Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Cycle 2/Healthy, Inclusive Communities - Meta-Wiki

Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Cycle 2/Healthy, Inclusive Communities - Meta-Wiki
Jump to content
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Strategy
Wikimedia movement
2017
Cycle 2
Translate this page
Other languages:
Nederlands
Tiếng Việt
Türkçe
dansk
italiano
magyar
polski
português
български
русский
українська
עברית
العربية
हिन्दी
বাংলা
中文
2017 Movement strategy
REPORTS
LEARN
JOIN
ORGANIZE
REACH
Theme: Healthy, inclusive communities
The following discussion is closed.
Cycle 2 of the discussion is now closed for final sensemaking and drafting. Please join us soon for
the next cycle of this process
By 2030, the Wikimedia volunteer culture will be fun, rewarding, and inclusive for both existing contributors and newcomers. We will welcome new volunteers to our movement and mentor them to ensure that they have a great experience and continue to participate in the projects. People from every background will feel part of
a network
of groups and organizations with deep relationships. As a result, our movement will grow both in size and in nature, as our projects flourish under our collective care.
Sub-themes
edit
This theme was formed from the content generated by individual contributors and organized groups during cycle 1 discussions. Here are the sub-themes that support this theme. See the
Cycle 1 Report
, plus the supplementary
spreadsheet
and
synthesis methodology
of the 1800+ thematic statements.
Community health
Community engagement & support
Diversity & inclusion
Gender diversity
Internal communication
User engagement
New users
Experienced users
Readers
Insights from movement strategy conversations and research
edit
Insights from the Wikimedia community (from this discussion)
edit
Week 1 summary
Week 2 summary
Week 3 summary
Week 4 summary
Insights from partners and experts
edit
Summary of 20 expert interviews from India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Egypt, Brazil and Mexico (2017)
Summaries of salons, meetings, and interviews with experts and partners
Insights from user (readers and contributors) research
edit
Generative research in Mexico, Nigeria, and India (2016)
Summary of Indonesia research - Initial findings
Indonesia research findings draft May 2017
Other Research
edit
Findings from Wikimedia user analytics
edit
220,000 people contribute monthly:
Representation is skewed:
English Wikipedia editor retention decline:
c:File:Monthly active editors.enwiki 2016-06.svg
English Wikipedia monthly user retention:
c:File:Enwiki.monthly user retention.survival proportion.svg
Information on Wikimedia affiliates and organized groups
edit
Wikimedia affiliates and organized groups:
m:Wikimedia movement affiliates
100+ affiliates around the world:
c:File:Wikimedia Capters and WMF Maps.svg
Past community engagement and donor research
edit
Gender gap remains:
m:Community Engagement Insights
Reader motivations:
Editor motivations:
c:File:Editor Survey 2012 - Wikipedia editing experience.pdf
Money raised by the Foundation:
c:File:FY1516DonationsByContinent.png
Donor motivation survey:
File:Wikimedia 2014 English Fundraiser Survey.pdf
Research from other sources
edit
"From Blueprint to Scale: The Case for Philanthropy in Impact Investing",
"The Future of Free Speech, Trolls, Anonymity, and Fake News Online", Pew Research Center:
"Online Harassment", Pew Research Center:
"The Agency, The New York Times, "From a nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, Russia, an army of well-paid “trolls” has tried to wreak havoc all around the Internet":
"Lithuanian Elves Combat Russian Influence Online", AP:
Underrepresented topics remain that way:
84% of Wikipedia articles focus on Europe and North America:
Questions
edit
View discussion of these questions on the talk page
These are the main questions we want you to consider and debate during this discussion. Please support your arguments with research when possible. We recognize you may not have time to answer all the questions; to help you choose where to focus, we have listed three types of questions below. The primary questions are the ones most important to answer during this discussion cycle.
Primary questions
What impact would we have on the world if we follow this theme?
Note that if you already submitted key ideas that answer this question for this theme in the previous discussion, consider just adding a link to that source page versus rewriting the whole statement. (see
spreadsheet
). If you have something new to add to a comment you made previously, however, please do.
How important is this theme relative to the other 4 themes? Why?
Secondary question
Focus requires tradeoffs. If we increase our effort in this area in the next 15 years, is there anything we’re doing today that we would need to stop doing?
Expansion questions
What else is important to add to this theme to make it stronger?
Who else will be working in this area and how might we partner with them?
Other comments:
Remember, if you have thoughts about the strategy process or larger issues, please share those
here
, where they are being monitored daily!
If you have specific ideas for improving the software, please consider submitting them in
Phabricator
or the product's specific talkpage.
2017 Wikimedia Movement Strategy
Participate
On Meta-Wiki
Elsewhere
Learn
Organize
Sources
Reports
Cycle 1 synthesis report
Cycle 2 synthesis report
New Voices synthesis report
Cycle 3 synthesis report
Direction
Strategic direction
Endorse the Strategic direction
People
Drafting group
Core team
Steering Committee
Advisory Group
You!
Process
Audit of past strategy processes
Considerations
Timeline
Translation
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
Cycle 3
Drafting
Endorsement
Concerns
Frequently asked questions
Updates
Signup for updates
Retrieved from "
Category
2017 Wikimedia movement strategy Cycle 2
Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Cycle 2/Healthy, Inclusive Communities
Add topic