Scientists Perfect Technique To Create Most Dense, Solid-State Memory in History that Could Soon Exceed the Capabilities of Current Hard Drives By 1,000 Times - Slashdot
Close
binspam
dupe
notthebest
offtopic
slownewsday
stale
stupid
fresh
funny
insightful
interesting
maybe
offtopic
flamebait
troll
redundant
overrated
insightful
interesting
informative
funny
underrated
descriptive
typo
dupe
error
101823012
story
New submitter
weedjams
shares a report:
Scientists at the University of Alberta have demonstrated a new data storage technique that
stores zeroes and ones by the presence (or absence) of individual hydrogen atoms
. The resulting storage density is an unparalleled 1.2 petabits per square inch -- 1,000 times greater than current hard disk and solid state drives, and 100 times greater than Blu-rays. The researchers, led by PhD student Roshan Achal and physics professor Robert Wolkow, built on a technique previously developed by Walkow that used the tip of a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) to remove or replace individual hydrogen atoms resting on a silicon substrate.
The inconceivably small dimensions (a hydrogen atom is only half a nanometer in diameter) allow for an astounding data storage density of 1.1 petabits (138 terabytes) per square inch. By comparison, a Blu-ray disk can "only" store about 12 terabits of data in the same area (one hundredth the data density), while both traditional magnetic hard drives and solid-state drives store somewhere in the region of 1.5 terabits per square inch (a thousandth of the density). This development, says Achal, could allow you to store the entire iTunes library of 45 million songs on the surface of a US quarter-dollar coin.
Achal and his team demoed the technology by creating a 192-bit cell, which they used to store a simple rendition of the Super Mario Bros video game theme song. To show the rewrite capabilities, the scientists also created an 8-bit memory cell which they used to store the letters of the alphabet one by one, represented via their respective ASCII code.
Further reading:
ScienceDaily
, and
Nature
You may like to read:
Google Search Now Provides More Details on Local Events
Europe Has 'Maybe 6 Weeks of Jet Fuel Left'
Apple MacBook Neo Beats Every Single x86 PC CPU For Single-Core Performance
Is the Iran War Driving a Surge of Interest in Electric Cars?
California Now Has 68% More EV Chargers Than Gas Nozzles, Continues Green Energy Push
Much of the World's Solar Gear is Made Using Fossil Power in China
Submission: Scientists have created the most dense, solid-state memory in history.
Microsoft Discovers Supply Chain Attack at Unnamed Maker of PDF Software
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Scientists Perfect Technique To Create Most Dense, Solid-State Memory in History that Could Soon Exceed the Capabilities of Curr
More
Scientists Perfect Technique To Create Most Dense, Solid-State Memory in History that Could Soon Exceed the Capabilities of Curr
Comments Filter:
All
Insightful
Informative
Interesting
Funny
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Opportunity:
Score:
by
Futurepower(R)
( 558542 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:23PM (
#57014714
Homepage
Record video of everything you say and do in your entire life.
Share
Re:Opportunity:
Score:
, Interesting)
by
pablo_max
( 626328 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:30PM (
#57014752
It seems likely that Apple will still start out with 32Gb installed, and charge an extra 80% for 1Tb, even though the costs are pennies.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
avandesande
( 143899 )
writes:
I vaguely remember an Isaac Asimov? book with that theme in it.
Re:
Score:
by
oldgraybeard
( 2939809 )
writes:
From multiple perspectives including but not limited to family, relatives and friends. With audio tracks in most languages with subtitles. Accounting each and every requirement in the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Even though for most individuals, no one including the individual doing it would never look at it again.
Just my 2 cents
;)
Re:
Score:
by
gweihir
( 88907 )
writes:
No way. This is just another "magic" storage technology that will never materialize in a product that actually works.
Re:
Score:
by
HiThere
( 15173 )
writes:
Never is a long time, but I wouldn't expect a consumer product this decade or next. Controlling the accuracy of reads and writes that finely is not going to be easy. Still, it sounds like a capacious non-volatile memory, so it might someday be developed.
Re:
Score:
by
account_deleted
( 4530225 )
writes:
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Re:
Score:
by
tattood
( 855883 )
writes:
Since this uses placement of Hydrogen atoms to determine bit state, does that mean it could be wiped out by static electricity, similar to how you can bend a stream of water using a statically charged balloon?
