Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

Line 168: Line 168:

==== Ponpan@th.wikibooks ====

==== Ponpan@th.wikibooks ====

{{sr-request

{{sr-request

|status = <!--don't change this line-->

|status = done<!--don't change this line-->

|domain = th.wikibooks

|domain = th.wikibooks

|user name = Ponpan

|user name = Ponpan

Line 174: Line 174:

}}

}}

Hello, according to [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec-rightschanges/th.wikibooks.org/Ponpan my logs for the rights changes], my adminship should actually end since around Sep. 2012. However, nothing has happened afterwards and neither I've noticed about the date at all. Until 2019 there was an user asking me and reminding me ([https://th.wikibooks.org/wiki/คุยเรื่องวิกิตำรา:ผู้ดูแลระบบ#สิทธิถาวรของคุณ_Ponpan_%3F 1]). After discussing about the situation with other users on th.wikibooks, including the possibility of returning to be in the ''rightful'' adminship that they said they would happily support this ([https://th.wikibooks.org/wiki/คุยกับผู้ใช้:B20180#ต่อสิทธิผู้ดูแลระบบ 2]). I have to reject this offer unfortunately because of the business in my real life that I cannot maintain the duty of adminship appropriately from this time on ([https://th.wikibooks.org/wiki/คุยกับผู้ใช้:Ponpan#ยกเลิกสิทธิ 3]). --[[User:Ponpan|Ponpan]] ([[User talk:Ponpan|talk]]) 00:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, according to [https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec-rightschanges/th.wikibooks.org/Ponpan my logs for the rights changes], my adminship should actually end since around Sep. 2012. However, nothing has happened afterwards and neither I've noticed about the date at all. Until 2019 there was an user asking me and reminding me ([https://th.wikibooks.org/wiki/คุยเรื่องวิกิตำรา:ผู้ดูแลระบบ#สิทธิถาวรของคุณ_Ponpan_%3F 1]). After discussing about the situation with other users on th.wikibooks, including the possibility of returning to be in the ''rightful'' adminship that they said they would happily support this ([https://th.wikibooks.org/wiki/คุยกับผู้ใช้:B20180#ต่อสิทธิผู้ดูแลระบบ 2]). I have to reject this offer unfortunately because of the business in my real life that I cannot maintain the duty of adminship appropriately from this time on ([https://th.wikibooks.org/wiki/คุยกับผู้ใช้:Ponpan#ยกเลิกสิทธิ 3]). --[[User:Ponpan|Ponpan]] ([[User talk:Ponpan|talk]]) 00:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

:{{done}} - I've removed your sysop flag. Thanks for all your help over the last "three months" :-) – [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] ([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|talk]]) 16:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)



=== Miscellaneous requests ===

=== Miscellaneous requests ===

Using this page

1. Place the following code at the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== Username@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!-- Don't change this line -->
 |domain    = <!-- Such as en.wikibooks -->
 |user name = 
 |discussion= 
}}
(your remarks) ~~~~

2. Fill in the values:

  • domain: the wiki's URL domain (like "ex.wikipedia" or "meta.wikimedia").
  • user name: the name of the user whose rights are to be changed (like "Exampleuser"). In case this is for multiple users, leave this field blank and give a list of these users in your remarks.
  • discussion: a link to the local vote or discussion about the rights change (for example, "[[ex:Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#ExampleUser]]"). This should normally be for at least one week, but no more than three weeks (if so, you'll need to restart the process).

3. If anything is missing from your request, a steward will request more information.

Confirmation of signing confidentiality agreement

Certain permissions (notably CheckUser and Oversight) additionally require users to sign a confidentiality agreement. Users requesting these permissions must make a request below, and must also sign the confidentiality agreement with the Wikimedia Foundation. The request is placed on hold temporarily, until the receipt has been formally confirmed by the Office.

COPY THE FOLLOWING CODE to the bottom of the appropriate section below:

==== User name@xxproject ====
{{sr-request
 |status    = <!--don't change this line-->
 |domain    =
 |user name =
 |discussion= 
}}

Administrator access

See Administrator for information about this user group.

  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.

