| Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in February 2026, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion. |
Akademik Igor R. Janev@hr.wikipedia
- +
Comment Lock/ban evasion. Igor Janev. + See here: (1.) en:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Operahome, (2.) en:Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Operahome, & (3.) sh:Kategorija:Dokazani čarapci korisnika Operahome. نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 13:19, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Confirmed Filozof Relacionizma, Opći fundament, Институт за политички студии, Politolog.Mk, Medford.MA, Akademik Igor R. Janev
--Sotiale (talk) 13:39, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- +
Comment If necessary, compare those accounts to this other group of recently CU-confirmed socks on uk.wiki: (1.) uk:Вікіпедія:Запити на перевірку користувачів#Дијалектика, & glock all of them per this previous SRG request: (2.) Steward requests/Global/2026-w03#Global mass (b)lock 8. نوفاك اتشمان (talk) 14:23, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
Qedimali0912@az.wikipedia
- No relationship between the two accounts from a technical point of view. @Qədir: Ping since I was asked to do so. EPIC (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Antonylucky@zh.wikipedia
Confirmed Antonyoung, Antonykkkk, Antonylucky
--Sotiale (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
Elisha the FRICKIN Gamer@global
- All related accounts have been locked. --Sotiale (talk) 01:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Regluvörðurinn@is.wikipedia and Danakonungur@is.wikipedia
- Hi. Is it because you're not sure if Regluvörðurinn is them or not that you posted this request here and not on SRG? --Sotiale (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was thinking that there should be a technical confirmation (if possible) before asking for a global lock. Should I take this straight to SRG in this situation (I'm sure there will be more)? Bjarki S (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- If they have a clear pattern, there's no reason to go through SRCU. The only thing that matters is whether you suspect they're not the same user, or whether you find it difficult to convince others that your suspicions are clear. --Sotiale (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Alright. They are already blocked on iswiki based on clear behavioral factors. This request can be closed. --Bjarki S (talk) 22:44, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
- If they have a clear pattern, there's no reason to go through SRCU. The only thing that matters is whether you suspect they're not the same user, or whether you find it difficult to convince others that your suspicions are clear. --Sotiale (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I was thinking that there should be a technical confirmation (if possible) before asking for a global lock. Should I take this straight to SRG in this situation (I'm sure there will be more)? Bjarki S (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
Request withdrawn by requester -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 13:36, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
冷火羽@zh.wikipedia
PunhanWiki@az.wikipedia
Possible: PunhanWiki, ElmirWiki
Confirmed to PunhanWiki: Paşazadeh, UzbekAdib, Qn666 -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
VIKRAM PRATAP7@hi.wikipedia
Obvious {{duck}}, but regardless they’re
Confirmed with no other accounts visible. -- XXBlackburnXx (talk) 17:38, 25 February 2026 (UTC)