විකිපීඩියා:Link rot - විකිපීඩියා

විකිපීඩියා:Link rot - විකිපීඩියා
Jump to content
විකිපීඩියා වෙතින්
How to prevent or repair broken links
සැකිල්ල:SHORTDESC:How to prevent or repair broken links
මෙම පිටුව (primarily) link rot in
external links
පිලිබඳ වේ. broken section links within Wikipedia සඳහා,
Wikipedia:Database reports/Broken section anchors
බලන්න. internal links which point to deleted or non-existent articles සඳහා,
WP:REDLINKS
බලන්න. other uses සඳහා,
Wikipedia:Citing sources § Preventing and repairing dead links
බලන්න.
"WP:LR" මෙතැනට යළියොමුවෙයි. Lua requests සඳහා,
Wikipedia:Lua requests
බලන්න.
To request URL changes, see
WP:Link rot/URL change requests
මෙම පිටුව ඉංග්‍රීසි ව්‍යාපෘතියෙන් මෙහි ගෙනවිත් ඇත. අන්තර්ගතය අපගේ ව්‍යාපෘතිය සමඟ 100% නොගැලපෙනමුත් අපගේ අවශ්‍යතාවයන් වලට අනුකූලව ගොඩනගා ගැනීම සඳහා මූලික පියවර ලෙස භාවිතා කළ හැකිය.
මෙම උදවු පිටුව
කෙලෙසද-මාර්ගෝපදේශනයකි
මෙය විකිපීඩියාවේ ප්‍රතිමාන සහ ක්‍රියාමාර්ගවල සමහර ලක්ෂණ විස්තර කරයි. එය
විකිපීඩියාවේ ප්‍රතිපත්ති සහ මාර්ගෝපදේශන
අතුරින් එකක් නොවේ, and may reflect varying levels of
consensus
and
vetting
. මෙම පිටුව තුල කිසිවක් අසංගත නම් එම ප්‍රතිපත්ති සහ මාර්ගෝපදේශන වෙත යොමු වන්න
කෙටි මං
WP:LR
WP:404
WP:ROT
WP:BADLINK
WP:LINKROT
මෙම පිටුවේ අඩංගු කරුණු සැකෙවින්:
Steps may be taken to reduce or repair dead external links.
Like most large
websites
, Wikipedia suffers from the phenomenon known as
link rot
where external links become
dead
, as the linked web pages or complete websites disappear, change their content, or move without HTTP redirection. This presents a significant threat to Wikipedia's
reliability
policy and its
source citation
guideline.
In general, do not delete cited information
solely
because the URL to the source does not work any longer. Tools, procedures, and processes are available as outlined in this document.
Preventing link rot
සංස්කරණය
කෙටි මග
WP:PLRT
Automatic archiving
සංස්කරණය
Links added by editors to the English Wikipedia mainspace are automatically saved to
Wayback Machine
within about 24 hours (nb. in practice not every link is getting saved for various reasons). This is done with a program called
"NoMore404"
which Internet Archive runs and maintains; other language wiki sites are included. It monitors
EventStreams API
, extracts new external URLs and adds a snapshot to the Wayback. This system became active sometime after 2015, though previous efforts were also made. Also, sometime after 2012,
archive.today
(aka archive.is) attempted to archive all external links then existing on Wikipedia at that time. This was incomplete but a significant number of links were added to archive.today during this period making it a major archival source filling in gaps of coverage. Archive.today is still making some automated archives as of 2020, though the extent of coverage and frequency is unknown.
As of 2015, there is a Wikipedia bot and tool called
WP:IABOT
that automates fixing link rot. It runs continuously, checking all articles on Wikipedia if a link is dead, adding archives to
Wayback Machine
(if not yet there), and replacing dead links in the wikitext with an archived version. This bot runs automatically but it can also be directed by end users through its web interface. It is available when viewing any page's history, located near the top of the page on the line of "External Tools", with the "Fix dead links" option.
