Lurking and Social Networks – Interdependent Thoughts
While having lunch with
Lilia
(who gave a great
sketch
of how our conversation developed) we talked about her new topic of interest,
lurking
Lurking
Lurking, although the word seems to imply a negative connotation, has usefull aspects nonetheless. It is a way of determining rules of behaviour for new comers to a group.
The most obvious characteristic of a lurker is that he’s at the fringe of a group, listening and observing. Being at the fringe may seem like a bad place from the core, but in fact is a good position to build bridges to other groups, and be aware of other groups in the vicinity. In a face to face setting like a pub or a meeting of some kind, a lurker is visible, often shortly introduced after which the focus of attention shifts to the established group members again.
In on-line settings things are different. In some fora lurkers are encouraged to introduce themselves and then adviced to lurk, i.e. observe and learn for a while. But at all times there is no way of knowing how many lurkers are there that you are unaware of.
As lurkers are possible bridges to other groups, I as a blogger, would like to know:
How many lurkers I have, who read my blog but don’t comment or post.
Who they are
Serverlogs can give some clues, and I keep a close watch on them. Dave Winer’s RSS-tool also brings new info to light.
Weak and Strong Ties
The importance of lurking lies in the fact that they constitute weak ties. Weak ties are where interesting transactions and exchanges can take place. Strong ties imply that all people involved have access to more or less the same information and opportunities so nothing new comes from them.
Looking at social networks, lurkers are probably two or three nodes away (that’s how they found my blog presumeably). Most interesting new commenters (de-lurking lurkers) that pop up on my radar screen/blog are coming from that (social) distance.
network with almost only strong ties
Is this mix of strong and weak ties that forms my micro-blogosphere also a major factor of importance if you suffer from the
echo-chamber
effect? Where strong ties are the source of resonance, and the absence or presence of weak ties determine wether that cluster of strong ties is closed to input from the outside world?
network with strong ties and numerous weak ties, preventing echo chambers
Meshing of Networks
Another angle on this would be looking at the meshing of networks, a well known IT problem; How much meshing do you need to keep up performance of the network when one or more nodes fail?
There are different levels of meshing one can distinguish.
Total meshing: all nodes are connected directly to all other nodes.
Optimal meshing: all nodes are only a few steps away from all other nodes, via multiple possible paths
Sub-optimal meshing: all nodes are only a few steps away from all other nodes, some via only one path (some info might get lost for some nodes, but the network will still perform)
Sparse meshing: not all nodes are connected to all others through a few steps, and a lot only via 1 path. Islands form, connected by a few bridges.
Echo-chambers, my guess is, form most easily in places (groups of blogs) that have total meshing, and have no ‘capacity’ left to connect to less meshed ‘regions’ in a network.
Lurkers are in that case nodes in a sub-optimally meshed network. They’re there, but you are not necessarily aware of them.
Magic Numbers
Taking it one step further, maybe the ‘magic numbers’ we see in networks of humans relate these meshing concepts to our mental capacity to juggle social data.
12 being the average capacity to track nodes in a totally meshed network
50 being the average capacity to track nodes in an optimally meshed network
150 being the average capacity to track nodes in a sub-optimally meshed network.
above 150 being the sparsely meshed social network where anonymity and getting lost becomes possible.
If we relate this to blogs and Clay Shirky’s power law, teenage diaries blogs are possibly primarily on the 12/total meshing levels, professional content blogs are probably all in the 50 to 150 ranges, with distinct stability levels (my blog went from 0 to 12 inbound blogs then stabilized, then grew to just over fifty inbound blogs and stabilized again.) Above 150 people are more sparsely connected and start looking for beacons or leaders to orient themselves socially. This is the range where the broadcasting type blogs are, the A-listers.
Landscapes
A last and different way to look at Social Networks could be the metaphor of landscapes, with mountains as barriers, and roads and rivers as attractors.
Closely knit groups would be villages, echo-chambers isolated villages with no nearby roads. Larger groups, sub-optimally meshed are towns and cities, where the risk of too little meshing lurks (homeless people, drop outs etc as a consequence). Lurkers might be unnoticed city dwellers, or tourists from other landscapes, that only become visible if they make themselves known as tourists, leave footprints or marks on/in the landscape as it were. (Kilroy was here)
Oh and yeah, we also ate during lunch, not just talked.
The picture below shows my original notes, taken during the lunch 🙂
UPDATE: Matt starts wondering about
tools for lurkers
17 reactions on “
Lurking and Social Networks
Cool diagram!
Here is a picture of our political ‘echo chambers’… this book network is a proxy for the social networks behind it.
