1. Bravenboer, M., Kalleberg, K.T., Vermaas, R., Visser, E.: Stratego/XT 0.17. A language and toolset for program transformation. SCP 72(1-2), 52–70 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Brun, C., Pierantonio, A.: Model differences in the Eclipse Modeling Framework. In: UPGRADE, IX (April 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colvin, R., Hayes, I.J.: A semantics for Behavior Trees using CSP with specification commands. SCP 76(10), 891–914 (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. de Jonge, M., Nilsson-Nyman, E., Kats, L.C.L., Visser, E.: Natural and flexible error recovery for generated parsers. In: van den Brand, M., Gašević, D., Gray, J. (eds.) SLE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5969, pp. 204–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. de Jonge, M., Visser, E.: An algorithm for layout preservation in refactoring transformations. In: Sloane, A., Aßmann, U. (eds.) SLE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6940, pp. 40–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dmitriev, S.: Language oriented programming: The next programming paradigm (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dromey, R.G.: From requirements to design: Formalizing the key steps. In: SEFM, pp. 2–11 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eysholdt, M., Behrens, H.: Xtext: implement your language faster than the quick and dirty way. In: OOPSLA, pp. 307–309 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heering, J., Hendriks, P.R.H., Klint, P., Rekers, J.: The syntax definition formalism SDF - reference manual. SIGPLAN 24(11), 43–75 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heidenreich, F., Johannes, J., Karol, S., Seifert, M., Wende, C.: Derivation and refinement of textual syntax for models. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 114–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hemel, Z., Kats, L.C.L., Groenewegen, D.M., Visser, E.: Code generation by model transformation: a case study in transformation modularity. SoSyM 9(3), 375–402 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jouault, F., Bézivin, J., Kurtev, I.: TCS: a DSL for the specification of textual concrete syntaxes in model engineering. In: GPCE, pp. 249–254 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kats, L.C.L., Visser, E.: The Spoofax language workbench: rules for declarative specification of languages and IDEs. In: OOPSLA, pp. 444–463 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Konat, G., Kats, L., Wachsmuth, G., Visser, E.: Declarative name binding and scope rules. In: Czarnecki, K., Hedin, G. (eds.) SLE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7745, pp. 311–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Krahn, H., Rumpe, B., Völkel, S.: Integrated definition of abstract and concrete syntax for textual languages. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 286–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mülder, A., Nyßen, A.: TMF meets GMF. Kombination textueller und grafischer Editoren. Eclipse Magazin 3, 74–78 (2011) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Myers, T.: TextBE: A textual editor for behavior engineering. In: ISSEC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group. Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification. Version 1.1 (January 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheidgen, M.: Integrating content assist into textual modelling editors. In: Modellierung, pp. 121–131 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scheidgen, M.: Textual modelling embedded into graphical modelling. In: Schieferdecker, I., Hartman, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5095, pp. 153–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Simonyi, C.: The death of computer languages, the birth of intentional programming. In: NATO Science Committee Conference (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, C., Winter, K., Hayes, I.J., Dromey, R.G., Lindsay, P.A., Carrington, D.A.: An environment for building a system out of its requirements. In: ASE, pp. 398–399 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steel, J., Raymond, K.: Generating human-usable textual notations for information models. In: EDOC, pp. 250–261 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: Eclipse Modeling Framework, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van der Storm, T., Cook, W.R., Loh, A.: Object grammars: Compositional & bidirectional mapping between text and graphs. In: Czarnecki, K., Hedin, G. (eds.) SLE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7745, pp. 4–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Visser, E.: A family of syntax definition formalisms. Technical Report P9706, Programming Research Group, University of Amsterdam (August 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wen, L., Colvin, R., Lin, K., Seagrott, J., Yatapanage, N., Dromey, R.G.: “Integrare”, a collaborative environment for behavior-oriented design. In: Luo, Y. (ed.) CDVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4674, pp. 122–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Xing, Z., Stroulia, E.: UMLDiff: an algorithm for object-oriented design differencing. In: ASE, pp. 54–65 (2005)

    Google Scholar