…s of this approach noted differences in the criteria concerning assumptions and events that must be recognized, such as “at risk” status under ERISA or anticipation of plan changes that may occur under GAAP. One commenter was concerned with switching back to a going concern liabi…

…s of this approach noted differences in the criteria concerning assumptions and events that must be recognized, such as “at risk” status under ERISA or anticipation of plan changes that may occur under GAAP. One commenter was concerned with switching back to a going concern liabi…

…s of this approach noted differences in the criteria concerning assumptions and events that must be recognized, such as “at risk” status under ERISA or anticipation of plan changes that may occur under GAAP. One commenter was concerned with switching back to a going concern liabi…

…s of this approach noted differences in the criteria concerning assumptions and events that must be recognized, such as “at risk” status under ERISA or anticipation of plan changes that may occur under GAAP. One commenter was concerned with switching back to a going concern liabi…