…ring labels discussed in RFC 1035 and RFC 2181 [ RFC2181 ] and bitstring ones [ RFC2673 ]), but only in certain contexts. The different contexts for different sets of usable characters are outlined in the next section. For the rest of this document and in the related ones, the te…
…y string labels discussed in RFC 1035 and RFC 2181 RFC2181 ] and bitstring ones RFC2673 ]), but only in certain contexts. The different contexts for different sets of usable characters are outlined in the next section. For the rest of this document and in the related ones, the te…
… Huitema, "DNS Extensions to support IP version 6", RFC 1886 , December 1995. [ RFC2673 ] Crawford, M., "Binary Labels in the Domain Name System", RFC 2673 , August 1999. [ RFC2874 ] Crawford, M. and C. Huitema, "DNS Extensions to Support IPv6 Address Aggregation and Renumbering"…
… Huitema, "DNS Extensions to support IP version 6", RFC 1886 , December 1995. [ RFC2673 ] Crawford, M., "Binary Labels in the Domain Name System", RFC 2673 , August 1999. [ RFC2874 ] Crawford, M. and C. Huitema, "DNS Extensions to Support IPv6 Address Aggregation and Renumbering"…
…sses, it proposes to use a new kind of DNS label (a "bit label"), specified in [RFC2673], to represent binary addresses directly in the DNS. *** RFC 2673 should also appear in the References section.*** Notes: This document is listed as updating RFC 2673. That claim is actually d…
…sses, it proposes to use a new kind of DNS label (a "bit label"), specified in [RFC2673], to represent binary addresses directly in the DNS. *** RFC 2673 should also appear in the References section.*** Notes: This document is listed as updating RFC 2673. That claim is actually d…