Line 325: Line 325:

====Los688@ja.wikipedia ====

====Los688@ja.wikipedia ====

{{sr-request

{{sr-request

|status = <!--don't change this line-->

|status = done<!--don't change this line-->

|domain = ja.wikipedia

|domain = ja.wikipedia

|user name = Los688

|user name = Los688

Line 331: Line 331:

}}

}}

He/she has been inactive over the last 3 months on jawiki. Please remove his/her sysop access as per our [[w:ja:Wikipedia:管理者の退任#自動退任について|desysop policy]]. Thanks in advance. --[[User:Penn Station|Penn Station]] ([[User talk:Penn Station|talk]]) 01:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

He/she has been inactive over the last 3 months on jawiki. Please remove his/her sysop access as per our [[w:ja:Wikipedia:管理者の退任#自動退任について|desysop policy]]. Thanks in advance. --[[User:Penn Station|Penn Station]] ([[User talk:Penn Station|talk]]) 01:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

:Done. &mdash;&nbsp;regards, [[User:-revi|<span style="color:green;font-family:Courier new, serif;font-variant:small-caps">Revi</span>]] 06:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)



=== Miscellaneous requests ===

=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

 and also mistakes. Thank you. 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.

  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

Manik Soren@sat.wikipedia.org

Recently Santali Wikipedia has been created. I was the test admin on incubator. Now an admin is needed in the new Santali Wikipedia for fixing basic things. Therefore I am requesting to grant myself as a temporary admin for this newly made wikipedia. --Manik Soren (talk) 14:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 1 month to expire on 2018-09-08. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 16:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tuyenduong97@vi.wikivoyage.org

Currently, Vietnamese wikivoyage hasn't administrator, I want to be granted this right. Tuyenduong97 (talk) 23:48, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vietnamese wikivoyage is being vandalized [1], [2], but we don't have the authority to delete or at least hide those fault articles. A discussion is unlikely because only a few members often online. Please reply soon. Thanks! Tuyenduong97 (talk) 09:13, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Link to a local election page that has been open for at least seven days. -- Tegel (Talk) 09:17, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tuyenduong97: please open a local discussion page to grant you sysop flag in vi.wikivoyage, even there's no contributes in the local discussion we'll grant you sysop flag after 7 days from the beginning of the local discussion --Alaa :)..! 09:18, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Thank you! Tuyenduong97 (talk) 09:33, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold until 14 August --Alaa :)..! 10:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Sroy@ts.wikipedia

Please grant me the admin rights on the Xitsonga wiki. Discussion on the local wiki was posted on 2nd August, still no objection. Although knowing that ts_wiki is very small and thus admin rights are temporary but I want it for the longest duration possible. My two weeks experience clearly states that the community is very inactive and thus the RfA is just documentation. The only administrator ts:User:Thuvack has not edited since last week. So actually I feel, there's no one to approve me locally! Dr. Sroy (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 9 August --Alaa :)..! 09:25, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@علاء: Today is 9th of August, and I'm having no information about this. Please let me know if I should get the flag... Dr. Sroy (talk) 16:33, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2018-11-09. -- --Alaa :)..! 17:13, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mahir256@bn.wikisource

This is a request to renew my administrator privileges on the Bengali Wikisource as they have just expired today. Mahir256 (talk) 21:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 14 August --Alaa :)..! 08:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wasami007@zhwikiversity

This user requests sysop rights. Local discussion not possible as there's no community yet, but this user is a sysop in beta Wikiversity. GZWDer (talk) 23:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GZWDer: he should open a local discussion page to grant the sysop flag , even there's no contributes in the local discussion we'll grant him sysop flag after 7 days from the beginning of the local discussion! --Alaa :)..! 08:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the discussion here.--GZWDer (talk) 08:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 15 August --Alaa :)..! 09:11, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tuyenduong97@vi.wikibooks

6 supports and no disagreement. 118.71.8.245 13:55, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2019-02-08. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mattruffoni@it.wikiversity

