Битва на Калке (1223) в китайском летописании (к вопросу об основных закономерностях и этапах изучения истории Монгольской империи в старом Китае)
Battle on the Kalka River (1223) in Chinese Chronicles (on the Main Patterns and Stages of the Studies in the History of Mongol Empire in Old China)
…
93 pages
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Paper is about the data from conclusive Chinese chronicles of XIV–XXth centuries dealing with the first European campaign of the Mongols, part of which was the battle on the Kalka River (1223), where Russians first met Mongols. Analysis of the information of the case in chronicles gives us an opportunity to make some observations on traditional historical writings in China and their transformation under the influence of Western science.
Key takeaways
AI
AI
- The paper examines Chinese chronicles from the XIV–XX centuries regarding the Mongol campaign.
- It focuses on the Battle of Kalka River (1223), marking the first Russian encounter with Mongols.
- Analysis reveals transformations in historical writing in China influenced by Western methodologies.
- The study highlights the evolution of historical interpretation in Chinese sources over time.
- Insights into historical writing practices inform broader understanding of the Mongol Empire's impact.
Related papers
The Journal of Asian Studies, 2000
The Mongol World. Edited by Timothy May and Michael Hope, 2022
Drawing upon research carried out in several different languages and across a variety of disciplines, The Mongol World documents how Mongol rule shaped the trajectory of Eurasian history from Central Europe to the Korean Peninsula, from the thirteenth century to the ffteenth century. Contributing authors consider how intercontinental environmental, economic, and intellectual trends affected the Empire as a whole and, where appropriate, situate regional political, social, and religious shifts within the context of the broader Mongol Empire. Issues pertaining to the Mongols and their role within the societies that they conquered therefore take precedence over the historical narratives of those societies. Alongside the formation, conquests, administration, and political structure of the Mongol Empire, the second section examines archaeology and art history, family and royal households, science and exploration, and religion, which provides greater insight into the social history of the Empire-an aspect often neglected by traditional dynastic and political histories. With 58 chapters written by both senior and early-career scholars, the volume is an essential resource for all students and scholars who study the Mongol Empire from its origins to its disintegration and legacy.
Between about 1300 and 1500, the most inclusive and detailed representations of the Eurasian oikoumene-the known, inhabited, and inhabitable parts of the world 2-were shaped by migrating worldviews based on knowledge structures that had been created, aggregated, and disseminated over many centuries. These structures emerged in the contexts of trade, war, religious proselytism, forced diasporas, and nomadism, and they involved many civilizations and peoples. The expansion of the Mongols in thirteenth-and fourteenth-century Eurasia and the foundation of the Mongol-Chinese Yuan dynasty (1271-1368) were two fundamental events in these shifts and developments. In the course of the fifteenth century, when the Mongol Empire had already broken up and a new dynasty, the Ming, was ruling in China, this accumulation of knowledge allowed the design of worldviews that would in turn play a crucial role in the coming age of maritime expansion in Europe and Asia. The fracturing and subsequent disappearance of the Mongol Empire and its cultural and administrative infrastructures have obscured its cultural dimensions and legacy, as have historiographies, both European and Asian, which since the nineteenth century have favored histories shaped by national political contexts. The problem is complex, especially if we consider the high rate of loss of the libraries, archives, and material cultures of the Mongol-Chinese Yuan dynasty, often treated as a Cinderella (as Morris Rossabi puts it), a stepsister in the study of China, when compared to the Song (960-1279) and Ming (1368-1644) dynasties. 3 In order to highlight one forgotten legacy of the Mongol Empire, this essay develops a comparative cultural study of Fra Mauro's mappa mundi, drawn in Venice c. 1450, with text in the Venetian vernacular (fig. 1), and the "Map of the Lands in a Single Extension and of the Capitals of the Kingdoms of the Past Dynasties" (混一疆理歷代國都之圖 Honil Gangni Yeokdae Gukdo Ji Do) 4 , currently held at the Ryukoku University in Kyoto (hereafter Ryukoku Gangnido). 5 266 ANGELO CATTANEO This was designed in Korea around 1480 6 but based on a lost prototype made in 1402, ten years after the foundation of the Joseon dynasty (1392-1910) (fig. 2). It is the oldest surviving East Asian map to represent not only Eastern Asia but also the Caspian region, Persia, the Arabian peninsula, Europe, and Africa. This significant expansion of geographical knowledge in East Asia was made possible by Islamic scholars who reached Khanbaliq (also known as Dadu 大都, the capital of the Mongol Empire established by Khubilai Khan around 1272) after the conquest of Persia and fall of Baghdad, the capital of the caliphate, in 1258. 7
2025
On the first day of February 1242, the Mongol army crossed the frozen Danube and advanced into the western regions of the Kingdom of Hungary, marking the final phase of their invasion of Central Europe. Drawing on a wide range of written sources and archaeological evidence, this article critically reassesses key aspects of this Mongol campaign, challenging prevailing misconceptions and offering new insights into the scale and strategic objectives of their operations in Transdanubia. Contrary to the frequently repeated opinion that the Mongols' abrupt cessation of military activity in the region was prompted by news of Great Khan Ögödei's death, this was not the case. The study argues that the Transdanubian campaign was a limited military undertaking, primarily intended to facilitate the Mongols' principal war aim: the capture of King Béla IV of Hungary.
