Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Third Edition)
Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Third Edition)
W3C Recommendation 8 December 2009
This version:
Latest version:
Previous versions:
Editors:
Tim Bray, Textuality

Dave Hollander, Contivo, Inc.

Andrew Layman, Microsoft

Richard Tobin, University of Edinburgh and Markup Technology Ltd

Henry S. Thompson, University of Edinburgh and W3C

- Third Edition
Please refer to the
errata
for this document, which may
include normative corrections.
See also
translations
This document is also available in these non-normative formats:
XML
and
HTML highlighting
differences from the second edition
W3C
MIT
ERCIM
Keio
), All Rights Reserved. W3C
liability
trademark
and
document use
rules apply.
Abstract
XML namespaces provide a simple method for qualifying
element and attribute
names used in Extensible Markup Language documents by associating them
with namespaces identified by URI references.
Status of this Document
This section describes the status of this document at the time
of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document.
A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of
this technical report can be found in the
W3C technical reports index
at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This document is a product of the
XML Core Working Group
as part of the
W3C XML Activity
The English version of this specification is the only normative version.
However, for translations of this document, see
Known implementations are documented in the
Namespaces 1.1 implementation report
(all known Namespaces 1.1 implementations also support Namespaces 1.0)
A test suite is also available via the
XML Test Suite
page.
This third edition incorporates all known errata as of the publication date.
It supersedes the previous
edition of 16 August 2006
This edition has been widely reviewed. Only minor editorial changes
have been made since the 6 August 2009 Proposed Edited Recommendation.
Please report errors in this document to
xml-names-editor@w3.org
public
archives
are available. The errata list for this document
is available at
This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software
developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is
endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. It is a stable
document and may be used as reference material or cited from another
document. W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to draw attention
to the specification and to promote its widespread deployment. This
enhances the functionality and interoperability of the Web.
W3C maintains a
public
list of any patent disclosures
made in connection with the deliverables of
the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent.
An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual
believes contains
Essential
Claim(s)
must disclose the information in accordance with
section
6 of the W3C Patent Policy
Table of Contents
Motivation and Summary
1.1
A Note on Notation and Usage
XML Namespaces
2.1
Basic Concepts
2.2
Use of

URIs
as Namespace Names
2.3
Comparing

URI
References
Declaring Namespaces
Qualified Names
Using Qualified Names
Applying Namespaces to Elements and Attributes
6.1
Namespace Scoping
6.2
Namespace Defaulting
6.3
Uniqueness of Attributes
Conformance of Documents
Conformance of Processors
Appendices
Normative References
Other references
(Non-Normative)
The Internal Structure of XML Namespaces
(Non-Normative)
Changes since version 1.0
(Non-Normative)
Acknowledgements
(Non-Normative)
Orphaned Productions
(Non-Normative)
1 Motivation and Summary
We envision applications of Extensible Markup Language (XML) where
a single XML document may
contain elements and attributes
(here referred to as a "markup vocabulary")
that are defined for and used by multiple software modules.
One motivation for this is modularity: if such a markup vocabulary exists
which is well-understood and for which there is useful software
available, it is better to re-use this markup rather than re-invent it.
Such documents, containing multiple markup vocabularies,
pose problems of recognition and collision. Software modules need to
be able to recognize the elements and attributes which they are designed
to process, even in the face
of "collisions" occurring when markup intended for some other software
package uses the same element
name
or attribute name.
These considerations require that document constructs
should have names constructed so as to avoid clashes
between names from different markup vocabularies.
This specification describes a mechanism,
XML namespaces
, which accomplishes this
by assigning
expanded names
to elements and attributes.
1.1 A Note on Notation and Usage
Where
EMPHASIZED
, the key words
MUST
MUST NOT
REQUIRED
SHOULD
SHOULD NOT
MAY
in this document are to be interpreted as described in
[Keywords]
Note that many of the
nonterminals in the productions in
this specification are defined not here but in
the XML specification
[XML]
When nonterminals defined here have the same names as nonterminals
defined in the XML specification, the productions here
in all cases match a subset of the strings matched by the
corresponding ones there.
In this document's productions,
the
NSC
is a "Namespace Constraint",
one of the rules that documents conforming to this specification
MUST
follow.
2 XML Namespaces
2.1 Basic Concepts
Definition
An
XML namespace
is identified by

a URI reference
[RFC3986]
element and attribute names
may be placed in an XML namespace using the mechanisms described
in this specification.
Definition
An
expanded name
is a pair consisting of a
namespace name
and a
local name

Definition
For a name
in a namespace identified
by

a URI
, the
namespace name
is
. For a name
that is not in a namespace, the
namespace name
has no value.