As of 2015, the periodic bot
WP:WAYBACKMEDIC
checks for link rot in the archive links themselves. Archive databases are dynamic: archives move or go missing, new ones are added, etc. This bot maintains existing archive links on English Wikipedia. It also archives resources on request at
WP:URLREQ
. It is a flexible tool that can carry out many custom jobs such as URL migration/move,
usurped domains
, soft-404 discovery and repair.
Manual archiving
සංස්කරණය
Suggestions for ways to manually improve archiving:
Avoid
bare URLs
. Use citation templates such as
{{
cite web
}}
for citations, and
{{
webarchive
}}
for external links sections.
Use a
web archiving
service such as
Internet Archive
or
Archive.today
. A complete list is available at
WP:List of web archives on Wikipedia
. Within citation templates, put the archive URL in
|archive-url=
and add an
|archive-date=
. If the link is still valid, include
|url-status=live
, otherwise set
|url-status=dead
To add more than one archive URL, as extra insurance against provider outage,
{{
webarchive
}}
accepts up to 10 archive provider URLs. The
|format=addlarchives
option produces output appropriate for trailing a CS1|2 template. eg.
{{cite web|archive-url=..}}{{webarchive|format=addlarchive|url1=..|url2=..|url3..}}
will show 4 archive URLs (one from the cite web and three from the webarchive).
If the link is still live but not yet archived, visit the web site of the archive service of your choice and request that the page be archived.
Run
WP:IABOT
on pages via its user interface.
Alternative methods
සංස්කරණය
Most
citation templates
have a
|quote=
parameter that can be used to store text quotes of the source material. This can be used to store a limited amount of text from the source within the citation template. This is especially useful for sources that cannot be archived with web archiving services. It can also provide insurance against failure of the chosen web archiving service. Storing the entire text of the source is not appropriate under
fair use policies
, so choose only the most important portions of the text that most support the assertions in the Wikipedia article. Where applicable,
public domain
materials can be copied to
Wikisource
Repairing a dead link
සංස්කරණය
කෙටි මග
WP:DEADLINK
"WP:DEADLINK" මෙතැනට යළියොමුවෙයි. the guideline on what to do when a link is dead (including potential removal of the cited material) සඳහා,
WP:DEADREF
බලන්න.
There are several ways to try to repair a dead link, detailed below:
Searching
සංස්කරණය
If the dead link includes enough information (article title, names, etc.) it is often possible to use it to find the Web page at a different location, either on the same site or elsewhere.
Often web pages simply move within the same site. A site index or site-specific search feature is a useful place to locate the moved page. If these tools are not available, many Internet search engines allow a search on a specified site.
Failing this, searching the Internet for the page can find alternatives.
If you find a suitable new URL, then you can edit the parameters within the citation. If the citation uses one of the common templates (e.g. {{
cite web
}}, {{
cite news
}}, {{
Citation
}}), then you can edit as follows:
Change the
|url=
to point to the new URL;
Change or add
|access-date=
to refer to the current date.
Internet archives
සංස්කරණය
Check for archived versions at one of the many web archive services. The "Big 3" archive services are
web.archive.org
webcitation.org
and
archive.today
. These account for over 90% of all archives on Wikipedia, with
web.archive.org
being over 80% of all archive links. Other archive services are listed at
WP:WEBARCHIVES
The
Mementos interface
allows one to search multiple archiving services with a single search. The Memento database is cached, meaning results are returned quickly, but the cache also becomes out of date. Therefore, it should not be relied on as the final word – very often it may report no archives are available, when they actually are. You may still need to do the work of checking individual archive sites, but Mementos can be a quick first check.
Bookmarklets to check common archive sites for archives of the current page
(all open in a new tab or window)
Archive site
Bookmarklet
Archive.org
javascript
void
window
open
'https://web.archive.org/web/*/'
location
href
))
UKGWA
javascript
void
window
open
'https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/*/'
location
href
))
If multiple archive dates are available, use the one that is most likely to be the contents of the page seen by the editor who entered the reference on the
|access-date=
. If that parameter is not specified, a
search of the article's revision history
can be performed to determine when the link was added to the article.
View the archive to verify that it contains valid page information. Usually dates closer to the time the link was placed in the Wikipedia page, or earlier, are more likely to show valid information.