Re:Opportunity:
Score:
, Informative)
by
mark-t
( 151149 )
writes:
markt@nerdRABBITflat.com minus herbivore
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:49PM (
#57014914
Journal
Nothing about "solid state" implies non-volatility... it actually implies no moving parts, but actually only means that is implemented on silicon.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
avandesande
( 143899 )
writes:
So if I made a car out of silicon it would be 'solid state'?
My apologies
:(
Re:
Score:
by
mark-t
( 151149 )
writes:
Technically, the actual semiconductor substrate is immaterial... the point is that something that is 'solid state' is built from semiconductor technology. I mentioned silicon because that is currently the only really practical substrate that is used commercially today.
Re:
Score:
by
HiThere
( 15173 )
writes:
Not even that. There's a proposed diamond crystal that would store memories in the polarization of imperfections filled with a particular Nitrogen isotope as doping. That's solid state, and I think it might even be a persistent as flash. Reading it, writing it, and making it are currently problematic, though. (IIRC in the lab sample they wrote it with a particle beam, but that may have been how they made it.)
Re:
Score:
by
Joey Vegetables
( 686525 )
writes:
The phrase originated when most electronics were based on vacuum tubes, to signify implementation via transistors (germanium or silicon) instead.
Re:
Score:
by
DontBeAMoran
( 4843879 )
writes:
You haven't met my ex-wife. As solid as ice yet as volatile as TNT.
I can finally hold all my porn
Score:
by
known_coward_69
( 4151743 )
writes:
Imagine, more porn than one can possibly watch in a lifetime in the palm of my hand
Re:I can finally hold all my porn
Score:
, Funny)
by
Oswald McWeany
( 2428506 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:31PM (
#57014762
Imagine, more porn than one can possibly watch in a lifetime in the palm of my hand
I really don't want to think about the palm of your hand right now.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
Locke2005
( 849178 )
writes:
Just ONE hand, I assume...
Re:
Score:
by
Greyfox
( 87712 )
writes:
Yeah, we thought that when the first gigabyte drive came out, too. My God, we thought, how will we ever fill that thing up with 8 bit pixellated porn? Once they start encoding other sense data into the porn, you'll probably end up being able to store less of it than you're able to store of your current porn now.
Re: I can finally hold all my porn
Score:
by
Type44Q
( 1233630 )
writes:
...and you only have one hand?
Re:
Score:
by
AmazingRuss
( 555076 )
writes:
Imagine that porn nestled in fur....
Soon?
Score:
, Interesting)
by
msauve
( 701917 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:27PM (
#57014728
They've stored 192 bits in a lab, and they're claiming that all of iTunes could fit on a quarter "soon?" Are they also selling bridges?
Share
Re:
Score:
by
jellomizer
( 103300 )
writes:
With all these storage enhancements I read about the time it takes for them to come out and be tested. useful and affordable. Comes in during the normal trending of storage.
20 years ago. My System had a 1 Gig drive. which was standard amount. 20 years later 1 TB drives are standard. 1000x improvement. same form factor.
Re: Soon?
Score:
, Insightful)
by
c6gunner
( 950153 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:57PM (
#57014970
Homepage
20 years is a more likely timeline.
The scientists involved here said "5-10 years with proper funding", which is a science euphemism for "cover my next funding cycle and then we will see". If the technology is viable and there aren't any serious unexpected hurdles to overcome, expect it to be 20 years by the time it hits the market.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
ctilsie242
( 4841247 )
writes:
Maybe about 5-7 years ago, but it seems that storage has leveled off. HDD and SSD prices have been almost unchanged in the past two years.
I have read about storage density improvements for years now. However, prices and capacity are basically unchanged since 2016. When stuff changes in the marketplace, what is when I might care.
Re:Soon?
Score:
, Insightful)
by
Ed_1024
( 744566 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @04:11PM (
#57015062
The thing that gets my goat is the headline *Scientists Perfect Technique* when that is not at all what they have done. Its a demonstration of what _might_ be possible given a huge amount of R&D and Im pretty sure these particular scientists did not claim to have perfected anything.
It would have been fine to introduce the subject with any hyperbole at all and would have still been exciting to read...