  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent adminship and the duration of adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

Kaleem Bhatti@sd.wiktionary

(your remarks) Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What permission do you want? Ruslik (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: I want administration at sd.Wiktionary because at sd.wiktionary is only 1 administration Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then you need to start a local discussion first. Ruslik (talk) 08:48, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: I have added local discussion link Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please, transclude that subpage to the main discussion page. Ruslik (talk) 20:04, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: done Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 06:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any transclusion. Ruslik (talk) 20:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now check transclusion. Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 03:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
???? Ruslik (talk) 12:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaleem Bhatti: It's still not transcluded on a request for administrator rights page. Please do so. Trijnsteltalk 21:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Trijnstel: Please now check I have added administrators link and sorry because first I was not understand Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 05:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: Kaleem Bhatti (talk) 13:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you escape@ro.wikiquote


The only administrator has not been active since February 2017(which is more than 2 years ago), there are a lot of spam articles and I want to clear up the mess and possibly revive this. There are also no active members, so I can’t make a discussion on the local wikiquotes. With respect, Can you escape (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

can you link to some of these spam articles? They can easily be dealt with by a global sysop. Praxidicae (talk) 19:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure!, https://ro.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ex_hoc_momento_pendet_aeternitas , https://ro.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ggga , https://ro.wikiquote.org/wiki/プレモノ_-_Yahoo!_JAPAN_PR企画 , https://ro.wikiquote.org/wiki/00a0a0 , https://ro.wikiquote.org/wiki/00nn001xx .There are most likely more, though ro.wikiquotes needs an administrator(even if it’s only temporary) to put things back on track. As I specified above, the current admin hasn’t made 1 edit in more than 2 years. The activity of the community is close to zero. Can you escape (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sure you can understand why people are skeptical given your very short tenure here. Praxidicae (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely! I don’t think abusing would be a problem since the wiki is always being monitored. Can you escape (talk) 07:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Comment You have been here two weeks, and otherwise have no evident history. Yet you are not a wiki-novice, so I would like to understand your previous wiki personalities. Much of wikiquote needs is activity and organisation, not administrators from what I can see. Requests for administration can be posted at SRM. [Noting that I have handled the deletion requests.]  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for handling the deletion requests! I am not a wiki novice indeed but it’s just that i’m a pretty fast learner. You can’t organize wikiquotes when vandals create useless pages and destroy others. During these 7 days i’ve done a lot of useful modifications to the site that will make the user experience more pleasant. There are also still, a lot of useless with spam/vulgar content, I have marked the ones I noticed with the „delete” template. There is still a lot of backend implementations that need to be done that i’ll be taking care of this week. With respect, Can you escape (talk) 11:36, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Klein Muçi@sqwikiquote

I've been a temporary admin for almost a year now and would like to be permanent. Also, if possible, I'd like to request interface administrator rights. We are a really small community there and currently I do all the admin jobs around and initially I've asked for bureaucrat rights but I was told we couldn't have a local bureaucrat since we're not that big a community so at least, having interface administrator rights would give me some other tools helping to look after the project. Do check my contributions on that project and also the Recent changes there if you want to make sure I mean no harm whatsoever. - Klein Muçi (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I read that I need two-factor authentication enabled for interface administration. Can I have a little technical help on how to do that? As a matter of fact, I have that kind of log in enabled in all my web accounts but the procedures on Wikimedia seems a little bit more complex than the usual websites, as far as I saw. - Klein Muçi (talk) 15:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was able to enable the two-factor authentication. - Klein Muçi (talk) 03:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: can I have an answer too? Is there a specific reason I must wait? It's been 4 days already. - Klein Muçi (talk) 13:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2020-06-01. Ruslik (talk) 08:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: thank you! :) - Klein Muçi (talk) 08:57, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Junior 588@tn.wikipedia

Good evening I would like to request to be a permanent administrator at the Tswana wikipedia tn.wikipedia.org I once requested for being an admin in April I think but nobody was against me but I didn't know that I should go through here .well ever since I joined wikipedia nothing has changed in Tswana Wikipedia especially the main page it keeps on showing the same information repeatedly and also the information is outdated there is only 1 admin and he is not being responsible so plzz am willing to make Tswana Wikipedia a better place to students because I don't want them to suffer with information or get outdated information.Thank you.(Junior 588 (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

You were blocked at English Wikipedia due to abuse of multiple accounts. One account you have operated is Kgm2019, which is blocked due to the behavior showing you are not here to contribute to Wikipedia. With your Junior 588 account you continued similar behavior at some user talk pages in Tswana Wikipedia, and the account is also blocked at English Wikipedia as a confirmed sockpuppet. Do you wish to explain what's happening? -★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 19:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well I do agree that have been blocked but that was when I was lacking some skills my intentions were never meant to destroy wikipedia but to build it to become a better place for me and you I do believe that the only way for us to learn is by making mistakes.(Junior 588 (talk) 04:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Not done - Looking over your contributions on tnwiki, it looks like most edits are completely unrelated to improving that project. Prior to filing a request for adminship you hadn't even edited there for a couple of months. Please show some evidence of actual content contributions to that project before we will grant admin access. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

gitartha.bordoloi@aswikisource

Hi. I'm re-applying for temporary general and interface adminship in as.wikisource for a period of 6 months. My current tenure will expire on 4th June, 2019. 2FA is already enabled. Thank you. Gitartha.bordoloi (talk) 06:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold until 5 June 2019 Ruslik (talk) 12:34, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interface administrator access

See Interface admin for information about this user group.

