… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…
Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…
Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…
…ped by SIL2 , and ELAN3 which helps with multi- text annotations wrapped into a wiki which serves as media annotation, this group of applications is prob- a general entrance port and collaboration tool. The ably the best known set of linguistic tools specialised system is loaded …
… ] Thanks, I'm still learning how these things work. I looked it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attributive_verb . So it appears travel acts as a deverbal adjective. So it seems either SemperBlotto is wrong or somebody needs to remove the adjective section from exciting or I m…
…entation of the citation if it's not the problem, with the cited part bolded in wiki-syntax (even if it's not bolded in actual font in the browser). Those abbreviations seem a bit opaque - I'm sure they're well-known for your average Egyptologist, but not necessarily so for every…
…ace as its alternate form, but not the other way around. Even its corresponding Wikipedia page redirects to its article on Euclidean space. But I'm not sure if this is correct as I don't really have much experience in Wiktionary. NOTAROBOT1101 ( talk ) 09:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC) R…
…really SoP, but maybe the information belongs somewhere else? Maybe link to the Wikipedia article? Rl 12:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC) I don't think "on" is an antonym for "against". "For" is closer, but is not a real antonym, not being commonly used in the same way grammatically. We have…
…the relevant definitions, as it may be different from place to place. The Dutch Wikipedia says: Doodslag is het opzettelijk, maar niet met voorbedachten rade, beroven van het leven van een ander. Wanneer er wel sprake is van voorbedachten rade, spreekt men van moord. "Doodslag" i…
Thank you for participating in the first phase of the 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy process . The text of the strategic direction has now been finalized. New comments will contribute to the next phase of discussions. This refers to: drafts A , G , K Structural inequalities: Sh…
…These shortcuts are made possible by "template redirects": a non-intuitive MediaWiki hack where " transcluding " a redirect is equivalent to "transcluding" its target page. Template:Cn is a redirect to Template:Citation needed , the same way United States of America is a redirect…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…