Thanks Valdis! That is a great picture of echochambers. (Ton)
Oops… forgot.
Landscapes… in Cleveland a local Econ Devel orgnaization has a “Landscape Project” to map all of key players [individuals, groups, organizations] involved in economic development in NE Ohio. The networks they will map will include social, business, partnership, investment, …
From the ‘As Is’ map they hope to build the ‘Could Be’ community!
I’d love to map “our corner” of blogosphere (let’s say starting from BlogWalk crowd) to see if our blog reading preferences fit “echo-chamber” or open format…
Lurking and Social Networks
Ton Zijlstra has some interesting thoughts about how lurking affects networks. This is a discussion in progress. Ton’s Interdependent Thoughts: Lurking and Social Networks…
for more on magic numbers and the echo chamber 😉
Thanks Ross,
While writing this post I remembered your posts as well, but had no time to look them up and add the links. Thanks for adding them yourself.
Lurking builds commonality
EEK Speaks writes on Lurkers: Are Lurkers Bad? My answer [to this]: Sometimes. Lurkers are part of a group’s latent energy; good things happen when that energy is activated. Lurkers are part of the all-important weak-tie network, and it’s important…
Lurkers as potential bridges in social networks
lurking in social netwokrs – not a bad thing, necessarily
Thanks for this article.
I am a doctoral student exploring lurking in formal online course discussions. I am finding that lurkers are also learning, albeit differently. Also, I am finding that in the formal ediucation context, when the teachers decide to make discussion participation compulsory, they may be inhibiting lurkers from learning due to many reasons.
I was wondering how the picture would look for an online course in formal HE set up. It may be the same as the one you have drawn for the ‘lurker’ learner; but different for the teacher, perhaps?
Shalni
Interesting comments about those on the fringe of an online community. I’ve been spending the last few weeks working on a project of my own design – investigating online communities and how to deepen interaction and improve dialogue. I’m keeping my research in blog format too, if you’re interested [
Link
]. I’ve only just started this semester, so the ball isn’t rolling that fast yet. 🙂
I’ve lurked around a few blogs, mostly just unable to offer any sort of comment because of lack of ideas or just being uninspired. I wonder how it’s possible to engage those readers though? One thing I’ve noticed is that a few pictures go a long way toward getting someone to comment.
Oh, and just so that my “lurking” can benefit both of us, here’s how I found my way on to your blog —
This relates to a paper (
) I have written with some colleagues about students involvement with a course on-line. Lurking should be seen as ‘legitimate peripheral participation’ in a community of practice rather than as a problem.
Lilia makes a good point. I suspect there is a large element of “echo-chamber” in KM Blogging, but hopefully enough external links to provide interesting (off-beat) leads too.
The encouraging thing here is the focus on the links, not the members. I’m a firm believer in the fact that knowledge is about the characterisation of relationships (in terms of purpose) rather than the snippets / nodes / facts at their ends.
I like your ideas.
Lurking. I must be a lurker.
I just need a piece of information
so I skip through some sites and
take(ideas) what I need.
This is how I got to this unlikely spot.
Google: “points in documentation”
BlogWalk Chicago: colorful on white
BlogWalk Chicago was fun 🙂 Jack Vinson
Lurking
Lurking and Social Networks: “The most obvious characteristic of a lurker is that he�s at the fringe of a group, listening and observing. Being at the fringe may seem like a bad place from the core, but in fact is…
Echokamer
Tijdens zijn presentatie op Reboot ging David Weinberger in op het verwijt dat de schrijvende pers, in dit geval de New York Times, weblogs regelmatig maakt: weblogs wijzen alleen naar zichzelf en elkaar, en zijn dus navelstaarders. Deze twee screensho…
Lurking builds commonality
EEK Speaks writes on Lurkers: “Are Lurkers Bad?” Interesting thoughts about community and shared context with respect to the people who aren’t talking out loud.
Comments are closed.
I don’t track you here, but others might
(due to embedded content)
This work is covered by a
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International-license
Subscribe to my blog
full article feed
Feedburner feed (Google tracking!)
comments feed
all reactions feed
See
/feeds
for more feeds
Blogs I subscribe to
OPML Blogroll
, human and machine readable
Books I’ve read
books and subscriptions
OPML list of fiction 2021
About
Blog
In
ter
dependent Thoughts
maintained since 2002 by
Ton Zijlstra
European citizen in a networked world. Based in the
Netherlands
, living in Europe, working globally. There are no Others. There is just me and many of you.
I write about how our digital and networked world changes how we work, learn, decide and organize. I explore the tools and strategies that help us navigate the networked world.
