SOC201 Classical Sociology - Explaining Double Consciousness within Selfie Culture
2020
…
6 pages
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
Using W.E.B. Du Bois' theory of double consciousness to explain the healthy usefulness of selfie culture.
So, picture this: You snap a selfie, maybe you tweak a filter, maybe, uh, you spend 10 minutes picking just the right angle—you’re presenting yourself to the world! But here’s the question that Audrey Lawson’s paper digs into: Can selfie culture—this phenomenon of constant self-imaging—actually help us merge how we see ourselves with how others see us? Or does it just deepen that weird gap between our self-image and public perception? That, right there, is the core issue Lawson tackles, using the lens—pun intended!—of W. E. B. Du Bois’ theory of double consciousness!
But, um, let’s pause—double consciousness? What is that really? Well, Du Bois, writing all the way back in 1897, described double consciousness as the experience of seeing yourself both through your own eyes AND through the sometimes harsh, judgmental eyes of society—originally in relation to the Black American experience. Lawson’s argument is that this concept actually helps explain what’s happening in selfie culture today! Pretty wild connection, right?
Here’s why it matters: In today’s world, identity is more public—and more complicated—than ever! The urge to present our “best self” online bumps up against the reality that others might interpret or judge us very differently! For young people, or, honestly, anyone just trying to figure out who they are, this can create a kind of psychological tug-of-war! Lawson argues that selfies, rather than being purely narcissistic or shallow, could actually be a way of negotiating this tension—trying to express a more authentic self!
Let’s look at the main points and findings, in plain language! First, Lawson says that the selfie is more than just a photo—it’s an act of self-creation. You control the angle, the lighting, the expression—it’s about agency! But there’s always that nagging awareness that when someone else takes your picture, or comments on your selfie—there’s a gap between how you see yourself and how they see you! That, Lawson argues, is modern double consciousness at play, just in a new digital setting!
Second, the paper uses Du Bois’ insights to show that double consciousness is not just a burden, but actually a site for growth. When we’re confronted with those clashing images—the selfie as we want to be seen, and the tag from our friend we wish would just disappear—we’re actually learning about ourselves! Lawson suggests that grappling with this “twoness” can help build skills like self-awareness, confidence, even empathy! So, uh, yeah—your next selfie session could be an exercise in emotional development!
What’s really interesting—yeah, and maybe a little unexpected—is that Lawson also brings in the idea of community. Think about how social media lets people encourage, support, or sometimes criticize each other’s self-representations! According to Lawson, this feedback loop can help people practice both intrapersonal skills (like, you know, sorting out your own feelings about yourself) and interpersonal skills—connecting, empathizing, communicating! Wild to think that using a filter or replying to a comment could have that kind of effect, right?
So, the bottom line from this paper—again, not my personal view, just sharing the argument!—is that selfie culture, despite all its critics, might actually be helping individuals integrate their “authentic” self with their “social” self. Selfies aren’t just trivial vanity projects! They’re part of a much broader process of identity construction, one that echoes the classic, deep theories of sociology!
Oh, wait—before I go further, random thought! Have you ever noticed how pets seem fascinated when they see themselves in a mirror or a phone screen? Like, do they have double consciousness too? Or is that just me wondering… Anyway, let’s get back on track!
If you’re listening and thinking, hmm, what does this all mean for me? Well, it’s a reminder that the things we do online, the ways we present ourselves, and the feedback we get—they all shape our sense of who we are! But Lawson’s paper suggests that instead of seeing this as a source of stress or insecurity, we might treat it as a tool for growth! We can accept that we possess the power to define ourselves—and that the way others see us doesn’t have to determine our entire identity!
But—again, this is just one paper, one theory! Academia is a field of questions, not answers! The important thing is to reflect, to ask: How do I relate to my own online image? Where do I feel that double consciousness in my life? And what can I, um, learn from that?
Alright, folks, that’s all for today! Thanks for joining me on In Depth with Academia—where we take scholarly ideas and try to make them, honestly, a little less intimidating! Remember—research is about exploring possible truths, not laying down the law! Until next time, keep questioning, keep learning, and maybe snap a selfie, just for science!
