… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…

Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Poll - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions Pending changes discussions Poll 2009 RfC 2010 Poll 2010 Interim RfC 2011 Phase 1 Phase 2 Pha…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…ात माहिती देणारा आणि शिष्यवृत्तीसाठी आवेदने देण्याची सूचना देणारा हा संदेश आहे. WikiConference India 2023 या काॅन्फरन्सविषयी तुम्ही नक्कीच उत्सुक असाल.काही दिवसांपासून आपण या परिषदेची रचना आणि समायोजन करीत आहोत त्याला हळूहळू निश्चित आकार येऊ लागला आहे. शिष्यवृत्तीसाठी आपण १४ डिसे…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

This discussion is being opened by the Wikimedia Foundation to determine how it can support the English Wikipedia community on its decision (if any) relating to the protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act . The purpose of this discussion is to gauge whether consensus is emerging fo…

…quals a version. Version 1.5 is a release, as is version 3.0.1 . [8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars February 23, 2026 11:39 AM February 13, 2026 The first Mobile Progress Report of 2026 provides a high-level overview to our mobile plans and priorities for the coming y…

…early used the news article as source (2 years ago), yet you let them use it on Wikipedia. And when I fixed that That too from a source that's already on the website. Will you block me for that? What military edit did I make there? Even in the Vidyadhar section, I had only includ…

WP:CBAN currently says, Community sanctions may be discussed on the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard (preferred) or on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. In a discussion that's happening now at WP:AN#Good Article ban proposal , there's confusion about what may …

…d the “arbitrary code execution from unsanitized input” bug that the Arch Linux Wiki mentions here for the xdg-user-dirs utility, by replacing the shell script with a C binary. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release! Allan Day @aday GNOME Foundation Update, 2026-04-17…

…d the “arbitrary code execution from unsanitized input” bug that the Arch Linux Wiki mentions here for the xdg-user-dirs utility, by replacing the shell script with a C binary. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release! Allan Day @aday GNOME Foundation Update, 2026-04-17…

… in that session. Later these ideas were transcribed and uploaded to the PPPSIG wiki. Other ideas were added subsequently and invitations were sent to members to review what they found: to improve the ideas, to comment on them or to add further ideas. The work was edited to make …