If you find a suitable archive URL, then you can add it to the citation. If the citation uses one of the common templates (e.g. {{
cite web
}}, {{
cite news
}}, {{
Citation
}}), then you can edit as follows:
Leave the
|url=
unchanged, pointing to the source URL.
Add
|archive-url=
, pointing to the archive URL.
Add
|archive-date=
, specifying the date when the archived copy was saved. YYYY-MM-DD format is usually easiest but any format can be used.
Add or change
|url-status=
. Use
|url-status=dead
if the old URL does not work. Use
|url-status=unfit
or
|url-status=usurped
if the old URL has been usurped for the purposes of spam, advertising, or is otherwise unsuitable (see
WP:USURPURL
). Use
|url-status=live
if
|url=
still works and still gives the correct information, but you want to preemptively add an
|archive-url=
Leave the
|access-date=
unchanged, referring to the date when a previous editor last accessed the
|url=
. Some editors believe
|access-date=
should be removed once a working
|archive-url=
is established since the
|url=
is no longer available, as maintaining an
|access-date=
is redundant clutter.
Mitigating a dead link
සංස්කරණය
කෙටි මග
WP:MDLI
At times, all attempts to repair the link will be unsuccessful. In that event, consider finding an alternative source so that the loss of the original does not harm the verifiability of the article. Alternative sources about broad topics are usually easily located. A simple search engine query might locate an appropriate alternative, but be extremely careful to avoid citing
mirrors and forks of Wikipedia
itself, which would violate
Wikipedia:Verifiability
Sometimes, finding an appropriate source is not possible, or would require more extensive research techniques, such as a visit to a library or the use of a subscription-based database. If that is the case, consider consulting with Wikipedia editors at
Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange
, the
Wikipedia:Village pump
, or
Wikipedia:Help desk
. Also, consider contacting experts or other interested editors at a relevant
WikiProject
Sometimes a link is dead because the website moved the URL (e.g.
moved to
). If you discover an URL change like this, please submit a request at
WP:URLREQ
for a url move. A bot will make the change.
Keeping dead links
සංස්කරණය
කෙටි මග
WP:KDL
A dead, unarchived source URL may still be useful. Such a link indicates that information was (probably) verifiable in the past, and the link might provide another user with greater resources or expertise with enough information to find the reference. It could also return from the dead. With a dead link, it is possible to determine if it has been cited elsewhere, or to contact the person originally responsible for the source. For example, one could contact the Yale Computer Science department if
භින්න වූ සබැඳිය
were dead.
Place {{
dead link
|date=අප්‍රේල් 2026}} after the dead citation, immediately before the

tag if applicable, leaving the original link intact. Marking dead links signals to editors and to link rot bots that this link needs to be replaced with an archive link. Placing {{
dead link
}} also auto-categorizes the article into
Articles with dead external links
project category, and into specific monthly date range category based on
|date=
parameter.
Do not delete
a citation just because it has been tagged with {{
dead link
}} for a long time.
Link rot on non-Wikimedia sites
සංස්කරණය
කෙටි මග
WP:EXTERNALROT
Non-Wikimedia sites are also susceptible to link rot. Following a
page move
or
page deletion
, links to Wikipedia pages from other websites may break. In most page moves, a
redirect
will remain at the old page—this won't cause a problem. But if a page is completely deleted or
usurped
(i.e. replaced with other content) then link rot will have been caused on any external websites that link to it.
Replacement of page content with a
disambiguation page
may still cause link rot, but is less harmful because a disambiguation page is essentially a type of
soft redirect
that will lead the reader to the required content. If a page is usurped with content for another subject that shares its name, a
hatnote
may be placed at the top that directs readers to the original content on its new page—this again is a type of soft redirect, but less obvious. In these cases, readers arriving from an external rotten link should be able to find what they're looking for, but the situation is best avoided as they would have to get there via an additional page, potentially giving a poor impression of both Wikipedia and the linking website.