Related papers
International Journal of Philosophy, 2019
Leszek Kołakowski once wrote such a sentence: "Metaphysics pushed out the door returns through the window". These words of the Polish philosopher are still valid. Metaphysics did not die, although it went through intricate paths of criticism. It cannot be practised any more as Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas or Hegel did. Martin Heidegger, Emmanuel Levinas and Maurice Merleau-Ponty introduced it to new paths. One thought seems obvious: metaphysics cannot be practised outside cultural, sociological and psychological contexts. In this paper, we seek metaphysical experience in contemporary culture. It is impossible to mention all the paths followed by culture and metaphysics related to it. Obviously, not every cultural phenomenon "generates metaphysics", but the scale of the changes and redefinitions requires us to seek metaphysics in places where it has not been expected before. One of them is the omnipresent phenomenon of the so-called selfie. A photograph, taken with a smartphone, which documents both the person taking the photo and a trace of the environment they are in, is an attempt to create a new reality. "Creation" and reproduction are complicated cognitive processes. One may ask: is it not an attempt to formulate a "new metaphysics"? Can we provide its definition? Yes, we can. It is the metaphysics of oneself. An important inspiration for the presented reflections is a film by a renowned Polish director, Krzysztof Kieślowski -"Amator". Descartes and Merleau-Ponty cannot be overlooked either. The conclusion I aim to reach is the following: a selfie is a rendering of a person, who is running away from himself and at the same time wants to find himself; who wants to notice, but does not notice; who wants to see, but does not see. This "pursuit" means both an escape from reason, concealed under a hastily conjured smile or seriousness.
Cultural Studies have always concerned themselves with the contemporary—the practices and habits that define or represent the culture of today. One such “ongoing” cultural practice is the Selfie that has become the buzzword in the present-day media and social network sites. Thus we have the ‘celebrity selfie’, ‘dangerous selfie’, ‘feminist selfie’, ‘group selfie’, ‘friendship-day selfie’ etc. The term has also crept into the Oxford Dictionary, which defines it as, “a photograph that one has taken of oneself, typically one taken with a smartphone or webcam and shared via social media”. What is the impulse behind the selfie? Is it an extension of the genre of self portraiture, or is it the common man’s resistance against the objectification of and by the state agency? Is it a love of self-exhibition, a desire for agency, or a protest against hegemony? The present paper is an attempt to answer these questions by tracing the evolution of the selfies, how the selfie culture is promoted and disseminated by technology, how the feminists, capitalists and socialists perceive the rising of the selfie culture, the hazards of an obsession with selfies and the future of the selfie culture. Such an analysis, I believe, would throw light on one of the most popular sub-cultures of the world today, namely, the Selfie Culture.
Sociology Compass, 2020
Over the past 2 decades or so, the triple digital revolution—social network, Internet, and mobile phone—has increased the use and popularity of the “selfie.” Within social sciences, the phenomenon of the selfie has been examined as a new culture that shapes human self‐presentation, social relationships, and social consumptions. This article provides an overview of the most common theoretical approaches that have been used by researchers to understand the phenomenon of the selfie. In particular, the article focuses on the use of the following frameworks: dramaturgic lens, sociosemiotic approach, and dialectical framework. In addition to these approaches, this article also introduces some preliminary ideas relating to the possibility of exploring the selfie through the lens of mediatization theory. This is based on the argument that the selfie phenomenon operates within media logic as it offers symbolic resources, discursive strategies, communicative messages, and performance tactics ...
Mobile devices can instantly create and distribute a digital self-portrait, or ‘selfie’ across a myriad of social networks. The word ‘selfie’ summarises a particular kind of cultural and photographic practice that is motivated by a combination of the agency and aspirational biases of the selfie producer and where they prefer to share on social networks. With a specific focus on gendered selfie production, this paper aims to explore the relevant theories for gender identity within online communities in which selfies are shared. From a theoretical starting point, firstly this paper employs the poststructuralist theories (Deleuze and Guattari, 1980) as interpretative filters for a decisive understanding of the inner “rhizome” of an individual’s ideal of “becoming”. This paper argues that the embodied human subject is transformed by self-exploration with the production and distribution of their selfies.
