Kalogeropoulos, A. P. et al. Validation of clinical scores for right ventricular failure prediction after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 34, 1595–1603 (2015).
LaRue, S. J. et al. Clinical outcomes associated with INTERMACS-defined right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 36, 475–477 (2017).
Kirklin, J. K. et al. Eighth annual INTERMACS report: special focus on framing the impact of adverse events. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 36, 1080–1086 (2017).
Atluri, P. et al. Predicting right ventricular failure in the modern, continuous flow left ventricular assist device era. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 96, 857–863 (2013).
Drakos, S. G. et al. Risk factors predictive of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. Am. J. Cardiol. 105, 1030–1035 (2010).
Fitzpatrick, J. R. 3rd et al. Risk score derived from pre-operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 27, 1286–1292 (2008).
Lo, C. et al. Right ventricular failure after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist device: analysis of predictors and outcomes. Clin. Transplant. 29, 763–770 (2015).
Konstam, M. A. et al. Evaluation and management of right-sided heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137, e578–e622 (2018).
Rajpurkar, P. et al. Deep learning for chest radiograph diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of the CheXNeXt algorithm to practicing radiologists. PLoS Med. 15, e1002686 (2018).
Attia, Z. I. et al. An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction. Lancet 394, 861–867 (2019).
Rajpurkar, P. et al. AppendiXNet: Deep learning for diagnosis of appendicitis from a small dataset of CT exams using video pretraining. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–7 (2020).
McKinney, S. M. et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577, 89–94 (2020).
Yim, J. et al. Predicting conversion to wet age-related macular degeneration using deep learning. Nat. Med. 26, 892–899 (2020).
Benjamin, E. J. et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics’2017 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 135, e146–e603 (2017).
United Network for Organ Sharing. Transplant trends: transplants by organ type. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/# (2019).
Gerber, Y. et al. Atherosclerotic burden and heart failure after myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 1, 156–162 (2016).
Kiernan, M. S. et al. Sharing the care of mechanical circulatory support: collaborative efforts of patients/caregivers, shared-care sites, and left ventricular assist device implanting centers. Circ. Heart Fail. 8, 629–635 (2015).
Mehra, M. R. et al. Two-year outcomes with a magnetically levitated cardiac pump in heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800866 (2018).
Matthews, J. C., Koelling, T. M., Pagani, F. D. & Aaronson, K. D. The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51, 2163–2172 (2008).
Mehra, M. R. et al. A fully magnetically levitated circulatory pump for advanced heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 440–450 (2017).
Kiernan, M. S. et al. Early right ventricular assist device utilization in patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: incidence and risk factors from INTERMACS. Circ. Heart Fail. 10, e003863 (2017).
Lampert, B. C. & Teuteberg, J. J. Right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist devices. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 34, 1123–1130 (2015).
Argenziano, M. et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of inhaled nitric oxide in LVAD recipients with pulmonary hypertension. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 65, 340–345 (1998).
Kormos, R. L. & Miller, L. W. Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease Ebook (Elsevier Health Sciences, 2011).
Raymond Fitzpatrick, J. et al. Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. C. 137, 971–978 (2009).
Kormos, R. L. et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 107, 341–353 (2019).
Grady, K. L. et al. Age and gender differences and factors related to change in health-related quality of life from before to 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation: findings from Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 35, 777–788 (2016).
Kormos, R. L. et al. Updated definitions of adverse events for trials and registries of mechanical circulatory support: A consensus statement of the mechanical circulatory support academic research consortium. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 39, 735–750 (2020).
Zhang, J. et al. Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation in clinical practice. Circulation 138, 1623–1635 (2018).
Ouyang, D. et al. Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2145-8 (2020).
Huang, M.-S., Wang, C.-S., Chiang, J.-H., Liu, P.-Y. & Tsai, W.-C. Automated recognition of regional wall motion abnormalities through deep neural network interpretation of transthoracic echocardiography. Circulation 142, 1510–1520 (2020).
Morgan, J. A., John, R., Lee, B. J., Oz, M. C. & Naka, Y. Is severe right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients a risk factor for unsuccessful bridging to transplant and post-transplant mortality. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77, 859–863 (2004).
