User talk:Freechild - Wikipedia

User talk:Freechild - Wikipedia
Jump to content
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Semi-retired
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Omaha
, which seeks to expand information about
Omaha, Nebraska
. Please feel free to join us.
You can click here to leave me a new message. I will reply on this page unless you request otherwise.
Archive
Freechild
Talk
DYKs
Favorites
Contribs
Workspace 1
Archives
10
New archive
edit
You can view my archive for January 2, 2012 through September 1, 2013
here
. 17:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
edit
Hello, I'm
BracketBot
. I have automatically detected that
your edit
to
Mary Beth Tinker
may have broken the
syntax
by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page
again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
school-speech-case-starts-tour-4815977.php "Plantiff in iconic school speech case starts tour"]
, ''San Francisco Chronicle''. Retrieved September 15, 2013.
Thanks,
BracketBot
talk
16:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguation link notification for September 22
edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
List of defunct amusement parks
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Krug Park
check to confirm
fix with Dab solver
). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
Read the
FAQ
• Join us at the
DPL WikiProject
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions
. Thanks,
DPL bot
talk
11:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Omaha park-and-boulevard system
edit
Just a heads-up in case this hasn't come to your attention: the Omaha Park and Boulevard System is now listed in the National Register of Historic Places, under that name. There's a short summary at
[1]
; the nominating form is at
[2]
. I've put a note to that effect in the article
Boulevards in Omaha, Nebraska
, which you created; don't know if you'd want to revisit the article, particularly in light of the inclusion of parks and golf courses in the NRHP nomination.
Ammodramus
talk
02:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Hey Ammodramus, thanks for the heads-up. I'll definitely work something out, but I'm not sure how yet. Can the boulevard system maintain its own article, with a separate one for the designated areas? We surely wouldn't merge the parks into the article, right? Hmmm. I'm going to research Chicago and a few others, but tell me what you think? Thanks. •
Freechild
talk
14:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Haven't really given it much thought-- I'm more of an outstate person. Thinking at the keyboard, my first inclination would be to rename the existing article to include parks, and to include material on the particular parks that're considered part of the parks-and-boulevards system. I wouldn't suggest a merge with
Parks in Omaha, Nebraska
, which also covers lots of parks that don't appear to be included in the P&B system; nor would I exclude non-NRHP boulevards (e.g. Sorenson Pkwy) from the boulevards article. Mostly, I think I'd be disposed to expand the boulevards article with a little more material on the parks that Cleveland designed as part of the system. Will think about this some more and get back to you on it...
Ammodramus
talk
19:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Just from what you've written and what I've been able to find so far, I'm thinking about a separate article. The nomination cited the specific work of HWS Cleveland, which is comprised of "18 contributing parks, six noncontributing parks, and approximately 19 boulevards that span approximately 26.5 miles and link approximately 1,650 acres of park land." The City of Omaha, however, claims it has a total of "over 250 parks covering approximately 10,000 acres of parkland", and doesn't really say how many miles of boulevards there are citywide - but the number is greater than the nomination, because they've added new boulevards as recently as a few years ago.
All that said, I think a separate article is justified. Thanks for your thoughts, and for spurring mine! •
Freechild
talk
20:31, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Thanks, and good luck with the article development.
I'm still doing photography in Nebraska; drop me a line if there's anything specific you'd like photographed for the article (or if there's something else that you're trying to push toward GA or FA). I've got a few NRHP sites left to shoot in Omaha; unfortunately, most of them are historic districts, and it takes a lot of work to photograph them right. The boulevards-and-parks one will be especially time-consuming, since I won't be able to do it on foot like I can in most HDs.
Don't know if you've been paying any attention to WikiProject NRHP, but one of the members recently put together a dandy
progress page
, with maps of the US showing the fraction of NRHP sites in each county that've been illustrated, that have articles, and that have articles rated Start or better. The last of those maps might interest you: only two Nebraska counties have reached 50% Start+. One of those was Arthur County, where I wrote a C-class article on one of the two sites. The other is Douglas County-- and the reason it's got such a high percentage of Start+ articles is all the work that you've done there. Too bad it's not a bigger county geographically-- it'd be nice to have it show up more conspicuously on the map.
