Papers by Tanja Trausmuth-Wallner
Fundberichte aus Österreich 59, 2020

New Insights into a Romanesque Basilica Church in the Deserted Town of Corvey, Germany, Based on a High-Resolution GPR Survey
ArcheoSciences 45-1, 2021

The ‘Archpro Carnuntum’ Project – Integrated Archaeological Interpretation of Combined Prospection Data, Carnuntum (Austria)
Épités - Épitészettudomány, Feb 16, 2021

Zerstörungsfreie archäologische Prospektion des römischen Carnuntum – erste Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts „ArchPro Carnuntum“
Carnuntum Jahrbuch
Remote Sensing
New Global Perspectives on Archaeological Prospection, 13th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, 2019
Lebenswelten zwischen Archäologie und Geschichte - Festschrift für Falko Daim zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, 2018
Durrington walls and the Stonehenge Hidden Landscape Project 2010-2016
Archaeological Prospection 25 (3), 2018

Zerstörungsfreie archäologische Prospektion des römischen Carnuntum – erste Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts „ArchPro Carnuntum“
Carnuntum Jahrbuch, 2018
In Raimund Karl & Jutta Leskovar, Interpretierte Eisenzeiten 7. Fallstudien, Methoden, Theorie. Tagungsbeiträge der 7. Linzer Gespräche zur interpretativen Eisenzeitarchäologie, Studien zur Kulturgeschichte von Oberösterreich, Folge 47, Oberösterreichisches Landesmuseum, p. 243-254, Linz 2017., 2017
surrounding Stonehenge. The sheer scale, resolution and complexity of the data produced are unprecedented. The results range from discoveries of new prehistoric monuments to the very detailed mapping of extensive multi-period field-systems and modern complexes such as Royal Air Force Stonehenge. Inevitably, there is particular interest in the landscape context of Stonehenge itself from the 3rd millennium BC, our knowledge of which has greatly increased as a result of the project. In this interpretative context, the significance of the Durrington Walls ‘super-henge ́, located c. 3 km to the north-east of Stonehenge, cannot be overrated.
The roughly circular henge enclosure consists of an internal ditch up to 5.5m deep and 18m wide, and an external chalk rubble bank surviving up to 1.5m high and up to c. 32m wide, with an overall diameter of c. 480 metres. It encloses a number of other structures, including two timber circles excavated by Wainwright on the east side of the enclosure (Wainwright and Longworth 1971, 204-34).
The ‘Stonehenge Riverside Project’ investigations have significantly changed our understanding of the monument. It is now clear that a settlement existed prior to the henge construction, dated to c. 2525-2440 BC, and it has been suggested that it was inhabited by up to 4000 people (Parker Pearson 2012, 109-111), although this extrapolation of the excavated south-east entrance area data is conjectural and direct evidence for wider occupation is limited.
This melange of data generates new challenges concerning its joint interpretation; the generated information has to be understood, interpreted and interlinked within its given archaeological setting. In particular, non-invasive high-resolution archaeological prospection projects, offer a great potential for the detailed investigation of archaeological sites. The combination of remote sensing and nearsurface geophysical survey methods is a specifically
useful approach as the methods complement each other without damaging the archaeological heritage.
One of the LBI ArchPro case studies is to investigate the phenomenon of Neolithic circular enclosures (Kreisgrabenanlagen) in eastern Austria. These monuments are usually built on loess, a soil type that is favourable for magnetometry but provides no or only very limited penetration for ground-penetrating radar (GPR) pulses. Therefore, these prehistoric monuments were overwhelmingly discovered and investigated using aerial photography and magnetic prospection. Both methods are well suited to detect and map these sites. However, three-dimensional depth information could only be gathered through cost intensive and destructive excavations.
The presented site of the circular ring ditch system of Velm (parish of Himberg in Lower Austria) is situated on gravel, deposited as river sediments. Discovered by aerial photography in 2000 and re-photographed in 2001 (Fig. 1), it offered itself as an ideal candidate for a multi-methodological prospection approach. Due to the unique ground conditions, several non-invasive archaeological prospection methods, including GPR, could be successfully applied and generated spectacular results.
In 2009, geophysical surveys were conducted in Rathcroghan, the place described as the royal seat of Ailill and Medb in medieval Irish texts. This article discusses whether the medieval descriptions of the royal residence ’Cruachan Aí‘ can be related to the results of this geophysical surveys and to other, excavated archaeological structures similar to features discovered at Rathcroghan. It is argued that the archaeological information can successfully be used as an additional interpretational aid for previously somewhat confusing or difficult to translate passages of the Old- and Middle-Irish narratives, and vice versa the texts be used to help interpreting the archaeological record.
This article presents a cost-effective and user-friendly method for three-dimensional documentation of excavations on the example of several years of research at Meillionydd (Wales). Documentation is one of the most important activities during an archaeological dig. Because deposits, which are destroyed by the progressive excavation activities may be held only by a careful record for future scientific work. For this reason, the three-dimensional digital documentation of individual surfaces is the minimum requirement for ‘state of the art’ excavation-documentation. Therefore ‘Structure from motion’ creates digital, textured surface models, that allows future scientists to perform
interactive observations inside the virtual 3d-model.
This contribution presents the results of an opinion poll aimed at discovering the archaeological interests of the Austrian population. A randomly selected total of 500 people were interviewed between November 2013 and January 2014. The results are very satisfactory. 61 % of those questioned were somewhat interested, interested or very interested in archaeology and 85 % think that the archaeology is important or very important. The interviewees defined monuments primarily as objects which are particularly important
for research into the past. They also saw the absolute age of an object as playing an important role in the definition of a monument. The interviewees were also much more
selective than the current interpretation of the law and did not regard all archaeological finds or features as monuments, but only those which are of particular importance for research into the past. A majority of 59 % is in favour of public ownership of archaeological monuments. There is also considerable interest in active public involvement in archaeology – 58 % of those questioned would like or very much like to take part in archaeological activities. A right to participate in archaeological decisions is sought after by only a minority of 20 %, but this is a clear majority of those who are interested or very interested in archaeology. Bearing in mind that Austria has recently signed the Faro Convention, it seems appropriate to consider how the strong public interest in active participation in archaeological activity can – with professional supervision and coordination – be satisfied.