Steward requests/Permissions: Difference

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

Steward requests/Permissions/Sysop-header

Санюн Вадик@mhr-wikipedia

On hold until 18 May 2013. Ruslik (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Mikhalenko@ru-wikiversity

Voting has ended. Our bureaucrat is not elected (see below), so I ask for rights of admin here. Alexander Mikhalenko (talk) 10:34, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you blocked in ruwiki for vandalism? Ruslik (talk) 16:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What it is related to ru.wikiversity? On how many I remember problems in other communities shouldn't be considered. I know this situation, there the person systematically finished and he emotionally didn't sustain, but why we have to consider it? --SergeyJ (talk) 17:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is not just a problem in one community. It is just plain vandalism. I do not think a vandal can be a sysop in any Wikimedia project. Ruslik (talk) 18:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is vandalism? This is the person much and well writes about German. And that that at it once wasn't sustained by nerves - I don't think that this basis to call him the vandal --SergeyJ (talk) 18:32, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same person will be awarded by ruwikimedia as the most active participant wikiversity [1]. --SergeyJ (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why can not a vandal be awarded a ru.wikimedia prize? Especially since you plainly told them to whom it should be awarded.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps but for this reason he isn't a vandal, and the good participant. --SergeyJ (talk) 18:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The last two blocks sound like a rage quit, apparently he was not really happy and wanted to get his account locked. The first one is indeed more difficult to explain, this is plain vandalism as a retaliation for smth.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also say that it is emotional failure, instead of systematic occupation by vandalism just for the hell of it. It explained that it had problems in life and here it yet didn't understand - he simply took offense then. (Я и говорю, что это эмоциональный срыв, а не планамерное занятие вандализмом ради удовольствия. Он пояснял, что у него были проблемы в жизни и тут его еще не поняли - он просто обидился тогда. ) --SergeyJ (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be honest, I'm not exactly understanding what this ruwikimedia prize is or how it is relevant to this request. From what I understand, this user has no less than an indefinite block for vandalism on ruwiki with talk page access revoked, which is obviously a concern and perhaps the user should explain the circumstances that led to the block and what it's all about. Also, could anybody kindle explain whate these two blocks that "sound like a rage quit" are? Are we talking about the last two entry on the block log on ruwiki? Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was talking about the last two entries. Apparently, the user wanted to get blocked but nobody wanted to block him, so that he decided to vandalize articles so that he finally gets blocked (and succeeded). Note that I have no position or no interest of either having or not having this user as admin on ru.wv, frankly, I do not care about this project. I am just talking as someone who reads Russian and is somewhat familiar with the practices of ru.wp.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that and it is much appreciated. Yeah that really is unacceptable from administrators, especially given how recent it is and how if one ragequits by vandalism once, they might very well ragequit that way twice by using their admin tools. Let's see what explanation the user has for these disturbing events. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 19:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to be blocked at first. And the first blocking was not for me. My account was available to two people - it belonged to me and my roommate. The account was created not by me. I usurped it in the Russian Wikipedia and renamed an account "Alexander Hoffmann" to "Alexander Mikhalenko". The second blocking was made through my fault. I really had problems in my personal life, other users in the Russian Wikipedia began to criticize me because of small defects in my articles. Then one of administrators removed two pages in my personal space. He decided that these pages violate Wikipedia rules. Actually these pages contained information on me and on my activity in Wikipedia. Many users have such subpages. It very angered me. I recognize that I arrived incorrectly and sometime I will be rehabilitated in Wikipedia. During an award ceremony which you already discussed I will publicly ask forgiveness for users. I never planned to undermine activity of projects of Wikimedia Foundation. I promise that I will never make vandal editings and I will never trade on the status of the administrator. You said that I wanted to be blocked. It partly truth. After blocking I told thanks on the personal page. I thought that I will never return back. Later more than half a year a lot of things changed. I understood that was too quick-tempered. I think that former sins which I realized shouldn't influence my wiki-career in the future (you shouldn't take the word "career" literally). There are in the Wikiversity few active users, but there are many anonymous vandals. And one administrator doesn't manage to eliminate a consequence of their vandalism. I want to help to the actual administrator. Alexander Mikhalenko (talk) 02:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maikeli@fjwiki

(this request was added by an IP, at 02:12, 6 May 2013‎ UTC). --MF-W 02:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please make a local request/announcement first. --MF-W 02:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as Not done, the user currently does not seem to be interested in requesting adminship anymore. --MF-W 13:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hunsvotti@fi-wiktionary