Ammodramus
talk
21:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Thanks for that heads-up, and for your ongoing offer for the pics. I'll admit to you that I've grown weary of the WP project in general. I've spent so much time and energy digging up info on places and people and events that wasn't compiled anywhere else before, and now I find it
all over the Internet
, relatively speaking, with people taking credit for the finds and whatnot. Its discouraging. So I started
a blog
to put my finds on and break away from the encyclopedic formula, and that's been a bit better. I still contribute here occasionally though, especially when I'm goaded on by other serious editors like you! It's good to be seen, you know? •
Freechild
talk
01:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Thanks for the link to the blog. I don't have the time to go through it in detail right now-- I've got to spend some time struggling with spreadsheets today-- but it's up on my bookmark bar, awaiting a chunk of leisure time.
Have to pick someone up at Eppley in the early afternoon of Oct. 14, so if the weather's good, I'll take my camera and try to spend the morning a-photographing. I've got plenty of NRHP sites to hit, including several HD's; but if you've got a place that particularly wants photographing, feel free to ask. (I think all photos at Commons are free-use-- I release all of mine into public domain-- so if you find something there that you can use for the blog, by all means do so.)
Ammodramus
talk
16:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
reply
Saturday: NYC Art And Feminism Wikipedia Editathon
edit
Please join
Wikipedia "Art and Feminism Editathon" @ Eyebeam
on Saturday February 1, 2014,
an event aimed at collaboratively expanding Wikipedia articles covering
Art and Feminism
, and the
biographies of women artists
There are also regional events that day in
Brooklyn
Westchester County
, and the
Hudson Valley
--
Pharos
talk
Fur trade
edit
Hi, hope all is well. Thought you might find this work interesting: Gitlin, Jay.
The Bourgeois Frontier: French Towns, French Traders & American Expansion,
Yale University Press, 2010. Great topic!
Parkwells
talk
22:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
reply
Thanks for sharing this
Parkwells
! I really appreciate you thinking of me. Things are good for me. I am focusing my efforts almost exclusively on my
blog
now. After years of seeing
our
hard work replicated freely across the entire internet, including a lot of for-profit websites that are literally making money off our volunteer time, I decided to hone my volunteerism on someplace the vultures couldn't get to it. The limited contributions I've made these last few years have shown me the editing climate has changed, too. I'm glad to know you're still here though. Hope all's well with you! •
Freechild
talk to me
22:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
reply
Upcoming Saturday events - March 1: Harlem History Editathon and March 8: NYU Law Editathon
edit
Upcoming Saturday events - March 1:
Harlem History Editathon
and March 8:
NYU Law Editathon
You are invited to join upcoming Wikipedia "Editathons", where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on a selected theme, on the following two Saturdays in March:
Saturday March 1:
Harlem History Editathon
RSVP
, focusing on Harlem history, landmarks and biographies
Saturday March 8:
NYU Law Editathon
RSVP
, focusing on innovation law and intellectual property (with social dinner afterward)
I hope to see you there!
Pharos
talk
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from
this list
.)
Saturday June 21: Wiki Loves Pride
edit
Upcoming Saturday event - June 21:
Wiki Loves Pride NYC
You are invited to join us at
Jefferson Market Library
for "Wiki Loves Pride", hosted by New York Public Library, Metropolitan New York Library Council, Wikimedia LGBT and Wikimedia New York City, where both experienced and new Wikipedia editors will collaboratively improve articles on this theme:
Saturday June 21:
Wiki Loves Pride NYC
RSVP
, focusing on LGBT history and culture.
11am–4pm at Jefferson Market Library.
We hope to see you there!
Pharos
talk
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from
this list
.)
Sunday July 6: WikNYC Picnic
edit
Sunday July 6:
WikNYC Picnic
You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" in
Central Park
, as part of the
Great American Wiknic
celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means
potluck
Sunday July 6
WikNYC Picnic
RSVP
1pm–8pm at southwest section of the
Great Lawn
, north of the
Delacorte Theater
Also, before the picnic, you can join in the
Wikimedia NYC
chapter's annual meeting.
11:30am-12:30pm at
Yeoryia Studios
, 2067 Broadway.
We hope to see you there!--
Pharos
talk
16:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
reply
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from
this list
.)
