…dvertises the LANG extension MUST use the language "i-default" as described in [RFC2277] as its default language until another supported language is negotiated by the client. A server MUST include "i-default" as one of its supported languages. The LANG command requests that human…
…vertises the LANG extension MUST use the language "i-default" as described in [ RFC2277 ] as its default language until another supported language is negotiated by the client. A server MUST include "i-default" as one of its supported languages. The LANG command requests that huma…
…ide some way of identifying the charset used, if there might be more than one [ RFC2277 ]. However, there is currently no provision within the generic URI syntax to accomplish this identification. An individual URI scheme may require a single charset, define a default charset, or…
… a set of rules significantly longer than the rest of this specification. See [ RFC2277 ] for an overview of some of these issues. It is much more important for the NSID payload data to be passed unambiguously from server administrator to user and back again than it is for the pa…
…is UTF-8. This is consistent with IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages [ RFC2277 ] and it is further supposed that the server is more likely to support any local character set and be able to convert it to UTF-8. However, because the server does not always know the encoding…
…vertises the LANG extension MUST use the language "i-default" as described in [ RFC2277 ] as its default language until another supported language is negotiated by the client. A server MUST include "i-default" as one of its supported languages. The LANG command requests that huma…
…ide some way of identifying the charset used, if there might be more than one [ RFC2277 ]. However, there is currently no provision within the generic URI syntax to accomplish this identification. An individual URI scheme may require a single charset, define a default charset, or…
…vertises the LANG extension MUST use the language "i-default" as described in [ RFC2277 ] as its default language until another supported language is negotiated by the client. A server MUST include "i-default" as one of its supported languages. The LANG command requests that huma…
…ide some way of identifying the charset used, if there might be more than one [ RFC2277 ]. However, there is currently no provision within the generic URI syntax to accomplish this identification. An individual URI scheme may require a single charset, define a default charset, or…
…ide some way of identifying the charset used, if there might be more than one [ RFC2277 ]. However, there is currently no provision within the generic URI syntax to accomplish this identification. An individual URI scheme may require a single charset, define a default charset, or…
…ide some way of identifying the charset used, if there might be more than one [ RFC2277 ]. However, there is currently no provision within the generic URI syntax to accomplish this identification. An individual URI scheme may require a single charset, define a default charset, or…
…ide some way of identifying the charset used, if there might be more than one [ RFC2277 ]. However, there is currently no provision within the generic URI syntax to accomplish this identification. An individual URI scheme may require a single charset, define a default charset, or…
…eadable text MUST be provided in the UTF-8 charset using the Default Language [ RFC2277 ]. . Control Word 6.1 . PW Types for Which the Control Word is REQUIRED The Label Mapping messages that are sent in order to set up these PWs MUST have c=1. When a Label Mapping message for a …
…d. Implementers need to be aware of IETF character set requirements RFC3629 ] [ RFC2277 ]. 3.1.1.3 . Canonicalization and Text Defaults Internet media types are registered with a canonical form. A representation transferred via HTTP messages MUST be in the appropriate canonical f…
…c Mail: Part II: Certificate-Based Key Management", RFC 1422 , February 1993. [ RFC2277 ] Alvestrand, H., "IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages", BCP 18 , RFC 2277 , January 1998. [ RFC2459 ] Housley, R., Ford, W., Polk, W., and D. Solo, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastr…