PRAYAS: individual patient data meta-analysis database for Pooled Research and Analysis for Yielding Anemia-free Solutions in In

PRAYAS: individual patient data meta-analysis database for Pooled Research and Analysis for Yielding Anemia-free Solutions in India - PMC
Official websites use .gov
.gov
website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
lock
) or
means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.
Journal List
User Guide
PERMALINK
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
PMC Copyright Notice
. 2025 Dec 23;13:1696787. doi:
10.3389/fpubh.2025.1696787
PRAYAS: individual patient data meta-analysis database for Pooled Research and Analysis for Yielding Anemia-free Solutions in India
Anuj Kumar Pandey
Anuj Kumar Pandey
Department of Health Systems and Implementation Research, International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Anuj Kumar Pandey
1,
Anju Pradhan Sinha
Anju Pradhan Sinha
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal-analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Anju Pradhan Sinha
2,
*,
Ramu Rawat
Ramu Rawat
Centre for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ramu Rawat
3,
Ranadip Chowdhury
Ranadip Chowdhury
Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ranadip Chowdhury
4,
Shivaprasad S Goudar
Shivaprasad S Goudar
J N Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Shivaprasad S Goudar
5,
Jitender Nagpal
Jitender Nagpal
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research New Delhi (SBISR), New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Jitender Nagpal
6,
Shrey Desai
Shrey Desai
Society for Education, Welfare and Action–Rural, Bharuch, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Shrey Desai
7,
Avula Laxmaiah
Avula Laxmaiah
ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Avula Laxmaiah
8,
Kalpana Basany
Kalpana Basany
SHARE India, MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Kalpana Basany
9,
Sadhana Joshi
Sadhana Joshi
10
Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Sadhana Joshi
10,
Chittaranjan Yajnik
Chittaranjan Yajnik
11
KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Chittaranjan Yajnik
11,
Aparna Mukherjee
Aparna Mukherjee
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Aparna Mukherjee
2,
Pratibha Dwarkanath
Pratibha Dwarkanath
12
St. John’s Research Institute, Bangalore, India
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Pratibha Dwarkanath
12,
Priyanka Gupta Bansal
Priyanka Gupta Bansal
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Priyanka Gupta Bansal
2,
Molly Jacob
Molly Jacob
13
Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision
Find articles by
Molly Jacob
13,
Shinjini Bhatnagar
Shinjini Bhatnagar
14
Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Shinjini Bhatnagar
14,
Komal Shah
Komal Shah
15
Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Komal Shah
15,
Debarati Mukherjee
Debarati Mukherjee
16
Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Debarati Mukherjee
16,
Amlin Shukla
Amlin Shukla
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Amlin Shukla
2,
Raghu Pullakhandam
Raghu Pullakhandam
ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Raghu Pullakhandam
8,
Varsha Dhurde
Varsha Dhurde
17
Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Varsha Dhurde
17,
Aditi Apte
Aditi Apte
18
Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Aditi Apte
18,
Rajeev Singh
Rajeev Singh
19
ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Gorakhpur, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Rajeev Singh
19,
Aakriti Gupta
Aakriti Gupta
20
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Software, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Aakriti Gupta
20,
Yamini Priyanka
Yamini Priyanka
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Yamini Priyanka
2,
Usha Dhingra
Usha Dhingra
Centre for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Usha Dhingra
3,
Ravi Prakash Upadhyay
Ravi Prakash Upadhyay
Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ravi Prakash Upadhyay
4,
Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi
Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi
Department of Health Systems and Implementation Research, International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi
1,
Manjunath S Somannavar
Manjunath S Somannavar
J N Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Manjunath S Somannavar
5,
Anirban Mandal
Anirban Mandal
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research New Delhi (SBISR), New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Anirban Mandal
6,
Gayatri Desai
Gayatri Desai
Society for Education, Welfare and Action–Rural, Bharuch, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Gayatri Desai
7,
Shantanu Sengupta
Shantanu Sengupta
21
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Shantanu Sengupta
21,
Shailendra Dandge
Shailendra Dandge
SHARE India, MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Shailendra Dandge
9,
Girija Wagh
Girija Wagh
22
Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Girija Wagh
22,
Urmila Deshmukh
Urmila Deshmukh
11
KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Urmila Deshmukh
11,
Gunjan Kumar
Gunjan Kumar
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Gunjan Kumar
2,
Anura V Kurpad
Anura V Kurpad
12
St. John’s Research Institute, Bangalore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Anura V Kurpad
12,
G S Toteja
G S Toteja
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
G S Toteja
2,
Nikhitha Mariya John
Nikhitha Mariya John
13
Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Nikhitha Mariya John
13,
Shailaja Sopory
Shailaja Sopory
14
Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Shailaja Sopory
14,
Somen Saha
Somen Saha
15
Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Somen Saha
15,
Giridhar R Babu
Giridhar R Babu
23
Department of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Giridhar R Babu
23,
Anandika Suryavanshi
Anandika Suryavanshi
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Anandika Suryavanshi
2,
Ravindranadh Palika
Ravindranadh Palika
ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ravindranadh Palika
8,
Archana Patel
Archana Patel
17
Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Archana Patel
17,
‡,
Radhika Nimkar
Radhika Nimkar
18
Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Radhika Nimkar
18,
Gaurav Raj Dwivedi
Gaurav Raj Dwivedi
19
ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Gorakhpur, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Gaurav Raj Dwivedi
19,
Umesh Kapil
Umesh Kapil
20
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Umesh Kapil
20,
Dilip Raja
Dilip Raja
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Dilip Raja
2,
Arup Dutta
Arup Dutta
Centre for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Arup Dutta
3,
Sunita Taneja
Sunita Taneja
Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Sunita Taneja
4,
Diksha Gautam
Diksha Gautam
Department of Health Systems and Implementation Research, International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Diksha Gautam
1,
Avinash Kavi
Avinash Kavi
J N Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Avinash Kavi
5,
Swapnil Rawat
Swapnil Rawat
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research New Delhi (SBISR), New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Swapnil Rawat
6,
Kapilkumar Dave
Kapilkumar Dave
Society for Education, Welfare and Action–Rural, Bharuch, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Kapilkumar Dave
7,
Rajiva Raman
Rajiva Raman
24
Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Rajiva Raman
24,
Catherine L Haggerty
Catherine L Haggerty
25
School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Catherine L Haggerty
25,
Sanjay Lalwani
Sanjay Lalwani
22
Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Sanjay Lalwani
22,
Prachi Phadke
Prachi Phadke
11
KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Prachi Phadke
11,
Alka Turuk
Alka Turuk
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Alka Turuk
2,
Tinku Thomas
Tinku Thomas
12
St. John’s Research Institute, Bangalore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Tinku Thomas
12,
Neena Bhatia
Neena Bhatia
26
Lady Irwin College, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Neena Bhatia
26,
Manisha Madai Beck
Manisha Madai Beck
13
Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Manisha Madai Beck
13,
Lovejeet Kaur
Lovejeet Kaur
14
Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Lovejeet Kaur
14,
Aakansha Shukla
Aakansha Shukla
15
Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Aakansha Shukla
15,
R Deepa
R Deepa
16
Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
R Deepa
16,
Lindsey M Locks
Lindsey M Locks
27
Department of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Lindsey M Locks
27,
Dhiraj Motilal Agarwal
Dhiraj Motilal Agarwal
18
Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Dhiraj Motilal Agarwal
18,
Raja Sriswan Mamidi
Raja Sriswan Mamidi
ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Raja Sriswan Mamidi
8,
Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research New Delhi (SBISR), New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Harshpal Singh Sachdev
6,
Rounik Talukdar
Rounik Talukdar
28
Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Rounik Talukdar
28,
Sayan Das
Sayan Das
Centre for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Sayan Das
3,
Nita Bhandari
Nita Bhandari
Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Nita Bhandari
4,
Ranjana Singh
Ranjana Singh
29
Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ranjana Singh
29,
S Yogeshkumar
S Yogeshkumar
J N Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
S Yogeshkumar
5,
Ramasheesh Yadav
Ramasheesh Yadav
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research New Delhi (SBISR), New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ramasheesh Yadav
6,
P S Reddy
P S Reddy
25
School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
P S Reddy
25,
Sanjay Gupte
Sanjay Gupte
30
Gupte Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Sanjay Gupte
30,
S Rasika Ladkat
S Rasika Ladkat
11
KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
S Rasika Ladkat
11,
Zaozianlungliu Gonmei
Zaozianlungliu Gonmei
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Zaozianlungliu Gonmei
2,
Swati Rathore
Swati Rathore
13
Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Swati Rathore
13,
Dharmendra Sharma
Dharmendra Sharma
14
Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Dharmendra Sharma
14,
Apurvakumar Pandya
Apurvakumar Pandya
15
Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Apurvakumar Pandya
15,
Yamuna Ana
Yamuna Ana
16
Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Yamuna Ana
16,
Patricia Hibberd
Patricia Hibberd
31
Boston University School of Medicine, Corsstown, Boston, MA, United States
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Patricia Hibberd
31,
Himangi Lubree
Himangi Lubree
18
Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Himangi Lubree
18,
Anwar Basha Dudekula
Anwar Basha Dudekula
ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Anwar Basha Dudekula
8,
Priti Rishi Lal
Priti Rishi Lal
20
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Priti Rishi Lal
20,
Pearlin Amaan Khan
Pearlin Amaan Khan
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Pearlin Amaan Khan