Sunday August 17: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
edit
Sunday August 17:
NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
You are invited to join the the
Wikimedia NYC
community for our upcoming
wiki-salon
and knowledge-sharing workshop on the
Upper West Side
of Manhattan.
Sunday August 17
NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
RSVP
2pm–5pm at
Yeoryia Studios
at Epic Security Building, 2067 Broadway (5th floor).
Afterwards at 5pm, we'll walk to a social wiki-dinner together at a neighborhood restaurant (
to be decided
).
We hope to see you there!--
Pharos
talk
15:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
reply
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from
this list
.)
Thursday December 4: NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
edit
Thursday December 4:
NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
You are invited to join the the
Wikimedia NYC
community for our upcoming
wiki-salon
and knowledge-sharing workshop in Manhattan's
Greenwich Village
Thursday December 4
NYC Wiki-Salon and Skill Share
RSVP
6:30pm–8pm at Babycastles, 137 West 14th Street
Afterwards at 8pm, we'll walk to a social wiki-dinner together at a neighborhood restaurant (
to be decided
).
We hope to see you there!--
Pharos
talk
07:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
reply
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by removing your name from
this list
.)
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Al Duncan
, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages
PTA
and
WDEF
. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
Read the
FAQ
• Join us at the
DPL WikiProject
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions
. Thanks,
DPL bot
talk
09:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
reply
A hotel key for you.
edit
for being a nice user.
Here is your Hotel room key to The dfrr hotel (which means visiting my userpage) where you will see awesome waterfalls pac-man Ads userboxes and everything else beyond your wildsist dreams.
Dfrr
talk
18:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
reply
Reference errors on 1 August
edit
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot
. I have
automatically detected
that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
On the
Neighborhoods of Omaha, Nebraska
page,
your edit
caused a
broken reference name
help
. (
Fix
Ask for help
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a
false positive
, you can
report it to my operator
Thanks,
ReferenceBot
talk
00:21, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Neighborhoods of Omaha, Nebraska
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Near Northside
. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
Read the
FAQ
• Join us at the
DPL WikiProject
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions
. Thanks,
DPL bot
talk
10:17, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion
of
Gloria Marshall
edit
Hello, Freechild. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,
Gloria Marshall
, for deletion because it's a
biography of a living person
that lacks references. If you don't want Gloria Marshall to be deleted, please
add a reference
to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on
my talk page
Thanks,
Rberchie
talk
22:42, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
reply
Rberchie
- I created a redirect to this name. It looks like someone else created this article. See the edit history for their name at
Freechild
talk to me
22:55, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom elections are now open!
edit
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election
. The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process
. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements
and submit your choices on
the voting page
. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
List of charitable foundations
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
List of charitable foundations
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of charitable foundations
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Aeonx
talk
09:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
You've been missed
edit
Just saw that you'd added something to
Old Gold Coast
. Hope that this means you're back to working on articles about Omaha history. I've done a bit of touching up from time to time (for instance, when
El Museo Latino
made the NRHP), but I'm really an outstate person. WP's a better place for your work on Omaha, and there's plenty left to do...
Ammodramus
talk
22:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Your words are deeply appreciated, Ammodramus. I miss the collaboration of Wikipedia A LOT. But I have to tell you how utterly, totally and completely disappointing it was to keep finding our hard labor spread across tacky spammy websites all over the place, and printed inside books people actually buy, without any attribution to you or me or any individual involved, and little acknowledgment of Wikipedia. Yuck. I actually ran into people who thought I plagiarized off Wikipedia! So I bailed out, and I'm still out.
My blog
has gone really well, and that's fun, but yes, some other activities are a waste of time. I'll test different forms of them to see if they work. In the meantime, come over and play with the new
Omaha History Club
! Thanks again for the compliment - that's the kind of thing that could bring me back here. •
Freechild
talk to me
07:07, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Hope that you do return! For my part, I'm happy with the acknowledgement that I get from fellow WP editors, and wouldn't especially care if one of my articles were reproduced elsewhere without acknowledgement (although I'd fly into a rage if they messed up my punctuation). But then, I tend to write on fairly obscure subjects, judging by the page-view numbers, so the likelihood that someone would want to reproduce one of my articles is minimal... I figure that whatever I write or photograph for WP or Commons goes into the public domain, and that the fun of researching and writing is the reward for me. Hasten to say that this is personal taste: I'm not trying to score altruism points, or to denigrate your own motives for writing.
