…fication text Values to be added to this name space require Expert Review (see [RFC5226], Section 4.1 ). Nottingham, et al. Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 7838 HTTP Alternative Services April 2016 7.3.2 . Registrations The "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Alt-Svc Parameter Regi…
…cifications, with a registry (having an IANA policy definition of IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]) defined for them at such time. Hodges, et al. Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 6797 HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) November 2012 NOTE: Such future directives will be ignored by UAs impl…
…shed by this specification. Values are registered on a Specification Required [ RFC5226 ] basis after a three-week review period on the jose-reg-review@ietf.org mailing list, on the advice of one or more Designated Experts. However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to …
…r RPKI repository objects. The registry's contents are managed by IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]. The initial contents of this registry are the following: Filename extension RPKI Object Reference .cer Certificate [ RFC6481 .crl Certificate Revocation List [ RFC6481 .mft Manifest [ RFC64…
…shed by this specification. Values are registered on a Specification Required [ RFC5226 ] basis after a three-week review period on the jose-reg-review@ietf.org mailing list, on the advice of one or more Designated Experts. However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to …
…iven below. For future assignments, the registration procedure is IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]. The security and privacy implications of all new parameters should be thoroughly documented. New parameters and their values MUST conform with the forwarded-pair as defined in ABNF in Secti…
… specification. The registration procedure for values is Specification Required RFC5226 ] after a three-week review period on the jose-reg-review@ietf.org mailing list, on the advice of one or more Designated Experts. However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to public…
…ecification text Values to be added to this namespace require IETF Review (see [RFC5226], Section 4.1 ). 5.1.2 . Registrations The initial range unit registry contains the registrations below: +-------------+---------------------------------------+-------------+ | Range Unit | De…
… specification. The registration procedure for values is Specification Required RFC5226 ] after a three-week review period on the jose-reg-review@ietf.org mailing list, on the advice of one or more Designated Experts. However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to public…
…cifications, with a registry (having an IANA policy definition of IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]) defined for them at such time. Hodges, et al. Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 6797 HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) November 2012 NOTE: Such future directives will be ignored by UAs impl…
… specification. The registration procedure for values is Specification Required RFC5226 ] after a three-week review period on the jose-reg-review@ietf.org mailing list, on the advice of one or more Designated Experts. However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to public…
…ESG or their delegate), with a Specification Required (using terminology from [ RFC5226 ]). However, to allow for the allocation of values prior to publication, the Designated Expert(s) may approve registration once they are satisfied that such a specification will be published. …
…s registry. The update policy for this registry shall be Specification Required RFC5226 ]. Shekh-Yusef, et al. Standards Track [Page 27] RFC 7616 HTTP Digest Access Authentication September 2015 The initial registry contains the following entries: +----------------+-------------+…
…iven below. For future assignments, the registration procedure is IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]. The security and privacy implications of all new parameters should be thoroughly documented. New parameters and their values MUST conform with the forwarded-pair as defined in ABNF in Secti…
…iven below. For future assignments, the registration procedure is IETF Review [ RFC5226 ]. The security and privacy implications of all new parameters should be thoroughly documented. New parameters and their values MUST conform with the forwarded-pair as defined in ABNF in Secti…