…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…
…ion of their choice under § Other discussions . In the first phase, the English Wikipedia was registered as a single "participant group"; this is to be the same in Phase 2. About 100 editors participated in the local discussion , and more than 300 other editors participated elsew…
…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…
…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…
… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…
Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…
…ness. Good luck in this role. Try not to let it keep you from enjoying your own wikiwork. :) – SJ talk 07:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Reply Thanks, and congratulations in your re-election. Whatamidoing (WMF) ( talk ) 08:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Reply Congratulations. I hope you enjoy yo…
…n (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] I gather you haven't seen Slate? Wikipedia Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning’s New Gender L iz Let's Talk 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no conceivable reason for us to want to garner …
… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…
Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Poll - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions Pending changes discussions Poll 2009 RfC 2010 Poll 2010 Interim RfC 2011 Phase 1 Phase 2 Pha…
…d article up to date. This is pure censorship . It is a sad day in history when wikipedia decides to change the rules of a wiki and only allow a select few to make changes. Sitedown ( talk ) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that this only makes sense if we exclude …
…These shortcuts are made possible by "template redirects": a non-intuitive MediaWiki hack where " transcluding " a redirect is equivalent to "transcluding" its target page. Template:Cn is a redirect to Template:Citation needed , the same way United States of America is a redirect…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
Page 1
Next →