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
Luckyo
( 1726890 )
writes:
"Soon" means nothing. It's the go to marketing buzzword when you don't have any idea, but want the free marketing attention that is journalists who have no idea how anything works.
Re:
Score:
by
fafalone
( 633739 )
writes:
'Soon' is one of those great words that can mean whatever you want it to mean. I have no doubt in my mind this technology will be available to the consumer "soon" when thinking in historical timescales, even 'very soon' on geological times scales, where written language was followed up very quickly by the internet.
Re:
Score:
by
ArchieBunker
( 132337 )
writes:
We've been hearing this same line of bullshit for years and it never pans out. Someone in a lab has a "breakthrough" and surprise surprise it never amounts to anything. It used to be 3d holographic storage was going to make magnetic media obsolete. I'll believe it when I can buy it from a store.
Re:
Score:
by
FunkSoulBrother
( 140893 )
writes:
username checks out
Re:
Score:
by
gweihir
( 88907 )
writes:
Probably will not materialize, ever. The history of storage tech is full with "magic" solutions that never worked.
Re:
Score:
by
account_deleted
( 4530225 )
writes:
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Re:
Score:
by
omnichad
( 1198475 )
writes:
A manufacturing process is all that remains to accomplish the claims.
Same is true of graphene. How long have people been working on that?
Re:Soon?
Score:
, Informative)
by
QRDeNameland
( 873957 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @04:41PM (
#57015222
The densities are incredibly high, there is no doubt about that. A manufacturing process is all that remains to accomplish the claims.
Well, if you read the article (yeah, yeah, I know), there's this:
"Unfortunately, writing speeds still leave something to be desired. According to the accompanying paper, writing each 8-bit ASCII code took between 10 and 120 seconds, which isn't exactly practical for today's consumer products."
Not saying they can't overcome that eventually, but that would need to be solved long before the manufacturing process.
Parent
Share
Current broadband
Score:
by
pablo_max
( 626328 )
writes:
And with the average broadband in the US being about 50Mb/s DL and 5 UP, I guess it should take a while to fill with content.
Not to mention, Cock (or is it Cox?) will surely throttle your connection long before you ever get the chance.
Re:
Score:
by
Oswald McWeany
( 2428506 )
writes:
And with the average broadband in the US being about 50Mb/s DL and 5 UP, I guess it should take a while to fill with content.
Not to mention, Cock (or is it Cox?) will surely throttle your connection long before you ever get the chance.
It will be cheaper to have the contents of the internet delivered to your house via snail mail once a week.
Re:
Score:
by
Oswald McWeany
( 2428506 )
writes:
To clarify... that is- once storage gets so small (and cheap)
Re:Current broadband
Score:
, Informative)
by
buravirgil
( 137856 )
writes:
buravirgil@gmail.com
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:47PM (
#57014892
It will be cheaper to have the contents of the internet delivered to your house via snail mail once a week.
Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.
~ Andrew S. Tanebaum, creator of Minix
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
Hognoxious
( 631665 )
writes:
Mind you, the latency sucks donkey balls.
~ A. Turing, creator of tests
Re:
Score:
by
Walter White
( 1573805 )
writes:
I've done it. I have offsite backups at my son's place. They've been building incrementally for years now. I wanted to migrate from EXT4 to ZFS and upgrade the H/W while I was at it. In order to complete the work, I created a local copy of the remote filesystem and put it on an 8TB external HDD. It took hours. Then I took it to my son's place and loaded it on the remote system. The data set is over 3TB and would have taken way way too long to transfer over the Internet with the upload caps that Comcast exer
Re:
Score:
by
JackSpratts
( 660957 )
writes:
perhaps. no telling where speeds will be down the road, but yeah, you'll eventually have the entire output of the mpaa, riaa, library of congress and every smokin southern gal's bitchin fried green tomaters and mint julep recipes on your single little homedrive, all waiting to be cloned in person by your new found pals, all more than willing to return the favor of course. viva the new p2p sneakernet.
Blu-ray storage density?
Score:
, Informative)
by
ERJ
( 600451 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:32PM (
#57014764
Cool tech if they can make it an actual product but I am getting hung up on their storage density of Blu-ray disks. Since when can a Blu-ray disk store 12 terabits of data per square inch? As far as I am aware the largest disks store 128GB of data on a what my quick back of the envelop calculations show to be around 12 square inches.