Autobiografia, 2015
Film cameras made it possible for individuals to present themselves to others, to assume and feel agency, also to change it, to utilize agency to claim participation in diverse collectivities. Most recently, digital cameras have presented their users with astonishing ways to encourage but also to disseminate diverse acts of agency. In this paper the author proposes to bring to the fore the selfie (an emerging sub-genre of portraiture) as a new cultural product responsible for mediation, production, and transmission of subjectivities in the global mediascapes. Framing the subject in ways which defy ennobled aesthetic principles of photography, its cultivated artistry, selfies reconfigure and adapt ways the subject represent and understand themselves. This paper argues that selfies create visual spaces of novel modes of selfhood, of its certification and assertion.
I first coined the term, Self-Media, in my article “Selfies shape the world. Selfies, healthies, usies, felfies" (March 2014, see references p. 14). I had no opportunity at that point to go deeply into the term and its implications. I will try to do that subsequently. The self and identity are not only issues connected to the selfies. It is connected to the development of media since the renaissance; this is the thesis of the following key-note. The subject, the self, is most clearly exposed in the face, and face and identity becomes important in the media since the renaissance. The selfies is just the newest development is this tradition, which began with the invention of the mirror, the book (printing), and the miniature painting. They all put the subject as both maker and receiver in the center. This was the birth of the modern subject. The development continued throughout the coming centuries. The selfies is the latest invention to discover, explore, visualize and find the self of the subject. The following will therefore naturally focus on the self, the face where the self is most clearly expressed and seen, and the self-media, where the subject can face itself. There are a few minor typing errors in this version, if they irritate you please read a corrected version here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/236971521/SELF-MEDIA-The-Self-the-Face-the-Media-and-the-Selfies A revised and extended version of this article is to be found here: https://www.academia.edu/13785723/Self-media._The_self_the_face_the_media_and_the_selfies
Selfie as a cultural phenomenon, or rather a bunch of phenomena, is considered in this essay as an emergent figure of self-representation, which, despite its novelty, has a history as well as a futurity, and a subject of persistent critique. Narcissism and self-absorption are evident in selfies for many observers. Selfie is both a potential cause of violent death and a source of endless entertainment in the public imagination. Simultaneously, selfie is a territory of insecurity and of the body-positive self-affirmation. To answer the question, what is selfie, and in order to unpack some of its cultural implications, it is necessary to ask: what is self? And, it is acceptable to leave this last question without answer. ~ There are two versions of this writing; 02 and 06.
2019
This paper explores the social phenomenon of selfie practice as a way of communication in social media networks. The phenomenon includes photographing and posting the selfie on social networks (SN) to make person available to the public eye, in this way feeding the self-esteem or narcissistic hunger, and as such being bought or sold in currency of likes. As much as selfie is an interesting phenomenon of new technology era of self portrait and a tool for self-awareness and building up the self-esteem on SN, the problems of society are mirroring in this self-image: it serves as a platform for amplification of personality disorders and addiction on selfie and feedbacks from SN, it's a cause of accidental mortality and an increase of facial plastic surgeries in the USA. Nevertheless, selfie has a higher purpose in use among the population of black women, LGBT society (Lang, 2013), and other minorities, by nationality or emotional condition, which use it as affirmation, identification, proof of existing and belonging. Feminists, similarly, use the selfie as a statement where the woman is the manifest and the subject. Changing the urban landscape, is selfie showing our True Self or a pose for the public eye exhibiting a superimposed image based on our belief of good looks influenced by pop-culture?
Social Sustainability & Technology · Technoscientist | Researcher & Writer | Knowledge Mobilization · Bridging human, non-human, and digital worlds toward collective well-being. I'm also interested in digital sovereignty, artificial intelligence, human-computer and robot interaction, and non-human animal-nature-human interaction within the realm of health and wellness.
Related papers
Institute of Network cultures, 2017
Culture of the Selfie is an in-depth art-historical overview of self-portraiture, using a set of theories from visual studies, narratology, media studies, psychotherapy, and political principles. Collecting information from various fields, juxtaposing them on the historical time-line of artworks, the book focuses on space in self-portraits, shared between the person self-portraying and the viewer. What is the missing information of the transparent relationship to the self and what kind of world appears behind each selfie? As the 'world behind one's back' is gradually taking larger place in the visual field, the book dwells on a capacity of selfies to master reality, the inter-mediate way and, in a measure, oneself.