Status: Locally handled

I'm an administrator at the Finnish Wiktionary (fi.wiktionary.org), and User:Hunsvotti was approved as administrator, 100 % support. He should be given the administrator rights (voting has ended). Our local bureaucrat is not available on short notice, so I decided to ask for the rights here and the local bureaucrat will make the rights permanent when he'll be available (I'll leave a message on his talk page ASAP). Please, ask for clarification/elaboration if necessary. --Hartz (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you please send an email and a talk page note to TJ first? We have granted in the past rights on wikis with bureaucrats if they're inactive (no problems with that) but I'd preferr if we gave him a couple of days to respond to see if our intervention is necessary. I'd propose to set this on hold for 48 hours and, if there's no action by TJ; flag the user as the vote looks valid. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I thought that it would be quicker to request the rights here, but I have now sent an email and a talk page note to TJ. --Hartz (talk) 16:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. If (s)he doesn't respond, we will promote. Regards. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. This request can be closed. --Hartz (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closed request: taken care of by local 'crat. Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bjarki S@is.wikisource

Hey. I requested administrator privileges on is.wikisource in January and got local support from the local community. The request was closed by giving me three month temporary adminship that expired on 19 April. For the record I think should have gotten a permanent adminship but if the stewards disagree, then I would like an extension of the temporary adminship. Bjarki S (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Place a new request locally and link to it here. -- Tegel _(Talk) 14:12, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Bjarki S, to elaborate what Tegel said above, please put a new request on is.wikisource announcing that your temporary adminship has expired, and you now seek for permanent adminship. Then, if in a week your request has been approved by the community, come back here and put a new request again, we would be happy to grant you permanent adminship in is.wikisource. Right you, you only linked to the vote for your previous request, therefore it's not sufficient. We'll be waiting for your successful nomination soon. ✒ Bennylin 12:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You can quickly create a new announcement/voting in is.wikisource and link it here, or if no action is taken within the next day, your request shall be archived for now, and you can submit another request as soon as you have the nomination done. Thanks. ✒ Bennylin 12:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rajasekhar1961@te.wikisource

Rajasekhar1961's candidature for Adminship received full support as per the discussion link-- Arjunaraoc (talk) 03:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Jusjih (talk) 11:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

T.sujatha@te.wikisource

T.sujatha's candidature for Adminship received full support as per the discussion link--Arjunaraoc (talk) 03:49, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Jusjih (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rajasekhar1961 @te.wiktionary

Status: In progress

Rajasekhar1961 email] • verify 2FA)

Rajasekhar1961's candidature for Adminship received full support as per the discussion link--T.sujatha (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The request link points to te.wikisource, please fix it. --MF-W 14:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bhaskaranaidu @te.wiktionary

Bhaskaranaidu's candidature for Adminship received full support as per the discussion link--T.sujatha (talk) 13:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With existing permanent sysops on te.wikt, and 4 regularly active users + 2 others supporting, this is Done permanently. --MF-W 14:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olsi@sq.wikinews

Hi! I have been administrator on sq.wikinews from July 3, 2011 to January 3, 2012 and from January 6 2012 to January 6 2013. I want to become an administrator because I am going to write new articles there and I need administrator tools to protect published articles. I posted a notice on the village pump last week and there are no objections yet! --Olsi (talk) 21:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To note that it seems this was proposed by the known abusor Google9999 at sq:Përdoruesi_diskutim:Olsi#Administrator_on_sq_Wikinews. Nevertheless I have no objection on this request, knowing Olsi's long-term commitment to this project; but won't decide it. --MF-W 13:59, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[Syphax Amaynu]@rif.wikipedia

Status: Locally handled

Since rif.wikipedia is still in Incubator, please redirect your request to incubator:I:A. --MF-W 17:35, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tucoxn@fj.wikipedia

Please add the sysop bit. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 21:33, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Granted for 6 months to expire on 2013-11-16. –BruTe ^talk 10:24, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

Steward requests/Permissions/Crat-header

CheckUser access

Steward requests/Permissions/CU-header

None currently

Teles@ptwikipedia

Teles was elect checkuser in ptwiki, according voting (25/01/0) (already identified). Thanks in advance. Érico Wouters ^msg 00:56, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- Menti fisto 01:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oversight access

Steward requests/Permissions/OS-header

XenonX3@dewiki

Can you please grant XenonX3 oversight access to German Wikipedia according to the past elections, as soon as he has been identified to the foundation, please? He’s sending the identification information now. --– Geitost ^diskusjon 23:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ID done Jamesofur (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for processing … anything missing? --– Geitost ^diskusjon 09:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 09:25, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :-) --– Geitost ^diskusjon 09:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of access

If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.

To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.

To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.

See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

traroth@frwikinews

Inactivity of this account for 5 years. -- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 13:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Fait :) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

notafish@frwikinews

Inactivity of this account for 5 years.-- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 14:07, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Done -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alecs.bot@frwikinews

Sysop bot account inactivity for 4 years. -- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 14:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Done -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 14:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chaps_the_idol@frwikinews

Sysop account inactivity for 3 years. -- Bertrand GRONDIN → ^(Talk) 14:18, 16 May 2013 (UTC)