Share
Re:
Score:
by
joshgs
( 71451 )
writes:
I was thinking the same thing. Don't tell the movie companies, can you imagine how many more previews they will add before each movie?
Re:
Score:
by
jellomizer
( 103300 )
writes:
Redundancy error correction I expect is used for some of that space.
Being that normal consumers will but some wear on these things scratches and the like can kill a lot of data when you have 12 terabits per square inch.
Re: Blu-ray storage density?
Score:
by
c6gunner
( 950153 )
writes:
Redundancy error correction I expect is used for some of that space.
Quick back of the envelope math says that the difference between the claimed capacity and his observed capacity means that you could have 140 copies of the data on that disc. That's some serious redundancy.
Re:
Score:
by
Headw1nd
( 829599 )
writes:
Yeah their numbers seem pretty far off. I think they say 12Gbit/in sq and read it as 12 Tbit/in sq
Re:
Score:
by
Smidge204
( 605297 )
writes:
A Blu-Ray disc is 4.7 inches in diameter, which is 3.14*2.35*2.35 = 17.34 square inches.
But here's where the "cheat" comes in; they use multiple layers in the higher capacity Blu-Ray disks. I believe the 128GB ones 4 layers? So that's really almost 70 square inches to store that data...
=Smidge=
Re:
Score:
by
RhettLivingston
( 544140 )
writes:
Apparently, they can only use 16 square inches of that. The areal density of a blu ray layer is 12.5 Gbits / square inch. Each layer holds 25 GBytes. (25*8)/12.5 = 16 square inches of area. Frankly, I'm surprised they can use that much.
Newer tech has allowed them to reach 100GB using three layers with the Ultra Blu Ray. There is also a 4 layer spec for the 128GB.
If the article was interpreting layers as density, it would take near 1000 layers to boost blu ray's native 12.5 gigabits/ square inch to the 12 Tb
Re:
Score:
by
strikethree
( 811449 )
writes:
Since when can a Blu-ray disk store 12 terabits of data per square inch?
I am not them, but I assume that they mean that the technology is capable of that in a lab environment. When the process is moved into a mass manufactured product, that theoretical limit is lowered
... substantially.
Or, maybe they messed up their units. *shrug*
Nintendo will want $100M for that Super Mario Bros
Score:
by
Joe_Dragon
( 2206452 )
writes:
Nintendo will want $100M for that Super Mario Bros usage.
Re:
Score:
by
pablo_max
( 626328 )
writes:
I don't get it...
Re:
Score:
by
Joe_Dragon
( 2206452 )
writes:
[denofgeek.com]
Re:
Score:
by
pablo_max
( 626328 )
writes:
Thanks. I had missed that one.
Comment removed
Score:
, Insightful)
by
account_deleted
( 4530225 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:41PM (
#57014836
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Share
Re:
Score:
by
thegarbz
( 1787294 )
writes:
I mean, there have been hundreds of similar news over the years and how many of those have actually materialized into a useful product? A tiny, miniscule fraction, that's how many.
The methods and R&D from many such advancements have made it into many products you take for granted already. Just because each company doesn't launch it's own standalone product doesn't mean you aren't using the fruits of many of these R&D announcements you have heard.
Off by an order of magnitude
Score:
by
Anonymous Coward
writes:
I really feel the need to point out that a hydrogen atom does not, in fact, have a diameter equal to half a nanometer. It's 0.05 nm.
Re:Off by an order of magnitude
Score:
, Informative)
by
pablo_max
( 626328 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:48PM (
#57014898
Actually, A hydrogen atom is about 0.1 nm in diameter
Parent
Share
Terrible Performance Scaling
Score:
, Interesting)
by
Anonymous Coward
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:44PM (
#57014864
I've heard about these techniques before. Atomic Force Microscopes, DNA storage, they all have the same problems. Incredible storage densities but the ability to read and write quickly is missing.
In order to commercialize this technology you have to overcome the bottleneck of terrible I/O speeds. Oh, and you need to incorporate an atomic microscope into your storage device. That is not great for commercialization prospects.
Short of that, these storage systems are only good for offline data storage, and situations where exceptionally high density must be achieved at any cost.
