…automatically re-link references to the effective request URI ( Section 5.5 of [RFC7230] ) to one or more of the new references sent by the server, where possible. The server SHOULD generate a Location header field ( [RFC7231], Section 7.1.2 ) in the response containing a preferr…
…Track in 1997 [RFC2068], revised in 1999 [RFC2616], and revised again in 2014 ([RFC7230] through [RFC7235]). HTTP/2 ([HTTP/2]) introduced a multiplexed session layer on top of the existing TLS and TCP protocols for exchanging concurrent HTTP messages with efficient field compress…
…Track in 1997 [RFC2068], revised in 1999 [RFC2616], and revised again in 2014 ([RFC7230] through [RFC7235]). HTTP/2 ([HTTP/2]) introduced a multiplexed session layer on top of the existing TLS and TCP protocols for exchanging concurrent HTTP messages with efficient field compress…
…automatically re-link references to the effective request URI ( Section 5.5 of [RFC7230] ) to one or more of the new references sent by the server, where possible. The server SHOULD generate a Location header field ( [RFC7231], Section 7.1.2 ) in the response containing a preferr…
…automatically re-link references to the effective request URI ( Section 5.5 of [RFC7230] ) to one or more of the new references sent by the server, where possible. The server SHOULD generate a Location header field ( [RFC7231], Section 7.1.2 ) in the response containing a preferr…
…automatically re-link references to the effective request URI ( Section 5.5 of [RFC7230] ) to one or more of the new references sent by the server, where possible. The server SHOULD generate a Location header field ( [RFC7231], Section 7.1.2 ) in the response containing a preferr…
…rds Track in 1997 RFC2068 , revised in 1999 RFC2616 , and revised again in 2014 RFC7230 through RFC7235 ). HTTP/2 ( HTTP/2 ) introduced a multiplexed session layer on top of the existing TLS and TCP protocols for exchanging concurrent HTTP messages with efficient field compressio…
…rds Track in 1997 RFC2068 , revised in 1999 RFC2616 , and revised again in 2014 RFC7230 through RFC7235 ). HTTP/2 ( HTTP/2 ) introduced a multiplexed session layer on top of the existing TLS and TCP protocols for exchanging concurrent HTTP messages with efficient field compressio…
…pared to an application that only uses the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) [ RFC7230 ] . This may be problematic in certain cases. This document summarizes the concerns and makes recommendations on how WebRTC implementations should best handle the trade-off between privacy and…
…source o operation resource o target resource The following term is defined in [RFC7230] and is not redefined here: o request URI The following terms are used throughout this document: access control: A security feature provided by the server that allows an administrator to restr…
…tion Sequence: 0x68 0x74 0x74 0x70 0x2f 0x31 0x2e 0x31 ("http/1.1") Reference: [RFC7230] Protocol: SPDY/1 Identification Sequence: 0x73 0x70 0x64 0x79 0x2f 0x31 ("spdy/1") Reference: http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol/spdy-protocol-draft1 Protocol: SPDY/2 Identification S…
…pecific mechanisms: HTTP/1.1 servers should support chunked Transfer-Encoding [ RFC7230 ] to receive and server data incrementally. HTTP/2 servers should handle the data incrementally using HTTP Frames [ RFC7540 ]. The HTTP/1.1 chunked transfer encoding is not supported in HTTP/2…
…ion Sequence: 0x68 0x74 0x74 0x70 0x2f 0x31 0x2e 0x31 ("http/1.1") Reference: [ RFC7230 ] Protocol: SPDY/1 Identification Sequence: 0x73 0x70 0x64 0x79 0x2f 0x31 ("spdy/1") Reference: http://dev.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol/spdy-protocol-draft1 Protocol: SPDY/2 Identification …
…n base64. For binary clean transports (e.g., BINARY ESMTP [ RFC3030 ] or HTTP [ RFC7230 ]), no content-transfer- encoding is necessary (or even possible, in the case of HTTP) for 7bit, 8bit, or binary data. Security considerations: See Section 10 . Interoperability considerations…
…e a plaintext format similar in some ways to the Hypertext Transport Protocol [ RFC7230 ], whereas Jingle messages are pure XML. Mappings between SIP headers and Jingle message syntax are provided below. o SIP payloads for session semantics use the Session Description Protocol [ …