With the worldwide proliferation of mobile phones, Oxford University Press defines 'selfie', as "a photograph that one has taken of oneself, usually with a smartphone or webcam". The 'selfie' has evolved into a ritualistic and routinized practice. While there are studies that report the positive impacts of selfie-taking and selfie-viewing, a large number of studies (Iqani and Schroeder 2016, Chua and Chang 2016) have highlighted that there are increasing concerns on the harmful implications of the selfie. Hence, in this paper, we shall explore the selfie phenomenon through the lens of cultural theorists Adorno and Horkheimer, Althusser, De Beauvoir and Foucault, to discover if the selfie is truly a tool of empowerment as some perpetuate it to be, or it is another strategy for the social elites to remain in power.
Towards a sociology of selfies: The Filtered Face, 2023
This book examines selfies as a relational and processual networked social practice, performed between people within digital contexts and that involve online/ offline intersections and tensions. It offers an analysis of selfies through a rich and interdisciplinary framework that explores the ritualized and affective engagements selfies provoke from others. Given that selfies by definition are shared and posted through networked platforms, they complicate notions of traditional photographic selfportraiture. As such, this book explores how selfies invoke broader, stratified patterns of looking that are occluded in discourses of "empowerment" and "visibility," as well as the subjectivities these networked practices work to produce. Drawing on extensive qualitative research conducted over a period of three years, this book questions not only what selfies are but what they do, the worlds they create, the imaginaries that organize them, and the flows of desire, affect, and normativity that underpin them, questions that can only be addressed through research that closely attends to the experience of selfie-takers. It will be of interest to those working in the fields of Sociology, Cultural studies, Communications, Visual studies, Social Media studies, Feminist research, and Affect Theory.
Drawing on a wide corpus of ethnographic research projects, including on photography practices, young filmmakers and writers, and current research with young unemployed people, we argue that contemporary understandings of selfies either in relation to a “documenting of the self” or as a neoliberal (narcissistic) identity affirmation are inherently problematic. Instead, we argue that selfies should be understood as a wider social, cultural, and media phenomenon that understands the selfie as far more than a representational image. This, in turn, necessarily redirects us away from the object “itself,” and in so doing seeks to understand selfies as a socio-technical phenomenon that momentarily and tentatively holds together a number of different elements of mediated digital communication.
Since the introduction of the mobile phone technology, at the end of the last century, digital photography as a medium has changed rapidly, especially regarding the image distribution. With a new stage of Web2 interface development in social networks, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram et al these changes become more profound, especially regarding unpredictability of the distribution. Basing a differentiation on historic layers of pre-modern, modern and postmodern relationship to self, being conditioned and framed with technology, I will try to analyze a shift occurring in visual self-perception, analyzing changes of visual paradigms, since pre-modern times. These technologies are; camera obscura, photocamera, compact camera and mobile phone camera. Contrary to the times of camera obscura in which a subject was defining the space, or the subjectivised space of photo technologies, in selfie enabled technologies, subject and the object appear and at the same time; are – the same.
Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku. Akademija za umjetnost i kulturu u Osijeku., 2020
The research explores the social phenomenon of selfie practice as a way of communication in social media networks, hypothesizing False Self representation in the image presented by everyman and his smartphone. The phenomenon includes posting the selfie on social networks (SN) to make a person available to the public eye, in this way, feeding the selfesteem or narcissistic hunger, and as such being bought or sold in the currency of "likes." As much as selfie is an interesting phenomenon of self-portrait in the new technology era, a tool for self-awareness and building up the self-esteem, the problems of society are mirroring in this self-image: it serves as a platform for amplification of personality disorders and addiction on selfie and feedbacks from SN, it is a cause of accidental mortality (unintentional deaths while making selfie, most often occurrences are falling off the high places, train accidents, and drowning) and an increase of facial plastic surgeries in the USA (FlorCruz, as cited in Shah & Tewari, 2016). Alternately, it seems the selfie has a higher purpose in use among minorities, LGBT society, and other marginal layers of society (Lang, 2013) who use it as affirmation, identification, proof of existence and belonging. Feminists, similarily, use the selfie as a statement where the woman is the manifest and the subject of the photograph. Feminists are well aware that their body alone can serve as a message of feminism, in the case of selfie the message is privatecarries the name and the identity of a certain woman in the selfie, and generala feminist setting the statement to general public. Changing the urban landscape, is selfie showing our True Self or a pose for the public eye exhibiting a superimposed image based on our belief of good looks influenced by popculture?
