Wikipedia:Glossary - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Glossary of terms commonly used on Wikipedia Abbreviations Edit summaries Glossary HTML Shortcuts Templates Wikitext Directory Shortcuts WP:G WP:G WP:TERM WP:TERM For abbreviations used in edit s…
… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…
Thank you for participating in the first phase of the 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy process . The text of the strategic direction has now been finalized. New comments will contribute to the next phase of discussions. This refers to: drafts A , G , K Structural inequalities: Sh…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…the relevant definitions, as it may be different from place to place. The Dutch Wikipedia says: Doodslag is het opzettelijk, maar niet met voorbedachten rade, beroven van het leven van een ander. Wanneer er wel sprake is van voorbedachten rade, spreekt men van moord. "Doodslag" i…
…d article up to date. This is pure censorship . It is a sad day in history when wikipedia decides to change the rules of a wiki and only allow a select few to make changes. Sitedown ( talk ) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that this only makes sense if we exclude …
…UK-SCAPE) (https://ukscape.ceh.ac.uk/) Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) – Wiki Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) – Cetacean Bycatch Workshop: Hauling Up Solutions Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) – Commonwealth …
…subpages) Discuss existing and proposed policies Discuss technical issues about Wikipedia Discuss new proposals that are not policy-related Incubate new ideas before formally proposing them Discuss matters involving the Wikimedia Foundation Post messages that do not fit into any …
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
User talk:Patsw - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end. Discussion of Contributions of Patsw edit patsw 01:46, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC) I like your re-introduction of the Zogby poll, and I think…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…