Can you grant a 2 years flag? Thanks, --Hippias (talk) 15:49, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2020-08-10. --MF-W 15:32, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pierpao@it.wikiversity

Can you grant a 2 years flag? Thanks, --Hippias (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 2 years to expire on 2020-08-10. --MF-W 15:32, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Godric ki Kothri@hiwiki

Please grant permanent admin right as per RFA. Thanks. आर्यावर्त (talk) 01:00, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ThiênĐế98@viwikivoyage

Please grant sysop flag for 1 year. Thanks! Tuyenduong97 (talk) 13:27, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On hold for 14 August (and 1st temp adminship is not 1 year). Stryn (talk) 16:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Icem4k@nywikipedia

I would like to request to be an admin at the Chi-Chewa Wikipedia to fix basic things, translate the main page of the site and also import stuff. I cannot provide a local discussion because there's hardly anyone active there. Chabota (talk) 20:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Still you should put a notice on a village pump or other appropriate forum and wait for one week. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ruslik Thank you will do so. Chabota (talk) 20:56, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huỳnh Nhân-thập@viwikibooks

Huỳnh Nhân-thập ran for administrator a year ago but their candidacy went mostly unnoticed and didn't garner enough support. Within the last couple months, now that the requests for permissions page is linked more prominently, the discussion has received more attention. There seems to be a consensus that they should have administrator rights, despite the extraordinary length of this poll (by Vietnamese wiki standards, at least). – Minh Nguyễn 💬 22:14, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does he still want the permission? Sometimes they don't know they are getting the permission when the request is rescued from the realm of the forgotten. — regards, Revi 13:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, he does. He has confirmed his election few day ago. --ThiênĐế98 (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-08-13. — regards, Revi 17:31, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Nico@ro.wikipedia.org

His candidacy ran for 7 days, as requested, and has not encountered any opposition. I believe it can now be closed.--Strainu (talk) 13:30, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Wiki looks big enough for perma-sysop. — regards, Revi 13:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interface administrator access

See Interface admin for information about this user group.

  • If you are requesting adminship and the interface admin at the same time, you can file one request in administrator section and state you want interface adminship as well.
  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request interface administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
  • Since the end of 2018, all interface administrators are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled. Please, enable it before posting your request here.

  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew interface adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request interface adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want interface adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent interface adminship and the duration of interface adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.


Bureaucrat access

See

Bureaucrat

for information about this user group.

  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Itsmine@zh-classical.wikipedia

Per community discussion WAN233 (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that the community is large enough to have bureaucrats. Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
lzh:維基大典:會館 has too many backlog complex discussions that need to be handled properly.They are all the best administrator at zh-classical wikipedia.Interface-admin needs to be elected.There will be many people in the election.Local bureaucrats can make community work efficiently--WAN233 (talk) 14:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, a community with only 4 sysops doesn't need bureaucrats. --MF-W 15:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Davidzdh@zh-classical.wikipedia

Per community discussion WAN233 (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

丁子君@zh-classical.wikipedia

Per community discussion WAN233 (talk) 09:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser access

See

CheckUser policy

for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.

  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.

Oversight access

See

Oversight policy

for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.

  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .

  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

MIKHEIL@ka.wikipedia

According to local policy If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting. In several three-month periods he has not made the required 500 edit (January-March, February-April, March-May, April-June, also 17 April to 17 July). There is also consensus in KaWiki, please have a look at the last activities in this discussion. Deu. 06:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep local discussion to local. — regards, Revi 02:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Strong oppose — If you look at the latest statistics of the admin, you can understand that it is active, so it was not necessary for the removal of the flag in this time. At the moment there is no reason to remove the rights, or is there a law that you can apply later, when the administrator active? --Mehman 97 16:06, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Mehman, you as a Georgian Wikipedian could participate in this discussion. Mehman's argument has already been discussed locally and there is a democratic consensus: All responding users demand the removal of administrative rights. Namely: Giorgi13, Surprizi, Beqabai, Gobrona, Giorgi Balakhadze, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე, Zangala, SHOTHA, Fiqriasidamonize, პაატა შ and me. The only opponent in KaWiki was user David1010. Deu. 16:36, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear DEU, if Mr. MIKHEIL were not an active administrator at the moment, I would also agree with you, but he is active. So I see no reason to deprive him of his rights. You had to apply then when the fact was fixed, and not after that. --Mehman 97 16:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, dear DEU, the link that you presented to us is the forum of arbitration, and the forum where the question of removing the full authority of the administrator should be resolved is here, so let's solve this issue democratically by means of voting. So the issue in the local wikipedia on this issue is not resolved, and you alone should not decide this problem! --Mehman 97 17:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi people, this page is not for the discussion whether the removal should happen or not. Please discuss it locally. Thanks! — regards, Revi 17:15, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Mehman, it is unfortunate that you did not participate in local discussion, even though you were informed about the discussion. Okay, it's clear that you're a second opponent with user David1010. As I said, your argument has already been discussed locally. In addition, according to the local rules, I first applied in KaWiki on 18 July. At that moment, MIKHEIL was not sufficiently active for half a year. That's why the local users agree that admin rights should be removed. @-revi, it was already discussed locally. Deu. 17:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear DEU, I repeat, the page you submitted to us is a forum, and not a page where the issue of removing rights should be decided. Let's then democratically decide on the page of removing the admin's rights this issue, by voting. That's how the question will be solved. --Mehman 97 17:29, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Mehman, it has already been said that this is not a suitable place for such discussion. After the local policy If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting. It does not even matter where the discussion took place. All the above users have expressed their own opinion and there is already a democratic consensus. You can discuss the matter further locally. Deu. 17:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear DEU, you do not want to understand me or do it on meaningly? I tell you where the law that the administrator should lose his rights when he is active? if he was not active and because of this he should lose his rights, then give us this law and I will agree with you. Yes, perhaps it's time to discuss this locally. --Mehman 97 17:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
By decision of the majority of Georgian Wikipedians, MIKHEIL remains the administrator of the Georgian Wikipedia. Please refuse and close this request. Thanks --Mehman 97 20:25, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done --MF-W 15:34, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Runes@en.wikibooks

Per local inactivity policy. He has been informed on his userpage about the same. Thanks. Leaderboard (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - QuiteUnusual (talk) 09:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

xeno@en.wikipedia

Unfortunately I haven't been able to meet the activity requirements and respectfully request removal of the oversight permission for security reasons. Thank you in advance, –xeno 19:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done; best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Piwaiwaka@mi.wikipedia

User Piwaiwaka at mi (Māori Wikipedia) Re the comment on my talk page there, I request removal of my administrator rights for reason of inactivity, which I don’t see changing and I believe that the Wikipedia is served better when administrators are members of the currently active community. Thank you Piwaiwaka (talk) 06:13, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note to stewards: this needs to be noted at Admin activity review/2017/Data when this is done. --Rschen7754 06:28, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Piwaiwaka, thanks for your service as an admin. I removed your rights. --MF-W 15:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