Speaking of obscure subjects, I don't know if you knew that
Engineer Cantonment
recently made the NRHP. I did some reading up on it while trying to find and photograph it, and found it interesting enough to kick me into article-writing mode. It's not quite Omaha, but it's only half a mile north of
Fort Lisa
, so you might be interested.
I've been checking out your North Omaha website at intervals; among others, I really enjoyed some of the guest pieces, notably the one on Druid Hall (which also made the NRHP recently). Unfortunately, the Omaha History Club link led me to F—b—, which I assiduously shun...
Ammodramus
talk
17:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Thanks for putting me onto the Engineer Cantonment. I'd seen it referred to, but couldn't identify mentally where it was. I'm equally intrigued by the mention of
Rockport, Nebraska Territory
, which as an important early port needs its own article! We'll see what I can cook up... Thanks again for your note! •
Freechild
talk to me
19:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion of National Service Learning Partnership
edit
The article
National Service Learning Partnership
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:NONPROFIT
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
Chrisw80
talk
08:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguation link notification for April 22
edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Alvin Saunders
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
New Republic
. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
Read the
FAQ
• Join us at the
DPL WikiProject
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions
. Thanks,
DPL bot
talk
10:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
reply
Giselle O. Martin-Kniep
edit
Hi
Freechild
You started
this article
in 2008. I am trying to find appropriate
wp:rs
to bolster the article. I see a lot written
by
her, but I have not come across much so far that is of weight that is
about
her. I am still working on trying to find something. Perhaps you have an interest in revisiting this article to see what you can identify as helpful sourcing. Thanks.
FeatherPluma
talk
18:38, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
reply
Category:Nonprofit executives
has been nominated for discussion
edit
Category:Nonprofit executives
, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you.
Rathfelder
talk
22:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
reply
List of place names of Native American origin in Nebraska
edit
Hello, Freechild. You created
List of place names of Native American origin in Nebraska
, a list which is redundant to
List of place names in Nebraska of Native American origin
. The lists have been tagged for merging for some time now. Since you know something of the topic, would you mind merging them?–
Gilliam
talk
10:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion of
Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
edit
The article
Paul G. Allen Family Foundation
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
WP:N
, no substantial independent sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
Lankiveil
speak to me
13:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Freechild. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
the candidates' statements
and submit your choices on
the voting page
Mdann52
talk
22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom Elections 2016
: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Freechild. Voting in the
2016 Arbitration Committee elections
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
the candidates' statements
and submit your choices on
the voting page
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
List of businesses in Omaha
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
List of businesses in Omaha
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of businesses in Omaha
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Thryduulf
talk
10:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
reply
Napoleon Hill refs
edit
Hi Freechild. I hope you might be able to help verify some references you added to
List of New Thought writers
[3]
. I'm unable to find online versions of the first two, and an editor with access to both hardcopy and online versions is unable to verify the information. The discussion is at the end of
Talk:Napoleon_Hill#Lede_-_undue_weight
. I've been looking for scholarly works that discuss Napoleon Hill in a historical context, but they're difficult to find amidst all the self-help mentions. I hope you can help. Thanks. --
Ronz
talk
17:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
reply
Speedy deletion
nomination of
Template:WikiProject Omaha
edit
A tag has been placed on
Template:WikiProject Omaha
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (
{{substituted}}
).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
contest the nomination
by
visiting the page
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
deleting administrator
, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here
Evad
37
talk
23:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Freechild. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
reply
Category:Children's rights bodies
has been nominated for discussion
edit
Category:Children's rights bodies
, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you.
Rathfelder
talk
20:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
Ryan Roenfeld
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Ryan Roenfeld
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Roenfeld
until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Neiltonks
talk
13:01, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
reply
Category:Children's rights bodies
has been nominated for discussion
edit
Category:Children's rights bodies
, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you.
Brown
HairedGirl
(talk)
• (
contribs
18:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Carter Lake, Iowa
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Krug Park
check to confirm
fix with Dab solver
). Such links are
usually incorrect
, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
(Read the
FAQ
• Join us at the
DPL WikiProject
.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions
. Thanks,
DPL bot
talk
23:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
reply
Omaha Race Riot listed at
Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect
Omaha Race Riot
. Since you had some involvement with the
Omaha Race Riot
redirect, you might want to participate in
the redirect discussion
if you have not already done so.
Mr. Guye
talk
) (
contribs
22:27, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit
Hello, Freechild. Voting in the
2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
reply
Nebraska historic sites and architecture
edit
Hi, I just happened to notice you have been working occasionally on Nebraska historic sites and architecture from at least 2008 to just now in 2019. We must have crossed paths, but i am not remembering. By the way there is
wp:NRHPPROGRESS
which has maps showing "progress" (updated very occasionally) and statistics (updated almost daily).
wp:NRHPPROGRESSNE
is link to its NE statistics section. It brings attention to smaller achievements, perhaps, like starting short articles which is what i mostly do. cheers, --
Doncram
talk
21:09, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
reply
Thanks for your note Doncram. I've actually started just over 300 articles related to Nebraska history, including almost every single one related to North Omaha's history. I mostly retired from WP around 2012, when I found my volunteer efforts replicated in for-pay websites across the internet without any attribution. I don't like people making money off my volunteer labor, so I don't spend a lot of time here. Also, I didn't notice a lot of other editors working on Nebraska-related articles. I'll keep an eye out for your work though--thanks for sharing the link. •
Freechild
talk to me
22:39, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
reply
2019 US Banknote Contest
edit
US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of
United States banknotes
, yet only a fraction of these are represented on
Wikimedia Commons
in the form of 2D scans. Additionally,
Colonial America
, the
Confederate States
, the
Republic of Texas
, multiple
states and territories
, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.
In the months of November and December,
WikiProject Numismatics
will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the
2019 US Banknote Contest
. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on
all Wikimedia projects
. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive
awards
. Whether you want to claim the
Gold Wiki
or you just want to have fun, all are invited to
participate
If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions
here
Sent by
ZLEA
at
23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
via
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
reply
Your submission at
Articles for creation
Margaret McKenny
(November 15)
edit
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's
minimum standard for inline citations
. Please
cite
your sources using
footnotes
. For instructions on how to do this, please see
Referencing for beginners
. Thank you.
The comment the reviewer left was:
More inline citations needed e.g. the early life section and the bibliography.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
when they have been resolved
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Margaret McKenny
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Margaret McKenny
, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "
{{
db-self
}}
" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
may be deleted
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
Articles for creation help desk
, on the
reviewer's talk page
or use
Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors
MurielMary
talk
09:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
reply
Hello,
Freechild
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk
. If you have any
other
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse
, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
MurielMary
talk
09:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
{{
NoACEMM
}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
reply
GA Reassessment of Transportation in Omaha
edit
Transportation in Omaha
, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
reassessment page
. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Kew Gardens 613
talk
12:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
reply
Speedy deletion
nomination of
Template:Ethnic Omaha sidebar
edit
A tag has been placed on
Template:Ethnic Omaha sidebar
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion
because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
contest the nomination
by
visiting the page
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
deleting administrator
, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here
Mitchumch
talk
05:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
reply
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ethnic Omaha sidebar
edit
Template:Ethnic Omaha sidebar
has been
nominated for deletion
. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
Mitchumch
talk
07:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
reply
Custom signature fix needed
edit
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A
change to Wikipedia's software
has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem:
Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.
The solutions:
You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "
Treat the above as wiki markup.
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences
Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
Current signature:
• [[User :Freechild|Freechild]] | ''[[User talk:Freechild |talk to me]]''
Fixed signature:
• [[User :Freechild|Freechild]] | ''[[User talk:Freechild |talk to me]]''
More information is available at
Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature
. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at
Wikipedia talk:Signatures
. Thanks. –
Jonesey95
talk
20:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
reply
Black journalists of Omaha
edit
Hi, I thought you might be interested in this category discussion:
Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_17#Category:African-American_journalists_of_Omaha,_Nebraska
I see you added the original category to
Cyrus D. Bell
and perhaps others a few years ago. -
Pete Forsyth
talk
22:00, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
reply
Thanks for adding a comment there. I meant to mention before, you may be interested in our current campaign to write more Wikipedia articles about Black-owned newspapers:
WP:News On Wiki
Pete Forsyth
talk
23:50, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
reply
I don't see any convo about Black-owned Newspapers on that group
User:Peteforsyth
. Can you direct me? I have questions I need answered before I become involved in that effort - I don't like wasting my time in WP fights anymore, and if I invest a bunch of energy in writing new articles only for them to be deleted it would upset me.
