This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…
…ne, please do so on the current talk page . Start 1 I've tried to adhere to the Wiki nature in this morning's edit of Creationism. I accept that the dominant view is anti-Creationist and content myself merely with labeling the critique as such. I have restored much of the origina…
…ch allows users to collaboratively edit and manage files on remote web servers. Wikipedia : "The WebDAV protocol allows 'Intercreativity,' making the Web a readable and writable medium, in line with Tim Berners-Lee's original vision.[1] It allows users to create, change and move …
… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…
On 10 June 2019, an English Wikipedia administrator was banned by the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) from editing the English Wikipedia for a period of 1 year. A large community discussion followed, which included various statements by stakeholders , including the Trust & Safety depa…
… Representation) Created on 3 July 2018 (114 participants) Welcome post Group's wiki See also the group's pages from the right-hand side menu The overall goal/mission of this community group is to explore the requirements, best practices and implementation options for the concept…
… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…
… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
…d article up to date. This is pure censorship . It is a sad day in history when wikipedia decides to change the rules of a wiki and only allow a select few to make changes. Sitedown ( talk ) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that this only makes sense if we exclude …
Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2 , using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations. This had led to some controversies: some editors have been converting infoboxes to use Wikidata, believing use of Wikidat…
…majority of all active, unrecused arbitrators (same as the final decision). See Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures#Motions to dismiss . Template 1) {text of proposed motion} Support: Oppose: Abstain: Comments: Proposed final decision Purpose of Wikipedia 1) The purpose of…
…e got 2FA turned on. One more thing, Special:OATH needs to be done on the local wiki where you have administrator rights, the instructions tried to log me in to Meta, where I don't have admin rights. All that said, once I had the app, scanned the code and put the key in, it didn'…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…