…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…

Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 140 - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous Village pump (technical) archive This page contains discussions…

…hough not everyone may be able to see the relevance). Lastly, I am not big into wiki bureaucracy and did not even remember what autopatrolling even is, and trying to look up that useful 101-level information at WT:Autopatrollers was fruitless because it isn't even explained there…

…hough not everyone may be able to see the relevance). Lastly, I am not big into wiki bureaucracy and did not even remember what autopatrolling even is, and trying to look up that useful 101-level information at WT:Autopatrollers was fruitless because it isn't even explained there…

…e monk ( talk ) 12:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC) There was a similar discussion at Wikipedia talk:TemplateData#Extending use; removing redundancy . There are problems with trying to share documentation between template data and normal wikitext. The biggest is the markup supported by…

…ty is blatantly bureaucratic and is definitely bad faith, and goes against what Wikipedia stands for. Community consensus should be the the final say on content, not an elected body that we have to hope are doing the right thing. Kirbanzo ( userpage - talk - contribs ) 14:23, 17 …

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

…se v 2.0 This document includes content originally authored on the Eclipsepedia wiki by Wayne Beaton, Fabian Steeg, Denis Roy, Dave Carver, Ed Merks, Bjorn Freeman-Benson, Anne Jacko, Ian Skerrett, Mike Milinkovich, and John Arthorne. Overview This document provides you with the …

…ped by SIL2 , and ELAN3 which helps with multi- text annotations wrapped into a wiki which serves as media annotation, this group of applications is prob- a general entrance port and collaboration tool. The ably the best known set of linguistic tools specialised system is loaded …

…ve learning, which can be found in the Open-Source Software movement and in the Wikipedia information production and consumption model. Next, the chapter presents and discusses examples of educational platforms, open education, and shared resources and initiatives in Europe. The …

…is not easily understood by many readers. For an example, see [1] To say that a Wikimedia project has a "Systemic problem" is a fancy way of saying that an entire system has a problem. One could simply say: "Severe problems that affect an entire project" to describe the Big-Endia…

Wikidata:Requests for comment/Notability policy reform - Wikidata Jump to content From Wikidata Wikidata:Requests for comment An editor has requested the community to provide input on "Notability policy reform" via the Requests for comment (RFC) process. This is the discussion pa…