2,
Aruna Verma
Aruna Verma
32
LLRM Medical College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Aruna Verma
32,
Umesh S Charantimath
Umesh S Charantimath
J N Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Umesh S Charantimath
5,
Indrapal I Meshram
Indrapal I Meshram
ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Indrapal I Meshram
8,
Karuna Randhir
Karuna Randhir
10
Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Karuna Randhir
10,
Onkar Deshmukh
Onkar Deshmukh
11
KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Onkar Deshmukh
11,
Ashok Kumar Roy
Ashok Kumar Roy
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ashok Kumar Roy
2,
Obed John
Obed John
13
Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Obed John
13,
Nolita Dolcy Saldanha
Nolita Dolcy Saldanha
33
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Nolita Dolcy Saldanha
33,
Ashish Bavdekar
Ashish Bavdekar
18
Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Ashish Bavdekar
18,
Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar
34
BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Raj Kumar
34,
Shyam Prakash
Shyam Prakash
20
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Shyam Prakash
20,
Wafaie W Fawzi
Wafaie W Fawzi
34
BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Wafaie W Fawzi
34,
Sunil Sazawal
Sunil Sazawal
Centre for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Software, Resources, Visualization, Project administration, Supervision, writing-original-draft, Writing – review & editing
Find articles by
Sunil Sazawal
3,
Department of Health Systems and Implementation Research, International Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, India
Indian Council for Medical Research, New Delhi, India
Centre for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India
Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India
J N Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka, India
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research New Delhi (SBISR), New Delhi, India
Society for Education, Welfare and Action–Rural, Bharuch, India
ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India
SHARE India, MediCiti Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
10
Interactive Research School for Health Affairs, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Pune, India
11
KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
12
St. John’s Research Institute, Bangalore, India
13
Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
14
Translational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, Haryana, India
15
Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar, India
16
Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India
17
Lata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur, India
18
Vadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India
19
ICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Gorakhpur, India
20
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
21
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), New Delhi, India
22
Bharati Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
23
Department of Population Medicine, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
24
Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, India
25
School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
26
Lady Irwin College, New Delhi, India
27
Department of Health Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
28
Ahmedabad University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
29
Indian Institute of Public Health, Delhi, India
30
Gupte Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, India
31
Boston University School of Medicine, Corsstown, Boston, MA, United States
32
LLRM Medical College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
33
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, United Kingdom
34
BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
35
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
Correspondence: Anju Pradhan Sinha,
apradhandr@gmail.com
1st set of equal contributors
2nd set of equal contributors
3rd set of equal contributors
4th set of equal contributors
5th set of equal contributors
ORCID: Archana Patel,
orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-7421
Roles
Anuj Kumar Pandey
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Anju Pradhan Sinha
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal-analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Ramu Rawat
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Ranadip Chowdhury
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Shivaprasad S Goudar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Jitender Nagpal
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Shrey Desai
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Avula Laxmaiah
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Kalpana Basany
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Sadhana Joshi
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Chittaranjan Yajnik
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Aparna Mukherjee
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Pratibha Dwarkanath
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Priyanka Gupta Bansal
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Molly Jacob
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision
Shinjini Bhatnagar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Komal Shah
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Debarati Mukherjee
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Amlin Shukla
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Raghu Pullakhandam
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Varsha Dhurde
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Aditi Apte
Data curation, Formal-analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Rajeev Singh
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Aakriti Gupta
Software, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Yamini Priyanka
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Usha Dhingra
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Ravi Prakash Upadhyay
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Manjunath S Somannavar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Anirban Mandal
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Gayatri Desai
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Shantanu Sengupta
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Shailendra Dandge
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Girija Wagh
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Urmila Deshmukh
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Gunjan Kumar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Anura V Kurpad
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
G S Toteja
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Nikhitha Mariya John
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Shailaja Sopory
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Somen Saha
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Giridhar R Babu
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Anandika Suryavanshi
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Ravindranadh Palika
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Archana Patel
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Radhika Nimkar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Gaurav Raj Dwivedi
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Umesh Kapil
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Dilip Raja
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Arup Dutta
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Sunita Taneja
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Diksha Gautam
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Avinash Kavi
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Swapnil Rawat
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Kapilkumar Dave
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Rajiva Raman
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Catherine L Haggerty
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Sanjay Lalwani
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Prachi Phadke
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Alka Turuk
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Tinku Thomas
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Neena Bhatia
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Manisha Madai Beck
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Lovejeet Kaur
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Aakansha Shukla
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
R Deepa
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Lindsey M Locks
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Dhiraj Motilal Agarwal
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Raja Sriswan Mamidi
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Rounik Talukdar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Sayan Das
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Nita Bhandari
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Ranjana Singh
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
S Yogeshkumar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Ramasheesh Yadav
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
P S Reddy
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Sanjay Gupte
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
S Rasika Ladkat
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Zaozianlungliu Gonmei
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Swati Rathore
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Dharmendra Sharma
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Apurvakumar Pandya
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Yamuna Ana
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Patricia Hibberd
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Himangi Lubree
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Anwar Basha Dudekula
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Priti Rishi Lal
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Pearlin Amaan Khan
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Aruna Verma
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Umesh S Charantimath
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Indrapal I Meshram
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Karuna Randhir
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Onkar Deshmukh
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Ashok Kumar Roy
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Obed John
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Nolita Dolcy Saldanha
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Ashish Bavdekar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Raj Kumar
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Shyam Prakash
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Wafaie W Fawzi
Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Sunil Sazawal
Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Software, Resources, Visualization, Project administration, Supervision, writing-original-draft, Writing – review & editing
Received 2025 Sep 1; Revised 2025 Nov 17; Accepted 2025 Nov 20; Collection date 2025.
