…ion of their choice under § Other discussions . In the first phase, the English Wikipedia was registered as a single "participant group"; this is to be the same in Phase 2. About 100 editors participated in the local discussion , and more than 300 other editors participated elsew…

Any Wikimedia community member is welcome to ask questions. Please add your questions to candidates here, with a new section for each one. If you want to ask a single candidate a specific question, please go to their nomination's talk page and ask there. The election facilitators…

…t a suicide pact either, and it doesn't extend indefinitely. You've been around Wikipedia for coming up on two years now (longer than I have, in fact!), so it's hard to argue that this is a case of biting a newbie. You see, the whole point of WP:BITE is that we shouldn't punish o…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…

…soon. Candidates from the community are needed to fill the available seats. The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees oversees the Wikimedia Foundation's operations. Community trustees and appointed trustees make up the Board of Trustees. Each trustee serves a three year term. T…

Thank you for participating in the first phase of the 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy process . The text of the strategic direction has now been finalized. New comments will contribute to the next phase of discussions. This refers to: drafts A , G , K Structural inequalities: Sh…

Notifications inform you of new activity that affects you on Wikipedia -- and let you take quick action. This page describes feature requirements for a notifications system for MediaWiki, code-named Echo . The features below are for the first release of Echo in early 2013. To lea…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…

…le to grant accesses , apply bot flags, uncover CheckUser information, on every Wikimedia project, in every language. This year, voting for the 2007 Steward elections began on 26 November (at 00:00:01 UTC), and ended on 16 December (at 23:59:59 UTC). Voting has ended so please do…

…p a page to organise how best to tackle improving the Penwith pages here , as a wikiproject - feel free to add your name to the list. there isn't much there yet as we haven't had much time to organise lists of things to do yet, but the idea is to write down a list of things that …

…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…

…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…

…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…