…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…
…ve learning, which can be found in the Open-Source Software movement and in the Wikipedia information production and consumption model. Next, the chapter presents and discusses examples of educational platforms, open education, and shared resources and initiatives in Europe. The …
Wikisource:Scriptorium/Archives/2008-04 - Wikisource, the free online library Jump to content From Wikisource Wikisource:Scriptorium Archives Latest comment: 17 years ago by T. Mazzei in topic Announcements Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion ar…
…n (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] I gather you haven't seen Slate? Wikipedia Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning’s New Gender L iz Let's Talk 20:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC) [ reply ] There is no conceivable reason for us to want to garner …
…is not easily understood by many readers. For an example, see [1] To say that a Wikimedia project has a "Systemic problem" is a fancy way of saying that an entire system has a problem. One could simply say: "Severe problems that affect an entire project" to describe the Big-Endia…
Wikipédia – Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre Ir para o conteúdo Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre. (Redirecionado de Wikipedia ) Nota: Este artigo é sobre a enciclopédia online. Para um guia não enciclopédico voltado para visitantes, veja Wikipédia:Sobre a Wikipédia . Para o…
…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …
Wikipédia – Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre Ir para o conteúdo Origem: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre. Nota: Este artigo é sobre a enciclopédia online. Para um guia não enciclopédico voltado para visitantes, veja Wikipédia:Sobre a Wikipédia Para o artigo sobre a edição lusófona …
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
Requests for comment/Should the Foundation call itself Wikipedia - Meta-Wiki Jump to content From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki < Requests for comment Latest comment: 5 years ago by Wagner67 in topic Question The following request for comments is closed. comment exp…
… stating that they did not find it acceptable for the Foundation to call itself Wikipedia At 24 minutes and 40 seconds in, during this Wikimedia Foundation branding proposal presentation of April 11, 2019 used as the basis for the community consultation, Zack McCune, User:ZMcCune…
…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
Page 1
Next →