…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…
Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 140 - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous Village pump (technical) archive This page contains discussions…
…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …
…ped by SIL2 , and ELAN3 which helps with multi- text annotations wrapped into a wiki which serves as media annotation, this group of applications is prob- a general entrance port and collaboration tool. The ably the best known set of linguistic tools specialised system is loaded …
…ch allows users to collaboratively edit and manage files on remote web servers. Wikipedia : "The WebDAV protocol allows 'Intercreativity,' making the Web a readable and writable medium, in line with Tim Berners-Lee's original vision.[1] It allows users to create, change and move …
On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…subpages) Discuss existing and proposed policies Discuss technical issues about Wikipedia Discuss new proposals that are not policy-related Incubate new ideas before formally proposing them Discuss matters involving the Wikimedia Foundation Post messages that do not fit into any …
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
…ves: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 At https://wikimania.wikimedia.org/wiki/2026:Program I noticed: "Language and Francophonie: Presentations in French and those from or related to the French-speaking world could be given priority, in line with th…
…Recoding life in common: a critical approach of post-nature 301 Eric Deibel The wiki way: prefiguring change, practicing democracy 327 Kate Milberry Tailoring rights regimes in biotechnology: introducing DRIPS next to TRIPS 345 Niels Louwaars About the authors 357 Index 361 12 Re…
…nge in the face of other types of online cooperation. Here, the main example is Wikipedia. Although Wikipedia is no panacea (in the end, there is always an editor who controls what is pub- lished), it allows us to speculate about the possibility of a radical wiki-an- thropology, …
Page 1
Next →