vlsergey@ru.wikipedia

Status:    Locally handled

Local bureaucrats refused to remove flag from my account at ruwiki. Please, just do it. Vlsergey (talk) 06:25, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please hold this request on 3 days, this a emotions. Thanks. // Просьба отложить решение на 3 дня, это на эмоциях на фоне конфликта в рувики. Спасибо. [3] -- dima_st_bk 06:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Being a member of Arbitration Committee (ru:Википедия:Арбитражный комитет), I would like to ask for putting this particular request on hold, as well as any similar requests coming from ruwiki within next a couple of weeks. The thing is there is an active conflict between some sysops, engineers and bureaucrats in ruwiki, which is related to the new technical flag (interface-admin) to be given to a couple of non-technical sysops, and which results into emotional reactions. A couple of active editors already requested to remove their flags in ruwiki, and local bureaucrats indeed refused to do that. Vlsergey is only one of them, and the only one who decided to get in touch with Stewards. But just so you know the order of magnitude, 5 out of 10 existing engineers in ruwiki requested the flags to be removed, so you can only imagine what would happen to the technical side of ruwiki if all of these requests were executed. I believe we will address the issues with the interface-admin flag within next 2 weeks, have the community to approve the related rules and policies, and after that engineers and sysops will be able to make well thought-out decisions. --Good Will Hunting (talk) 06:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
6 of 10, and 2 more on hold. --Serhio Magpie (talk) 06:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not done there's 5 bureaucrats, so it should be handled locally --Alaa :)..! 07:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Additional explanation: Stewards do not perform actions on wikis with ability to self-manage, unless there is emergency ("crat says no" is not an emergency) or all the crats are gone for a long time (at least 6 months - 1 year). Not the case here. — regards, Revi 10:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@-revi and علاء: The following is not meant to suggest that you act contrary to an explicit request from ruwiki's ArbCom at all. But if @Good Will Hunting had not appeared, I do not see where policy would allow anybody to force a user to hold rights that s/he does not want to keep.
We have a 24-hour hold rule here for resignations of rights, and for good reason. But if someone wishes to resign rights on a self-managing wiki, and bureaucrats fail to act within (3 days?)(7 days?)(surely something longer than 24 hours), then in my opinion stewards actually should act. This is not like most other situations where we normally don't want stewards to act when 'crats can. This is a case of a user not being permitted to voluntarily give up rights. And as long as we're satisfied there has been a cooling off period, we should facilitate that. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Policy(+"If there are any doubts as to whether or not an action should be performed, stewards should not act unless it is an emergency or there are no active local users to do it.") is that we do not intervene on the projects with active crats, so it's unactionable. — regards, Revi 01:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rapaloux@fr.wiktionary

I do not want the permission for Interface administrator access Rapaloux (talk) 09:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to correct section.  On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions — regards, Revi 11:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. — regards, Revi 14:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

用心阁@zh.wikipedia

  • 用心阁 has been inactive longer than 6 months that local policy prescribed, and still be inactive after notified over 1 month. As a local Bcrat I hereby request for removing both of its sysop flag, Thank you.—AT (talk) 09:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Thank you for the service. — regards, Revi 14:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aursani@sd.wikipedia

(As per administrator removal policy of SD Wiki, admin must make one edit at least in a year, but mentioned user made his last edit almost 16 months ago!.) Arslanali (talk) 13:44, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Los688@ja.wikipedia

He/she has been inactive over the last 3 months on jawiki. Please remove his/her sysop access as per our desysop policy. Thanks in advance. --Penn Station (talk) 01:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — regards, Revi 06:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.

Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:

  • SRB — Local or global bot status
  • SRGP — Global permissions

Gopala Krishna A@knwiki

Dear Stewards, I will be conducting workshops in Kannada Wikipedia frequently. Since participants face difficulties in the workshop to create an account I would like to request for account creator right on [kn.wikipedia.org]. Before this, I requested in the local village pump and I got good support. --Gopala Krishna A (talk) 08:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Note for Stew: One inactive crat, invoked AAR process)
Do you need it permanently or just temporarily? — regards, Revi 08:47, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@-revi: Previously in a emergency situation had a temporary right for 7 days in the last month. I would like to have a permanent right. Thanks and regards. --Gopala Krishna A (talk) 05:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2019-08-02. I granted it for 1 year, as usual practice for granting sysops. You can ask it to be renewed, and I would be happy to grant you indef as that demonstrates your sustained need to access. — regards, Revi 15:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --Gopala Krishna A (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GZWDer@zhwikiversity

Request temporary import flag until September 30, 2018.--GZWDer (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until the wiki is open for edit.--GZWDer (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Probably can be proceeded now.--GZWDer (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Ruslik (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also