…sic/FMXdrngMz_KeemdUmbQoj7XVfsY/ 3485441 2144524 [MMUSIC] Re: [Errata Verified] RFC3264 (7597) [MMUSIC] Re: [Errata Verified] RFC3264 (7597) Orie Steele 2024-05-10 mmusic /arch/msg/mmusic/KBiKNj0c0PQtR2z6iYAl6lnNVg4/ 3457708 2132377 24543 Messages Page 1 of 614 Next Archive Expor…
…ed miscellaneous typos, as noted in: Issue 183 Added informative reference to [ RFC3264 ] Section 5.1, as noted in: Issue 184 Now that we have an updated draft we will be calling for the next ORTC Community Group meeting. That post will follow soon. ORTC W3C CG Meeting 7 Erik Lag…
…otocol 1999-03 Proposed Standard RFC Obsoleted by rfc3261 , rfc3262 , rfc3263 , rfc3264 , rfc3265 2 18 pages 2000-10 Experimental RFC 110 pages RFC 3108 Conventions for the use of the Session Description Protocol (SDP) for ATM Bearer Connections Errata 2001-05 Proposed Standard R…
…CoAP could equally be proxied to other protocols such as XMPP [RFC6120] or SIP [RFC3264]; the definition of these mechanisms is out of scope for this specification. Shelby, et al. Standards Track [Page 74] RFC 7252 The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) June 2014 There are t…
…vailable to re-activate more quickly than re-adding the encoding. As noted in [[RFC3264]] Section 5.1, RTCP is still sent, regardless of the value of the active attribute. rid of type DOMString If set, this RTP encoding will be sent or received with RID header extension as define…
…ed miscellaneous typos, as noted in: Issue 183 Added informative reference to [ RFC3264 ] Section 5.1, as noted in: Issue 184 Now that we have an updated draft we will be calling for the next ORTC Community Group meeting. That post will follow soon. ORTC W3C CG Meeting 7 Erik Lag…
…ge 12, says: When H.261 is offered over RTP using SDP in an Offer/Answer model [RFC3264] the following considerations are necessary. This could easily be misunderstood as talking about an 'SDP offer over RTP'. The RFC should say instead (exchanging two pairs of words): When H.261…
…ge 12, says: When H.261 is offered over RTP using SDP in an Offer/Answer model [RFC3264] the following considerations are necessary. This could easily be misunderstood as talking about an 'SDP offer over RTP'. The RFC should say instead (exchanging two pairs of words): When H.261…