Freechild
talk
16:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
reply
I suppose I should make it clearer on that page. The objectives of this campaign (through Feb. 2021) are to increase the number of Wikipedia articles about individual (a) Washington state-based, (b) Black-owned, or (c) Caribbean-focused newspapers (along with some related goals involving related Wikipedia articles, Wikidata items, etc.) We did this in 2018, and we really didn't have any fights...the content we are trying to generate is generally not controversial, just neglected. I believe it can help to work with others on this sort of thing though. One of the related things we've worked on is an early draft of
notability guidelines for newspapers
which, if we can get them approved, should streamline some of the arguments that occasionally crop up around whether or not a newspaper is notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. If you'd be willing to take a look at that page and make any edits, feedback, or suggestions, that would be most welcome too. -
Pete Forsyth
talk
00:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
{{
NoACEMM
}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
Saratoga Elementary School (North Omaha, Nebraska)
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Saratoga Elementary School (North Omaha, Nebraska)
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saratoga Elementary School (North Omaha, Nebraska)
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
power~enwiki
00:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion
of
Fontenelle Boulevard
edit
The article
Fontenelle Boulevard
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
non-notable street that doesn't appear to pass
WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
Imzadi 1979
00:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
Category:Ethnic restaurants
has been nominated for merging
edit
Category:Ethnic restaurants
has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you. --
Another Believer
Talk
17:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
{{
NoACEMM
}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
List of the youngest mayors in the United States
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
List of the youngest mayors in the United States
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the youngest mayors in the United States (2nd nomination)
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
RandomCanadian
talk
contribs
22:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
Al Duncan (motivational speaker)
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Al Duncan (motivational speaker)
, to which you have
significantly contributed
, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or if it should be
deleted
The discussion will take place at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Duncan (motivational speaker)
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
the configuration page
. Delivered by
SDZeroBot
talk
01:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion
of
Nebraska Zen Center
edit
The article
Nebraska Zen Center
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
No indication that this center meets the
notability criteria
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
Pichpich
talk
01:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
reply
Speedy deletion
nomination of
Caroline Curling Club
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard
to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
Caroline Curling Club
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not
credibly indicate
how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion
, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about
what is generally accepted as notable
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
contest the nomination
by
visiting the page
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
deleting administrator
Yee
no
talk
18:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
reply
Category:New Thought terminology
has been nominated for merging
edit
Category:New Thought terminology
has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you.
Marcocapelle
talk
11:33, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
Category:New Thought schools
has been nominated for deletion
edit
Category:New Thought schools
has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you.
Marcocapelle
talk
16:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the
2022 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
{{
NoACEMM
}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
reply
Speedy deletion
nomination of
Guy C. Barton House
edit
A tag has been placed on
Guy C. Barton House
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
No indication of importance
Under the
criteria for speedy deletion
, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
contest the nomination
by
visiting the page
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the
deleting administrator
, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here
–DMartin
07:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion
of
Guy C. Barton House
edit
The article
Guy C. Barton House
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
Unremarkable single-family home. No claim of significance or notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
–DMartin
07:37, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
Guy C. Barton House
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Guy C. Barton House
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guy C. Barton House
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
–DMartin
08:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Good article reassessment for
African Americans in Omaha, Nebraska
edit
African Americans in Omaha, Nebraska
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
reassessment page
. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
Onegreatjoke
talk
22:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the
2023 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
{{
NoACEMM
}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
reply
Good article reassessment for
Omaha, Nebraska
edit
Omaha, Nebraska
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
reassessment page
. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
~~ AirshipJungleman29
talk
03:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
reply
CfD nomination at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Geography of the United States by populated place
edit
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Geography of the United States by populated place
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you. –
Aidan721
talk
23:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
reply
Category:Lynching survivors in the United States
has been nominated for merging
edit
Category:Lynching survivors in the United States
has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you.