Copyright © 2025 Pandey, Sinha, Rawat, Chowdhury, Goudar, Nagpal, Desai, Laxmaiah, Basany, Joshi, Yajnik, Mukherjee, Dwarkanath, Bansal, Jacob, Bhatnagar, Shah, Mukherjee, Shukla, Pullakhandam, Dhurde, Apte, Singh, Gupta, Priyanka, Dhingra, Upadhyay, Neogi, Somannavar, Mandal, Desai, Sengupta, Dandge, Wagh, Deshmukh, Kumar, Kurpad, Toteja, John, Sopory, Saha, Babu, Suryavanshi, Palika, Patel, Nimkar, Dwivedi, Kapil, Raja, Dutta, Taneja, Gautam, Kavi, Rawat, Dave, Raman, Haggerty, Lalwani, Phadke, Turuk, Thomas, Bhatia, Beck, Kaur, Shukla, Deepa, Locks, Agarwal, Mamidi, Sachdev, Talukdar, Das, Bhandari, Singh, Yogeshkumar, Yadav, Reddy, Gupte, Ladkat, Gonmei, Rathore, Sharma, Pandya, Ana, Hibberd, Lubree, Dudekula, Lal, Khan, Verma, Charantimath, Meshram, Randhir, Deshmukh, Roy, John, Saldanha, Bavdekar, Kumar, Prakash, Fawzi and Sazawal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)
. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
PMC Copyright notice
PMCID: PMC12771771  PMID:
41503041
Abstract
Purpose
The PRAYAS Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis (IPD-MA) database aims to estimate the prevalence of anemia among children under 18 years, non-pregnant and non-lactating (NPNL) women, and pregnant women (by trimester), with further stratification by age group, year, and region of India. Beyond prevalence, it seeks to address the etiological contribution of iron and other erythropoietic micronutrient deficiencies and to evaluate the effectiveness of anemia prevention and treatment interventions, including factors associated with non-response. This will directly support India’s “test–treat–track” approach under the Anemia Mukt Bharat program.
Participants
Children (0–18 years), pregnant women, and NPNL women in India.
Findings to date
The database currently includes 88 datasets (1994–2023), with 319,721 participants for prevalence analysis—children (19,762), NPNL women (17,883), and pregnant women (282,076). Intervention studies comprise 59,292 participants—children (13,435), NPNL women (11,594), and pregnant women (34,263). Over half the datasets (55.7%, 49/88) are randomized controlled trials, while 35.2% (31/88) are observational. Geographically, 43.2% (38/88) are from northern India, 22.7% (20/88) from the west, and 18.2% (16/88) from the south. Most studies (67%, 59/88) are community-based. Median ages were 26 years (IQR 23–32) for NPNL and 23 years (IQR 21–25) for pregnant women, while children’s data covered 6 months to 18 years. Mean gestational age at enrollment in pregnancy was 10.24 weeks (SD 17.65). Of the total sample, 10.8% had complete blood count data, 9% ferritin, and 4.5% vitamin B12.
Among interventions, pregnant women received intravenous iron sucrose, ferric carboxymaltose, iron isomaltoside, combined IV iron with vitamin B12/folic acid/niacinamide, integrated packages, and low-dose calcium supplementation. NPNL women were often part of trials comparing 60 mg daily ferrous sulfate with 120 mg on alternate days. Children’s interventions mainly included ferrous sulfate, food supplementation, and select Ayush-based approaches.
Future plans
PRAYAS will generate robust, policy-relevant evidence to refine anemia prevention and treatment strategies. Findings will directly inform the Anemia Mukt Bharat program, supporting targeted, evidence-driven interventions to reduce anemia and associated health burdens across children, women, and pregnant populations in India.
Clinical Trial Registration
OSF—
Keywords:
anemia, iron-deficiency, intervention, public policy and governance, sustainable development goals
Highlights
The harmonized PRAYAS pooled Indian dataset is one of the largest, reliable, and most comprehensive datasets on pregnant/non-pregnant and non-lactating women and children.
One of its kind of dataset with information on hemoglobin levels, relevant biochemical and key micronutrients parameters, and varied interventions from across India.
Heterogeneity of interventions, dosage, duration, and data collection approaches.
Studies lack critical parameters needed to assess changes in hemoglobin concentration like non-availability of key erythropoietic micronutrients in most of the studies, limiting the scope of certain analyses.
Introduction
Nutritional anemia remains a significant global public health challenge (
), with profound implications for the health and productivity of women and children. In 2019, anemia affected approximately one-third of women of reproductive age (WRA) globally, with approximately 269 million children aged 6–59 months also impacted (
). The burden of anemia is disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (
), with the African and South-East Asian regions contributing the most to global prevalence (
). In LMIC, anemia affects 43% of the population compared to just 9% in developed nations, with WRA and children being the most vulnerable groups (
). While anemia has a multifactorial etiology, iron deficiency is the most prevalent cause, particularly in LMICs, where nutritional deficiencies are widespread (
). The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Nutrition Targets aim for a 50% reduction in anemia among WRA by 2030, reflecting its prioritization in global health initiatives (
10
).
In India, the burden of anemia has shown alarming trends. The National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) highlights an increase in anemia prevalence among WRA (from 53.1% in 2015–16 to 59.1% in 2019–21), pregnant women (from 50.3 to 52.6%), and children aged 6–59 months (from 58.6 to 67.1%) over the same period (
11
). However, the methods used for assessments and the interpretation of the results have highlighted several challenges, like the use of capillary blood, unlike gold standard methods of assessments through venous blood (
12–14
). Additionally, a national survey reported that ~41% of preschoolers, school-age children, and adolescents (aged 1–19 years) were anemic, with female adolescents experiencing higher prevalence rates (40%) than males (18%) (
15
). Anemia’s consequences are far-reaching, including fatigue, impaired cognitive and immune function, reduced productivity, and increased morbidity and mortality (
16
17
). Addressing anemia remains a public health priority in India, as evidenced by initiatives like the Anemia Mukt Bharat (AMB) program, launched in 2018 to reduce anemia prevalence by three percentage points annually among children, adolescents, and WRA (
17
). The reduction of anemia is one of the important objectives of the POSHAN Abhiyaan launched in March 2018.
Despite these efforts, the prevalence of anemia remains unacceptably high (
18
19
). Improving the understanding of anemia’s burden across demographic groups and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions are critical for guiding policy and program decisions. Complying with the targets of POSHAN Abhiyaan and National Nutrition Strategy set by the NITI Aayog, AMB strategy has been designed to reduce the prevalence of anemia.
There is a need to synthesize the evidence on anemia and analyze the progress made under AMB or reasons for its inadequate progress. In this context, it was decided to collate all existing data on anemia from studies conducted over more than four decades across diverse regions of the country by contacting the investigators. The primary goal of this initiative is to answer the questions that remain unanswered by individual studies. The results would feed into the AMB program recommendations for WRA and children. The results would also guide targeted strategies to reduce anemia in India. It is expected that by pooling the observational and interventional studies, we may investigate the etiological fractions of various causes of this recalcitrant public health problem and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of several interventions used for prevention and treatment of anemia. By integrating data from a wide range of geographical, community, and healthcare settings, this extensive pooling of studies aims to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the underlying trends and patterns. Our approach not only enhances the depth and breadth of available evidence but also ensures a more representative and holistic perspective on the factors influencing health outcomes over time.
Database description
Selection of studies
Given the persistent and high burden of anemia in India despite ongoing initiatives, there was a recognized need for an in-depth understanding of the issues concerned with anemia across the country. In response, the Director General of the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) commissioned an initiative in early 2023 to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the anemia burden in India. To facilitate this effort, ICMR constituted a committee of eminent experts in the field of anemia in India. The initial phase involved key preparatory activities, including the development of database search keywords, identification of principal investigators (PIs), and relevant studies across India, as well as contacting the study PIs. These activities were undertaken by the Secretariat at the ICMR.
A designated committee conducted the selection of studies under the chairperson’s guidance. To identify relevant studies, the committee adopted two well-established approaches. First, a systematic search of trial registries, and second, collaborative discussions with investigators of ongoing studies involving children and women (pregnant and NPNL) (
20
21
). The process began with a database search of the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI) (
22
). The initial search was conducted using designated keywords such as “anemia,” “prevalence,” “children,” “randomized controlled trial,” “intervention studies,” “anemia etiology,” “pregnant women,” “women of reproductive age,” and “non-pregnant women” (
22
).