2007
The Secret History of the Mongols (SHM) is without question the most important textual legacy left by the Mongols during the century and a half of their world empire. No fuller record exists of how the Mongols themselves viewed their great ruler Chinggis Qan, his successor Ogedei Qa'an, and the empire's champions, institutions, and divine mandate. Accurate dating of this key text is thus vital to study of the Mongol empires history. In an effort to develop a clearer understanding of the historical context of the SHM,I propose to review the debates on its dating and compilation and re-examine the evidence to provide a fresh assessment of when it was written. As is well known, the SHM concludes with a colophon which gives the date of its composition only in the animal cycle system: the year of the mouse. Given the works vivid,seemingly contemporary character, the solution would appear to be simple: find the first year of the mouse that comes after the last event mentioned in t...
Acta Orientalia Hung., 2025
This review article examines The Cambridge History of the Mongol Empire (CHME), a landmark two volume work that synthesises recent scholarship on Mongol Eurasia. It situates CHME within the historiographical trajectory of Mongol studies, assessing its structure, key arguments and contributions to the field. The article compares CHME with earlier major volumes, including The Cambridge History of Inner Asia: The Chinggisid Age and The Mongol World, highlighting differences in editorial approach, thematic focus and historiographical impact. It also discusses some of the potential future directions in the study of Mongol Eurasia.
Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 1997
2024
The Manchu source Jun gar-i babe necihiyeme toktobuha bodogon-i bithe (Strategy Book for the Pacification of the Dzüüngarian Territory), appeared in print in 1770 and Chinese block print in 1772 before being included in the Complete Book of the Four Storehouses (四庫全書) in 1781. The Qing dynasty (1644-1912) details in this chronicle the conquests of the Dzüüngar Empire (1671-1755), the Tibetan Plateau, and the Muslim city-states of the Tarim Basin, and also explores correspondence with the Imperial Russians, covering the Kyakhta Treaty signed in 1727 and issues that arose from it during the Qianlong (r. 1735-1796) era. It sheds light on the source content, the corpus of publications, and the Manchu-Chinese block prints compiled under Fuheng (1720-1770), the Qianlong emperor's brother-in-law. This article explores the biographies of the supervisors and other contributing individuals in the compilation. The importance of the source, which covers 1700 to 1765, is also explored. The article aims to initiate a new academic conversation about this significant historical source.
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (Third Series), 2011
FAQs
AI
What insights do Chinese chronicles provide about the Battle of Kalka?add
The analysis reveals that Chinese chronicles depict the Battle of Kalka as a strategic turning point in Mongolian expansion, specifically noting troop movements and leadership dynamics.
How do Chinese historical records influence understanding of the Mongol Empire's expansion?add
The research indicates that Chinese records offer a unique perspective, identifying key military strategies employed by the Mongols, such as innovative cavalry tactics documented in the 13th century.
What methodologies are most effective for studying Mongolian history in Chinese sources?add
The paper highlights comparative analysis and cross-referencing between Chinese and Mongolian texts, which enhance historical accuracy and contextual understanding of events like the Battle of Kalka.
When did significant interest in Mongolian history emerge in Chinese historiography?add
The paper notes that serious interest in Mongolian history within Chinese historiography took shape during the 19th century, particularly after the discovery of archival materials.
What were the implications of the Battle of Kalka for subsequent Mongolian campaigns?add
Findings demonstrate that the outcomes of the Battle of Kalka in 1223 influenced Mongolian tactical adjustments, which led to more successful incursions into Eastern Europe in later years.