Share
Very Slow
Score:
by
Drethon
( 1445051 )
writes:
Unless they overcome the access speed issues listed in the article, it is going to be much slower than existing storage methods. But this could be used as a long term storage layer, below a faster SSD.
Re:
Score:
by
BronsCon
( 927697 )
writes:
Just parallel a bunch of 192 bit cells. Access speed issue overcome.
Re:
Score:
by
BronsCon
( 927697 )
writes:
Of course, the cells will be larger than 192 bits; I only used that number as it's what they've achieved at this moment.
For reference, parallelization is the same trick used by today's fastest flash-based SSDs. Are those the size of a house?
Exotic design..
Score:
, Insightful)
by
jwhyche
( 6192 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:49PM (
#57014902
Homepage
Scientists at the University of Alberta have demonstrated a new data storage technique that stores zeroes and ones by the presence (or absence) of individual hydrogen atoms
In other words a exotic design that barely works in the lab, with no chance of working in the real world. But give us 20 years and we might have something.
Didn't we hear the same thing about some holographic crystal storage 20 years ago?
Share
20 years ago I bought a 7 gig hard disk
Score:
by
rsilvergun
( 571051 )
writes:
for $190. It was a good price. I just bought a 500 gig SSD for $150, and I could have had a fast 1 terabyte platter drive for $60.
Maybe this won't be the next storage solution, but maybe it will. You never know. But we've increased storage by 70-140x while adjusting for inflation dropped the price massively. I can't complain really. I say let the boffins work
:).
Re:
Score:
by
thegarbz
( 1787294 )
writes:
Holding up one example of a failed delivery doesn't negate that in the past 20 years we have seen over a 1000x increase in storage density for similar R&D anouncements dismissed. You dismissed holographic storage, others dismissed SMR, incidentally the holographic made it out of the lab, but never realised as cost effective. It was further developed into the HVD format which also showed promise right until a competitor showed you can start layering many optical medium layers together.
These technologies
Re:
Score:
by
OneHundredAndTen
( 1523865 )
writes:
There are roughly 20 flops for every breakthrough.
More like 20 megaflops.
Speed
Score:
by
dtmos
( 447842 )
writes:
Besides reliable operation at room temperature, the biggest issue with
atomic-scale memories
[arxiv.org] always has been read and (especially) write speed, since they use an atomic force microscope. It will be interesting to see how the technology develops to overcome these limitations.
And yet
Score:
by
cyberchondriac
( 456626 )
writes:
Users will still find a way to burn up the drive space in no time at all. Speaking as a storage admin.
Re:
Score:
by
cyberchondriac
( 456626 )
writes:
We generally have not set quotas (with exceptions!) or auto-audited individual usage, historically. For some odd reason, that was the business policy in most cases, unless the user managers wanted to use it on their users. Most did not.
While we are currently in the process of moving to Windows, currently most of our file shares are Novell OES linux servers.
One large server had an issue right after a migration to new hardware where it's volume did in fact have user quotas enabled and some users restricted,
what?
Score:
by
thoper
( 838719 )
writes:
Where are these multi terabyte blu rays tfs refers to? this summanry is nonsense.
Also the first and second paragraphs says basically the same.
how do you read and write this "memory"
Going to have to see how quickly we can fill it
Score:
by
nucrash
( 549705 )
writes:
Back in the day when Slashdot was a new thing and I recently purchased a 5 GB drive, my friend and I would bring over a collection of media and we would see how quickly we could fill the new drive. Less than a few hours.
We repeated the experiment when I upgraded to a 13 GB drive and again when I moved up to a 20 GB drive and later to a 250 GB drive.
I haven't done such an experiment in a long long time, but to do such again would be tempting.
I doubt my cable provider would like me if I did this over the wir
Science giveth, Science taketh away
Score:
, Insightful)
by
SuperKendall
( 25149 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:53PM (
#57014954
a technique previously developed by Walkow that used the tip of a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) to remove or replace individual hydrogen atoms resting on a silicon substrate.
Wow, a chip the size of my thumbnail that can hold 2.8 LOCs!
Too bad the reader will be the size of an 80's Dell desktop.