The committee also expanded the search by examining cross-references from related studies, following up with leads provided by principal investigators (PIs) of studies included, and reaching out to additional researchers in the field. After identifying related studies, committee members contacted the PIs with requests for collaboration in early 2024. Once the PIs agreed, a data sharing agreement was prepared and signed by them, and several online meetings were held to discuss the details of the proposed database and the datasets involved. After the online meetings with study PIs, the harmonization meeting was held at ICMR headquarters in New Delhi in early August 2024 with the objective of discussing methodological issues, explaining to the participants what the database would be, and discussing the difficulties in filling the data extraction sheets. Such meetings were scheduled at the ICMR headquarters at routine intervals of 3–4 months of time. The meeting also aimed at handholding the PIs on how to fill in the data cells. A second round of data harmonization meeting was held at the end of October 2024. After identifying and removing duplicates, a total of 88 datasets from studies, conducted by 23 organizations at different time points in India, were included in the database synthesis following certain inclusion criteria -
This database included studies on anemia conducted on children under 18 years, NPNL women, and pregnant women, where data on hemoglobin levels were available.
Eligible studies included cross-sectional and interventional designs (both randomized and non-randomized), longitudinal studies, unpublished studies, including the COVID registries with due approval from the relevant authorities.
Studies conducted in India, with data on hemoglobin and other relevant biochemical parameters (e.g., serum ferritin levels, complete blood counts, vitamin B12 levels, and inflammatory markers) at baseline and post-intervention were also included within the database.
Data sets were excluded if data on hemoglobin and other relevant biochemical parameters were not available.
Data sources in the pooled data set
After completing the formalities and harmonization, the PIs shared their anonymized datasets in a predefined format. The data included information such as study ID, woman/subject ID, demographic details, interventional strategies, hemoglobin and ferritin levels, relevant biochemical parameters at baseline and post-intervention, comorbidities, adverse effects, etc.
Figure 1
provides details of the studies identified through databases and the number of studies included in the final database. The details of each of the studies included are available elsewhere (
Supplementary Table 1
).
Figure 1.
Open in a new tab
Overview of the data included in the pooled database.
The ICMR team ensured that the included studies complied with relevant ethical guidelines and regulations. All included primary studies had received approval from ethics committees recognized by the Department of Health Research in India, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
Table 1
provides details of studies included within the database of PRAYAS.
Table 1.
Details of studies—database profile PRAYAS.
Name of institute (no of dataset)
Sample size
Period (year of blood collection during the study)
Study setting (Community-based or hospital-based)
Region (North, West, South, Central, North-East)
Study design (observational or RCT)
Prevalence-WRA
IIHMR—New Delhi (2)
2,457
2014–14
Hospital
North, South, East
Observational
838
2018–19
Hospital
South, East
Observational
KEM Hospital, Pune (2)
691
2001–03
Community
West
Observational
656
2006–08
Community
West
Observational
SAS—New Delhi (3)
408
2018–2019
Community
North
RCT
907
2017–2021
Community
North
RCT
6,672
2017–2021
Community
North
RCT
ICMR-NIN, Hyderabad (1)
470
2019
Hospital
South
Longitudinal
ICMR-RMRC, Gorakhpur (1)
536
2022–23
Community
North
Observational
ICMR—Headquarter (1)
4,128
2020–22
Hospital
Across India
Observational
CMC Vellore (1)
120
2021
Hospital
South
Longitudinal
Total sample
17,883
Intervention-WRA
SAS—New Delhi (4)
816
2018–2019
Community
North
RCT
4,069
2017–2021
Community
North
RCT
4,069
2017–2021
Community
North
RCT
2,050
2017–2021
Community
North
RCT
CMC, Vellore (1)
120
2020–21
Hospital
South
RCT
ICMR-NIN, Hyderabad (1)
470
2019
Community
South
Longitudinal
Total sample
11,594
Prevalence—pregnant
CMC—Vellore (3)
107
2019–22
Hospital
South
Longitudinal
107
2019–22
Hospital
South
Longitudinal
107
2019–23
Hospital
South
Longitudinal
KLE (JN Medical College) Belagavi (2)
11,220
2002–23
Community
South, North
RCT
125,180
2010–19
Community
South
Observational
IIPH—Bengaluru (2)
1,634
2016–19
Hospital
South
Observational
1,317
2016–19
Hospital
South
Observational
KEM Hospital—Pune (2)
737
1994–95
Community
West
Observational
670
1994–95
Community
West
Observational
SAS—New Delhi (2)
2,269
2017–2021
Community
North
RCT
910
2017–2021
Community
North
RCT
SEWA Rural—Gujarat (1)
458
2023
Hospital
West
Observational
ICMR—Headquarter (1)
16,539
2021
Hospital
Across India
Observational
ICMR—Headquarter (1)
874
2020–22
Hospital
Across India
Observational
THSTI—Faridabad (1)
6,000
2015–23
Hospital
North
Observational
8,665
6,481
IIPH—Gandhinagar (1)
207
2020
Community
West
Observational
MIMS—Telangana (1)
1,257
2010–18
Hospital
South
Longitudinal
Bharati Vidyapeeth, Pune (1)
1,062
2017–21
Hospital
West
Observational
Lata Foundation Nagpur (1)
85,277
2010–2021
Community
Central
Observational
SJRI Bangalore (1)
10,998
2018–22
Hospital
South
RCT
Total sample
282,076
Intervention-pregnant
SAS—New Delhi (3)
4,081
2017–21
Community
North
RCT
4,081
2017–21
Community
North
RCT
2,059
2017–21
Community
North
RCT
KLE (JN Medical College) Belagavi (2)
2,912
2022–23
Community
South, North
RCT
2,906
2022–23
Community
South, North
RCT
IIHMR—New Delhi (1)
1,999
2017
Hospital
North, East
RCT
SJRI—Bengaluru (1)
10,998
2018–22
Hospital
South
RCT
SEWA Rural—Gujarat (1)
100
2017–18
Hospital
West
Pre-post
MIMS Hyderabad, Telangana
5,127
2009–18
Hospital
South
Observational Cohort
Total sample
34,263
Prevalence children
SAS—New Delhi (5)
517
2018–2019
Community
North
RCT
408
2018–2019
Community
North
RCT
652
2021–2022
Community
North
RCT
1,300
2021–2022
Community
North
RCT
319
2020–2021
Community
North
RCT
CPHK—New Delhi (4)
1,257
2002–2004
Community
North
RCT
3,002
2014–15
Community
North
RCT
300
2009–2011
Community
North
RCT
2,250
2017–19
Hospital
North
RCT
KEM Hospital, Pune (3)
704
2001–03
Community
West
Observational
685
2005–08
Community
West
Observational
685
2012
Community
West
Observational
KEM Vadu—Pune (2)
972
2004
Community
West
RCT
551
2007
Community
West
RCT
SBISR—New Delhi (1)
100
1999
Hospital
North
RCT
ICMR—RMRC-Gorakhpur (1)
1,017
2022–23
Community
North
Observational
IIPH—Bengaluru (1)
256
2023–24
Hospital
South
Observational
IIPH, Gandhi Nagar (1)
450
2021
Community
West
RCT
Lata Foundation—Nagpur (1)
225
2020
Community
Central
Observational
AIIMS, New Delhi (1)
1,054
2017
Community
North
Observational
ICMR—Headquarter (1)
658
2020–22
Hospital
Across India
Observational
ICMR—Headquarter (1)
446
2015
Community
North
Observational
ICMR—Headquarter (1)
446
2020–22
Hospital
Across India
Observational
NIN—Telangana (1)
1,508
2017
Community
Central, Northeast, South, West, East
Observational
Total sample
19,762
Intervention children
SAS—New Delhi (8)
816
2018–2019
Community
North
RCT
1,036
2018–2019
Community
North
RCT
1,029
2018–2019
Community
North
RCT
1,300
2021–2022
Community
North
RCT
1,300
2021–2022
Community
North
RCT
1,678
2020–2021
Community
North
RCT
1,678
2020–2021
Community
North
RCT
837
2020–2021
Community
North
RCT
KEM Vadu—Pune (5)
184
2004–05
Community
West
RCT
167
2004–05
Community
West
RCT
165
2004–05
Community
West
RCT
165
2004–05
Community
West
RCT
414
2007
Community
West
RCT
IIPH—Gandhi Nagar (1)
245
2022
Community
West
RCT
MIMS—Telangana (1)
1,286
2010–18
Hospital
South
Observational
ICMR—Gorakhpur (1)
461
2023
Community
North
RCT
SBISR—New Delhi (1)
100
1999–2000
Hospital
North
RCT
AIIMS, New Delhi (1)
1,054
2017
Community
North
RCT
Total sample
13,435
Open in a new tab
After finalizing the datasets, the entire database was separated into groups for children under 18 years, NPNL, and pregnant women. The studies were then categorized into two groups:
Prevalence studies and
Intervention studies
This categorization was important since it dictated the type of analysis and statistical methods to be applied. The included studies (
Table 1
) span both hospital and community settings and include observational, longitudinal, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and pre–post-intervention designs. States and UTs were classified as regions for analysis following the classification system set by the Registrar General & Census Commissioner of India for sample registration system (SRS) (
23
).