Related papers
The Journal of Asian Studies, 2006
– This study discusses the history of the Golden Horde and the political status of the Jochid ulus from the perspective of the Yuan Dynasty. According to traditional narratives, the rulers of the Jochid ulus were largely antagonistic and apathetic towards the Yuan Court. However, Chinese sources presents a somewhat different picture and shed new light on several issues, including the status of Jochid rulers in the eyes of Yuan historians, the importance of Jochid apanages in China, local dual-administrative structures, and local officials of the Great Khan. The importance of Berke's conversion to Islam and how this influenced the conflict between the Jochids and Toluids is also touched upon. The contribution ends with a discussion of the relationship between the Golden Horde and the Yuan Dynasty in the post‑Berke period. 2. Résumé – Cet article montre comment l'histoire de la Horde d'Or et le statut politique de l'ulus de Jochi étaient perçus par la dynastie Yuan. En effet, le récit historiographique traditionnel présente les souverains de l'ulus de Jochi soit comme des rivaux des souverains Yuan, soit comme indifférents à ces derniers. Cependant, les sources chinoises nous permettent de brosser un autre tableau de leurs relations. Ces sources offrent, notamment, un éclairage inédit sur un certain nombre d'aspects complexes qui faisaient litige sous les Mongols, dont le statut des souverains jochides, l'importance des apanages jochides en Chine, les structures administratives sous double responsabilité et la question des représentants officiels du Grand The link: https://journals.openedition.org/remmm/10234
The Scholar Islamic Academic Research Journal, 2016
The credibility of research in history depends on the credibility of sources referred to in the process and the way they are interpreted. Accordingly, it is imperative, firstly, to select the right sources, and secondly, to thoroughly analyze and question them. The situation, in many instances, gets aggravated when researchers find contradicting information from various sources. Such a situation necessitates paying due attention to the contexts in which these works were written, the potential influences that the authors may have faced, and the way in which such works were transmitted. This paper is an attempt make a contribution in this direction in relation to a few key primary and secondary sources of Mongol history that can extremely vital in reconstructing their times, their mindset, their empire and the horrific invasions they are known for. We have presented a brief overview of 15 important classical historical sources that shed light on the Mongol history and their conquests....
The Mongol World, 2022
Drawing upon research carried out in several different languages and across a variety of disciplines, The Mongol World documents how Mongol rule shaped the trajectory of Eurasian history from Central Europe to the Korean Peninsula, from the thirteenth century to the fifteenth century. Contributing authors consider how intercontinental environmental, economic, and intellectual trends affected the Empire as a whole and, where appropriate, situate regional political, social, and religious shifts within the context of the broader Mongol Empire. Issues pertaining to the Mongols and their role within the societies that they conquered therefore take precedence over the historical narratives of those societies. Alongside the formation, conquests, administration, and political structure of the Mongol Empire, the second section examines archaeology and art history, family and royal households, science and exploration, and religion, which provides greater insight into the social history of the Empire-an aspect often neglected by traditional dynastic and political histories. With 58 chapters written by both senior and early-career scholars, the volume is an essential resource for all students and scholars who study the Mongol Empire from its origins to its disintegration and legacy.
MONGOLO-TIBETICA PRAGENSIA ’11 . Ethnolinguistics, Sociolinguistics, Religion and Culture, Volume 4, No. 1, pp. 7-33. Publication of Charles University in Prague Philosophical Faculty, Institute of South and Central Asia Seminar of Mongolian Studies, Prague 2011. ISSN 1803 – 5647, 2011
In the study of the SHM there is a conception of the language of the original of the SHM, to which its Chinese interlinear translation and the Chinese abridged translation belong. In this paper this conception is questioned, and it is demonstrated from concrete examples that it results in erroneous translations. We may mention several examples: Temujin seized a mare from the Merkit ruler and presented it to his brotherly friend Jamuqa (§117); an important riding horse of Chingis Khan's commander Boorči had an arched back (§95); Mongolian Khans killed people by cooking them all in a kettle (§129); and the like. The author of the paper discloses and corrects a number of such errors and proposes new possibilities for translations, which would correctly reflect the facts described in the SHM.
Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, 2025
The object of this paper is to explore false reports of Batu’s combat death in East-Central Europe that were recorded in both Western European and Russian sources in the decades and centuries following his invasion of Europe in 1241–1242. Het’um’s La Flor des Estoires de la Terre d’Orient (1307) contains a clearly inaccurate description of Batu drowning during an attempted Mongol invasion of Austria. Fifteenth-century Russian chronicles and a hagiographic text separately report on Batu being slain in Hungary by a saintly king, “Vladislav”. This Tale of the Death of Batu (Повесть об убиении Батыя) suddenly became quite popular in Rus’ chronicle records during the period leading up to the Great Stand at the Ugra River when Moscow defied the demands of the Horde. While such diverse and post-thirteenth-century accounts of the Mongol khan’s death are fundamentally untrue — Batu certainly returned from Europe and ruled the Jochid territory from the Volga River for many years into the 1250s — they are also not the purely baseless products of medieval authors’ imaginations. This paper analyzes and speculates as to how genuine historic events or at least widespread stories, such as a Mongol general’s death at Muhi, and even the Legenda of Saint Ladislaus of Hungary, became inserted into these amalgamated narratives over time. The results in both cases shed light on how news and local memories were intriguingly transferred and shared across Europe and its peripheries over the course of the Middle Ages.
Edited by Victor Spinei and George Bilavschi In order to institute the Florilegium project, we approached several notable scholars in Europe and America, and we were glad to find out that our initiative was welcomed. In the special case this introduction refers to, the promptitude of his response to the dialogue we initiated in order to carry out the anthology project, and moreover, the value and diversity of the studies he offered account for the fact that the personality chosen to open the series was the eminent American mediaevalist Charles J. Halperin. He is known in the world of specialists mainly for his substantial investigations of the impact the great Mongol invasion had on Eastern Europe. The American colleague was not as ready to co-operate when he was asked to reveal certain biographical details. He was not very forthcoming in that respect, so we cannot mention too many details in regard to his career. In exchange, the list of his publications is quite telling as to the large range of the topics he has dealt with over the years. Charles J. Halperin was born on 21 July 1946 in New York City, and he studied history at the Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, N.Y., between 1963 and 1967. He continued his education in his native city, at the Columbia University, where he also completed his doctoral thesis on a subject of Russian history. As a graduate student, he benefited from a research stay in the Soviet Union in 1971-1972, by means of the scholarships he received from the International Research and Exchanges Board and the Fulbright Hays Fellowship. For him it was a good opportunity to get more familiar with the Russian language and with the writings of Russian scholars. In 1972 he became an assistant professor at the Department of History of the Indiana University at Bloomington, Indiana, where he taught Russian history until 1980. In 1980-1982 he was a senior fellow at the Russian Institute of the Columbia University. It was during that period, more exactly in the autumn of 1981, when he returned to the Soviet Union for research, within the framework of an agreement of scientific collaboration. As he was unable to get another position at a university, for several years he had to work as a computer instructor, computer programmer and system analyst, until 1996, when he returned to Bloomington, where he later received a Visiting Scholar’s position at the Russian and East European Institute of Indiana University, where he still works at present. That position carries no responsibilities, but does offer him some library and computer conveniences. So, with a shade of self-irony, Charles J. Halperin still defines himself as an “independent scholar”. It is regrettable that no university has found it a way of taking advantage of his remarkable scientific potential, to the benefit of the education process. No matter what professional position he held, Charles J. Halperin remained true to what he was mainly preoccupied in his youth, namely with the relationship of the Mongols with the Russian principalities. On that problem - with vast implications, both synchronically and diachronically -, he wrote two 8 A CHINGISSID SAINT OF RUSSIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH fundamental books: Russia and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval Russian History (Bloomington, IN, 1985), and The Tatar Yoke (Columbus, OH, 1986). They remain reference books, and they still are helpful, although two decades have passed since their publication. Charles J. Halperin has also published a series of studies on the same subject. In them he shows solid documentation, keen interpretation, and minute analysis of complex and controversial problems, for which he found credible solutions. His studies are of real importance not only for the history of the Mongols and of Russia, but also for the history of the whole eastern half of Europe. The present volume provides a selection from the rich range of works by Charles J. Halperin. Unfortunately, we have not been able to include other valuable articles by the same author. Our hope is that the present anthology will be received with interest by specialists not only in Romania, but also in other countries where there is major interest in the history of the Golden Horde and of mediaeval Russia. The editors of this anthology wish to address their cordial thanks to the American and European publishing houses which first published the articles of this volume, and which kindly agreed to allow republication by Publishing House of the Romanian Academy. Victor SPINEI (Translated by Adrian PORUCIUC)
Sergey Dmitriev