I am passionate about increasing people's ability to act (knowledge), and their ability to change (learning). Key-words: open data, open government, fablabs, making, complexity, networked agency, networked learning, ethics by design.
Contacting me
is easy and appreciated! I prefer e-mail.
blog@zylstra.org
or use
tonz@protonmail.ch
(encrypted webmail)
Mastodon personal
@ton@m.tzyl.eu
Mastodon work
@ton@m.tgl.eu
Keybase
keybase.io/ton
No use to try find me on
or
WhatsApp
Proto
WP sand box,
Meso WP
sand box
Book a conversation
I keep open hours Wednesday afternoons (CET).
Book a conversation
(45 mins max).
Like what you’re reading? Here’s a
Tipjar
Read my book!
How to Unconference Your Birthday, by Ton & Elmine
Supporting what I use & appreciate
I support the
IndieWeb
monthly
I support the
Internet Archive
monthly
Ik steun
CoderDojo NL
in de
Club van 100
I support
Obsidian.md
development
I’m a member of
Open Street Map
I’m a supporter of
noyb
, the EU’s leading GDPR activists.
On this day…
There are
11
posts found on this site published on April 24
April 24, 2021
Federated Bookshelves Revisited
Some thoughts on sharing reading lists, as federated bookshelves with opml/rss
April 24, 2020
Federated Bookshelves
Tom Critchlow last week wrote about a decentralised format for shareable bookshelves he came up with. I like the concept, it’s like the FOAF of old but for books, BOAF maybe? Like he mentions in the updates, while providing JSON is probably more fitting technology for the now, there is a world of RSS and […]
RSVPed Attending Gardens and Streams: Wikis, blogs, and UI — a pop up IndieWebCamp session This sounds like a good conversation to have. I have been and am experimenting with the blog / wiki combination basically since the start of this blog. And I dislike the disconnect between that and my note taking system, as […]
Favorited Shop local to fuel the Open Source dividend by Dries Buytaert Dries describes the ‘shop local’ equivalent for open source, and how he and his company are experimenting with promoting that. Also mentions as example two organisations who make open source contributions part of the procurement requirements. Supporting Makers more than Takers. In the […]
April 24, 2018
Suggested Reading: GDPR, Fintech, China and more
Some links I think worth reading today. ICANN struggles with the GDPR for the WHOIS database, and has now run out of time:EFF: GDPR forces ICANN to improve WHOIS andEFF: Privacy as afterthought at ICANN Facebook removes 1.5 billion users from EU jurisdiction while maintaining they’re totally committed to applying the ‘spirit’ of the GDPR […]
GDPR as De Facto Norm: Sonos Speakers
Just received an email from Sonos (the speaker system for streaming) about the changes they are making to their privacy statement. Like with FB in my previous posting this is triggered by the GDPR starting to be enforced from the end of May. The mail reads in part We’ve made these changes to comply with […]
Facebook GDPR Changes Unimpressive
It seems, from a preview for journalists, that the GDPR changes that Facebook will be making to its privacy controls, and especially the data controls a user has, are rather unimpressive. I had hoped that with the new option to select ranges of your data for download, you would also be able to delete specific […]
April 24, 2015
Big Data for Malaysia and ASEAN
This week I was invited to Malaysia as one of 8 members of the advisory panel on big data to the Malaysian government. The meeting was part of the Big Data Week taking place in Kuala Lumpur where I gave two presentations and was part of a panel discussion. Malaysia intends to become a big […]
April 24, 2005
Microlearning Conference and BlogWalk 8
Sebastian Fiedler is busy trying to organize a BlogWalk meeting in Innsbruck on June 25th 2005. This on the day after the Microlearning Conference in the same city, which takes place on June 23rd and 24th. It certainly looks like a great conference also from a KM and social software viewpoint. Are you going to […]
Blognomics, a much needed event
Finally the Netherlands has seen it’s first symposium on the use of weblogs. Drawing a mixed crowd of journalists, politicians, business people and of course bloggers, Blognomics was a succes to my eyes. Have a look at Technorati for impressions, in words, video and pictures. I will upload my pictures to Flickr. I have written […]
Blognomics
(Deze blogpost publiceerde ik oorspronkelijk op de site van mijn werkgever, en heb ik in 2021 aan het archief hier toegevoegd.) Tijdens de TINE afgelopen week in de Rai vond het middagsymposium Blognomics plaats. Dit evenement, georganiseerd door Guido van Nispen, Krijn Schuurman en anderen bracht een grote groep mensen uit de wereld van media, […]