Variable availability and definition
Data harmonization is a critical step while developing a database profile, ensuring that data from diverse studies can be integrated and analyzed collectively, thus enhancing the reliability and generalizability of the findings (
24–26
). A significant aspect of harmonization was to ensure uniform units for all biochemical variables. For example, hemoglobin levels (reported in grams per deciliter or grams per liter by different studies) were standardized to a single unit (grams per deciliter). This step, along with the standardization of other blood parameters such as red blood cell count and serum ferritin, was also undertaken. A separate sheet with standardized parameters was developed for reference (
Table 2
).
Table 2.
Cutoff values for hemoglobin along with the unit for data collection.
Hemoglobin cutoff
Unit
Children 6–23 months of age
Children 6–59 months of age
NPNL
Pregnant women (first and third trimester)
Pregnant women (second trimester)
Non-anemia
gm/dl
10.5 or higher
11.0 or higher
12.0 or higher
11.0 or higher
10.5 or higher
Mild anemia
9.5–10.4
10.0–10.9
11.0–11.9
10.0–10.9
9.5–10.4
Moderate anemia
7–9.4
7.0–9.9
8.0–10.9
7.0–9.9
7–9.4
Severe anemia
<7.0
<7.0
<8.0
<7.0
<7.0
Open in a new tab
Hemoglobin (Hb), the primary outcome indicator of anemia, was measured in grams per deciliter (g/dL), and categorized as mild, moderate, and severe based on the hemoglobin threshold as mentioned in the updated guideline on hemoglobin cutoffs to define anemia, released in 2024 (
Table 2
) (
27
28
).
Table 3
also presents the acceptable upper and lower values for each hematological and biochemical biomarkers for children, pregnant, and non-pregnant women. These values served as quality control measures to exclude implausible values. Additionally, the table also presents the acceptable unit for each parameter. Definition for the micronutrient-related thresholds, inflammatory, and metabolic markers was also defined to check for the quality of collected data.
Table 3.
Acceptable values to eliminate abnormal values from the database.
Parameter
Children
Pregnant women
Non-pregnant women
Lower acceptable value
Upper acceptable value
Lower acceptable value
Upper acceptable value
Lower acceptable value
Upper acceptable value
Hematocrit (
36
<30%
>44.1%
<36%
>48%
<36%
>48%
MCV (
37
>86 femtoliter (fL)
<80 femtoliter (fL)
>100 femtoliter (fL)
<80 femtoliter (fL)
>100 femtoliter (fL)
MCH (
38
39
(6 m–1 yr)23 pg
(6 m–1 yr) 31 pg
>33 picograms (pg) per cell
>33 picograms (pg) per cell
MCHC (
40
(6 m–1 yr) < 32 g/dL
(6 m–1 yr) > 36 g/dL
<32 g/dL
>36 g/dL
<32 g/dL
>36 g/dL
Ferritin (
41
42
140 μg/L
13 μg/L
150 μg/L
13 μg/L
150 μg/L
Transferrin saturation (
43–45
).
(0 to <1 year) 4.1%
30% (0 to <1 year) 59%
15%
50%
15%
50%
sTfR (
46
).
4.4 mg/L
4.4 mg/L
μg/dL (
46
47
).
(Abnormal values) 3–6 years >70 μmol/mol heme
100 μg/㎗
100 μg/㎗
Vitamin A (
48
49
<0.70 μmol/L
0.07 μmol/g
3,000 retinol activity equivalents (RAE)/Day
0.07 μmol/L
3,000 retinol activity equivalents (RAE)/Day
Vitamin B12 (
50
51
<150 pmol/L (203 pg./mL)
100 pmol/L
350 pmol/L
100 pmol/L
350 pmol/L
Folate (Serum) (
52
53
<4 ng/mL (<10 nmol/L)
2.0 ng/mL
7.0 ng/mL
2.0 ng/mL
7.0 ng/mL
Folate (RBC) (
53
54
<151 ng/mL (<340 nmol/L)
>400 ng/mL
>400 ng/mL
Zinc (
55
<10 years:65 mg/dL
<10 years:65 mg/dL
70 mcg/dL
<56 (μg/dL)
70 mcg/dL
Vitamin D (
56–58
<12 ng/mL
<30 nmol/L
10 ng/mL
50 ng/mL
CRP (
59
> 5 mg/L
0.1 mg/L
>5.0 mg/L
0.1 mg/L
>5.0 mg/L
AGP (
60
>1 g/L
0.4 mg/mL
3 mg/mL
0.4 mg/mL
3 mg/mL
IL-6 (
55
5 pg./mL
25 pg./mL
5 pg./mL
25 pg./mL
D-Dimer (
61
500 ng/mL
10,000 ng/mL
500 ng/mL
10,000 ng/mL
Open in a new tab
RDW, red cell distribution width; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; sTfR, soluble transferrin receptor; ZnPP, zinc protoporphyrin; CRP, C-reactive protein; AGP, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein; IL-6, interleukin-6.
Principles and plans for statistical analysis
A detailed statistical analysis and reporting plan was formulated in collaboration with the Technical Advisory Group of the PRAYAS consortium. This plan delineated the statistical techniques, underlying assumptions, and procedural steps, ensuring systematic, and transparent analyses (details will be reported in subsequent papers). One-stage meta-analysis and two-stage meta-analysis approaches would be used for analyzing all the available data to calculate the prevalence of anemia and its severity across age groups. Using a weighted sample, the prevalence of anemia and its severity will be calculated as the number of anemics divided by the total number of participants in different age groups. To account for differences in sample sizes across datasets, each dataset will be weighted, with
weights computed as the inverse of the ratio of the individual dataset sample size to the overall pooled database sample size
The analysis will use a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis approach, pooling harmonized data from all included studies to estimate the adjusted etiological fractions of anemia due to specific micronutrient deficiencies (such as iron, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin A, vitamin D, and zinc) in children, non-pregnant/non-lactating women, and pregnant women (by trimester where possible). Multilevel regression models will be employed, with study as a random effect and relevant covariates included to account for confounding and between-study heterogeneity. Adjusted risk ratios for each deficiency will be used to calculate PAFs, with subgroup analyses by age, region, and other modifiers. Sensitivity analyses will assess the robustness of findings to different deficiency cut-offs and model specifications. To evaluate intervention effects, logistic regression will estimate relative risks (RR) for anemia prevalence, while linear regression will compute mean differences (MD) in hemoglobin levels, adjusted for confounders. Additionally, the database would also be utilized to develop risk prediction models using machine learning approaches.