  • If you are requesting adminship and the interface admin at the same time, you can file one request in administrator section and state you want interface adminship as well.
  • MediaWiki interface translations are done at translatewiki.net. Please do not request interface administrator access solely for that purpose; your request will be declined.
  • Since the end of 2018, all interface administrators are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled. Please, enable it before posting your request here.

  • Stewards: Please use {{Systmp}} for approved temporary requests.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

Please start a new discussion about requesting the permission on the local village pump, administrators' noticeboard or a designated page for requesting permissions each time you request or renew interface adminship.

  • Discussions should be open for seven days. Please request interface adminship here seven days after discussions started. This page is not the place for any discussions or votes. (For wikis with few active users, it is OK to have no comments.)
  • If you only want interface adminship for specific tasks, please state for how long and for which tasks you need it. Otherwise stewards will decide whether to assign permanent interface adminship and the duration of interface adminship. See Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements.

Ninjastrikers@mywiktionary

To update some css script, I would like to request for the interface admin rights. Thanks. NinjaStrikers «» 18:19, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Granted for 11 months to expire on 2020-04-23. Ruslik (talk) 20:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bureaucrat access

See

Bureaucrat

for information about this user group.

  • In principle, requests for temporary bureaucrat access are not granted.
  • A small project does not need bureaucrats. Currently whether a promotion is valid or not is decided by stewards. See here for a guideline.

Requests for removal of access should be posted at the section below.

CheckUser access

See

CheckUser policy

for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.

  • To request CheckUser information, see Steward requests/Checkuser. This is the place to request CheckUser access.
  • One-time CheckUser access is not permitted and temporary access is only used by Stewards or when the mandate of the CUs has an expiry date specified in local policies.

Oversight access

See

Oversight policy

for information about this user group and the policy governing the use of this tool.

  • To request to have content oversighted, ask for a steward in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect and contact a steward privately. This section is for requesting access to the Oversight tool.
  • For contact details about oversighters across the wikis, refer to this page.
  • Note that temporary Oversight access is not permitted and temporary status is only used by Stewards .

  • When a new user is assigned to this group, please add them to this list.

Removal of access

  • If you're requesting the removal of your own permissions, make sure you're logged in to your account. If you have multiple flags, specify which you want removed. Stewards may delay your request a short time to ensure you have time to rethink your request (see previous discussion on 24 hour delays); the rights will not be restored by stewards once they are removed.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions, you must gain consensus on the local wiki first. When there is community consensus that the user's access should be removed, provide a link to the discussion, with a brief explanation of the reason for the request, and summarize the results of discussion. However, as bureaucrats of some wikis may remove users from the administrator or bureaucrat group, please see also a separate list of these specific wikis.
  • To request the removal of another user's permissions for inactivity, link to your local inactivity policy. If your site does not have inactivity policy, the global policy Admin activity review applies.
  • See the instructions above for adding new requests. Please post new requests at the bottom of the section.