Because the Wikipedia software does not store
Referer
information
, it will be impossible to tell how many external web pages will be affected by a move or deletion, but the risk of link rot will probably be greatest on older and higher profile pages. In truth, there is not a lot that can be done; maintenance of non-Wikimedia websites is not within the scope of being a Wikimedian, nor in most cases within our capability (although if they
can
be fixed, it would be helpful to do so). However, it may be good practice to think about the potential impact on other sites when deleting or moving Wikipedia pages, especially if no redirect or hatnote will remain. If a move or deletion is expected to cause significant damage, then this might be a factor to consider in
WP:RM
WP:AFD
and
WP:RFD
discussions, although other factors may carry more weight.
See also
සංස්කරණය
Essays
සංස්කරණය
Wikipedia:Build content to endure
Wikipedia:Offline sources
Tools and how-to guides
සංස්කරණය
Wikipedia:Link rot/URL change requests
– request help to change many URLs, or mark them dead
Help:Using the Wayback Machine
– how-to guide
Wikipedia:Using Archive.is
– how-to guide
Special:LinkSearch
– to find all the pages that contain a particular URL
Wikipedia:Citing sources/Further considerations#Pre-emptive archiving
– brief guide on how to use various archiving services
Wikipedia:Citing sources#Preventing and repairing dead links
Wikipedia:External links#Longevity of links
– prescribes removal of dead URLs from the "External links" section
Category:Articles with bare URLs for citations
– the backlog of articles containing bare URLs at risk of link rot, sub-categorised by month
Category:Articles with dead external links
– the backlog of articles containing dead links, sub-categorised by month
Bots
සංස්කරණය
InternetArchiveBot
(IABot) – automatically fixes dead links whenever possible, and tags them when it isn't
WaybackMedic
-automatically fixes dead links that are difficult to determine, other general fixes
User:Legobot
– can mass tag links with
{{
dead link
}}
. Requests can be made at
User talk:Legoktm
External links
සංස්කරණය
Official Wayback add-on for
Firefox
and
Chrome
note 1
Resurrect Pages
, a third-party add-on tool provides links to seven cache/archive websites upon coming across a dead link. (Firefox)
Webcache
, add-on for Opera. (discontinued; newer similar add-ons available)
weblinkchecker.py
—script from the
Python Wikipedia Bot
collection which finds broken external links.
Backlink Checker
, to search for potential link rot on non-Wikimedia sites
Notes
සංස්කරණය
"Save Pages in the Wayback Machine"
Internet Archive
. 2018-08-24.
විකිපීඩියා රචනා
Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
Philosophy
Articles must be written
All Five Pillars are the same height
Avoid vague introductions
Be a reliable source
Civil POV pushing
Cohesion
Competence is required
Concede lost arguments
Dissent is not disloyalty
Don't lie
Don't search for objections
Editing Wikipedia is like visiting a foreign country
Editors will sometimes be wrong
Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
Explanationism
External criticism of Wikipedia
Here to build an encyclopedia
Levels of competence
Most ideas are bad
Need
Neutrality of sources
Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction
The one question
Oversimplification
Paradoxes
Paraphrasing
POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
Process is important
Product, process, policy
Purpose
Reasonability rule
Systemic bias
There is no seniority
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
Tendentious editing
The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
The rules are principles
Trifecta
Wikipedia in brief
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
Wikipedia is a community
Article construction
100K featured articles
Acronym overkill
Advanced source searching
Adding images improves the encyclopedia
Advanced article editing
Advanced table formatting
Advanced template coding
Advanced text formatting
Akin's Laws of Article Writing
Alternatives to the "Expand" template
Amnesia test
A navbox on every page
An unfinished house is a real problem
Articles have a half-life
Autosizing images
Avoid mission statements
Bare URLs
Be neutral in form
Beef up that first revision
Blind men and an elephant
BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
Build content to endure
Cherrypicking
Chesterton's fence
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
Citation overkill
Citation underkill
Common-style fallacy
Concept cloud
Creating controversial content
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
Deprecated sources
Dictionaries as sources
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
Don't get hung up on minor details
Don't hope the house will build itself
Don't panic
Don't revert due solely to "no consensus"
Don't teach the controversy
Editing on mobile devices
Editors are not mindreaders
Encourage the newcomers
Endorsements (commercial)
Featured articles may have problems
Formatting bilateral relations articles
Formatting bilateral relations templates
Fruit of the poisonous tree
Give an article a chance
How to write a featured article
Identifying and using independent sources
History sources
Law sources
Primary sources
Science sources
Style guides
Tertiary sources
Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace
Inaccuracy
Introduction to structurism
Link rot
Mine a source
Merge Test
Minors and persons judged incompetent