Patient and public involvement
No patients or members of the public were directly involved in the design or conduct.
Findings to date
The PRAYAS database, spanning over 379,013 individuals, offers a rich, regionally diverse, and methodologically varied resource to derive meaningful insights into nutritional anemia across India.
Study profile
Pooled database comprises 88 datasets, encompassing a total of 319,721 participants for prevalence analysis—children (19,762), NPNL (17,883), and pregnant women (282,076). Additionally, 59,292 participants were included in intervention studies—children (13,435), NPNL (11,594), and pregnant women (34,263). RCTs comprised 55.7% (49/88) of the datasets, whereas observational studies comprised 35.2% (31/88) of the datasets. Others were longitudinal studies (8%–7/88) and pre–post-study (1.1%–1/88). The included studies were conducted across various regions of India: the major contributions were from the northern region of India with 38 studies (43.2%), followed by the western part of India with 20 studies (22.7%). The southern part contributed 16 studies (18.2%). A smaller share from the central part of India (2.3%–2/88) followed by 12 studies (13.6%) from across India or have spanned multiple regions. These studies span from 1994 to 2023. A majority [59/88 (67%)] of the datasets originates from community-based studies, while 29/88 (33%) were derived from hospital-based research (
Table 1
).
Baseline characteristics—prevalence datasets
Of the included studies, more than 85% of the sample had information on hemoglobin concentration with highest among the pregnant women datasets with information from 96.1% (270,939) sample followed by NPNL and children with 94.4% (16,878) and 87.8% (17,351), respectively. The sample included NPNL and pregnant women with a median age of 26 years (IQR 23–32) and 23 years (IQR 21–25), respectively. Within the children datasets, information from 6 months up to 18 years was pooled within the database. Ultrasonography was used in 76.8% (198,819) of the sample for gestational age assessment (23.2%–60,053 used the LMP method). The mean gestational age at enrollment was 10.24 weeks (SD
17.65). Specifically, more than one-third (41.32%–105,103) of the participants were enrolled in the first trimester of pregnancy, whereas 37% (94,249) in the second trimester.
Further assessment of information on each hematological and biochemical biomarker reported that overall, 10.8% (34,442/319,721) of the sample had information on complete blood count (CBC). Whereas of the total sample, 9% (28,672) and 4.5% (14,240) had information on ferritin and vitamin B12, respectively. Less than 5% of the sample had information on other essential parameters (
Figure 2
). We are yet to analyze other essential parameters within the database.
Figure 2
illustrates the distribution of available data on hemoglobin, vitamins, and complete blood count (CBC) among children, NPNL, and pregnant women dataset.
Figure 2.
Open in a new tab
Distribution of available data on hemoglobin, vitamins, and complete blood count (CBC):
(a)
Children dataset;
(b)
NPNL dataset;
(c)
Pregnant women dataset.
Baseline characteristics—intervention datasets
Within the PRAYAS database, a total of 33 datasets (sample
59,292) were from intervention studies. Of these, 87.9% (29/33) datasets are randomized controlled trials with maximum within the children database (17 datasets). This dataset focuses on addressing anemia through nutritional and therapeutic approaches.
For the pregnancy database, 23.8% (8,150/34,263) of the interventions were specified as therapeutic. It is pertinent to note that 54.6% (18,719) of the samples were not specified within the one single category of therapeutic or preventive. Among pregnant women, a broader range of interventions was implemented, including intravenous iron sucrose (
18
), ferric carboxymaltose (IV FCM) (
29
), iron isomaltoside (IV IIM) (
29
), IV iron combined with vitamin B12, folic acid, and niacinamide, integrated interventions (a combination of health, nutrition, psychosocial care, and WASH) (
30
31
), as well as low-dose calcium supplementation (
32
). These were administered either during pregnancy alone, during both preconception and pregnancy, or in the preconception period only (
30
31
). The control groups primarily received either high-dose calcium in one study (
32
) or oral iron in the rest others.
For the WRA group, 53.9% (6,246/11,594) of interventions were categorized as therapeutic. A total of 4 study namely WINGS (
30
31
), IMPRINT (
33
), ICMR NIN study (
34
), CMC-RCT contributed to the database. WINGS provided integrated interventions (a combination of health, nutrition, psychosocial care, and WASH). These interventions were delivered at different stages, namely during preconception, during preconception + pregnancy, and during pregnancy with a control of oral iron. A study by CMC compared ferrous sulfate tablets of 60 mg elemental iron daily with a control of 120 mg on alternate days. Whereas NIN study administered prophylactic IFA and assessed for iron deficiency anemia in pre–post-method. Lastly, IMPRINT study provided food supplements and compared them with the oral iron group.
Within the children’s datasets, 7 studies contributed to a total of 18 datasets (sample—13,435). First study IMPRINT (
33
) contributed to a total of eight dataset delivered interventions as supplement or food vehicle, whereas others have delivered interventions as supplement or through fortification. Studies have administered ferrous sulfate as interventions along with food supplements, and some were Ayush trials.
Discussion
The PRAYAS database is a compilation of datasets from India on Anemia among women and children. This compilation is in response to prolonged deliberations regarding stagnancy in the prevalence of anemia in India despite focused interventions like AMB. Studies have explained an increase in compliance with such programmatic interventions that can accelerate reductions in anemia prevalence (
35
). Despite such decisive interventions and framework, findings from nationally representative sample surveys highlight an increase in anemia prevalence among WRA (from 53.1% in 2015–16 to 59.1% in 2019–21), pregnant women (from 50.3 to 52.6%), and children aged 6–59 months (from 58.6 to 67.1%) over the same period in India (
11
). Another study noted that there is an obvious shift in the distribution of Hb to the right among pregnant women over the past several years (
28
). This shift could be attributed to the implementation of the programmatic interventions with a focus on pregnant women or to factors stemming from overall development. The dearth of robust evidence around the diverse clinical etiologies of anemia, effective interventions, etc., demands a study that can be used for further policy decision-making.
Strengths and limitations
Data synthesized from the pooled data database would be used for calculating anemia indicators for the given population as these data have been collected from high-quality and closely observed observational and randomized controlled studies mostly using venous blood samples. This is an important resource considering several challenges associated with the existing health surveys (
12–14
). Additionally, the analysis would provide etiological fractions for anemia prevalence importantly fraction due to iron deficiency in all age groups of children under 18 years, NPNL, and pregnant women. These details can help the program to decide on the necessity of continuing prophylactic supplementation for these age groups and also finetune the doses for the same. Furthermore, the individual patient data meta-analysis of intervention studies can inform robust evidence regarding the type of iron intervention and dose of iron in both therapeutic and prophylactic studies. Additional social parameters could further enrich the analysis; these were not included due to the nature of the secondary data used.
The analysis from this database is expected to generate robust, high-quality evidence from large high-quality studies to inform public health policies and guide strategies for reducing the anemia’s burden in India. The systematic harmonization approach employed in this study ensures the validity and reliability of the datasets by addressing variations in data collection and standardizing outcome measures. This methodological rigor will enable more precise estimates and facilitate meaningful comparisons across populations and interventions (
24–26
).