Share
Re:
Score:
by
SuiteSisterMary
( 123932 )
writes:
And back in the day, 5 megabyte hard drives were the size of dishwashers. What's your point?
Re:
Score:
by
SuperKendall
( 25149 )
writes:
Ha! I didn't think of that very obvious interpretation... it actually refers to that classic unit of measurement, the
Library of Congress
[loc.gov].
Technically a line of code could be any length though so perhaps they are the same...
:-)
A Better Battery
Score:
by
LordWabbit2
( 2440804 )
writes:
In other news, scientists have created a better battery! Or was it a mouse trap? I'll get my hopes up when I can buy it. Getting tired of all this sensationalist crap that never see's the light of day.
Wait a minute...
Score:
, Insightful)
by
Bruce Perens
( 3872 )
writes:
bruce@perens.com
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @03:54PM (
#57014962
Homepage
Journal
The described procedure is not easily scaled. It has been known for a long time that you could push individual atoms around with a needle, at least 10 years ago IBM produced an IBM logo made of individual atoms. This sets a theoretical record, for densest relatively static medium. I guess subatomic and field versions might go smaller.
But this is not at all about
practical
storage. To have that, you don't only need a small medium, you need a way to
address
large amounts of it efficiently, and access the addressed bits to read or write them.
Share
Temporal fugitive
Score:
, Informative)
by
fyngyrz
( 762201 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @05:11PM (
#57015374
Homepage
Journal
at least 10 years ago IBM produced an IBM logo made of individual atoms
1989
[wikipedia.org]... 29 years ago.
Parent
Share
Re:
Score:
by
gweihir
( 88907 )
writes:
It is always the same crap with these "magical" storage technologies: They never result in an useful product. Remember, say, optical tape? The stuff is always 5...20 years in the future and they want money.
hmm
Score:
by
cascadingstylesheet
( 140919 )
writes:
Scientists at the University of Alberta have demonstrated a new data storage technique that stores zeroes and ones by the presence (or absence) of individual hydrogen atoms.
That's kind of a tight tolerance there
... not much room for error, ya know
...
only 1000x?
Score:
by
bill_mcgonigle
( 4333 )
writes:
I am happily surprised to learn that current commodity technology is within 1000x of manipulating individual atoms. That's amazing for anybody who worked with shoebox-sized 5MB drives.
Perfect?
Score:
by
vanyel
( 28049 )
writes:
Demonstrating a technology is a long ways from perfecting a technology...
I watched the embedded video and lost 10 IQ points
Score:
by
Skip Whiffle
( 1452747 )
writes:
on Thursday July 26, 2018 @04:36PM (
#57015202
I thought the article was light on information until I watched the embedded video. Wow.
Share
Holographic Memory
Score:
by
Psion
( 2244 )
writes:
Color me skeptical, but I'm still waiting for Page Oriented Holographic Memory. I'm looking at
you
January 1991 issue of Byte Magazine! You got my hopes up and still no trillions of bits on a microscope slide.
Confused and impressed
Score:
by
DontBeAMoran
( 4843879 )
writes:
The resulting storage density is an unparalleled 1.2 petabits per square inch [...] The inconceivably small dimensions (a hydrogen atom is only half a nanometer in diameter) allow for an astounding data storage density of 1.1 petabits (138 terabytes) per square inch.
So, is it 1.1 or 1.2 petabits per square inch?
This development, says Achal, could allow you to store the entire iTunes library of 45 million songs on the surface of a US quarter-dollar coin.
Not sure which one is more mind-boggling... that there'
Improper calculation
Score:
by
GoRK
( 10018 )
writes:
"100 times greater than Blu-Ray" is wildly incorrect. Blu-ray is about 12.5Gb per square inch; 1.2Pb would therefore be an areal density nearly 100,000 times greater than Blu-Ray.
Hydrogen? Good luck with that
Score:
by
Artem S. Tashkinov
( 764309 )
writes:
Last time I heard it's nearly impossible to contain hydrogen as it leaks almost through everything. Good luck reading your data years after it was stored.
Mind boggling?
Score:
by
Tough Love
( 215404 )
writes:
Mind boggling, really? For me, 300 MPH is mind boggling... my mind would absolutely boggle if I could get up to that on the freeway. Mind boggling is really not a term that belongs in a Slashdot summary. It doesn't tell us much. Our minds are sufficiently boggled by matter travelling at relativistic speeds, thank you, could you please say it that way? Oh I forgot, the editor just cut and pasted this from the original article, which was aimed at knuckledraggers.