Shad, R. et al. Long-term survival in patients with post-LVAD right ventricular failure: multi-state modelling with competing outcomes of heart transplant. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 40, 778–785 (2021).
Puwanant, S. et al. Tricuspid annular motion as a predictor of severe right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 27, 1102–1107 (2008).
Kukucka, M. et al. Right-to-left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ratio and prediction of right ventricular failure with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 30, 64–69 (2011).
Grant, A. D. M., Smedira, N. G., Starling, R. C. & Marwick, T. H. Independent and incremental role of quantitative right ventricular evaluation for the prediction of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60, 521–528 (2012).
Aymami, M. et al. The incremental value of right ventricular size and strain in the risk assessment of right heart failure post—-left ventricular assist device implantation. J. Card. Fail. 24, 823–832 (2018).
Amsallem, M. et al. Right ventricular load adaptability metrics in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 157, 1023–1033.e4 (2019).
Alber, M. et al. iNNvestigate neural networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 20, 1–8 (2019).
Selvaraju, R. R. et al. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 128, 336–359 (2020).
Springenberg, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., Brox, T. & Riedmiller, M. Striving for simplicity: the all convolutional net. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6806 (2015).
Bleeker, G. B. et al. Acquired right ventricular dysfunction. Heart 92, i14–i18 (2006).
Soliman, O. I. I. et al. Derivation and validation of a novel right-sided heart failure model after implantation of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices. Circulation 137, 891–906 (2018).
Loghmanpour, N. A. et al. A Bayesian model to predict right ventricular failure following left ventricular assist device therapy. JACC Heart Fail 4, 711–721 (2016).
Fawcett, T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 27, 861–874 (2006).
Asch, F. M. et al. Automated echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction without volume measurements using a machine learning algorithm mimicking a human expert. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 12, e009303 (2019).
Ghorbani, A. et al. Deep learning interpretation of echocardiograms. npj Digit. Med. 3, 10 (2020).
Carreira, J. & Zisserman, A. Quo Vadis, action recognition? A new model and the kinetics dataset. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07750 (2018).
Ilg, E. et al. FlowNet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.01925 (2016).
Dandel, M. et al. Load dependency of right ventricular performance is a major factor to be considered in decision making before ventricular assist device implantation. Circulation 128, S14–S23 (2013).
Rudski, L. G. et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 23, 685–713 (2010). quiz 786–788.
Madani, A., Ong, J. R., Tibrewal, A. & Mofrad, M. R. K. Deep echocardiography: data-efficient supervised and semi-supervised deep learning towards automated diagnosis of cardiac disease. npj Digit. Med. 1, 59 (2018).
Carreira, J., Noland, E., Banki-Horvath, A., Hillier, C. & Zisserman, A. A short note about kinetics-600. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01340 (2018).
Caron, M. et al. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.14294 (2021).
Zhang, Y., Jiang, H., Miura, Y., Manning, C. D. & Langlotz, C. P. Contrastive learning of medical visual representations from paired images and text. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00747 (2020).
Harris, P. A. et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 42, 377–381 (2008).
Farnebäck, G. in Image Analysis (eds. Bigun, J. & Gustavsson, T.) vol. 2749, 363–370 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003).
Tran, D., Bourdev, L., Fergus, R., Torresani, L. & Paluri, M. Learning Spatiotemporal Features with 3D Convolutional Networks. in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 4489–4497 (IEEE, 2015).
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1603.05027 (2016).
Hara, K., Kataoka, H. & Satoh, Y. Learning spatio-temporal features with 3D residual networks for action recognition. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.07632 (2017).
Glorot, X. & Bengio, Y. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. in Proc. thirteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, 249–256 (PMLR, 2010).
Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. L. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015—Conference Track Proceedings (International Conference on Learning Representations, 2015).
Rubin, D. B. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91, 473–489 (1996).
Buuren, S. V. Flexible Imputation of Missing Data, 2nd edn. (CRC Press, 2018).
Turck, N. et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 12–77 (2011).
Davis, J. & Goadrich, M. The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser. 148, 233–240 (2006).
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M. & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44, 837–845 (1988).
Buuren, S. van & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J. Stat. Softw. 45, 10.18637/jss.v045.i03 (2011).
Shad, R. & Quach, N. Predicting post-operative right ventricular failure using video-based deep learning. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5161867 (2021).
US