However, several limitations should be noted. First, pooling data from studies with varying intervention types may result in high heterogeneity, which will be addressed through subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Second, some studies may lack critical parameters needed to assess changes in hemoglobin concentration, limiting the scope of certain analyses. Additionally, challenges in obtaining participant-level data due to restrictions from principal investigators or unpublished results could lead to data gaps. The inclusion of heterogeneous intervention and control conditions may also introduce a risk of bias, complicating the generalizability of findings. To mitigate these issues, we will evaluate heterogeneity using advanced statistical models, such as random-effects meta-analysis, and conduct subgroup analyses to explore the impact of differences across geographic, demographic, and intervention-specific factors.
The ability to analyze participant-level data allows for greater flexibility in adjusting for confounders, exploring effect modifiers, and conducting tailored subgroup analyses. By addressing sources of heterogeneity and potential biases, this meta-analysis aims to provide nuanced and reliable insights into the epidemiology of anemia and the effectiveness of various interventions.
Analyses from this database, to be presented in subsequent manuscripts, will provide findings that enhance understanding of the factors driving the high prevalence of anemia in India and the effectiveness of interventions to address this public health challenge. The findings will support evidence-based policymaking, i.e., will feed into the Anemia Mukt Bharat program recommendations for WRA and children and guide targeted strategies to reduce anemia and its associated health burdens across vulnerable populations.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) [vide letter no. 5/7/Pooled Analysis/2023-RCN].
Footnotes
Edited by:
Sujosh Nandi
, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India
Reviewed by:
Zeinab Gholamnia Shirvani
, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Sagar Acharya
, Vidyasagar University, India
Anit Kujur
, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Author’s note
Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will also be communicated to the policy makers for effective decision-making to curb the increasing trend of anemia in India. Commissioned by the Indian Council of Medical Research—India.
Data availability statement
The data analyzed in this study are subject to the following licenses/restrictions: All the collaborating PIs have acknowledged that the pooled data can only be used for this IPD analysis, with no transfer of ownership. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to
apradhandr@gmail.com
Ethics statement
Ethical approval for this study was not required since all included primary studies had received approval from ethics committees recognized by the Department of Health Research in India, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The ICMR team ensured that the included studies complied with relevant ethical guidelines and regulations.
Author contributions
AnP: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AnjS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RRaw: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. RC: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. ShG: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JN: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SDes: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AL: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. KB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SJ: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. CY: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ApM: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PD: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. PB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MJ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. KS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. DM: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AmS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RPu: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. VD: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AA: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. RajS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AG: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YP: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. UsD: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. RU: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SN: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. MS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AnM: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. GDe: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SSen: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SDan: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. GW: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. UrD: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. GK: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AKu: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. GT: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. NJ: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SSop: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SSah: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. GB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AnaS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RPa: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ArP: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RN: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. GDw: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. UK: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. DR: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ArD: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ST: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. DG: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AKa: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SRaw: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. KD: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RRam: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. CH: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SLal: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PP: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AT: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. TT: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. NeB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. LK: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AaS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RD: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. LL: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. DA: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RM: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. HS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RT: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SDas: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. NiB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RanS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SY: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RY: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PR: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SaG: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SLad: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ZG: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SRat: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. DS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AP: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YA: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PH: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. HL: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AnD: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PL: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. PK: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AV: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. UC: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. IM: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. KR: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. OD: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AR: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. OJ: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. NS: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. AB: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. RK: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SP: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. WF: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SSaz: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at:
Table_1.docx
(77.8KB, docx)
References
1.
Camaschella C. Iron-deficiency anemia. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:1832–43. doi: 10.1056/nejmra1401038
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
2.
Stevens GA, Finucane MM, De-Regil LM, Paciorek CJ, Flaxman SR, Branca F, et al. Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995-2011: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob Health. (2013) 1:e16–25. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
3.
Anaemia in women and children . Available online at:
(Accessed September 27, 2024).
4.
Kinyoki D, Osgood-Zimmerman AE, Bhattacharjee NV, Kassebaum NJ, Hay SI. Anemia prevalence in women of reproductive age in low- and middle-income countries between 2000 and 2018. Nat Med. (2021) 27:1761–82. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01498-0
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
5.
Kassebaum NJ, Jasrasaria R, Naghavi M, Wulf SK, Johns N, Lozano R, et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood. (2014) 123:615–24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-508325
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
6.
World Health Organization . Worldwide prevalence of anaemia 1993–2005. (2020). Available online at:
(Accessed November 18, 2024).
7.
Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Noori M, Nejadghaderi SA, Karamzad N, Bragazzi NL, et al. Burden of anemia and its underlying causes in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14:185. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01202-2
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
8.
Diana P, Hikmah N. Factors causing anemia in women of reproductive age In: Proceeding of international conference on science, health, and technology. Geneva: WHO; (2021). 34–5.
Google Scholar
9.
Pasricha SR, Tye-Din J, Muckenthaler MU, Swinkels DW. Iron deficiency. The Lancet. (2021) 397:233–48. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32594-0
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
10.
Global targets . (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed December 25, 2024).
11.
International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF . National family health survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: India. (2021). Available online at:
(Accessed June 15, 2022).
12.
Neogi SB, Babre A, Varghese M, Hallen JB. Improving the approach to assess impact of anaemia control programs during pregnancy in India: a critical analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2022) 22:966. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05248-z, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
13.
Neogi SB, Negandhi H, Kar R, Bhattacharya M, Sen R, Varma N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of haemoglobin colour strip (HCS-HLL), a digital haemoglobinometer (TrueHb) and a non-invasive device (TouchHb) for screening patients with anaemia. J Clin Pathol. (2016) 69:164–70. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203135, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
14.
Neogi SB, Sharma J, Pandey S, Zaidi N, Bhattacharya M, Kar R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care devices for detection of anemia in community settings in India. BMC Health Serv Res. (2020) 20:468. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05329-9, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
15.
IIPS, MoHFW G . National Family Health Survey. (2023). Available online at:
(Accessed January 14, 2023).
16.
Kumar A. National nutritional anaemia control programme in India. Indian J Public Health. (1999) 43:3–5, 16. PMID:
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
17.
Anemia Mukt Bharat . (2024). Available online at:
(Accessed December 25, 2024).
18.
Neogi SB, Devasenapathy N, Singh R, Bhushan H, Shah D, Divakar H, et al. Safety and effectiveness of intravenous iron sucrose versus standard oral iron therapy in pregnant women with moderate-to-severe anaemia in India: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. (2019) 7:e1706–16. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30427-9, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
19.
Manapurath RM, Gadapani Pathak B, Sinha B, Upadhyay RP, Choudhary TS, Chandola TR, et al. Enteral iron supplementation in preterm or low birth weight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. (2022) 150:e2022057092I. doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-057092I, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
20.
Seidler AL, Hunter KE, Cheyne S, Ghersi D, Berlin JA, Askie L. A guide to prospective meta-analysis. BMJ. (2019) 367:l5342. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5342, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
21.
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health . Meta-analyses of aggregate data or individual participant data meta-analyses (retrospectively and prospectively pooled analyses). (2017). Available online at:
(Accessed November 7, 2024).
22.
Clinical Trials Registry - India (CTRI) . (2024). Available online at:
(Accessed November 6, 2024).
23.
India - SAMPLE REGISTRATION SYSTEM (SRS)-STATISTICAL REPORT . (2020). Available online at:
(Accessed July 1, 2025).
24.
Cheng C, Messerschmidt L, Bravo I, Waldbauer M, Bhavikatti R, Schenk C, et al. A general primer for data harmonization. Sci Data. (2024) 11:152. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-02956-3
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
25.
Gernand AD, Gallagher K, Bhandari N, Kolsteren P, Lee AC, Shafiq Y, et al. Harmonization of maternal balanced energy-protein supplementation studies for individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses – finding and creating similarities in variables and data collection. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2023) 23:107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05366-2, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
26.
