Palaeogeography, …, Jan 1, 2010
Haslam and Petraglia raise three broad questions concerning our paper 'Environmental impact of th... more Haslam and Petraglia raise three broad questions concerning our paper 'Environmental impact of the 73 ka Toba super-eruption in South Asia', by Martin A. J. Williams, Stanley H. Ambrose, Sander van der Kaars, Carsten Ruehlemann, Umesh Chattopadhyaya, Jagannath Pal, Parth R. Chauhan [Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 284 (2009) 295-314]. (a) What was the relationship between the ∼ 73 ka Toba eruption and the cold stade between the Dansgaard-Oeschger interstades 20 and 19? (b) What was the regional impact of the eruption on vegetation? (c) What was the possible effect of the eruption upon humans and mammals? In response to questions (a) and (b) we note that the ∼ 73 ka Toba eruption was followed by several centuries of intense cooling and wind-blown dust accession in the Greenland GISP2 ice core, by a change from forest to grassland or open woodland in central India (carbon isotopic analysis) and in the wider region (pollen analysis of a marine sediment core in the Bay of Bengal). In regard to (c), the genetic evidence is as yet too imprecisely dated to demonstrate causality as is the archaeological evidence cited by Haslam and Petraglia in favour of minimal impact. Future work supported by higher resolution chronologies than are presently available is needed to provide a less equivocal picture of the environmental impact of the ∼ 73 ka Toba eruption.
Uploads
Books by Parth Chauhan
Papers by Parth Chauhan
bifacial technology referable to the Acheulean Technocomplex.4,5
India ), reflecting the successful adaptive strategies of South Asian hominins during the Pleistocene. More importantly, this evidence geographically links similar records of behavior from both the western and eastern parts of the Old World . Despite this significance, however, the subcontinent has received only marginal academic attention and, until recently, its behavioral record was not considered in general human
evolutionary syntheses. This is partly explained by the lack of early hominin fossils, a dearth of excavated sites and associated chronometric dates. These drawbacks are directly related to the lack of adequate funding and technical knowledge, complex bureaucracies, and a general lack of interest in paleoanthropology – all of which have hindered prehistoric research in South Asia , at varying levels.
Although Indian and Western researchers have recently begun to confront such problems through multidisciplinary excavations and international collaborations, the quality and frequency of this level of
research are minimal. Therefore, to foster the immense research and educational potential of South Asian paleoanthropology, greater emphasis needs to be placed (by both academic and government institutions) on the prioritization of research themes and the adoption of modern methodological techniques. This paper briefly reviews the salient features and academic status of the South Asian Paleolithic and its relevance in understanding human evolution in an Asian context. Associated problems (theoretical as well as practical) are discussed and broad solutions are introduced, to modernize and expand paleoanthropological studies in India.
with various hypotheses related to modern human
dispersals and evolution in the Indian subcontinent.
The focus is mainly on the available archaeological and
genetic evidence. The currently known Middle / Upper
Paleolithic archaeological records are complex, inconclusive,
and not dated well enough to reliably assume
that most or all such assemblages were produced exclusively
by modern humans. Some or all of the Middle
Paleolithic evidence may even belong to nonmodern
groups. Current problems also exist with regard to the
techno-
chronological
definition and recognition of the
Upper Paleolithic as a typomorphological marker for
“modern human behavior” and cognition as compared
with comparable contemporaneous evidence from Europe
and Africa. Likewise, the known South Asian genetic
evidence continues to be ambiguous with regard
to patterns of early arrival, subsequent dispersal within
the region and possible interbreeding with preexisting
regional nonmodern populations. At present, the only
reliable evidence is the fossil evidence and microlithic
archaeological evidence, which collectively suggest the
presence of modern human populations in South Asia
by at least 45 ka. In conclusion, various subthemes and
issues related to “out of Africa 3” and the Indian subcontinent,
are also highlighted and briefly discussed
(e.g., Middle Paleolithic and hominin species, dispersal
routes taken, cultural and dispersal implications of
ostrich eggshells).