Definition
In either case the
local name
is

It is this combination of the universally managed URI namespace
with the vocabulary's local names that is effective in avoiding
name clashes.
URI
references can contain characters not allowed in names, and are often
inconveniently long, so expanded names are not used directly to name
elements and attributes in XML documents. Instead
qualified names
are used.
Definition
qualified name
is a name subject to namespace interpretation.
In documents conforming to this specification,
element and attribute names appear as qualified names.
Syntactically, they are either
prefixed names
or
unprefixed names
An attribute-based declaration syntax is provided to bind prefixes to
namespace names and to bind a default namespace that applies to
unprefixed element names;
these declarations are scoped by the elements on which they appear so that
different bindings may apply in different parts of a document.
Processors conforming to this specification
MUST
recognize and act on these declarations and prefixes.
2.2 Use of

URIs
as Namespace Names
The empty string, though it is a legal

URI
reference, cannot be used as a namespace name.
The use of relative

URI
references,
including same-document references, in namespace declarations is
deprecated.
Note:
This deprecation of relative URI references was decided on by a
W3C XML Plenary Ballot
[Relative URI deprecation]
. It also declares that
"later specifications such as DOM, XPath, etc. will define no
interpretation for them".
2.3 Comparing

URI
References
URI
references identifying namespaces are compared when determining
whether a name belongs to a given namespace, and whether two names
belong to the same namespace.
Definition
The two

URIs
are treated as strings, and they are
identical
if and only if the strings are identical, that is, if they
are the same sequence of characters.
The comparison is case-sensitive, and no %-escaping is done or undone.
A consequence of this is that

URI
references which are not identical
in this sense may resolve to the same resource. Examples include

URI
references which differ only in case or %-escaping, or which are
in external entities which have different base URIs (but note that
relative

URIs
are deprecated as namespace names).
In a namespace declaration, the

URI
reference is the
normalized value
of the attribute, so replacement of XML character and entity references
has already been done before any comparison.
Examples:
The

URI
references below are all different for the purposes of identifying
namespaces, since they differ in case:
The URI references below are also all different for the purposes of identifying
namespaces:
Because of the risk of confusion between

URIs
that would be equivalent
if dereferenced, the use of %-escaped characters in namespace names is
strongly discouraged.
3 Declaring Namespaces
Definition
: A namespace
(or more precisely, a namespace binding)
is
declared
using
a family of reserved attributes.
Such an attribute's name must either
be
xmlns
or
begin
xmlns:
These attributes, like any other XML attributes, may be provided
directly or by
default
Attribute Names for Namespace Declaration
[1]
NSAttName
::=
PrefixedAttName
DefaultAttName
[2]
PrefixedAttName
::=
'xmlns:'
NCName
[NSC: Reserved Prefixes and Namespace Names]
[3]
DefaultAttName
::=
'xmlns'
[4]
NCName
::=
Name
- (
Char
* ':'
Char
*)
/* An XML
Name
, minus the ":" */
The attribute's
normalized value
MUST
be either

a URI
reference — the
namespace name
identifying the namespace —
or an empty string.
The namespace name, to serve its
intended purpose,
SHOULD
have the characteristics of uniqueness and
persistence.
It is not a goal that it be directly usable for retrieval of a schema (if
any exists).
Uniform Resource Names
[RFC2141]
is an example of a syntax that
is designed with these goals in mind.
However, it should be noted that ordinary URLs can be managed in such a way as
to achieve these same goals.
Definition
: If the
attribute name matches
PrefixedAttName
then the
NCName
gives the
namespace prefix
used to associate element and attribute names with the
namespace name
in the attribute value
in the scope of the element to which the declaration
is attached.