MIKHEIL@ka.wikipedia

According to local policy If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting. In last three-month periods he has not made the required 500 edits; see 25 February—25 May (483 total). In Georgian Wikipedia, Bureaucrats can't remove sysop rights, and therefore I apply to stewards on Meta-Wiki. Best regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 19:54, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@გიო ოქრო: Should the bureaucrat right be removed as well? Ruslik (talk) 08:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruslik0: No, because that rule don't includes bureaucrat right. გიო ოქრო (talk) 09:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@გიო ოქრო: Bureaucrats override admins for they can grant people admins. Chances are that once a steward removes the admin access of MIKHEIL, it could be soon granted by MIKHEIL themselves. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 09:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Wang: Yes, there are. But I think MIKHEIL will not do it. I just apply you about the administrator right. Do it as you decide. გიო ოქრო (talk) 12:22, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion that should (more likely) have happened locally
Administrator rights from Mikheil can be taken away only after filing an request in the Georgian Wikipedia and after discussion there can be administrative actions. So, while at the local level the issue is not resolved there is nothing to discuss. I'm waiting for request at the local level, and without the decision of the local community, the administrative actions of the steward are not welcomed. --Mehman 97 13:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
„If an administrator within 3 months doesn't make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting (automatically)“ — There is no need for discussion. Georgian Bureaucrats can't remove sysop rights. გიო ოქრო (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ვიკიპედია:ადმინისტრატორები/ადმინისტრატორის_სტატუსის_მოხსნა — It is not written that I don't have the right to request on Meta and I have to request in the local wiki first. გიო ოქრო (talk) 13:56, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In 2014 MIKHEIL himself applied to Meta-Wiki and demanded to resign 4 administrators (Zangala, BRUTE, Giorgi13, Island). He did not make any request in Georgian Wikipedia and directly wrote a resignation request. He indicated only the discussion of introduction of the rule. There was no local discussion. Now, when there is rule, there is no need for local discussion. Best regards გიო ოქრო (talk) 15:04, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
2014 case there was a discussion and elections where they took the appropriate decision (please do not mislead people). When the question is about 17 editing and because of this, asking for removing status, perhaps a discussion is required here. Without a local discussion, the status cannot be removing and everyone should respect the decision of the local community, no one has the right to bypass the opinion of the community. This is not a place for discussion, so submit request at the local level and continue the discussion there. Kindly, --Mehman 97 15:14, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Repeat the same: „If an administrator within 3 months does not make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting (automatic)- There is no need for discussion and community can not stop resignation if sysop has not made the required 500 edits. Show me rule that says, that I can't apply to Meta-Wiki. გიო ოქრო (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For context stewards might want to review Requests for comment/Vote of confidence on sysops and unblock for user Deu on kawiki. And good luck to whomever makes a call on this. --Rschen7754 15:48, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the discussion reported by Mehman, the new rule is discussed and does not include resignation of concrete administrators. In Georgian Wikipedia there is page (ვიკიპედია:ადმინისტრატორები/სტატუსის მოხსნა), where you can demand the resignation of sysop, but the community can't stop that process, if sysop has not made the required edits. So, the application in Georgian Wiki makes no sense, because the community does not solve the result (the result of discussion of community is that RULE) and the bureaucrats can not remove the status. For these reasons I apply here and not in Georgian Wiki. There is no rule that prohibits this. Please act according to the rules and remove sysop rights from MIKHEIL. Best regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's super that Rschen7754 noted Requests for comment/Vote of confidence on sysops and unblock for user Deu on kawiki. Keep in mind that this request is made by a person who has a personal dislike for MIKHEIL. I’m not going to continue the discussion here, which should be conducted at the local level, but at the end I’ll add that there are not enough 17 editing and this number is not a reason for removing the status, so this issue should be decided by the consensus at the local level (administrator who has more than 400 editing is clearly not a passive admin). Kindly, --Mehman 97 22:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have personal dislike for MIKHEIL and for other users. The rule is the rule (MIKHEIL supported himself during the voting). The rule don't includes "more than 400 edits". He (MIKHEIL) did not made required edits, and therefor sysop rights must be remove. There is a consensus at the local level — indentured rule supported by the majority of active users. According that rule discussions and consensus are not required and the rights should be automatically removed. Regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 06:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to the local rules, sysop status from MIKHEIL must be removed without discussion and vote, only by the stewards of Meta-Wiki; discussion on local level and decision of the local community is no longer needed (This is written in the rule — „If an administrator within 3 months does not make 500 edits and 50 sysop actions, sysop rights will be removed without voting (automatically)“). He is not an active editor. He made 483 edits in three months (from which 70-80% was Usertalk) and he has not made the required edits. Local rules don't say that I don't have the right for request on meta-wiki, especially that the Georgian bureaucrats can't remove sysop rights. @Super Wang, Ruslik0, -revi, and Tegel: and other stewards, please summarize that issue and make a decision. Best regards, გიო ოქრო (talk) 20:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@გიო ოქრო:It may be disappointing, but far from your prediction, I am not a steward. Sorry for being unable to assist you. --Super Wang hates PC You hate, too? 23:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ponpan@th.wikibooks

Hello, according to my logs for the rights changes, my adminship should actually end since around Sep. 2012. However, nothing has happened afterwards and neither I've noticed about the date at all. Until 2019 there was an user asking me and reminding me (1). After discussing about the situation with other users on th.wikibooks, including the possibility of returning to be in the rightful adminship that they said they would happily support this (2). I have to reject this offer unfortunately because of the business in my real life that I cannot maintain the duty of adminship appropriately from this time on (3). --Ponpan (talk) 00:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done - I've removed your sysop flag. Thanks for all your help over the last "three months" :-) – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellaneous requests

Requests for permissions that don't fit in other sections belong here. Importer rights can be granted on most wikis by stewards only. Please gain local community consensus before posting a new section here.

Note that the following types of permissions requests belong on separate pages:

  • SRB — Local or global bot status
  • SRGP — Global permissions

Capankajsmilyo

Status:    In progress

I want request for import rights so that I can perform imports of modules and templates across wikis. Please help. Thanks Capankajsmilyo (talk) 23:03, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Import requires special discussion with the community you want to hold the permission. — regards, Revi 19:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Capankajsmilyo Please indicate the wikis you need import and initiate the discussion on that wiki for your access. — regards, Revi 01:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also