…scussion will be moved to the talk page. Background statement [ edit ] Does the Wikipedia community support the concept of date autoformatting? Scope Autoformatting is a way of marking up dates to allow registered users to choose their preferred display format. A variety of metho…
… 02:18, 24 October 2025 (UTC) I uploaded a new image and immediately sent it to Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop because it contains some problems. And for this reason, I don't want to use it in the article yet. Now I'm waiting for the fixed version so that I can use …
… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
…finite edit,move Arbitration enforcement : WP:CT/IMH ; requested at WP:RfPP Yue Wikipedia:Timelash 2026-04-23 18:53 indefinite create Repeatedly recreated Zzuuzz User:Python eggs/Chinese calendar/month/78/42 2026-04-23 18:09 indefinite edit,move High-risk template or module : 412…
On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…
…subpages) Discuss existing and proposed policies Discuss technical issues about Wikipedia Discuss new proposals that are not policy-related Incubate new ideas before formally proposing them Discuss matters involving the Wikimedia Foundation Post messages that do not fit into any …
…22, there has been a discussion on the Village Pump on the needs of the English Wikipedia community. Within that discussion, the community decided on the changes necessary before deployment, which the Web team is addressing . The community also recommended that the next step woul…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…
…d article up to date. This is pure censorship . It is a sad day in history when wikipedia decides to change the rules of a wiki and only allow a select few to make changes. Sitedown ( talk ) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that this only makes sense if we exclude …
…ulti-media resources. Its interactive features include assignments, attendance, wiki projects and polls, available to both teachers and students. These characteristics heighten students‘ involvement and collaboration. Furthermore, students have the possibility to share samples of…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…