…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…
… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…
…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
…d article up to date. This is pure censorship . It is a sad day in history when wikipedia decides to change the rules of a wiki and only allow a select few to make changes. Sitedown ( talk ) 19:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC) [ reply ] I think that this only makes sense if we exclude …
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
User:U118827 - Wikiversity Jump to content From Wikiversity Editing help Intro to Wikiversity How to edit Editing toolbar Edit summary Embed media files Upload images Tips and tricks Editing FAQ Cheatsheet This user is a participant in the Motivation and emotion unit, 2010. See a…
…ent, place it just below the box. When I add something that VE decides needs "nowiki", it usually gives the warning "Wikitext markup detected". However, when I add <references/> to the bottom of a page, he wraps it in "nowiki"s, but no warning appears (while it does work with e.g…
…quals a version. Version 1.5 is a release, as is version 3.0.1 . [8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars February 23, 2026 11:39 AM February 13, 2026 The first Mobile Progress Report of 2026 provides a high-level overview to our mobile plans and priorities for the coming y…
…early used the news article as source (2 years ago), yet you let them use it on Wikipedia. And when I fixed that That too from a source that's already on the website. Will you block me for that? What military edit did I make there? Even in the Vidyadhar section, I had only includ…
…C) Where is the evidence or admission that Tim is paid for his contributions to Wikipedia? If there are none, you should strike that. I don't see much in Mr Gadling's comments that lead me to believe he is angry. Eve rgr een Fir (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC) On Tim's talk page…
…d the “arbitrary code execution from unsanitized input” bug that the Arch Linux Wiki mentions here for the xdg-user-dirs utility, by replacing the shell script with a C binary. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release! Allan Day @aday GNOME Foundation Update, 2026-04-17…
…ace as its alternate form, but not the other way around. Even its corresponding Wikipedia page redirects to its article on Euclidean space. But I'm not sure if this is correct as I don't really have much experience in Wiktionary. NOTAROBOT1101 ( talk ) 09:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC) R…