Re:
Score:
by
Tough Love
( 215404 )
writes:
Anyways, who is the knuckledragger now?
You are, because anyone with hairless knuckles can see where the post was actually intended to be posted, and where it is now posted.
Re:
Score:
by
Tough Love
( 215404 )
writes:
Look in the mirror, what do you see, how much does it suck to be?.
Wanna bet?
Score:
by
OneHundredAndTen
( 1523865 )
writes:
Announcing in Slashdot a technological breakthrough seems to be the death knell of said breakthrough. My expectation: it will amount to nothing. In a few months, everybody will have forgotten about it.
Re:
Score:
by
account_deleted
( 4530225 )
writes:
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Half a nanometer? Check your math bruh
Score:
by
phaserbanks
( 1977290 )
writes:
Hydrogen Bohr radius is half an Angstrom.
0.05 nanometers
Re:
Score:
by
greenwow
( 3635575 )
writes:
At least it's not yet another promising battery technology.
Re:
Score:
by
Kielistic
( 1273232 )
writes:
If it moves hydrogen atoms around it could conceivably be used as a battery of sorts.
Re:
Score:
by
Unknown User
( 4795349 )
writes:
Yep, unfortunately these stories almost always describe vaporware. I fondly remember all these magical reports about Tesa ROM and Tesa Worm and wonder every few years about what happened to this technology. Wo don't have the paperless office or flying cars yet either, and the robot also doesn't work for me so I have more spare time.
:-/
Re:
Score:
by
mark-t
( 151149 )
writes:
Umm... why? Serious question.
Re:
Score:
by
110010001000
( 697113 )
writes:
Cmon. Canada. I know you are Canadian, but cmon. Canada? University of Alberta?
Re:
Score:
by
mark-t
( 151149 )
writes:
That doesn't answer the question... again, why should this be so surprising when Canada is not a backwater country without any ubiquitous access to modern technology?
Re:
Score:
by
mark-t
( 151149 )
writes:
I have given you ample opportunity to justify your position with some particular rationalization, giving you the benefit of the doubt that you had some sort of reason to think it was somehow unlikely that someone in Canada could have done this. Given your continued ignoring of the direct question, and that you merely choose to repeat your expression of incredulity, It seems you have crossed the threshold between being forgivably naive about reality and just plain irrationally bigoted.
Re:
Score:
by
cflange
( 1208152 )
writes:
I would agree with "unexpected," because many do not know that the University of Alberta hosts the Canadian National Institute for Nanotechnology (NINT).
Also many are not aware that Robert Wolkow entered the Guinness Book of Records with the "Sharpest Object Ever Made":
[ualberta.ca]
But it is the practical translation of this new technology into nanomanufacturing that will make this computer memory revolution possible:
[ualberta.ca]
Now, the University of Alberta
Re:
Score:
by
FunkSoulBrother
( 140893 )
writes:
I feel like if you actually had this tech in a commercialized form, the smart move would be to short the fuck out of the other storage companies, release the 100PB drives, kill the market, and enjoy your time billionaire island.
But maybe this is why I'm not a billionaire.
Re:
Score:
by
FunkSoulBrother
( 140893 )
writes:
Does Insider trading cover shorting other companies in the industry when yours is about to each their lunch?
Related Links
Top of the:
day
week
month
362
comments
Europe Has 'Maybe 6 Weeks of Jet Fuel Left'
329
comments
Apple MacBook Neo Beats Every Single x86 PC CPU For Single-Core Performance
278
comments
Is the Iran War Driving a Surge of Interest in Electric Cars?
278
comments
California Now Has 68% More EV Chargers Than Gas Nozzles, Continues Green Energy Push
275
comments
Much of the World's Solar Gear is Made Using Fossil Power in China
next
Microsoft Discovers Supply Chain Attack at Unnamed Maker of PDF Software
31
comments
previous
Google Search Now Provides More Details on Local Events
19
comments
Slashdot Top Deals
A memorandum is written not to inform the reader, but to protect the writer.
-- Dean Acheson
Close
Working...