… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
… the use of a well-known prefix. Such prefixes are defined in [ RFC4291 ] and [ RFC2765 ] at the time of this writing. If it is known by some external method that a given prefix is used to embed IPv4, it MAY be represented as mixed notation. Tools that provide options to specify …
…filer is correct. Although the intent might be clear from Section 4: " As with [RFC2765], the translating function specified in this document does not translate any IPv4 options, and it does not translate IPv6 extension headers except the Fragment Header." Although the Length por…
…filer is correct. Although the intent might be clear from Section 4: " As with [RFC2765], the translating function specified in this document does not translate any IPv4 options, and it does not translate IPv6 extension headers except the Fragment Header." Although the Length por…