Definition
: If the
attribute name matches
DefaultAttName
then the
namespace name
in the
attribute value is
that of the
default namespace
in the scope of the element to which the declaration
is attached.]
Default namespaces and overriding of declarations are discussed in
6 Applying Namespaces to Elements and Attributes
An example namespace declaration, which associates the
namespace prefix
edi
with the namespace name



Namespace constraint: Reserved Prefixes and Namespace Names
The prefix
xml
is by definition bound to the namespace name
. It
MAY
but need not, be
declared, and
MUST NOT
be

bound to any other namespace name. Other prefixes
MUST NOT
be bound to this namespace
name,
and it
MUST NOT
be declared as the default namespace.
The prefix
xmlns
is used only to declare namespace bindings and is by
definition bound to the namespace name
. It
MUST NOT
be declared
Other prefixes
MUST NOT
be bound to this namespace
name,
and it
MUST NOT
be declared as the default namespace.

Element names
MUST NOT
have the prefix
xmlns
All other prefixes beginning with the three-letter sequence x, m, l,
in any case combination, are reserved. This means that:
users
SHOULD NOT
use them except as defined by later specifications
processors
MUST NOT
treat them as fatal errors.
Though they are not themselves reserved, it is inadvisable to use
prefixed names whose LocalPart begins with the letters x, m, l, in any
case combination, as
these names would be reserved if used without a prefix.
4 Qualified Names
In XML
documents conforming to this specification, some
names (constructs corresponding to the nonterminal
Name
MUST
be
given as
qualified names
defined as follows:
Qualified Name
[7]
QName
::=
PrefixedName
UnprefixedName
[8]
PrefixedName
::=
Prefix
':'
LocalPart
[9]
UnprefixedName
::=
LocalPart
[10]
Prefix
::=
NCName
[11]
LocalPart
::=
NCName
The
Prefix
provides the
namespace prefix
part of the qualified name, and
MUST
be associated with a namespace

URI
reference in a
namespace declaration
Definition
The
LocalPart
provides the
local part
of the qualified name.]
Note that the prefix functions
only
as a placeholder for a
namespace name.
Applications
SHOULD
use the namespace name, not the prefix, in constructing
names whose scope extends beyond the
containing document.
5 Using Qualified Names
In XML documents conforming to this specification,
element
names
are given as
qualified names
, as
follows:
Element Names
[12]
STag
::=
'<'
QName
Attribute
)*
? '>'
[NSC: Prefix Declared]
[13]
ETag
::=
'QName
? '>'
[NSC: Prefix Declared]
[14]
EmptyElemTag
::=
'<'
QName
Attribute
)*
? '/>'
[NSC: Prefix Declared]
An example of a qualified name serving as an element name:

32.18
Attributes are either
namespace
declarations
or their names are given as
qualified names
Attribute
[15]
Attribute
::=
NSAttName
Eq
AttValue
QName
Eq
AttValue
[NSC: Prefix Declared]
[NSC: No Prefix Undeclaring]
[NSC: Attributes Unique]
An example of a qualified name serving as an attribute name:


Baby food

Namespace constraint: Prefix Declared
The namespace prefix, unless it is
xml
or
xmlns
MUST
have been
declared in a
namespace declaration
attribute in either the start-tag of the element where the prefix
is used or in an ancestor element (i.e., an element in whose
content
the
prefixed markup occurs).
Namespace constraint: No Prefix Undeclaring
In a
namespace declaration
for a
prefix
(i.e.,
where the
NSAttName
is a
PrefixedAttName
), the
attribute value
MUST NOT
be empty.
This constraint may lead to operational difficulties in the case where
the namespace declaration attribute is provided, not directly in the XML
document entity
, but
via a default attribute declared in an external entity.
Such declarations may not be read by software which is based on a
non-validating XML processor.
Many XML applications, presumably including namespace-sensitive ones, fail to
require validating processors.
If correct operation with such applications is required
namespace declarations
MUST
be
provided either directly or via default attributes declared in the
internal subset of the DTD
Element names and attribute
names
are also given as qualified names when
they appear in declarations in the
DTD
Qualified Names in Declarations
[16]
doctypedecl
::=
'QName
ExternalID
)?
? ('['
markupdecl
PEReference
)*
']'
?)? '>'
[17]
elementdecl
::=
'QName
contentspec
? '>'
[18]
cp
::=
QName
choice
seq
('?' | '*' | '+')?
[19]
Mixed
::=
'('
'#PCDATA'
'|'
QName
)*
')*'
| '('
? '#PCDATA'
? ')'
[20]
AttlistDecl
::=
'QName
AttDef
? '>'
[21]
AttDef
::=
QName
NSAttName
AttType
DefaultDecl
Note that DTD-based validation is not namespace-aware in the following
sense: a DTD constrains the elements and attributes that may appear in
a document by their uninterpreted names, not by (namespace name, local
name) pairs. To validate a document that uses namespaces against a
DTD, the same prefixes must be used in the DTD as in the instance.
A DTD may however indirectly constrain the namespaces used in a valid
document by providing
#FIXED
values for attributes that
declare namespaces.
6 Applying Namespaces to Elements and Attributes
6.1 Namespace Scoping
The scope of a namespace declaration declaring a prefix extends from
the beginning of the start-tag in which it appears to the end of the
corresponding end-tag, excluding the scope of any inner declarations
with the same NSAttName part.
In the case of an empty tag, the scope is the tag itself.
Such a namespace declaration applies to all element and attribute
names within its scope whose prefix matches that specified in the
declaration.
The
expanded name
corresponding to a prefixed element or attribute name has the

URI
to which the
prefix
is bound as its
namespace name
and the
local part
as its
local name

Frobnostication
Moved to
here.


Multiple namespace prefixes can be declared as attributes of a single element,
as shown in this example:


xmlns:isbn='urn:ISBN:0-395-36341-6'>
Cheaper by the Dozen
1568491379

6.2 Namespace Defaulting
The scope of a
default namespace
declaration
extends from the beginning of the
start-tag in which it appears to the end of the corresponding end-tag,
excluding the scope of any inner default namespace declarations.
In the case of an empty tag, the scope is the tag itself.
A default namespace declaration applies to all unprefixed element names
within its scope.
Default namespace declarations do not apply directly to attribute names;
the interpretation of unprefixed attributes is
determined by the element on which they appear.
If there is a default namespace declaration in scope, the
expanded name
corresponding to an unprefixed element name has the

URI
of the
default namespace
as its
namespace name
If there is no default namespace declaration in scope, the
namespace name has no value.
The namespace name for an unprefixed attribute name always has no value.
In all cases, the
local name
is
local part
(which is of course the same as the unprefixed name itself).



Frobnostication

Moved to
here.





xmlns:isbn='urn:ISBN:0-395-36341-6'>
Cheaper by the Dozen
1568491379

A larger example of namespace scoping:


xmlns:isbn='urn:ISBN:0-395-36341-6'>
Cheaper by the Dozen
1568491379



This is a funny book!




The attribute value in a default namespace declaration
MAY
be empty.
This has the same
effect, within the scope of the declaration, of there being no default
namespace.











NameOriginDescription
HuntsmanBath, UK
BitterFuggles
Wonderful hop, light alcohol, good summer beer
Fragile; excessive variance pub to pub



6.3 Uniqueness of Attributes
Namespace constraint: Attributes Unique
In XML documents conforming
to this specification, no tag
may contain two attributes which:
have identical names, or
have qualified names with the same
local part
and with
prefixes
which have been bound
to
namespace names
that
are
identical
This constraint is equivalent to requiring that no element have two
attributes with the same
expanded name
For example, each of the
bad
empty-element tags is illegal in the
following:

xmlns:n2="http://www.w3.org" >



However, each of the following is legal, the second because the default
namespace does not apply to attribute names:

xmlns="http://www.w3.org" >



7 Conformance of Documents
This specification applies to XML 1.0
documents. To conform to this
specification, a document
MUST
be well-formed according to the
XML 1.0 specification
[XML]
In XML documents which conform to this specification, element
and attribute names
MUST
match the production for
QName
and
MUST
satisfy the "Namespace Constraints". All other tokens in the
document which are
REQUIRED

for XML 1.0 well-formedness, to match the
XML production for
Name
MUST
match this specification's production for
NCName
Definition
A document is
namespace-well-formed
if it conforms to this specification.
It follows that in a namespace-well-formed document:
All element and attribute names contain either zero or one
colon;
No entity names, processing instruction targets, or notation names contain any colons.
In addition, a namespace-well-formed document may also be namespace-valid.
Definition
A namespace-well-formed document is
namespace-valid
if it is valid according to the XML 1.0 specification, and all tokens
other than element and attribute names which are
REQUIRED
for XML 1.0 validity, to match the XML production for
Name
match this specification's production for
NCName
It follows that in a namespace-valid document:
No attributes with a declared type of
ID
IDREF(S)
ENTITY(IES)
, or
NOTATION
contain any colons.
8 Conformance of Processors
To conform to this specification, a processor
MUST
report
violations of namespace well-formedness, with the exception that it
is not
REQUIRED
to check that namespace names are
URI references
[RFC3986]
Definition
A validating XML processor that conforms to this specification
is
namespace-validating
if in addition
it reports violations of namespace validity.
A Normative References
Keywords
RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
S. Bradner, ed.
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force),
March 1997.
Available at
RFC2141
RFC 2141: URN Syntax
R. Moats, ed.
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force),
May 1997.
Available at
RFC3986
RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax
T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, and L. Masinter, eds.
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force),
January 2005.
Available at
RFC3629
RFC 3629: UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646
F. Yergeau, ed.
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force),
November 2003.
Available at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3629.txt
XML
Extensible Markup Language
(XML) 1.0
, Tim Bray, Jean
Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Eve Maler, and François Yergeau eds.
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium).
Available at
B Other references (Non-Normative)
1.0 Errata
Namespaces in XML Errata
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium).
Available at
1.0 2e Errata
Namespaces in XML
(Second Edition) Errata
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium).
Available at
Relative URI deprecation
Results of W3C XML Plenary
Ballot on relative URI References
In namespace declarations
3-17 July 2000
Dave Hollander and
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen,
6 September 2000.
Available at
C The Internal Structure of XML Namespaces (Non-Normative)
This appendix has been deleted.
D Changes since version 1.0 (Non-Normative)
This version incorporates the errata as of 20 July 2009
[1.0 Errata]
[1.0 2e Errata]
There are several editorial changes, including a number
of terminology changes and additions intended to produce greater
consistency. The non-normative appendix "The Internal Structure
of XML Namespaces" has been removed. The BNF
has been adjusted to interconnect properly with all editions of XML 1.0,
including the fifth edition.
E Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
This work reflects input from a very large number of people,
including especially the participants in the World Wide
Web Consortium XML Working Group and Special Interest Group
and the participants in the W3C Metadata Activity.
The contributions of Charles Frankston of Microsoft
were particularly valuable.
F Orphaned Productions (Non-Normative)
The following two productions are modified versions of ones which were present in the first two editions of this specification. They are no longer used, but are retained here to satisfy cross-references to undated versions of this specification.
Because the
Letter
production of XML 1.0, originally used in the definition of
NCNameStartChar
, is no longer the correct basis for defining names since XML 1.0 Fifth Edition, the
NCNameStartChar
production has been modified to give the correct results against any edition of XML, by defining
NCNameStartChar
in terms of
NCName
[5]
NCNameChar
::=
NameChar
- ':'
/* An XML
NameChar
, minus the ":" */
[6]
NCNameStartChar
::=
NCName
- (
Char
Char
Char
* )
/* The first letter of an
NCName
*/
Note:
Production
NC-NCNameStartChar
takes advantage of the fact that a
single-character NCName is necessarily an NCNameStartChar, and
works by subtracting from the set of NCNames of all lengths the
set of all strings of two or more characters, leaving only the
NCNames which are one character long.