The sleeper effect between psychotherapy orientations: a strategic argument of sustainability of treatment effects at follow-up | Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences | Cambridge Core
Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-57qhb
Total loading time: 0
Render date: 2026-04-23T23:57:43.698Z
Has data issue: false
hasContentIssue false
Journals
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Volume 26 Issue 4
The sleeper effect between psychotherapy orientations:...
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Article contents
Abstract
Background
Empirical evidence
Conclusions
References
The sleeper effect between psychotherapy orientations: a strategic argument of sustainability of treatment effects at follow-up
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
28 October 2016
C. Flückiger
[Opens in a new window]
and
A. C. Del Re
Show author details
C. Flückiger*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Division of Psychological Interventions and Psychotherapy, University of Zürich, Switzerland
A. C. Del Re
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to implementation, USA
Address for correspondence: Professor C. Flückiger, Ph.D., SwissBPP, Department of Psychology, Division of Psychological Interventions and Psychotherapy,
University of Zürich
, Binzmühlestrasse 14/04, CH-8050 Zürich,
Switzerland
. (Email:
christoph.flueckiger@psychologie.uzh.ch
Article
Figures
Metrics
Article contents
Abstract
Background
Empirical evidence
Conclusions
References
Save PDF (0.08 mb)
View PDF
[Opens in a new window]
Rights & Permissions
[Opens in a new window]
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Keywords
Randomized controlled trial
comparative psychotherapy outcome research
follow-up
evidence based practice
Information
Type
Letter to the Editor
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
Volume 26
Issue 4
, August 2017
, pp. 442 - 444
DOI:
[Opens in a new window]
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
Over the past 100 years, claims that
specific
psychotherapeutic orientations produce more sustainable outcomes, when compared with other orientations or interventions common across psychotherapies, have been pervasive and influential. This kind of
differences
in relative efficacy over follow-up time periods is referred to as the ‘sleeper effect’, i.e., the effects of psychotherapy A against psychotherapy B produces larger treatment differences at follow-up than at post-assessment (see
Fig. 1
).
Fig. 1.
Example of the sleeper effect:
More
sustainable outcomes at follow-up in favour of psychotherapy A in comparison with psychotherapy B.
Background
Psychotherapeutic treatments conducted by trained professionals that are intended to be therapeutic (i.e., bona fide psychotherapy) are shown to be highly effective for treating many mental health conditions. Interestingly, there are marginal to small differences in efficacy between the various bona fide psychotherapy orientations (e.g., cognitive behavioural therapy
. Psychodynamic therapy) at post-treatment, so attention has turned towards examining any potential sleeper effects that might favour one treatment over another. The sleeper effect has been formulated in the following ways:
The
depth
psychodynamic therapies: Lasting structural personality changes will only be achieved by a profound look into the depths of the mind. In comparison with more behaviourally oriented treatments, insight-oriented psychodynamic therapies work through the subconscious and therefore the effects are more sustainable (Shedler,
Reference Shedler
2010
).
The
carefully controlled
evidence-based (mostly cognitive-behavioural) therapies: Disorder-specific evidence-based therapies with close adherence to treatment manuals/guidelines under randomised controlled study conditions have been carefully developed and tested. Therefore, their effects will be more sustainable in comparison with less controlled treatments (Tolin,
Reference Tolin
2010
).
The
specificity
of additive component designs: Additive intervention components address specific therapeutic aspects, which may result in broader patient competencies and more sustainable treatment effects in comparison with treatments with less systematic focus on the specific ingredient (Bell
et al
Reference Bell, Marcus and Goodlad
2013
).
Empirical evidence
To test the presence of the sleeper effect, the statistical results of randomised controlled psychotherapy trials should indicate a
treatment
(psychotherapy A
. B)
by time
(post
. follow-up) interaction. In parallel, longitudinal meta-analyses can test these
treatment by time interactions
in direct treatment comparisons.
We searched the term ‘longitudinal meta-analysis’ and ‘psychotherapy’ and ‘follow-up’ in PsycINFO and MEDLINE (September 30, 2016) and found 18 hits from which three meta-analyses of the direct treatment comparisons provided a statistical test of the sleeper effect (Flückiger
et al
Reference Flückiger, Del Re, Munder, Heer and Wampold
2014
Reference Flückiger, Del Re and Wampold
2015
; Kivlighan
et al
Reference Kivlighan, Goldberg, Abbas, Pace, Yulish, Thomas, Cullen, Flückiger and Wampold
2015
). In addition, one longitudinal meta-analysis tested the longitudinal course within a treatment (Hanrahan
et al
Reference Hanrahan, Field, Jones and Davey
2013
):
Psychodynamic
. non-dynamic psychotherapies (
= 20 primary studies): Findings indicated equivalent efficacy at post-treatment and at follow-up, no sleeper effect (Kivlighan
et al
Reference Kivlighan, Goldberg, Abbas, Pace, Yulish, Thomas, Cullen, Flückiger and Wampold
2015
).
