…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…

…ion of their choice under § Other discussions . In the first phase, the English Wikipedia was registered as a single "participant group"; this is to be the same in Phase 2. About 100 editors participated in the local discussion , and more than 300 other editors participated elsew…

…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…

… "The free library" has achieved unusually strong across-the-board consensus at Wikisource, in all of its language versions. Take a look here and here . This was already discussed earlier on the template talk, and discussion was brief out of the simple realization that this is co…

…y There was no abuse of GS rights at all, the de-GS action was due to a local dewiki issue. -- Liliana • 14:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC) Reply So why have the rights been removed then? GS requires preceding abuse or a vote of no confidence respectively. -- Vogone ( talk ) 14:32, 27 Ma…

…rting point for the conversation or bring your own. Thank you! On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation’s Security team — Samuel (WMF) ( talk ) 00:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC) Reply A security-wise less educated user can probably not understand the scope of the risks from these explanation…

… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…

…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…

… or other issues, so people know these should be focused on. Possibly sorted by WikiProject (Music, TV, Football, etc) so we can work on topics that interest us that are also considered very important. This could be a regular post somewhere (Diff?) or twice yearly report. Whateve…

… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…

…e monk ( talk ) 12:40, 14 December 2014 (UTC) There was a similar discussion at Wikipedia talk:TemplateData#Extending use; removing redundancy . There are problems with trying to share documentation between template data and normal wikitext. The biggest is the markup supported by…

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

Commons:Requests for comment/MP4 Video - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository < Commons:Requests for comment Translate this page This discussion is now closed and archived. Please do not modify it. Closing with consensus prefer no MP…

… ] Thanks, I'm still learning how these things work. I looked it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attributive_verb . So it appears travel acts as a deverbal adjective. So it seems either SemperBlotto is wrong or somebody needs to remove the adjective section from exciting or I m…

Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Poll - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions Pending changes discussions Poll 2009 RfC 2010 Poll 2010 Interim RfC 2011 Phase 1 Phase 2 Pha…