"Murder of" articles
Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
Not everything needs a navbox
Not everything needs a template
Not everything needs a WikiProject
Nothing is in stone
Obtain peer review comments
Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
Permastub
Potential, not just current state
Presentism
Principle of Some Astonishment
Printability
Pruning article revisions
Publicists
Put a little effort into it
Restoring part of a reverted edit
Robotic editing
Sham consensus
Source your plot summaries
Specialized-style fallacy
Stub Makers
Run an edit-a-thon
Temporary versions of articles
Tertiary-source fallacy
There are no shortcuts to neutrality
There is no deadline
There is a deadline
The deadline is now
Understanding Wikipedia's content standards
Walled garden
What an article should not include
Wikipedia is a work in progress
Wikipedia is not a reliable source
Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion
The world will not end tomorrow
Write the article first
Writing better articles
Writing article content
Avoid thread mode
Copyediting reception sections
Gender-neutral language
Proseline
We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
Write the article first
Writing about women
Writing better articles
Removing or
deleting content
Adjectives in your recommendations
AfD is not a war zone
Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
Arguments to make in deletion discussions
Avoid repeated arguments
Before commenting in a deletion discussion
But there must be sources!
Confusing arguments mean nothing
Content removal
Counting and sorting are not original research
Delete the junk
Does deletion help?
Don't attack the nominator
Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
Follow the leader
How to save an article proposed for deletion
I just don't like it
Identifying blatant advertising
Identifying test edits
Immunity
Keep it concise
Liar liar pants on fire
Nothing
Nothing is clear
Overzealous deletion
Relisting can be abusive
Relist bias
The Heymann Standard
Unopposed AFD discussion
Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole
Why was the page I created deleted?
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
No Encyclopedic Use
Essays on civility
The basics
Accepting other users
Apology
Contributing to complicated discussions
Divisiveness
Edit at your own pace
Encouraging the newcomers
Enjoy yourself
Expect no thanks
High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
How to be civil
Maintaining a friendly space
Negotiation
Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
Relationships with academic editors
Thank you
Too long; didn't read
Truce
Unblock perspectives
We are all Wikipedians here
Philosophy
A weak personal attack is still wrong
Advice for hotheads
An uncivil environment is a poor environment
Be the glue
Beware of the tigers!
Civility warnings
Deletion as revenge
Failure
Forgive and forget
It's not the end of the world
Nobody cares
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
Profanity, civility, and discussions
Revert notification opt-out
Shadowless Fists of Death!
Staying cool when the editing gets hot
The grey zone
The last word
There is no Divine Right Of Editors
Most ideas are bad
Nothing is clear
Reader
The rules of polite discourse
There is no common sense
Two wrongs don't make a right
Wikipedia is not about winning
Wikipedia should not be a monopoly
Writing for the opponent
Dos
Argue better
Assume good faith
Assume the assumption of good faith
Assume no clue
Avoid personal remarks
Avoid the word "vandal"
Be excellent to one another
Beyond civility
Call a spade a spade
Candor
Deny recognition
Desist
Discussing cruft
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
Encourage full discussions
Get over it
How to lose
Imagine others complexly
Just drop it
Keep it down to earth
Mind your own business
Say "MOBY"
Mutual withdrawal
Read before commenting
Settle the process first
Don'ts
ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
Civil POV pushing
Cyberbullying
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
Don't be a fanatic
Don't be a jerk
Don't be an ostrich
Don't be ashamed
Don't be a WikiBigot
Don't be high-maintenance
Don't be inconsiderate
Don't be obnoxious
Don't be prejudiced
Don't be rude
Don't be the Fun Police
Don't bludgeon the process
Don't call a spade a spade
Don't call the kettle black
Don't call things cruft
Don't come down like a ton of bricks
Don't cry COI
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
Don't eat the troll's food
Don't fight fire with fire
Don't give a fuck
Don't help too much
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
Don't remind others of past misdeeds
Don't shout
Don't spite your face
Don't take the bait
Don't template the regulars
Don't throw your toys out of the pram
Do not insult the vandals
Griefing
Nationalist editing
No angry mastodons
just madmen
No Nazis
No, you can't have a pony
Passive aggression
Please don't bite the newcomers
POV railroad
There are no oracles
You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
WikiRelations
WikiBullying
WikiCrime
WikiHarassment
WikiHate
WikiLawyering
WikiLove
WikiPeace
Essays on notability
Advanced source searching
All high schools can be notable
Alternative outlets
Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
Articles with a single source
Avoid template creep
Bare notability
Big events make key participants notable
Bombardment
Businesses with a single location
But it's true!
