…reassembling of fragmented packets in the stateful translator is discussed in [ RFC6146 ], since it requires state maintenance in the translator. 2 . Changes from RFC 6145 The changes from RFC 6145 are the following: 1. Inserted the notes about IPv6 extension header handling: [ E…

…reassembling of fragmented packets in the stateful translator is discussed in [ RFC6146 ], since it requires state maintenance in the translator. 2 . Changes from RFC 6145 The changes from RFC 6145 are the following: 1. Inserted the notes about IPv6 extension header handling: [ E…

…scovery November 2013 . Introduction As part of the transition to IPv6, NAT64 [ RFC6146 ] and DNS64 RFC6147 ] technologies will be utilized by some access networks to provide IPv4 connectivity for IPv6-only nodes [ RFC6144 ]. DNS64 utilizes IPv6 address synthesis to create local …

…ranslation mechanisms have been defined by the IETF, such as those defined in [ RFC6146 ] and [ RFC7915 ]. These mechanisms target various different use cases. An operator might therefore wish to make use of several of them simultaneously. The WKP is reserved specifically for use…

…ranslation mechanisms have been defined by the IETF, such as those defined in [ RFC6146 ] and [ RFC7915 ]. These mechanisms target various different use cases. An operator might therefore wish to make use of several of them simultaneously. The WKP is reserved specifically for use…

…6343 . IPv6-only service providers, including those operating a NAT64 service [ RFC6146 ], are advised that their own customers need a route to such a relay in case a residual 6to4 user served by a different service provider attempts to communicate with them. Troan & Carpenter Be…

… MUST be discarded. If an IPv6-only agent is in a network that utilizes NAT64 [ RFC6146 ] and DNS64 [ RFC6147 ] technologies, it may also gather IPv4 server- reflexive and/or relayed candidates from IPv4-only STUN or TURN servers. IPv6-only agents SHOULD also utilize IPv6 prefix …

… MUST be discarded. If an IPv6-only agent is in a network that utilizes NAT64 [ RFC6146 ] and DNS64 [ RFC6147 ] technologies, it may also gather IPv4 server- reflexive and/or relayed candidates from IPv4-only STUN or TURN servers. IPv6-only agents SHOULD also utilize IPv6 prefix …

…tence. DNS64, used together with an IPv6/IPv4 translator such as stateful NAT64 RFC6146 ], allows an IPv6-only client to initiate communications by name to an IPv4-only server. DNS64 is a mechanism for synthesizing AAAA resource records (RRs) from A RRs. A synthetic AAAA RR creat…

…tence. DNS64, used together with an IPv6/IPv4 translator such as stateful NAT64 RFC6146 ], allows an IPv6-only client to initiate communications by name to an IPv4-only server. DNS64 is a mechanism for synthesizing AAAA resource records (RRs) from A RRs. A synthetic AAAA RR creat…

…d deployed, most are transparent to client devices. The combined use of NAT64 [ RFC6146 ] and DNS64 [ RFC6147 ] is a popular solution that is being deployed and requires changes in client devices. One possible way to handle these networks is for the client device networking stack…

…is is the same notation as the RFC; see for example https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6146#section-3.5.1; '*' is anything/irrelevant) Then ADF dictates whether the v4 endpoint is allowed to create the following new session (using the same BIB entry): Session: (*,*),(*,*) <--> (T,t),…

…as part of the text. For example: A. As part of the transition to IPv6, NAT64 [ RFC6146 ] and DNS64 RFC6147 ] technologies will be utilized by some access networks to provide IPv4 connectivity for IPv6-only nodes RFC6144 ]. B. Note that SAVI raises a number of important privacy c…

…is is the same notation as the RFC; see for example https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6146#section-3.5.1; '*' is anything/irrelevant) Then ADF dictates whether the v4 endpoint is allowed to create the following new session (using the same BIB entry): Session: (*,*),(*,*) <--> (T,t),…