…early used the news article as source (2 years ago), yet you let them use it on Wikipedia. And when I fixed that That too from a source that's already on the website. Will you block me for that? What military edit did I make there? Even in the Vidyadhar section, I had only includ…
…subpages) Discuss existing and proposed policies Discuss technical issues about Wikipedia Discuss new proposals that are not policy-related Incubate new ideas before formally proposing them Discuss matters involving the Wikimedia Foundation Post messages that do not fit into any …
…22, there has been a discussion on the Village Pump on the needs of the English Wikipedia community. Within that discussion, the community decided on the changes necessary before deployment, which the Web team is addressing . The community also recommended that the next step woul…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
… months or so, it is very frustrating. I refer to the links on this table here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anatomy#Article_assessment_statistics . Is it possible to file a bug report or change the links to a tool that works? Cheers, -- Tom (LT) ( talk ) 04:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC) Da…
User talk:Patsw - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end. Discussion of Contributions of Patsw edit patsw 01:46, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC) I like your re-introduction of the Zogby poll, and I think…
… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…
… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…
User talk:Paul Raj - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 2005 North India earthquake 8 Oct [ edit ] 2005 North India earthquake -- pradeepsomani Bengali Translation ---- Hi Raj, just checked your message. I would be more than happy to do this translati…
…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
…d article up to date. This is pure censorship . It is a sad day in history when wikipedia decides to change the rules of a wiki and only allow a select few to make changes. Sitedown ( talk ) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that this only makes sense if we exclude …
…nt than others. Kolya Butternut ( talk ) 11:42, 14 November 2020 (UTC) Oppose . Wikipedia's quality comes just as much from what we keep out as from what we let in. This proposal results in making it much harder to keep some things out. It significantly changes the meaning of WP:…
Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2 , using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations. This had led to some controversies: some editors have been converting infoboxes to use Wikidata, believing use of Wikidat…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…