Wikipedia:ᎾᎥ ᏄᎾᏓᎸ ᎾᎿᎢ - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia (Redirected from ᏫᎩᏇᏗᏯ:ᎾᎥ ᏄᎾᏓᎸ ᎾᎿᎢ Latest comment: 20 ᎯᎸᏍᎩ ᏧᏒᎯᏛ ᏥᎨᏒ by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Action Required: Update templates/modules for electoral maps (Migrating from P1846 to P14226) en: Requests f…
…t a suicide pact either, and it doesn't extend indefinitely. You've been around Wikipedia for coming up on two years now (longer than I have, in fact!), so it's hard to argue that this is a case of biting a newbie. You see, the whole point of WP:BITE is that we shouldn't punish o…
… and after this date. See current discussion . February Request bot flag for pl:Wikipedysta:Margosbot . Public anouncement: pl:Wikipedia:Bar#Status bota dla Wikipedysta:Margosbot . I'm inserting new interwiki links to articles. As for now I've put them into over 2000 articles (us…
WikiJournal User Group is a publishing group of open-access, free-to-publish, Wikipedia-integrated academic journals. <seo title=" WJM, WikiJMed, Wiki.J.Med., WikiJMed, Wikiversity Journal User Group, WikiJournal WikiMed, Free to publish, Open access, Open-access, Non-profit, onl…
Wikipedia:ᎾᎥ ᏄᎾᏓᎸ ᎾᎿᎢ - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia Latest comment: 20 ᎯᎸᏍᎩ ᏧᏒᎯᏛ ᏥᎨᏒ by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Action Required: Update templates/modules for electoral maps (Migrating from P1846 to P14226) en: Requests for the bot flag should be made on t…
…nger exist. — Marco Aurelio 18:01, 2 February 2016 (UTC) On 10 August 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation added a " superprotect " right – granted to the "staff" global user group – which can make pages uneditable even for administrators, hence creating a new hierarchy where administr…
Since the 2013 RfC on Wikidata Phase 2 , using Wikidata in infoboxes has gone from the concept stage to more extensive mainspace experimental implementations. This had led to some controversies: some editors have been converting infoboxes to use Wikidata, believing use of Wikidat…
… ( RFC on next steps), Summary of public discussions ( 2 online consultations , Wikimania workshop upcoming) Section in progress. This is a wiki, please edit to include links to any discussion that is not yet there. Editors spend a lot of time reading, writing, and reviewing mate…
…C) Where is the evidence or admission that Tim is paid for his contributions to Wikipedia? If there are none, you should strike that. I don't see much in Mr Gadling's comments that lead me to believe he is angry. Eve rgr een Fir (talk) 21:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC) On Tim's talk page…
… topic was opened with the focus on the actions of mainly one user on the Scots Wikipedia. His actions, albeit well-intentioned, nonetheless exposed a large vulnerability not just in the Scots Wiki, but small language Wikis in general. The conversation that followed quickly turne…
Commons:Village pump/Archive/2015/03 - Wikimedia Commons Jump to content From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository Commons:Village pump Archive Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ktr101 in topic First concrete bridge and Budapest metro line 1 This is an archive of past discu…
… like a bad idea, but actually seems like it could pose a fundamental threat to Wikipedia. If that sounds like an overreaction, let me explain. The point of this feature is that it would warn people when they're about to make a non-neutral edit. That sounds like a great idea in t…
…n one direction or another. Black Kite (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC) So Wikipedia should have religious tests for certain actions? And are you implying that leftists can't be religious? Besides being "not appropriate or relevant" as Mr Ernie said, I think it's more a viol…
… the last version of Template:Upload campaign header wle-de/i18n and of Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2016 for translation? Holger1959 ( talk ) 00:13, 1 May 2016 (UTC) the template seems ok now (was a cache issue maybe). But the main contest page still lacks relevant corrections which…
…s and smokescreens by Slowking will never help their case. The abuse of certain wikis is extensive, and especially if you want to argue that a block should be void because every admin from 5 different wikis gave you an involved block, you can't particularly do that while creating…
Page 1
Next →