Kalter J, Sweegers MG, de Leeuw IMV, Brug J, Buffart LM. Development and use of a flexible data harmonization platform to facilitate the harmonization of individual patient data for meta-analyses. BMC Res Notes. (2019) 12:164. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4210-7
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
27.
World Health Organization . Guideline on haemoglobin cutoffs to define anaemia in individuals and populations. (2024). Available online at:
(Accessed March 19, 2024).
PubMed
28.
Pandey AK, Gautam D, M BT, Neogi SB. Trends in anemia prevalence among Indian women using revised WHO hemoglobin cutoffs: insights from repeated cross-sectional surveys (1998-2019). Anemia. (2025) 2025:5214630. doi: 10.1155/anem/5214630, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
29.
Derman RJ, Goudar SS, Thind S, Bhandari S, Aghai Z, Auerbach M, et al. Rapidiron: reducing anaemia in pregnancy in India-a 3-arm, randomized-controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of oral iron with single-dose intravenous iron in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnant women and reducing low birth weight deliveries. Trials. (2021) 22:649. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05549-2, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
30.
Taneja S, Chowdhury R, Dhabhai N, Upadhyay RP, Mazumder S, Sharma S, et al. Impact of a package of health, nutrition, psychosocial support, and WaSH interventions delivered during preconception, pregnancy, and early childhood periods on birth outcomes and on linear growth at 24 months of age: factorial, individually randomised controlled trial. BMJ. (2022) 379:e072046. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072046
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
31.
T S, C R, D N, M S, U R, S S, et al. Impact of an integrated nutrition, health, water sanitation and hygiene, psychosocial care and support intervention package delivered during the pre- and peri-conception period and/or during pregnancy and early childhood on linear growth of infants in the first two years of life, birth outcomes and nutritional status of mothers: study protocol of a factorial, individually randomized controlled trial in India. Trials. (2020) 21. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4059-z
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
32.
Dwarkanath P, Muhihi A, Sudfeld CR, Wylie BJ, Wang M, Perumal N, et al. Two randomized trials of low-dose calcium supplementation in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. (2024) 390:143–53. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2307212
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
33.
Taneja S, Upadhyay RP, Chowdhury R, Kurpad AV, Bhardwaj H, Kumar T, et al. Impact of nutritional interventions among lactating mothers on the growth of their infants in the first 6 months of life: a randomized controlled trial in Delhi, India. Am J Clin Nutr. (2021) 113:884–94. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa383
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
34.
Kulkarni B, Augustine LF, Pullakhandam R, Pradhan AS, Dasi T, Palika R, et al. ‘Screen and treat for anaemia reduction (STAR)’ strategy: study protocol of a cluster randomised trial in rural Telangana, India. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e052238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052238
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
35.
Joe W, Rinju, Patel N, Alambusha R, Kulkarni B, Yadav K, et al. Coverage of iron and folic acid supplementation in India: progress under the anemia Mukt Bharat strategy 2017-20. Health Policy Plan. (2022) 37:597–606. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac015
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
36.
Hematocrit test: what it is, levels, high and low range. Available online at:
(Accessed July 1, 2025).
37.
Garg P. MyHealth. MCV blood test: normal range & other details. (2022). Available online at:
(Accessed July 26, 2025).
38.
What Is MCH and What Do High and Low Values Mean? (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed July 1, 2025).
39.
Pediatric Reference Ranges . (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed July 1, 2025).
40.
Sarma PR. Red cell indices In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical methods: The history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworths; (1990)
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
41.
Content - Health Encyclopedia - University of Rochester Medical Center . (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed July 2, 2025).
42.
Use of ferritin concentrations to assess iron status in individuals and populations . (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed July 2, 2025).
43.
Kelly AU, McSorley ST, Patel P, Talwar D. Interpreting iron studies. BMJ. (2017) 357:j2513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2513, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
44.
apuig . How to normalise high transferrin levels?
Barcelona: Ambar Lab; (2023).
Google Scholar
45.
Worwood M, May AM, Bain BJ. 9 - Iron deficiency Anaemia and Iron overload In: Bain BJ, Bates I, Laffan MA, editors. Dacie and Lewis practical haematology. 12th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; (2017). 165–86.
Google Scholar
46.
Rusch JA, van der Westhuizen DJ, Gill RS, Louw VJ. Diagnosing iron deficiency: controversies and novel metrics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. (2023) 37:451–67. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.11.001, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
47.
Schliemann A, Homann C, Hennig G, Lang A, Holdt LM, Vogeser M, et al. Non-invasive zinc Protoporphyrin screening offers opportunities for secondary prevention of Iron deficiency in blood donors. Transfus Med Hemother. (2023) 50:303–12. doi: 10.1159/000528545, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
48.
Vitamin A deficiency . (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed July 2, 2025).
49.
Olson JM, Ameer MA, Goyal A. Vitamin a toxicity In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; (2025)
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
50.
de Benoist B. Conclusions of a WHO technical consultation on folate and vitamin B12 deficiencies. Food Nutr Bull. (2008) 29:S238–44. doi: 10.1177/15648265080292S129
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
51.
Aparicio-Ugarriza R, Palacios G, Alder M, González-Gross M. A review of the cut-off points for the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency in the general population. Clin Chem Lab Med. (2015) 53:1149–59. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0784, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
52.
Singh G, Hamdan H, Singh V. Clinical utility of serum folate measurement in tertiary care patients: argument for revising reference range for serum folate from 3.0 ng/mL to 13.0 ng/mL. Pract Lab Med. (2015) 1:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2015.03.005, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
53.
Organization WH . Serum and red blood cell folate concentrations for assessing folate status in populations. (2015). Available online at:
(Accessed July 2, 2025).
54.
Cordero AM, Crider KS, Rogers LM, Cannon MJ, Berry RJ. Optimal serum and red blood cell folate concentrations in women of reproductive age for prevention of neural tube defects: World Health Organization guidelines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. (2015) 64:421–3. Available online at:
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
55.
Office of Dietary Supplements – Zinc . (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed July 2, 2025).
56.
Office of Dietary Supplements - Vitamin D . (2025). Available online at:
(Accessed July 2, 2025).
57.
Ginde AA, Wolfe P, Camargo CA, Schwartz RS. Defining vitamin D status by secondary hyperparathyroidism in the U.S. population. J Endocrinol Investig. (2012) 35:42–8. doi: 10.3275/7742, PMID:
DOI
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
58.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing, at the Institute of Medicine . The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) (2011).
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
59.
Finkelstein JL, Fothergill A, Guetterman HM, Johnson CB, Bose B, Qi YP, et al. Iron status and inflammation in women of reproductive age: a population-based biomarker survey and clinical study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. (2022) 49:483–94. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.02.123
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
60.
Gannon BM, Glesby MJ, Finkelstein JL, Raj T, Erickson D, Mehta S. A point-of-care assay for alpha-1-acid glycoprotein as a diagnostic tool for rapid, mobile-based determination of inflammation. Curr Res Biotechnol. (2019) 1:41–8. doi: 10.1016/j.crbiot.2019.09.002, PMID:
DOI
] [
PMC free article
] [
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
61.
Killeen RB, Kok SJ. D-dimer test In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; (2025)
PubMed
] [
Google Scholar
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table_1.docx
(77.8KB, docx)
Data Availability Statement
The data analyzed in this study are subject to the following licenses/restrictions: All the collaborating PIs have acknowledged that the pooled data can only be used for this IPD analysis, with no transfer of ownership. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to
apradhandr@gmail.com
ACTIONS
PERMALINK
RESOURCES
Cite
Download .nbib
.nbib
Format:
Add to Collections