…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

…ion of their choice under § Other discussions . In the first phase, the English Wikipedia was registered as a single "participant group"; this is to be the same in Phase 2. About 100 editors participated in the local discussion , and more than 300 other editors participated elsew…

…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…

…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…

Wikisource:Scriptorium/Archives/2008-04 - Wikisource, the free online library Jump to content From Wikisource Wikisource:Scriptorium Archives Latest comment: 17 years ago by T. Mazzei in topic Announcements Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion ar…

…n (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] I gather you haven't seen Slate? Wikipedia Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning’s New Gender L iz Let's Talk 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no conceivable reason for us to want to garner …

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

…soon. Candidates from the community are needed to fill the available seats. The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees oversees the Wikimedia Foundation's operations. Community trustees and appointed trustees make up the Board of Trustees. Each trustee serves a three year term. T…

…r-faith disruption from this single user ascends everything I have ever seen on Wikipedia entirely, so I am merely going to scratch the surface here. Make no mistake though; this disruption is blatant , systematic , and severe . Major recognition deserves to go to the team of edi…

…r-faith disruption from this single user ascends everything I have ever seen on Wikipedia entirely, so I am merely going to scratch the surface here. Make no mistake though; this disruption is blatant , systematic , and severe . Major recognition deserves to go to the team of edi…

… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…

…subpages) Discuss existing and proposed policies Discuss technical issues about Wikipedia Discuss new proposals that are not policy-related Incubate new ideas before formally proposing them Discuss matters involving the Wikimedia Foundation Post messages that do not fit into any …

On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…