Empirical researches have repeatedly tried to convince the behavioural scientists that the burgeoning 'selfie-frenzy' is to a large extent associated with the rise of Subclinical Narcissism in the mass. Quite a few media reports seem to extend support to this notion. For example, frequently incidents of death which had happened while taking selfies in life-threatening situations were cited in media to point out that selfie-obsession can prove to be fatal. On the other hand, quite a few studies claim that since selfie gives opportunity for selective self presentation, it bolsters the self-confidence of specifically adolescents. Even in case of adults, it provides a sense of control and importance which they derive by replicating the celebrity-like moments in their own lives. That way it may contribute to increase the sense of self-esteem and well-being in them ultimately warranting the opinion that selfie-behaviour actually works as a positive life-skill. Here, the present re...
Moritz Neumüller, ed., Routledge Companion to Photography and Visual Culture (London, New York: Routledge)., 2018
In this chapter, I summarize the findings from my extensive research on the selfie and photography on social media in general between 2014 and 2016. This research begun with my participation in the pioneering research project Selfiecity (2014), led by Lev Manovich. I argue that the selfie is more than an image, and more than an image of the self. Apart from the image, other essential attributes of the selfie include metadata, consisting of several layers: automatically generated data (like geo-tags and time stamps), data added by the user (hashtags), and data added by other users (comments and “likes”). At the same time, the selfie is also less than a self-portrait. One popular way of looking at selfies is as if they belonged to the same category of images as the famous painted self-portraits of the past. The similarity lies in the fact that both can be described as “images of the self.” But focusing on this one aspect can only lead to sweeping comparisons across cultures, centuries, and media, ignoring the historical specificity of each image and overlooking their radically different social and cultural functions. For example, one author compared selfies with self-portraits by Rembrandt and argued that “The selfie threatens to distract us from what Rembrandt did: looking at ourselves closely, honestly, but compassionately” (Judge 2014). Such comparisons are helpful only as much as they let us notice how different selfies on Instagram are from Renaissance paintings in museums.
Triade. Communicao, cultura e media, vol 3, no. 1 2015 , 2015
The self and identity are not only topics related to the selfies. They are connected to the development of media since the renaissance, the self-media. This is the thesis of the following. The subject, the self, is most clearly exposed in the face, and face and identity becomes important in the media since the renaissance. The selfies is just the newest development is this tradition, which began with the invention of the mirror, the book (printing), and the small painting. They all put the subject as both maker and receiver in the center. It was the beginning of the modern subject. The development continued throughout the coming centuries. The selfies is the newest creation to discover, explore, visualize and find the self of the subject. The following will thus emphasis the self, the face, where the self is most noticeably expressed and seen, and the self-media, where the individual can face him- or herself. (This is an unabridged, extended, revised and better version of the article, which was uploaded in August 2014. It was originally a keynote lecture from July 2014).
Portraits of Who We Are, 2018
This catalogue essay for the exhibition "Portraits of Who We Are" at the David C. Driskell Center discusses the role of self-portraiture in the formation of ideology. Through an investigation of Althusser's ideological theory in concert with Lacanian psychoanalytic theory, I suggest that the technologies available to us today in the formation of fantasy on social media are a manifestation and expansion of the human desire to represent ourselves, and that these gestures have social and political impact. I look at how Black cultural producers - entertainers, artists and activists - participate in the formation of resistant identities through media. Finally, I discuss two important controversies in the contemporary art world, in which the question of the right of representation leaves few simple answers.
S. L. Audrey Lawson