Marcocapelle
talk
08:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion
of
Youth Innovation Fund
edit
The article
Youth Innovation Fund
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
Subject does not meet the
WP:NORG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
Let'srun
talk
22:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
reply
Category:Youth activists
has been nominated for merging
edit
Category:Youth activists
has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
the category's entry
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you.
Mason
talk
20:26, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguation link notification for July 7
edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
East Omaha, Nebraska
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Ursuline Sisters
. Such links are
usually incorrect
, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
(Read the
FAQ
• Join us at the
DPL WikiProject
.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions
. Thanks, --
DPL bot
talk
06:07, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the
2024 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All
eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
{{
NoACEMM
}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
reply
CfD nomination at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 30 § Category:People by city
edit
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 30 § Category:People by city
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you. –
Aidan721
talk
17:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
reply
CfD nomination at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories
edit
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the
categorization
guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories
on the
categories for discussion
page. Thank you. –
Laundry
Pizza
03
c̄
08:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
reply
Nomination of
Youth Service America
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Youth Service America
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youth Service America
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
WormEater13
talk
02:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion
of
Project Adventure
edit
The article
Project Adventure
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
Marked for notability concerns 11 years ago. Insufficient third party coverage to meet
WP:ORG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the
page's history
for further information.
DatBot
talk
00:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
reply
Professeur
" listed at
Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect
Professeur
has been listed at
redirects for discussion
to determine whether its use and function meets the
redirect guidelines
. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 3 § Professeur
until a consensus is reached.
ArthananWarcraft
talk
08:26, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
reply
Proposed deletion
of
Omaha City Hall
edit
The article
Omaha City Hall
has been
proposed for deletion
because of the following concern:
No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish
notability
. Found directory listings, and tourist and news passing mentions, but no in-depth content.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
deleted for any of several reasons
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary
or on
the article's talk page
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process
, but other
deletion processes
exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion
allows discussion to reach
consensus
for deletion.
JoeNMLC
talk
14:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
reply
Proposed Deletion of Papillion Junior High
edit
Nomination of
Papillion Junior High
for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Papillion Junior High
is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines
or whether it should be
deleted
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papillion Junior High
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
CREditzWiki
yap
) | (
things i apparently did
14:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguation link notification for October 30
edit
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Omaha City Hall
, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
HDR
Opt-out instructions
.) --
DPL bot
talk
19:55, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
reply
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the
2025 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All
eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process
. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans
topic bans
, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review
the candidates
and submit your choices on the
voting page
. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
{{
NoACEMM
}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery
talk
00:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
reply
A (re-)invitation to
WikiProject Omaha
edit
Wikiproject under construction!
A (re-)invitation to
WikiProject Omaha
Hello!
You are listed as a member of
WikiProject Omaha
. The project has been inactive for several years now, and I am looking to relaunch it. I'm making plans for a Discord server, and for local meetups and edit-a-thons. If this sounds like something you'd be interested in, please let me know!
Thanks and happy editing.
Not interested? No problem. You can remove yourself from the
Active participants list
–DMartin
00:26, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
reply
When I put up the Wikiproject Omaha page in 2008, I couldn’t have imagined it would be picked back up 18 years later… and here you are!! Go, go, and let me know how I can be of use…
~2026-10768-1
talk
02:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
reply
When I put up the Wikiproject Omaha page in 2008, I couldn’t have imagined it would be picked back up 18 years later… and here you are!! Go, go, and let me know how I can be of use…
Freechild
talk
02:08, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
reply
I've sent you a link to the Discord server. if you're interested in helping with the server let me know, I'm not super familiar with discord.
–DMartin
05:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
reply
I went ahead and joined, and I'm familiar with Discord. However, I have no idea on how to get people involved. If you get them to join in, I'll be there to greet them. Honestly, that's my whole concern about this project — its one thing to start it, but another thing entirely for people to join. Are other editors responding to your inquiry? 07:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Freechild
talk
07:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
reply
Retrieved from "
Hidden category:
Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
User talk
Freechild
Add topic