Citation overkill
Common sourcing mistakes
Clones
Coatrack
Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
Every snowflake is unique
Existence ≠ Notability
Existence does not prove notability
Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
Fart
Google searches and numbers
High Schools
Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
Independent sources
Inherent notability
Insignificant
Masking the lack of notability
Make stubs
News coverage does not decrease notability
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
No big loss
No one cares about your garage band
No one really cares
Notability/Historical/Arguments
Notability cannot be purchased
Notability comparison test
Notability is not a level playing field
Notability is not a matter of opinion
Notability is not relevance or reliability
Notability means impact
Notability points
Notability sub-pages
Notabilitymandering
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
Offline sources
One hundred words
One sentence does not an article make
Other stuff exists
Overreliance upon Google
Perennial websites
Pokémon test
Read the source
Reducing consensus to an algorithm
Run-of-the-mill
Significant coverage not required
Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
Subjective importance
Third-party sources
Trivial mentions
Video links
Vanispamcruftisement
What BLP1E is not
What is and is not routine coverage
What notability is not
What to include
Wikipedia is not Crunchbase
Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé
Humorous essays
Anti-Wikipedian
Asshole John rule
Assume bad faith
Assume faith
Assume good wraith
Assume stupidity
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
Avoid using preview button
Avoid using wikilinks
Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
BOLD, revert, revert, revert
Boston Tea Party
Barnstaritis
CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
Don't stuff beans up your nose
Don't tempt the wrath of the Whatever, from high atop the Thing
Don't-give-a-fuckism
Editcountitis
Edits Per Day
Editsummarisis
Editing Under the Influence
Embrace Stop Signs
Emerson
Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
Go ahead, vandalize
How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
How to vandalize correctly
Is that even an essay?
Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
Legal vandalism
LTTAUTMAOK
No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
Oops Defense
Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
Please bite the newbies
R-e-s-p-e-c-t
Requests for medication
Requirements for adminship
Rouge admin
Rouge editor
Sarcasm is really helpful
Sausages for tasting
The Night Before Wikimas
The first rule of Wikipedia
The Five Pillars of Untruth
Things that should not be surprising
The WikiBible
Watchlistitis
Why not create an account?
You don't have to be mad to work here, but
About essays
About essays
Essay guide
Value of essays
Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
Don't cite essays as if they were policy
Avoid writing redundant essays
Finding an essay
Quote your own essay
Policies and guidelines
About policies and guidelines
Policies
Guidelines
How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance
Policy writing is hard
" වෙතින් සම්ප්‍රවේශනය කෙරිණි
ප්‍රවර්ග
විකිපීඩියා කෙලෙසද
Wikipedia essays about building the encyclopedia
සැඟවුණු ප්‍රවර්ග:
විකිපීඩියාවෙහි වැරදි ආරක්‍ෂිත සැකිලි අඩංගු පිටු
ඉංග්‍රීසි ව්‍යාපෘතියේ සිට ආයාත කළ පිටු
පළමු පරාමිතිය සකස් කල යුතු විකිපීඩියා කෙටි මග කොටුව
විකිපීඩියා නඩත්තු කටයුතු
විකිපීඩියා
Link rot
මාතෘකාවක් එක්කරන්න