…ed elsewhere. The Obama regime makes itself a laughingstock for pretending that Wikileaks and Snowden material are still secrets; this law would do the same. 26 August 2013 ( Jet Blue refused to let Hindu man board ) A Hindu man was taken for Muslim after he (not knowing why) set…
…Modern American Fiction Textual Curation: Authorship, Agency, and Technology in Wikipedia and Chambers's Cyclopaedia Textual Forces: The Political Prose of the Three Kingdoms Era Textures of Power: Central Africa in the Long Twentieth Century Thailand: Politics, Economy, and Soci…
…ed elsewhere. The Obama regime makes itself a laughingstock for pretending that Wikileaks and Snowden material are still secrets; this law would do the same. 26 August 2013 ( Jet Blue refused to let Hindu man board ) A Hindu man was taken for Muslim after he (not knowing why) set…
…g the talk pages of drafts, so they get put in the various WP:AALERTS notice of Wikiprojects. It works pretty well at WP:JOURNALS and WP:WPWIR and other involved projects. Headbomb { t · c · p · b } 19:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC) I don't see what benefit the current use of draft s…
…ods to prosecute people interested in any other kind of material. Material from Wikileaks, for instance. 29 April 2012 ( Brazil's Congress ) Effectively purchased by agribusiness, Brazil's congress passed a law that will facilitate deforestation. [Reference updated on 2018-02-24 …
…, we determine which articles are to be featured articles (FAs) . FAs exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and satisfy the FA criteria . All editors are welcome to review nominations ; please see the review FAQ . Before nominating an article, nominators may wish to receive feedba…
…ibraries, then you’ve probably come across some really strange maps during your Wikipedia wormhole plummets. Reading about the European discovery of the New World is one thing, but sifting through the speculative maps they made is another adventure entirely. With such limited inf…
…process. This process is doubly collaborative in user-generated systems such as Wikimedia, where online help is under constant revision, positioning users as au- thors and editors of crowd-sourced documentation. If technical and professional Foreword xv communication seems more f…
…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…
This is a project page to determine what action is required on the part of the Wikipedia community regarding the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and our response to it (if any). Jimmy Wales asked for community input on a possible database lock, similar to what the Italian Wikipedia…
This discussion is being opened by the Wikimedia Foundation to determine how it can support the English Wikipedia community on its decision (if any) relating to the protest of the Stop Online Piracy Act . The purpose of this discussion is to gauge whether consensus is emerging fo…
Wikipedia:Editor's index to Wikipedia - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Community portal Dashboard Departments Maintenance Tasks Discord IRC Matrix.org Meetups Directories ( Protocols Essays How-to Index Noticeboards AI WikiProjects ) Shortcuts WP:…
Wikipedia:Glossary - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Help:Glossary ) Glossary of terms commonly used on Wikipedia Abbreviations Edit summaries Glossary HTML Shortcuts Templates Wikitext Directory Shortcuts WP:G WP:G WP:TERM WP:TERM…
…aborate. — Justin ( ko a vf ) ❤ T ☮ C ☺ M ☯ 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…
…ely make anyone elaborate. — Justin ( ko vf 00:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC) Reply On wikis, the custom is to take more into account than just the raw number of votes on either side. That's why the term " !vote " is used in discussions here. A bare "support" or "oppose" doesn't carry a…