Evidence-based psychotherapy
. treatment as usual (
= 15): Small-to-moderate differences in efficacy were found in favour of evidence-based treatments at post-treatment but no extended efficacy at follow-up. The treatment as usual conditions ranged from the absence of minimal mental health treatment to legitimate psychological interventions provided by trained professionals, the latter of which indicated small differences in relative efficacy at post-treatment as well as at follow-up, no sleeper effect (Wampold
et al
Reference Wampold, Budge, Laska, Del Re, Baardseth, Flückiger, Minami, Kivlighan and Gunn
2011
; Flückiger
et al
Reference Flückiger, Del Re, Munder, Heer and Wampold
2014
).
Additive components
. usual components (
= 30): A re-analysis of Bell
et al
. – meta analysis (2013) found marginal to small differences in efficacy at post-treatment and no extended efficacy at follow-up in favour of additive components (Flückiger
et al
Reference Flückiger, Del Re and Wampold
2015
). In parallel, the longitudinal course in cognitive-behavioural therapy in generalised anxiety was tested and marginal differences in efficacy were found at post-treatment in favour to treatments with additive components. However, no extended efficacy at follow-up was found, no sleeper effect (
= 17, Hanrahan
et al
Reference Hanrahan, Field, Jones and Davey
2013
).
Conclusions
Historically, the argument that some psychotherapy orientations produced more sustainable outcomes at follow-up than others contributed to the split of the psychotherapy community into different camps. The most up-to-date meta-analytic evidence indicates a surprisingly different, yet consistent picture: There is marginal empirical evidence for the presence of a sleeper effect in comparative psychotherapy research. None of the meta-analyses found a growth of relative efficacy at follow-up assessment. While the theoretical arguments for differences in efficacy (depth, carefully controlled, specificity) are reasonable, there is little theoretical reason for why these effects would only notably appear at follow-up assessment points. Clearly, there is variation in the sustainability. However, the attribution of such an effect to a single psychotherapy orientation is not justified based on the evidence. Methodologically, potential confounds such as dropout rates, external events over time and additional treatments may have made it difficult to detect differences in relative efficacy at follow-up (Knekt
et al
Reference Knekt, Lindfors, Härkänen, Välikoski, Virtala, Laaksonen and Virtala
2008
; Durham
et al
Reference Durham, Higgins, Chambers, Swan and Dow
2012
).
Nevertheless, the sleeper effect as a lasting theoretical claim has survived over the past 100 years. The sleeper effect might be thought of as a strategic effect in the sense that the dominant and most powerful orientations in this time (earlier psychodynamic therapies, now maybe evidence-based psychotherapies) are ‘pulled’ to claim sustainability of their own approach; maybe in the hope of further decades of data collection to get an empirical proof of the claim.
Financial support
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
References
Bell
EC
Marcus
DK
Goodlad
JK
2013
).
Are the parts as good as the whole? A meta-analysis of component treatment studies
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
81
722
736
CrossRef
Google Scholar
PubMed
Durham
RC
Higgins
Chambers
JA
Swan
JS
Dow
MGT
2012
).
Long-term outcomes of eight clinical trials of CBT for anxiety disorders: symptom profile of sustained recovery and treatment-resistant groups
Journal of Affective Disorders
136
875
881
Google Scholar
Flückiger
Del Re
AC
Munder
Heer
Wampold
BE
2014
).
Enduring effects of evidence-based psychotherapies in acute depression and anxiety versus treatment as usual at follow-up – a longitudinal meta-analysis
Clinical Psychology Review
34
367
375
Google Scholar
Flückiger
Del Re
AC
Wampold
BE
2015
).
The sleeper effect: artifact or phenomenon – A brief comment on are the parts as good as the whole? A meta-analysis of component treatment studies (Bell, Marcus & Goodlad, 2013)
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
83
438
442
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Hanrahan
Field
AP
Jones
FW
Davey
CGL
2013
).
A meta-analysis of cognitive therapy for worry in generalized anxiety disorder (2013)
Clinical Psychology Review
33
120
132
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Kivlighan
DM
Goldberg
SB
Abbas
Pace
BT
Yulish
NE
Thomas
JG
Cullen
MM
Flückiger
Wampold
BE
2015
).
The enduring effects of psychodynamic treatments vis-à-vis alternative treatments: a multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis
Clinical Psychology Review
40
14
CrossRef
Google Scholar
PubMed
Knekt
Lindfors
Härkänen
Välikoski
Virtala
Laaksonen
MA
Virtala
2008
).
Randomized trial on the effectiveness of long and short term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solutionfocused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a 3 year followup
Psychological Medicine
38
689
703
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Shedler
2010
).
The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy
American Psychologist
65
98
109
Google Scholar
Tolin
DF
2010
).
Is cognitive-behavioral therapy more effective than other therapies? A meta-analytic review
Clinical Psychology Review
30
710
720
CrossRef
Google Scholar
PubMed
Wampold
BE
Budge
Laska
Del Re
AC
Baardseth
TP
Flückiger
Minami
Kivlighan
DM
Gunn
2011
).
Evidence-based treatments for depression and anxiety versus treatment-as-usual: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons
Clinical Psychology Review
31
1304
1312
CrossRef
Google Scholar
PubMed
Fig. 1.
Example of the sleeper effect:
More
sustainable outcomes at follow-up in favour of psychotherapy A in comparison with psychotherapy B.
You have
Access
22
Cited by
Cited by
Loading...
Cited by
22
Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref
Flückiger, Christoph
Held, Judith
Wolfer, Christine
Allemand, Mathias
and
Visla, Andrea
2017.
Ressourcenorientierung als Interventionsleitbild
Psychotherapeut,
Vol. 62,
Issue. 2,
p.
136.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Spielmans, Glen I.
and
Flückiger, Christoph
2018.
Moderators in psychotherapy meta-analysis
Psychotherapy Research,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
333.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Podina, Ioana R.
Vîslă, Andreea
Fodor, Liviu A.
and
Flückiger, Christoph
2019.
Is there a sleeper effect of exposure-based vs. cognitive-only intervention for anxiety disorders? A longitudinal multilevel meta-analysis
Clinical Psychology Review,
Vol. 73,
Issue. ,
p.
101774.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Flückiger, Christoph
and
Beesdo-Baum, Katja
2020.
Klinische Psychologie & Psychotherapie
p.
575.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Abbass, Allan
Town, Joel
Holmes, Hannah
Luyten, Patrick
Cooper, Angela
Russell, Leo
Lumley, Mark A.
Schubiner, Howard
Allinson, Jenny
Bernier, Denise
De Meulemeester, Celine
Kroenke, Kurt
and
Kisely, Steve
2020.
Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Functional Somatic Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 6,
p.
363.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
van Loon, Amanda W. G.
Creemers, Hanneke E.
Beumer, Wieke Y.
Okorn, Ana
Vogelaar, Simone
Saab, Nadira
Miers, Anne C.
Westenberg, P. Michiel
and
Asscher, Jessica J.
2020.
Can Schools Reduce Adolescent Psychological Stress? A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of School-Based Intervention Programs
Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 6,
p.
1127.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Schulz, Stefan M
Ritter, Oliver
Zniva, Richard
Nordbeck, Peter
Wacker, Christian
Jack, Mary
Groschup, Guido
Deneke, Thomas
Puppe, Frank
Ertl, Georg
Angermann, Christiane
Störk, Stefan
and
Pauli, Paul
2020.
Efficacy of a web-based intervention for improving psychosocial well-being in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: the randomized controlled ICD-FORUM trial
European Heart Journal,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 11,
p.
1203.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Bücker, Lara
Gehlenborg, Josefine
Moritz, Steffen
and
Westermann, Stefan
2021.
A randomized controlled trial on a self-guided Internet-based intervention for gambling problems
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Abbass, Allan
Lumley, Mark A.
Town, Joel
Holmes, Hannah
Luyten, Patrick
Cooper, Angela
Russell, Leo
Schubiner, Howard
De Meulemeester, Celine
and
Kisely, Steve
2021.
Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for functional somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of within-treatment effects
Journal of Psychosomatic Research,
Vol. 145,
Issue. ,
p.
110473.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
de Korte, Manon W. P.
van den Berk-Smeekens, Iris
Buitelaar, Jan. K.
Staal, Wouter G.
and
van Dongen-Boomsma, Martine
2021.
Pivotal Response Treatment for School-Aged Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 12,
p.
4506.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Sobanski, Thomas
Josfeld, Sebastian
Peikert, Gregor
and
Wagner, Gerd
2021.
Psychotherapeutic interventions for the prevention of suicide re-attempts: a systematic review
Psychological Medicine,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 15,
p.
2525.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Alsayednasser, Batool
Widnall, Emily
O'Mahen, Heather
Wright, Kim
Warren, Fiona
Ladwa, Asha
Khazanov, Gabriela Kattan
Byford, Sarah
Kuyken, Willem
Watkins, Ed
Ekers, David
Reed, Nigel
Fletcher, Emily
McMillan, Dean
Farrand, Paul
Richards, David
and
Dunn, Barnaby D.
2022.
How well do Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Behavioural Activation for depression repair anhedonia? A secondary analysis of the COBRA randomized controlled trial
Behaviour Research and Therapy,
Vol. 159,
Issue. ,
p.
104185.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Spielmans, Glen I.
and
Rosen, Gerald M.
2022.
Corrigendum Compounds Errors and Again Fails to Support the Specificity of Acupoint Tapping
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease,
Vol. 210,
Issue. 2,
p.
139.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Hasin, Deborah S.
Aharonovich, Efrat
Zingman, Barry S.
Stohl, Malka
Walsh, Claire
Elliott, Jennifer C.
Fink, David S.
Knox, Justin
Durant, Sean
Menchaca, Raquel
and
Sharma, Anjali
2022.
HealthCall: A randomized trial assessing a smartphone enhancement of brief interventions to reduce heavy drinking in HIV care
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,
Vol. 138,
Issue. ,
p.
108733.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
de Korte, Manon W. P.
van Dongen‑Boomsma, Martine
Oosterling, Iris J.
Buitelaar, Jan. K.
and
Staal, Wouter G.
2022.
Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) parent group training for young children with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Leuning, Esther Marion
van den Berk-Smeekens, Iris
van Dongen-Boomsma, Martine
and
Staal, Wouter G.
2023.
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing in adolescents with autism; Efficacy on ASD symptoms and stress
Frontiers in Psychiatry,
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Clancy, Olivia M.
Juarascio, Adrienne S.
Manasse, Stephanie M.
and
Srivastava, Paakhi
2023.
Predicting cognitive-behavioral therapy outcomes for bulimia nervosa patients based on skill use during treatment
Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
50.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Périer, Antoine
Harf, Aurélie
Radjack, Rahmeth
and
Moro, Marie Rose
2024.
L’adolescent/te en interrogation sur son identité de genre ou en conduite trans-affirmative : construire une alliance thérapeutique
La psychiatrie de l'enfant,
Vol. Vol. 67,
Issue. 2,
p.
33.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Babcock, Julia C.
Kini, Sheetal
Godfrey, Donald A.
and
Rodriguez, Lindsey
2024.
Differential Treatment Response of Proactive and Reactive Partner Abusive Men: Results from a Laboratory Proximal Change Experiment
Psychosocial Intervention,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
43.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Candeias, Maria de Jesus
Rosa, Pedro J.
and
Gouveia-Pereira, Maria
2025.
Healthy Minds: A School-Based Prevention Programme for Deliberate Self-harm in Adolescence
School Mental Health,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 2,
p.
701.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Download full list
Google Scholar Citations
View all
Google Scholar citations
for this article.
Cancel
Confirm
Save article to Kindle
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the
Kindle Personal Document Service.
The sleeper effect between psychotherapy orientations: a strategic argument of sustainability of treatment effects at follow-up
Volume 26,
Issue 4
C. Flückiger
(a1)
and
A. C. Del Re
(a2)
DOI:
Save article to Dropbox
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account.
Find out more about saving content to Dropbox
The sleeper effect between psychotherapy orientations: a strategic argument of sustainability of treatment effects at follow-up
Volume 26,
Issue 4
C. Flückiger
(a1)
and
A. C. Del Re
(a2)
DOI:
Save article to Google Drive
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account.
Find out more about saving content to Google Drive
The sleeper effect between psychotherapy orientations: a strategic argument of sustainability of treatment effects at follow-up
Volume 26,
Issue 4
C. Flückiger
(a1)
and
A. C. Del Re
(a2)
DOI:
Reply to:
Submit a response